戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 care (hand hygiene before donning nonsterile gloves).
2 r task using a cursor controlled by a haptic glove.
3 o motion analysis system and an instrumented glove.
4  a tennis ball, red cricket ball and cricket glove.
5 -resolution using a fully textile SEMS-based glove.
6 e actual finger movements recorded by a data glove.
7 acitors incorporated into the wristband of a glove.
8 e measured in each hand with a pair of wired gloves.
9 her substrates of interest, such as surgical gloves.
10 itable for use with both latex and synthetic gloves.
11  use of barrier techniques such as gowns and gloves.
12 ne pathogens and do not routinely use double gloves.
13 and 83 reported that they usually use double gloves.
14 red and backscattered x rays produced by the gloves.
15 sed by the interactions of x rays inside the gloves.
16 tive against risk of infection as was use of gloves.
17 tire except for sterile gowns and the use of gloves.
18 cedures performed with sterile vs nonsterile gloves.
19 reezing weather without a hat, overcoat, and gloves.
20  were randomized to exchange or retain outer gloves 1 hour into clean orthopedic procedures; cultures
21   In glove study 2, surgeons retaining outer gloves 1 hour into the case had a subsequent positive gl
22 events related to insertion compared with no gloves (1 non-randomized controlled trial [non-RCT]; adj
23 ins were seen in wound closure re-gowning/re-gloving (24.0% vs. 62.0%, P < 0.001), use of clean closi
24 with either contact precautions or universal gloving [51% with contact precautions and 43% with unive
25 006), mask (43.0% vs. 29.9%; P = 0.022), and gloves (64.0% vs. 52.1%; P = 0.050) and to drape the pat
26  by workers exposed to infected animals were gloves (71%), eye protection (60%), and face masks (47%)
27 ents (7/8); (9) usage of protective clothing/gloves (8/8); (10) proper measures during outbreak (8/8)
28   Most surgeons did not routinely use double gloves: 92 of 768 surgeons reported that they always use
29 al catheter insertion, consisting of sterile gloves, a surgical cap, a surgical mask, and a small ste
30 mly assigned to receive care with nonsterile gloves after hand hygiene (group A) or care after hand h
31                                 The proposed glove allows us to take advantage of the dexterity of th
32 cal intensive care unit and would always use gloves alone when attending 8 others.
33 tory droplets, whereas slit-lamp shields and gloves also contributed to limiting exposure to droplets
34  than half of firefighters (57%) stored fire gloves (an item sent for professional decontamination by
35  pressure sensors on curved surfaces such as glove and contact lens are also realized.
36               Here we use a scalable tactile glove and deep convolutional neural networks to show tha
37 the chicken pieces was placed inside a latex glove and examined by ultrasonography.
38                    The Benefits of Universal Glove and Gown (BUGG) cluster randomized trial found var
39 se events were not associated with universal glove and gown use (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.81; 95
40                                    Universal glove and gown use also decreased health care worker roo
41                                              Glove and gown use for all patient contact in medical an
42                                    Universal glove and gown use in the intensive care unit was associ
43 e effect of contact precautions or universal glove and gown use on adverse events.
44 CUs were randomized to standard practice for glove and gown use versus the intervention of all health
45 s of adverse events resulting from universal glove and gown use were not supported.
46     While all trainees were observed to gown/glove and handle sharps correctly, low scores were obser
47 ulated as the sum of the carbon footprint of glove and instrument change and SSI.
48     In this decision analytic model, sterile glove and instrument change before wound closure was ass
49 tic model compared the carbon footprint of a glove and instrument change intervention against a contr
50 nt change intervention against a control (no glove and instrument change).
51               Human participants wore a data glove and learned to manipulate a computer cursor by mov
52 will refer to as DN, with its characteristic glove and stocking like presentation of distal sensory o
53 extremities resulting in the characteristic "glove and stocking" pattern.
