ライフサイエンスコーパス: goodness-of-fit test

1 e (A) (purine to purine) (p<0.001, Pearson's goodness-of-fit test).

2 bration (P = .33 vs P = .02, Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test).

3 ating characteristic curve) and calibration (goodness-of-fit testing).

4 E are commonly performed using a simple chi2 goodness-of-fit test.

5 tudied using the Greenwood Nam-D'Agostino x2 goodness-of-fit test.

6 was evaluated with the Gronnesby and Borgan goodness-of-fit test.

7 tests, the chi 2 and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness of fit tests.

8 libration was assessed using Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit tests.

9 g control, compared with the C statistic and goodness-of-fit tests.

10 assessed through prediction diagnostics and goodness-of-fit tests.

11 d a small number of alleles, and approximate goodness-of-fit tests.

12 tatus Epilepticus Severity Score (chi-square goodness-of-fit test = 1.39; p = 0.845).

13 From the goodness-of-fit test, a critical percentage for each adm

14 Although the power-law model failed the goodness of fit test, after incorporating social network

15 s evaluated by measuring the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test and calibration curve.

16 The PBMS NLME method was performed using the goodness-of-fit test and Akaike weight to select the bes

17 Harrell C index, a modified Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test and calibration curves, and reclass

18 el); C-statistic and 95% CI; Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test and calibration plots; and sensitiv

19 These model fits can pass a host of standard goodness-of-fit tests and other model-selection diagnost

20 Goodness-of-fit tests and receiver operating characteris

21 on diversity index and the p-value from x(2) goodness-of-fit test are calculated to measure its stati

22 tes of heritability; and (iv) we developed a goodness of fit test based on the correlation of viral l

23 (discrimination) and by the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test (calibration).

24 well as good calibration (as measured by the goodness-of-fit test comparing observed to expected coun

25 quantile regressions were evaluated using a goodness-of-fit test derived from the cumulative sum of

26 We also propose a goodness-of-fit test for discriminating rejections due t

27 d by this problem we propose a nonparametric goodness-of-fit test for two empirical distributions of

28 el C index) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test) for prediction of in-hospital and

29 However, goodness-of-fit tests found that even bounded power-law

30 The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test indicated that the predictive model

31 y of observed against predicted outcomes and goodness-of-fit test indicated good calibration of the s

32 The three-level goodness-of-fit test indicated satisfactory performance

33 Goodness-of-fit testing indicated excellent model calibr

34 Goodness-of-fit tests indicated that this PRS was well c

35 Software for the goodness-of-fit test is available as a Julia package at

36 Segregation analysis and goodness-of-fit testing of genetic models suggest that r

37 e study of animal demography include running goodness-of-fit tests on a general starting model.

38 ve of 0.80) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, P = 0.102) when applied to the ADR

39 monstrated good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, P = 0.71) and discrimination (c-st

40 e show, however, that despite passing common goodness-of-fit tests, PP-GLMs estimated from data are o

41 -recall curve (AUCPR), Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) goodness-of-fit test, precision, sensitivity, accuracy,

42 logistic curve-fit evaluated by a Chi-square goodness-of-fit-test, receiver operating characteristic

43 Surprisingly, goodness-of-fit tests reveal that this class of phenotyp

44 A goodness-of-fit test revealed that DR-DQ haplotype shari

45 ing 1- and 2-tissue-compartment models, with goodness-of-fit tests showing a preference for the 2-tis

46 e representation of data, which are based on goodness-of-fit test statistics and standard errors of p

47 l using various model selection criteria and goodness-of-fit test statistics.

48 Goodness-of-fit tests strongly supported the fit of the

49 The goodness-of-fit test suggests that the phylogenetic mode

50 atio test of selection in conjunction with a goodness-of-fit test supports the selection hypothesis o

51 typing using either sampling into UMAT or a goodness-of-fit test test with a variance estimate takin

52 We also propose a goodness-of-fit test to aid investigators in determining

53 or the observed number of conversions, and a goodness-of-fit test to compare the observed number of c

54 rse Gaussian frailty was applied following a goodness-of-fit test to identify predictors of time to r

55 We propose here a goodness-of-fit test to quantify the fit between data ob

56 evaluate discrimination and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit tests to evaluate calibration.

57 tatistically significant and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was run to ascertain the fitness of

58 Using a chi-squared goodness-of-fit test, we identified 10 amino acid sites

59 (T classes vs. T + 1 classes) and chi-square goodness-of-fit tests were evaluated using parametric bo

60 Goodness-of-fit tests were more sensitive than the recei

61 g and validation samples as indicated by the goodness-of-fit test, which evaluated standardized nosoc

62 f the validity of a scoring system--and chi2 goodness-of-fit testing with data from 197 patients.