ライフサイエンスコーパス: glomerular filtration

1 nduced damage and preserved zebrafish larval glomerular filtration.

2 e targeted to renal proximal tubules through glomerular filtration.

3 ing of the physiology and pathophysiology of glomerular filtration and tubular endocytosis.

4 To clarify the relative contributions of glomerular filtration and tubular uptake to urinary prot

5 istent with extreme lactic acidosis, reduced glomerular filtration, and stress.

6 The glomerular filtration apparatus presents a barrier again

7 podocytes are uniquely organized to maintain glomerular filtration assembly and function, little is k

8 antioxidant nanocage - is able to cross the glomerular filtration barrier and is endocytosed by the

9 teract these effects of VEGFA to protect the glomerular filtration barrier and reduce albuminuria.

10 chanisms that contribute to breakdown of the glomerular filtration barrier and the development of INS

11 ponents of the structure and function of the glomerular filtration barrier but little is known about

12 Proper function of the glomerular filtration barrier depends heavily on the int

13 revealed a role for tmem63c in mediating the glomerular filtration barrier function.

14 In this work we model the glomerular filtration barrier, the structure responsible

15 les remains a major challenge because of the glomerular filtration barrier, which effectively exclude

16 an and albumin size selectivity across their glomerular filtration barrier.

17 aintaining the integrity and function of the glomerular filtration barrier.

18 a, proteinuria and structural changes of the glomerular filtration barrier.

19 not essential for normal development of the glomerular filtration barrier.

20 lization but to functional impairment of the glomerular filtration barrier.

21 tablishing the selective permeability of the glomerular filtration barrier.

22 capillaries with important function for the glomerular filtration barrier.

23 to 4 groups based on their listing estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) as well as based on their e

24 This approach to visualizing glomerular filtration function will be instrumental for

25 It may be a result of impaired glomerular filtration or impaired proximal tubule (PT) r

26 lants with atrial fibrillation and estimated glomerular filtration rate >=15 mL/(min.1.73 m(2)) were

27 inine ratio 30 to 5000 mg/g and an estimated glomerular filtration rate >=25 to <75 mL per min per 1.

28 t Association (NYHA) class II-III, estimated glomerular filtration rate >=30 mL/min/1.73m(2), and ele

29 known coronary artery disease, and estimated glomerular filtration rate >=60mL/min/1.73m(2).

30 patients were prescribed a NOAC in estimated glomerular filtration rate >=90, 60 to 90, 45 to 60, 30

31 ; n = 37) and poor renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min or graft loss at

32 a low kidney function at baseline (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 40 mL/min) was associated w

33 tolic blood pressure <95 mm Hg and estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL.min(-1).1.73 m(-2).

34 Estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) was

35 of HF patients with advanced CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)) fro

36 en had higher prevalence of hypertension and glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/1.73 m(2) but lowe

37 f 6 variables (male sex, diabetes, estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/1.73 m(2), Killip

38 factors, including age >60 years, estimated glomerular filtration rate <40 mL.min(-1).1.73 m(-2), an

39 tin (area under the curve [AUC]4.5/AUC5, for glomerular filtration rate <50 mL/min only) administered

40 bserved in 3 populations: baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL.min(-1).1.73 m(-2), al

41 Renal dysfunction was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m at listing

42 s dipstick proteinuria >=1+ and/or estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) base on

43 blood pressure, beta-blocker use, estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2), higher

44 Incident CKD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 accompanie

45 reduced kidney function threshold (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or creatin

46 ients with HFrEF and moderate CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60-30 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)),

47 osite outcome of GF, mortality, or estimated glomerular filtration rate <= 20mL/min/1.73m.

48 ic kidney disease (CKD, defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate <=60 mL/min) status.

49 expression correlated with reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (<60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)).

50 lone, resulting in improvements in estimated glomerular filtration rate (31.5 +/- 16 versus 38.8 +/-

51 , there were no differences in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (57.7 +/- 18.2 vs 56.3 +/- 17

52 D+ vs 92% D-, P = .9), 1-year mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (63 mL/min D+ vs 57 mL/min D-

53 s age (selected in each of the 1000 splits), glomerular filtration rate (794 splits), diabetes (323 s

54 ody mass index, blood pressure, or estimated glomerular filtration rate (all P for interaction >0.20)

55 The glomerular filtration rate (e-GFR) was estimated using t

56 participants with normal baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR >90 mL/minute/1.73 m2).