54                            Use of nonsterile gloves and an alcohol pad does not significantly impact
55 e small effects seen with the use of sterile gloves and antiseptics and antibiotics are clinically si
56                                       Use of gloves and cord clamp were associated with reduced risk
57 chnology enabled the production of antiviral gloves and filters (which deactivate HIV-1 and other vir
58                                              Gloves and gowns are frequently contaminated with MRSA i
59                       We assessed if wearing gloves and gowns during all patient contact in the inten
60 ll health care workers were required to wear gloves and gowns for all patient contact and when enteri
61 ll healthcare workers being required to wear gloves and gowns for all patient contact and when enteri
62                                   The use of gloves and gowns for all patient contact compared with u
63                It is unknown whether wearing gloves and gowns for all patient contact in the intensiv
64      In ICUs where healthcare workers donned gloves and gowns for all patient contact, patients were
65 d trial required that healthcare workers use gloves and gowns for all patient contact.
66 ve, multicenter cohort study of cultured HCP gloves and gowns for MRSA.
67                             Universal use of gloves and gowns was no better than universal use of glo
68 ts with 3982 interactions, we found that HCP gloves and gowns were contaminated with MRSA 14.3% and 5
69 that all hospital employees would always use gloves and gowns when attending 8 particular beds in the
70 quire antibiotic-resistant bacteria on their gloves and gowns when caring for intensive care unit (IC
71 tion consisted of healthcare workers wearing gloves and gowns when entering any patient room compared
72 atient procedures with sterile or nonsterile gloves and had follow-up regarding SSI.
73 tive equipment including masks, goggles, and gloves and handwashing.
74 specific inhalation challenge (SIC) with NRL gloves and in 25 symptomatic subjects with a negative ch
75 zed trial demonstrated that changing sterile gloves and instruments before wound closure reduces surg
76 g PEDOT on commercially available disposable gloves and masks, respectively.
77  Four sets of radiation-attenuating flexible gloves and one set of standard surgical gloves were test
78 ons, and analysis of body fluids, (ii) smart gloves and prosthetics to realise the sensation of touch
79 ught to be viral in nature: papular purpuric gloves and socks syndrome; pityriasis rosea; unilateral
80 ot noticed, except for sporadic use of latex gloves and surgical masks.This is believed to be the fir
81 th their hand washing practice, wearing hand gloves and their knowledge about food-borne illnesses.
82  conformal integration on curved surfaces of gloves and thin, refractive-index monitors wrapped on tu
83 contamination associated with changing outer gloves and using disposable spunlace paper versus reusab
84 on ICUs of the 20-site Benefits of Universal Gloving and Gowning cluster randomized trial required th
85  including outer glove exchange while double-gloving and surgical gown type selection.
86 s or allergens (e.g., by wearing impermeable gloves) and applying emollients and potent topical gluco
87 F), global vectors for word representations (GloVe), and concept unique identifier (CUI) embeddings.
88 on-mask, 87.17% for non-vest, 85.36% for non-glove, and 83.48% for non-shoes, with an overall average
89 rray (548 sensors) is assembled on a knitted glove, and consists of a piezoresistive film connected b
90 10 (45.5%) eye protection, 72 (23.2%) double gloves, and 259/307 (84.4%) avoided passing sharps from
91  before injection, 36% wear a mask, 73% wear gloves, and 45% always dilate the eyes before injection.
92  the EITC and BITC present in nitrile rubber gloves, and considered that alkyl isothiocyanate might a
93 e the effectiveness of radiation-attenuating gloves, and secondary electron dose to basal cells in th
94  personal protective equipment (PPE), masks, gloves, and shields, would likely damage the environment
95 ial PPE items such as helmets, masks, vests, gloves, and shoes.
96 nd protruded into the afferent terminal in a glove-and-finger configuration.
97              Fifteen (16.1%) patients in the glove-and-gown group and 13 (14.8%) in the glove-only gr
98          Twenty-four (25.8%) patients in the glove-and-gown group and 21 (23.9%) in the glove-only gr
99 ts who became colonized were 8.0 days in the glove-and-gown group and 7.1 days in the glove-only grou
100       Compliance with precautions was 79% in glove-and-gown rooms and 62% in glove-only rooms (P < 0.
101                           The 93 patients in glove-and-gown rooms and the 88 patients in glove-only r
102 on showed reduced light-touch sensation in a glove-and-stocking distribution; the radial and pedal pu
103                      Healthcare worker hands/gloves are frequently contaminated with A. baumannii aft
104                     No-rinse disposable wash gloves are increasingly implemented in health care to re
105 terfaces-a tactile surface and a kinesthetic glove-are demonstrated to show that printing with organi
106 cue feedback devices-a prosthetic, sole, and glove-are presented, demonstrating their capability to u
107         Patch tests were performed using the gloves as is, and the Japanese standard allergen 2008 an
108 itive patch test reactions to nitrile rubber gloves as is, as well as to the dithiocarbamate mix and
109  of form factors, including skin patches and gloves-based sensors.
110 2; 95% CI, 1.20-3.40), use of powdered latex gloves between 1992 and 2000 (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.27-3.7
111 hod may be greatly reduced if it relies on a glove box to enable the use of air- and moisture-sensiti
112    We performed separate testing in a sealed glove box, offering complete biosafety containment.
113 lysts, ligands, and bases) necessary for the glove-box-free palladium-catalysed carbon-fluorine, carb
114 quire hand hygiene before donning nonsterile gloves, but evidence to support this requirement is lack
115 allows the rapid detection of penetration of gloves by this virus.
116  Simultaneously, an 18-sensor motion capture glove calculated 23 joint angles from the hand and finge
117               Furthermore, cushioning of the gloves can be protective and should be increased to safe
118 constructed from these valves: 1) a wearable glove capable of analog control of a soft artificial rob
119                We propose a compact wearable glove capable of estimating both the finger bone lengths
120 compared against other models, including SVM-Glove, CNN-BERT, LSTM, CNN, KNN, SVM, BERT, and GRU.
121 hour into the case had a subsequent positive glove contamination rate of 23% compared with 13% among
122  CI, 2.10-12.60]), were associated with hand/glove contamination.
123                                              Gloves, cord clamps, and plastic sheets were the most fr
124                       CDKs, containing soap, gloves, cord clamps, plastic sheet, razor blade, matches
125  death (1-6 days) was associated with use of gloves, cord clamps, plastic sheets, and razor blades.
126                    We examined the effect of glove decontamination prior to removal on bacterial cont
127                                              Glove decontamination reduced bacterial contamination of
128 ty arising from fusion of digits in a mitten-glove deformity and growth retardation associated with a
129 igns (n = 10), 2 gown designs (n = 10), or 2 glove designs (n = 10).
130 Patients had reduced sensation with stocking-glove distribution in the distal limbs in later life.
131              Symptoms present in a "stocking-glove" distribution, with longest nerves affected most a
132 some antiseptics and antibiotics and sterile gloves during MMS were associated with modest reduction
133  biomechanical measurements from the sensing glove effectively distinguished patient cohorts receivin
134 xtual LLMs did not notably outperform static GloVe embeddings.
135                                        Outer glove exchange just before handling implant materials is
136 of optimal aseptic technique including outer glove exchange while double-gloving and surgical gown ty
137 nating from a variety of specimens: flowers, glove exposed to smoke, fuel stains, worn medical face m
138  are sensitive to contact with both bare and gloved fingers.
139              SCA-alpha2 has a better hand-in-glove fit at the bulge site, making it an ideal platform
140 d the use of contact precautions (a gown and gloves) for the care of patients with COVID-19.
141 use of 129 billion face masks and 65 billion gloves globally, is resulting in widespread environmenta
142  when combined with fit-testPASSED N95 mask, gloves, gown, and face shield.