57 wiss HIV Cohort Study with a first estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >60 ml/min/1.73 m2 aft

58 om three groups of recipients: (1) estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/minute/1.73 m(

59 baseline, 23.8% of patients had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL.min(-1).1.73 m(

60 hronic kidney disease at baseline (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <= 60 mL/min/BSA) (n =

61 Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (ml/min/1.73 m(2)) was

62 18-85 years with type 2 diabetes, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 25-75 mL/min per 1.73

63 Participants with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 59 to 30 mL/min/1.73 m

64 ey outcomes by different levels of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and albuminuria.

65 genome-wide association studies of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and independent replic

66 all cases, pre- and postope-rative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum creatinine w

67 of 2 key kidney disease measures, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urinary albumin-to

68 iciency Cohort) study measured the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin-to-c

69 Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as a marker of kidney

70 blood pressure changes and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at baseline and 6 mont

71 ne albumin-to-creatinine ratio and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on serum creatin

72 Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on serum creatin

73 using 23 covariates, stratified by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) before imaging (>=60 m

74 tal kidney volume (TKV) growth and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline over 3 years.

75 th renal function characterised by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in a cross-sectional a

76 min-to-creatinine ratio (ACR), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in individuals with ch

77 l can attenuate the decline of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with chron

78 Estimation of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with liver

79 lacing serum creatinine (SCr) with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in the MELD-Na score m

80 Patients presented with a mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 13 +/- 11 mL/min/1.

81 grams) of 30 to less than 300, an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 25 to less than 60

82 ary artery) and a creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 30-75 ml/min/1.73 m

83 (MACE) in patients with CKD and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 60 ml/min

84 dG were positively associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over time and a log-un

85 cted individuals but the impact on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) remains unclear.

86 We tested three formulae for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) to determine which was

87 The primary outcome was 12-month estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Chronic Kidn

88 Median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 43.7 ml/min/1.73 m

89 MRI examination were retrieved and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated.

90 WHR), body fat (BF) percentage and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were identified.

91 additionally adjusted for BMI and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were used.

92 We determined baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with the Chronic Kidne

93 genome-wide association studies of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), a measure of kidney f

94 associated with pre- and post-TAVR estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and assess associatio

95 ivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and homeostasis model

96 ding demographics, blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and proteinuria.

97 hospitalisation for heart failure, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), body-mass index, and

98 The associations between estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), CFR, diastolic and sy

99 dney disease (CKD), defined by low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), contributes to global

100 ence of either: >=50% reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), end-stage renal disea

101 s, hypertension, smoking, lipids, as well as glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), NT-proBNP, interleuki

102 l renal function measures included estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), proteinuria, and bloo

103 graft failure (ACGF) and 12-month estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), respectively.

104 SLK transplant policy change uses estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), which accounts for se

105 isease (CKD), defined by a reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

106 strong, positive correlation with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

107 of SU level on the risk of CKD and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

108 according to renal function using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

109 ip between plasmin (ogen) uria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

110 ble within 3 months before biopsy (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): 55.3 +/- 18.9 ml/min/

111 romotryptophan had higher baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, p < 0.001).

112 des correlated negatively with the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, rho = -0.309, p < 0.00

113 versus MAR, within groups with preoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR) >=60 mL/min/1.73 m; GFR

114 he association between the lower predonation glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and increased ESKD risk

115 Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and urinary albumin exc

116 dney function was assessed by measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and urine albumin excre

117 Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) assessment is a key asp

118 Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) assessment is indicated

119 In COMPASS, 21,111 patients had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at baseline of >=60 ml/

120 op clinical/protein models to predict future glomerular filtration rate (GFR) deterioration in this p

121 ith allopurinol may slow the decrease in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in persons with type 1

122 Evaluation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is central to the asses

123 Sustained and rapid loss of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the predominant clin

124 Reduction in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) not meeting CKD criteri

125 All the patients had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 30 to <90 ml per min

126 n allowed the accurate quantification of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of individual kidneys i

127 Kidney size and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) often increase with the

128 The best glomerular filtration rate (GFR) recovery in survivors w

129 Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated using the

130 atio of renal oxygen availability (RO(2)) to glomerular filtration rate (GFR), a measure of relative

131 allograft vasculopathy (CAV), improvement in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and reduced malignancy

132 moking, hypertension, diabetes, cholesterol, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), testosterone, androste

133 Primary end point was glomerular filtration rate (GFR).

134 hypothyroidism, and normal versus decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR).

135 nine (SCr)-based calculations for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR).

136 th alcohol use disorder (AUD) and comparable Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR).