143                    An HCW wearing PPE (mask, gloves, gown, face shield) was exposed to nebulized viru
144  intensified hand-washing regimen, barriers (gloves, gowns), and cleaning of anesthesiologist A's hou
145 ntion ICUs, health care providers used clean gloves, gowns, and hand hygiene less frequently than req
146 nsistent for masks but was also observed for gloves, gowns, eye protection, and handwashing; evidence
147  to identify and isolate carriers, universal gloving, greater use of sporicidal cleaning methods, enh
148 .1%) and 121 of 6040 patients in the sterile glove group (2.0%).
149 uding 107 of 5031 patients in the nonsterile glove group (2.1%) and 121 of 6040 patients in the steri
150 s; p =.4) The infection rate in the gown and glove group (2.3 per 100 patient days) was reduced signi
151 n length of stay in the PICU in the gown and glove group (p =.014), there was a trend toward reductio
152 est, p =.07; odds ratio,.76) in the gown and glove group.
153 of glove powder on either latex or synthetic gloves had no effect on the ability of the PCR assay to
154 ater from the palm of the surgeon's dominant gloved hand and from the surgical gown sleeve.
155  either with a soft brush or directly with a gloved hand and then analysed for differences in their i
156              During the shock, the rescuer's gloved hand was pressed onto the skin of the patient's a
157 kit (boiled blade and thread, plastic sheet, gloves, hand washing, and appropriate cord care) and neo
158                     A random sample of HCPs' gloved hands were imprinted on agar plates at entry to c
159 icroorganisms (viruses and bacteria) to test gloves have been developed but require classical culturi
160 heir host:guest adduct resembles a ball in a glove, hence their name as nanogloves.
161 8 per 100 patient-days in universal gown and glove ICUs (rate difference, -0.28; generalized linear m
162 uation, this work used a multi-modal sensing glove in a double-blind study to enable sensitive monito
163 s identified from healthcare worker hands or gloves in 77 (30%) interactions.
164     Whether the use of sterile vs nonsterile gloves in outpatient cutaneous procedures affects the ra
165 es with information on sterile vs nonsterile gloves in outpatient surgical procedures were retrieved.
166  incidence RR, 10.18; 95% CI, 2.13-44.94) on gloves in the emergency department and reduced colony co
167 h contact precautions and 43% with universal gloving] in intervention ICUs vs. a median of 38% of ICU
168 sment of the barrier quality of medical exam gloves includes visual inspection and a water leak test.
169 ive chemicals responsible for nitrile rubber glove-induced allergic contact dermatitis have not been
170 e was greater in the 6 units with the direct-gloving intervention than in the 7 usual care units (129
171 ith hand hygiene not required before donning gloves (intervention), or to usual care (hand hygiene be
172                             The soft sensing glove is designed to easily stretch and to be one-size-f
173                                  The sensing glove is shown to be a reliable tool for point-of-care s
174  performing delicate work with thick chamber gloves, is required for implementing this protocol.
175 ction in nosocomial infections, and gown and glove isolation appeared to have an additional protectiv
176 er strict handwashing or protective gown and glove isolation intervention groups.
177   The relative effect of protective gown and glove isolation was compared with strict handwashing in
178 polyethylene (PE) in almost all investigated glove leachates and with all applied methods.
179 linked via four acetal bonds, resulting in a glove-like architecture.
180 nteractions can result in the formation of a glove-like tight binding pocket around RNA bases, but th
181  consists of a bed bath with disposable wash gloves made of non-woven waffled fibers, saturated with
182    There are options in the form of eyewear, gloves, masks, respirators, and gowns.
183                               Opening of the glove occurs by outward movements of the distal histidin
184 usted logistic regression showed that use of gloves (odds ratio [OR] 0.33, 95% CI 0.24-0.46), cord cl
185 ong surgeons exchanging their original outer glove [odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 1.97 (1.02-
186 nd gowns was no better than universal use of gloves only in preventing rectal colonization by vancomy
187 e glove-and-gown group and 21 (23.9%) in the glove-only group acquired vancomycin-resistant enterococ
188 e glove-and-gown group and 13 (14.8%) in the glove-only group had vancomycin-resistant enterococci on
189 the glove-and-gown group and 7.1 days in the glove-only group.