137 ability to recover 50% of baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (if not on renal replacement

138 showed a positive association with estimated glomerular filtration rate (n = 39; r = 0.56; P < .001).

139 (r = 0.47 vs. r = 0.29; Meng test p = 0.07), glomerular filtration rate (r = -0.52 vs. r = -0.24; Men

140 onic variants were associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (rs58720902 at AQR, minor all

141 ) -m excretion with increased single nephron glomerular filtration rate (SNGFR) following unilateral-

142 .16; 95% CI, 0.94-1.43; P = 0.16), estimated glomerular filtration rate 1-y posttransplant (B, 0.58;

143 those with chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate 20-40 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)) a

144 older with chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate 25 to <=45 mL/min per 1.73 m(

145 3 months after LT in the SIR arm (estimated glomerular filtration rate 74 [57-95] versus 67 [55-85]

146 ellitus duration 11.0 [8.2] years, estimated glomerular filtration rate 88.4 [16.9] mL/min/1.73m(2),

147 tus (DM) with or without early DN (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] >30 mL/min/1.73 m(2)),

148 1 administrations to patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30 mL/min per 1.73 m(

149 kidney disease (CKD) at baseline (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) o

150 or older) with CKD (defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 but

151 d kidney function (>=2 measures of estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <90 mL/min/1.73 m2 >=9

152 stained decline of at least 40% in estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] to less than 60 mL/min

153 uded annual HbA1c, renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]), blood pressure (BP),

154 rmality in kidney structure or function (eg, glomerular filtration rate [GFR] <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or a

155 onset macroalbuminuria, decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate [or increase in creatinine],

156 was performed among patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate above 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) at

157 have investigated the prevalence of reduced glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria in the Fontan

158 stages of albuminuria, leading to decline in glomerular filtration rate and end-stage kidney disease

159 year 1 with significantly superior estimated glomerular filtration rate and lowest rate of chronic ki

160 Hazard ratios were adjusted for estimated glomerular filtration rate and the components of the CHA

161 s no difference in renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate and the number of patients al

162 Nephrotic mice displayed decreased glomerular filtration rate and urinary potassium excreti

163 project to identify novel loci for estimated glomerular filtration rate and urine albumin-to-creatini

164 tide polymorphisms associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate are located in the SHROOM3 ge

165 ral issues surrounding the donor candidate's glomerular filtration rate assessment.

166 lerosis on delayed graft function, estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 y, or long-term graft su

167 Glomerular filtration rate at 12 months and rates of bio

168 The median (range) estimated glomerular filtration rate at 2 years posttransplant was

169 Median estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3 months following transpl

170 The decrease of estimated glomerular filtration rate at 5 years post-biopsy was si

171 disease between clusters; however, estimated glomerular filtration rate at baseline was a better pred

172 The co-primary end point of mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at month 12 was 76.2 mL/min/1

173 significant (HR, 2.26; P = 0.015); even when glomerular filtration rate at month 3 < 30 mL/min/1.73 m

174 Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at month 36 was comparable be

175 eased risk of graft failure, while estimated glomerular filtration rate at time of biopsy (HR, 0.98;

176 nivariate Cox regression analyses, estimated glomerular filtration rate at time of biopsy, glomerulit

177 compared with the mean calculated estimated glomerular filtration rate based on the Modification of

178 compared with the mean calculated estimated glomerular filtration rate based on the Modification of

179 recommended that patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate below 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) be

180 e was no significant difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate between CS and MP at 12 month

181 An estimated glomerular filtration rate by chronic kidney disease (CK

182 Measurement of glomerular filtration rate by the plasma clearance of an

183 interaction between treatment and estimated glomerular filtration rate categories for any outcome.

184 isclassified patients according to classical glomerular filtration rate categories in approximately h

185 ycosuria without changes in blood glucose or glomerular filtration rate compared with control litterm

186 ssification did not associate with estimated glomerular filtration rate decline or graft failure and

187 f serum creatinine doubling or 40% estimated glomerular filtration rate decline, kidney failure, or d

188 Adverse events, including estimated glomerular filtration rate decline, were infrequent and

189 mong patients with elevated cfDNA, estimated glomerular filtration rate declined by 8.5% (interquarti

190 Graft survival and estimated glomerular filtration rate determinations at 4 years wer

191 limus trials (n = 279), decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate did not significantly differ

192 All known estimated glomerular filtration rate equations displayed high bias

193 aution when using creatinine based estimated glomerular filtration rate equations.