190 s was 79% in glove-and-gown rooms and 62% in glove-only rooms (P < 0.001).
191  glove-and-gown rooms and the 88 patients in glove-only rooms had similar demographic and clinical ch
192  HCP interactions are more likely to lead to glove or gown contamination.
193 sing bacterial burden on the patient and HCP glove or gown contamination.
194                      Contamination of either gloves or gowns occurred in 16.2% of interactions.
195 inant of transmission to healthcare workers' gloves or gowns.
196 lted in contamination of healthcare workers' gloves or gowns.
197 tances associated with disposable laboratory gloves or reagents used during sample preparation was in
198 mon to all hospitals-removal of boot covers, gloves (outer and inner pairs), the outermost garment, t
199  showed a correlation with cushioning of the gloves (p<0.05), and thus seems a protective measure reg
200  of a previously unidentified allele for the gloving pigmentation pattern found in the Birman breed s
201 hand hygiene rates, unit type, and universal gloving policies (risk ratio [RR], 1.76; 95% CI, 1.58-1.
202                              The presence of glove powder on either latex or synthetic gloves had no
203 ransplantation were enrolled into a gown and glove protective isolation protocol or a strict handwash
204 ased on findings of low to high COE, wearing gloves reduced the risk of overall adverse events relate
205 mpled at room exit (prior to hand hygiene or glove removal) and then evaluated for the presence of A.
206 nforcing the need for hand hygiene following glove removal.
207  usual care vs 1525 of 1785 [85%] for direct gloving; RR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.91-1.07]).
208  usual care vs 1111 of 1688 [66%] for direct gloving; RR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.91-1.10]) or at room exit (
209 ng a low-cost (about US$10) scalable tactile glove sensor array, we record a large-scale tactile data
210               We propose that nitrile rubber gloves should be produced without using vulcanization ac
211                                     LLMs and GloVe showed no significant difference, though distincti
212 omized clinical trial indicate that a direct-gloving strategy without prior hand hygiene should be co
213                                              Glove study 1 revealed 4-fold higher levels of baseline
214                                           In glove study 2, surgeons retaining outer gloves 1 hour in
215                                In an initial glove study, 102 surgical team members were randomized t
216                               In a follow-up glove study, 251 surgical team members, all wearing pape
217 paper gowns, were randomized as in the first glove study.
218                                          The glove system is capable of reconstructing arbitrary and
219 rough a stretchable DFOS-integrated wireless glove that can reconfigure all types of finger joint mov
220 ubstantial extracellular domain resembling a glove that contains all the divergent residues between t
221                We use this process to create gloves that can record, reproduce, and transfer tactile
222 ample, the inks can be printed on laboratory gloves that change color when exposed to bacteria.
223  process, were present in the nitrile rubber gloves the patient used at her workplace, as was ZDBC.
224                     By analogy to a baseball glove, the protein "catches" and then "holds" incoming l
225 rce made of GO was also written on a plastic glove to demonstrate wearability.
226  softball player must precisely position her glove to field a fast-approaching ground ball.
227 Neither method tests directly the ability of gloves to prevent penetration by microorganisms.
228                 Because the use of gowns and gloves together may be associated with better compliance
229 E for the first time, including four polymer glove types, two types of scrubs, apron material, a mask
230 cautions rooms was also higher in the direct-gloving units (1297 of 1491 [87%] vs 1530 of 2299 [67%];
231 atients were assigned to care with universal gloving until their discharge or until surveillance cult
232 echnicians performed significantly better in glove use (11.95 [8.98-15.89]), but significantly worse
233 hand hygiene (n=8655 indications), 74.8% for glove use (n=4915), 4.8% for disinfection of reusable eq
234                          We hypothesize that glove use after hand hygiene may further decrease these
235                                              Glove use after hand hygiene prior to patient and line c
236 r age was negatively associated with correct glove use and female health workers were more likely to
237     It is unknown whether universal gown and glove use in intensive care units (ICUs) decreases acqui
238 65) or with other occupations in which latex glove use is common (OR = 1.01, 95 percent CI: 0.49, 2.0
239 is study examines occupations in which latex glove use is common to determine whether it is associate
240                                              Glove use on entry to contact precautions rooms was also
241 verall relative risk for SSI with nonsterile glove use was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.81-1.39).
242               The risk associated with latex glove use was not apparent after 2000.
243                                              Glove use with handwashing prior to and after contact wi
244 ol measures (patient isolation, handwashing, glove use, and appropriate gown use) and implementation
245 l practices into four domains: hand hygiene, glove use, disinfection of reusable equipment, and waste
246  effect adjusting for isolation precautions, glove use, HCW type, and compliance at prior opportuniti
247                                          For glove use, nurses and midwives (10.06 [6.68-15.13]) and
248 ifficile acquisition with universal gown and glove use.
249 e environmental impact of increased gown and glove use.
250 bedside ophthalmologic equipment and limited glove use.
251 ions included strict hand hygiene, including glove use; isolation precautions; enhanced cleaning of l
252 , conjunctival displacement, use of provider gloves, use of a strict no-talking policy, use of subcon
253 rom body checks using the shoulder, arm, and glove was similar before and following the implementatio
254                                      Wearing gloves was protective (P < .005).
255                  Compliance with gowning and gloving was 82% and compliance with handwashing was 76%
256 ne after 69% of contacts, and when universal gloving was specified, gloves were used for a median of
257 eachates of 10 different types of disposable gloves were analyzed using Raman microspectroscopy (mu-R
258 ce mask, protective eyewear and two pairs of gloves were applied in 30.83%, 76.67%, 90.00% and 87.50%
259 t health care workers who reported not using gloves were at increased risk of latex sensitization, bo
260                                          The gloves were chemically analyzed and several detected sub
261                      Healthcare worker hands/gloves were sampled at room exit (prior to hand hygiene
262 ible gloves and one set of standard surgical gloves were tested for scattering characteristics and se
263 ot associated with health care work in which gloves were used (OR = 1.17, 95 percent CI: 0.51, 2.65)
264 s, and when universal gloving was specified, gloves were used for a median of 72% of contacts and han
265 ns; when contact precautions were specified, gloves were used for a median of 82% of contacts, gowns
266  were assigned to patient cohorts, gowns and gloves were worn on room entry, compliance with infectio
267 urgeons reported that they always use double gloves when performing surgery, and 83 reported that the
268          This is implemented into a wearable glove where an array of adhesives and sensors creates a
269 in was found in extracts prepared from latex gloves, which were shown to be allergenic.
270 mall proportion of them practised using hand gloves while handling raw products (5.6%), cleaning tabl
271 ith the welding equipment, 3) wear insulated gloves while operating electrical equipment, 4) verify t
272 of surgeons who always or usually use double gloves who also had hepatitis B vaccinations.
273 ble of real-time pulse monitoring and a PDMS glove with multiple embedded sensors to provide comprehe
274 le perceive the sensations reproduced by our gloves with integrated vibrotactile haptic actuators.
275 anual anti-phase finger tapping task wearing gloves with joint angular sensors, and an instrumented g
276 ostatic plasticity are likely to go 'hand-in-glove' with Hebbian mechanisms to allow experience to mo
277 pital units were randomly assigned to direct gloving, with hand hygiene not required before donning g

 
Page Top