194 PI and CKiD equations were used to calculate glomerular filtration rate estimates (eGFR).

195 PI and CKiD equations were used to calculate glomerular filtration rate estimates.

196 Glomerular filtration rate estimation by urinary creatin

197 s with C-TCMR had >=50% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate from 3 months compared with 7

198 Patients with a glomerular filtration rate greater than 60 mL/min/1.73 m

199 In pediatric inpatients with estimated glomerular filtration rate greater than or equal to 60 m

200 th renal function expressed as the estimated glomerular filtration rate in 1540 participants from the

201 cceptable errors when compared with measured glomerular filtration rate in a mixed ICU population, wi

202 was significantly associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate in meta-analysis with replica

203 factor 2 (Nrf2), is effective in increasing glomerular filtration rate in patients with chronic kidn

204 -toxicity, may preserve tubular function and glomerular filtration rate in the long term.

205 in 1 week of treatment, the median estimated glomerular filtration rate increased from 21 to 34 mL/mi

206 of 13 [12-19] mo), the median IQR estimated glomerular filtration rate increased to 52 (46-60) mL/mi

207 ort studies and trials indicate that reduced glomerular filtration rate increases the risk of stroke

208 Prior cerebrovascular events and a low glomerular filtration rate independently predicted the o

209 ed for patients who have AKI or an estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2)

210 In patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m, t

211 r, had lower lymphocyte counts and estimated glomerular filtration rate levels, and had higher serum

212 Finally, estimated glomerular filtration rate misclassified patients accord

213 dvanced chronic kidney disease (an estimated glomerular filtration rate of <30 ml per minute per 1.73

214 ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4-3.6; P=0.0012) and a glomerular filtration rate of <30 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) (

215 Nine LD had estimated glomerular filtration rate of <30 mL/min/1.73 m versus 4

216 -dependent chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate of 20-40 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)

217 ine ratio [UACR] 30-3500 mg/g), an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 25-75 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)

218 in-creatinine ratio >300 mg/g, and estimated glomerular filtration rate of 30 to <90 mL/min/1.73 m(2)

219 be considered in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 30-44 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at

220 nd older, with type 2 diabetes, an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 30-59 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)

221 d risk of 1-year mortality with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 40 to 60 mL.min(-1).1.73 m

222 ite individuals [82%], with median estimated glomerular filtration rate of 55.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 [IQR,

223 ith a mean age of 62 +/- 13 y old and a mean glomerular filtration rate of 59 +/- 20 mL/min/1.73m.

224 itis B virus infection, and had an estimated glomerular filtration rate of at least 50 mL/min.

225 No changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate or systolic and diastolic blo

226 exol clearance was an estimation of the mean glomerular filtration rate over 24 hours.

227 r heart failure, on the decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate over time, and on the risk of

228 >=90 days of waiting time and CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate persistently <60 mL/min/1.73

229 ident or worsening nephropathy and estimated glomerular filtration rate slope analyses.

230 On average, estimated glomerular filtration rate slope improved postconversion

231 The estimated glomerular filtration rate slope postconversion was comp

232 ter an initial transient decrease, estimated glomerular filtration rate stabilized over time with emp

233 We used estimated glomerular filtration rate trajectories and death-censor

234 clearance via Cockcroft-Gault and estimated glomerular filtration rate via Modification of Diet in R

235 1.0 years, 50.6% were male, median estimated glomerular filtration rate was 42.3 ml/min/1.73 m2, and

236 The median measured glomerular filtration rate was 51 mL/min/1.73 m (interqu

237 Mean measured glomerular filtration rate was 74.7 mL/min and 62.4 mL/m

238 Baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate was found to be a strong mode

239 In multivariate analysis, only estimated glomerular filtration rate was protective.

240 the association of pre-angiography estimated glomerular filtration rate with adverse outcomes.

241 IV single dose of iohexol and estimation of glomerular filtration rate with creatinine or cystatin C

242 the association of pre-angiography estimated glomerular filtration rate with the primary outcome.

243 association of the pre-angiography estimated glomerular filtration rate with these outcomes.

244 0.038; defined as >25% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate) and mortality (hazard ratio,

245 age, baseline HbA1c, and baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate), trial duration, treatment d

246 0 3A5 genotype, pregraft sensitization, mo 3 glomerular filtration rate).

247 D-dimer cutoff levels (> 333 ug/L [estimated glomerular filtration rate, > 60 mL/min/1.73 m], > 1,306

248 el, >=7%), chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate, 25 to 60 ml per minute per 1

249 ble within 3 months before biopsy (estimated glomerular filtration rate, 55.3 +/- 18.9 mL/min/1.73 m)

250 m2 accompanied by >=25% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate, a kidney disease-related hos

251 ssociated with kidney-related traits such as glomerular filtration rate, albuminuria, hypertension, e

252 t for demographics, comorbidities, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and enrollment strata.

253 diabetes mellitus, blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and hemoglobin).

254 Full blood count, glomerular filtration rate, and liver function test were

255 endpoints: delayed graft function, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and occult UOC.

256 etes (PTD), cardiac complications, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and occurrence of delayed gr

257 Four patients (5%) had normal glomerular filtration rate, and only one (1%) showed hyp

258 dy mass index, smoking, education, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and study center.

259 illation, coronary artery disease, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and urine albumin-to-creatin

260 CKD was confirmed by measurements of glomerular filtration rate, blood urea nitrogen, and kid

261 story of premature CAD, age, male sex, lower glomerular filtration rate, diabetes mellitus, elevated

262 09 copies/mL with estimated kidney function (glomerular filtration rate, eGFR) and overall survival a

263 TIMP-2/mOsm before an increase in estimated glomerular filtration rate, enabling us to monitor fDGF

264 1) -m in their sensitivity to changes in the glomerular filtration rate, glomerular protein leak, tub

265 emia index, increased liver stiffness, lower glomerular filtration rate, higher N-terminal pro-B-type

266 We also demonstrated that CRRL269 preserved glomerular filtration rate, increased renal blood flow,

267 articipants (mean age, 65.9 years; estimated glomerular filtration rate, mL/min per 1.73m(2); hemoglo

268 onance elastography-derived liver stiffness, glomerular filtration rate, N-terminal pro-B-type natriu

269 >=0.3 mg/dL, or >=25% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate, or an increase in cystatin C

270 nd poor accuracy when compared with measured glomerular filtration rate, overestimating renal functio

271 peptide), and fibrosis biomarkers; and lower glomerular filtration rate, peak oxygen consumption, 6-m

272 patients without AKI or with high estimated glomerular filtration rate, penKid was associated with h

273 r age, sex, race, body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, previous myocardial infarcti

274 The effect on estimated glomerular filtration rate, serum creatinine level, and

275 ey function loss, as determined by estimated glomerular filtration rate, was assessed.

276 stics of previously suggested that estimated glomerular filtration rate-adjusted D-dimer cutoff level

277 k to validate previously suggested estimated glomerular filtration rate-adjusted D-dimer cutoff level

278 -positive rate can be reduced when estimated glomerular filtration rate-adjusted D-dimer cutoff level

279 type of renal dysfunction affects estimated glomerular filtration rate-adjusted D-dimer test charact

280 s occurring at the lowest baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate.

281 varies proportionally to the single-nephron glomerular filtration rate.

282 ge estimated from CKD-epidemiology estimated glomerular filtration rate.

283 were defined by >=50% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate.

284 lated to delayed graft function or estimated glomerular filtration rate.

285 eatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

286 t lymphoproliferative disease, and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

287 roalbumin-to-creatinine ratio, and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

288 . 1.73 m-2) and 192 participants in study B (glomerular filtration rate: 13-24 mL . min-1 . 1.73 m-2)

289 DRD) Study from 482 participants in study A (glomerular filtration rate: 25-55 mL . min-1 . 1.73 m-2)

290 Among 28 patients with estimated glomerular filtration rates <30 mL/min who received >=5

291 the cutoff for administering prophylaxis to glomerular filtration rates <30ml/min/1.73m(2) and elimi

292 Estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) were assessed by the

293 n-to-creatinine ratios (UACRs) and estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) were estimated from

294 fined as at least mildly decreased estimated glomerular filtration rates [eGFRs]).

295 nction remained stable with a mean estimated glomerular filtration rates of 67 +/- 21 and 71 +/- 19 a

296 ions, patient characteristics, and estimated glomerular filtration rates were abstracted from the VA

297 Additionally, the influence of varying glomerular filtration rates, kidney somatostatin recepto

298 oss racial/ethnic groups and the spectrum of glomerular filtration rates.

299 rresponds to a 3.5-fold elevation in albumin glomerular filtration, supporting the use of microalbumi

300 sis of kidney disease has largely focused on glomerular filtration, while assessment of kidney tubula