ライフサイエンスコーパス: grass

1 iomass accumulation in a perennial temperate grass.

2 ccasionally isolated from trees, shrubs, and grass.

3 riginated very early in the evolution of the grasses.

4 levated Si concentrations compared with C(3) grasses.

5 ae) versus branch-formation in non-Triticeae grasses.

6 ctive approach for dwarfing breeding of turf grasses.

7 ators of cell wall polymers deposition in C4 grasses.

8 y, particularly for inflorescences of cereal grasses.

9 raits potentially related to g(m) in 18 C(4) grasses.

10 escence meristematic boundaries of different grasses.

11 der optimal and water stress environments in grasses.

12 functional genomics of temperate cereals and grasses.

13 rstand traits of importance to Andropogoneae grasses.

14 lopment are limited to Arabidopsis and a few grasses.

15 an inverse correlation with g(sw) among C(4) grasses.

16 is usually poor except for spring trees and grasses.

17 r and greater composition of invasive annual grasses.

18 into pathways controlling AMs development in grasses.

19 validations and root growth improvements in grasses.

20 lants and crops to kill broadleaf plants and grasses.

21 d in functional genomics studies of other C3 grasses.

22 s little influence on the ratio of C(3):C(4) grasses.

23 ps, including rice and wheat, and in various grasses.

24 emperate C(3) grasses and (sub)tropical C(4) grasses.

25 Paspalum vaginatum) is a halophytic Panicoid grass able to grow in salt concentrations near that of s

26 of p-hydroxycinnamyl alcohols (monolignols), grasses additionally use a flavone, tricin, as a natural

27 By contrast, grass AGB was stabilized under deepened winter snow and

28 Similar declines in grass AGB were also observed at three other locations in

29 ity of ACC measurement) were significant for grass AIT (P < 0.001) but not significant for birch AIT

30 the efficacy/safety of 4 dosing regimens of grass allergen peptides after a second (GPS2) and third

31 Grass allergen peptides are in development for the treat

32 Treatment with grass allergen peptides led to an improvement in allergi

33 , placebo-controlled study demonstrated that grass allergen peptides significantly improved total rhi

34 th microarray data, IgE to the major timothy grass allergen Phleum pratense 1 (Phl p 1) and the cat a

35 Here, we use the grass Alloteropsis semialata, a species that possesses m

36 ing these differences, suggest that invasive grasses alter US fire regimes at regional scales.

37 ) by -13.55 (-17.56, -9.54; P < 0.001) after grass and -9.81 (-14.13, -5.50; P < 0.001) after birch A

38 Chloris truncata, an Australian native C(4) grass and a summer-fallow weed, which is common in no-ti

39 were no significant annual fluctuations, but grass and Ambrosia pollen counts are increasing in some

40 ubjects undergoing a 3-year-long AIT against grass and birch pollen allergy, respectively.

41 nitions to properly mirror symptom loads for grass and birch pollen-induced allergic rhinitis in othe

42 have shown negligible effects of dust-laden grass and browse, suggesting that intrinsic properties o

43 bryophytes and higher land plants of monocot grass and dicot lineages and identified positively selec

44 initions on pollen season for both birch and grass and for a variety of geographical locations for th

45 We used four grass and four forb species to condition living soil.

46 igher shrub and bare ground cover, and lower grass and herbaceous species cover relative to adjacent

47 Thus, IDE1 seems to be conserved in grass and nongrass species.

48 lergens in natural rubber latex, peanuts and grass and tree pollens.

49 marily on differences between temperate C(3) grasses and (sub)tropical C(4) grasses.

50 These analyses were extended across C4 grasses and cereals to identify broader evolutionary con

51 icant attention, particularly with regard to grasses and grasslands.

52 ation of seeds from graminoid plants such as grasses and sedges could have formed a critical element

53 oid defense metabolites that are produced by grasses and sequestered by a specialist maize herbivore,

54 urther understanding lignin deposition in C4 grasses and will ultimately allow the validation of biot

55 Differences between the life histories of grasses and woody species led to a contrasting prevalenc

56 te change may influence silica deposition in grasses and, by extension, alter the important ecologica

57 different natural forages: lucerne, timothy grass, and bamboo with distinct phytolith/silica content

58 Fire and mammalian grazers both consume grasses, and feedbacks between grass species, their func

59 phylogenetic pattern of flowering control in grasses, and how this relates to broad- and fine-scale n

60 unctional identity (small herbs, tall herbs, grasses, and legumes).

61 iridis), a model species for studies of C(4) grasses, and use the resource to probe domestication gen

62 Grasses are among the most resilient plants, and some ca

63 Grasses are well known for their high silica content, a

64 olonize sympatric hosts such as mustards and grasses as endophytes.

65 r understanding of the dwarfing mechanism in grasses at physiological and transcript levels.

66 er several years leads to increased standing grass biomass and fuel loads, and, therefore, in larger

67 Consistent with ND, grass biomass doubled and foliar concentrations of N, P,

68 Declining grass biomass was the principal cause of this decline in

69 ategy to improve biorefinery applications of grass biomass.

70 ctor-based genetic engineering approaches of grass biomass.

71 by the roots of maize (Zea maize), palisade grass (Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu) and ruzigrass (

72 ecosystem (EcoFAB) devices to grow the model grass Brachypodium distachyon in three distinct media ac

73 In this work putative orthologs in the model grass Brachypodium distachyon were tested for their abil

74 We conducted a study on the model perennial grass Brachypodium sylvaticum to investigate the molecul

75 ntation of best management practices such as grass buffers.

76 ots pine than in endomycorrhizal reed canary grass, but nonetheless, both species showed soil-derived

77 PL8 induce phase transition and flowering in grasses by directly upregulating SEPALLATA3 (SEP3) and M

78 round plant structures most facilitate marsh grasses by reducing stem movement.

79 al grasses, compared with C(3) and perennial grasses, came from the faster growth of individual modul

80 The ecological dominance of grasses can be attributed to a number of physiological i

81 Far less is known for grass caryopses that differ in tissue morphology.

82 bined experimental work demonstrates that in grass caryopses the coleorhiza indeed controls germinati

83 rasses has revealed numerous features of the grass cell wall.

84 Grass cell walls have hydroxycinnamic acids attached to

85 gin to identify the determinants that define grass cell walls.

86 olonization by legume, nonlegume forb and C3 grass colonists, but not by C4 grass colonists.

87 diversity-dependent changes in biomass of C3 grass colonists, which decreased under low diversity and

88 e forb and C3 grass colonists, but not by C4 grass colonists.

89 backs in grasslands, facilitation in a beach grass community, and niche differences with independent

90 ish whether faster growth in C(4) and annual grasses, compared with C(3) and perennial grasses, came

91 Moench.), a drought-tolerant C4 grass, contain up to 50 nodes and internodes of varying

92 These results suggest palisade grass could be a more efficient nitrate catch crop than

93 hanged seasonality is driving the changes in grass cover, whereas fire has little influence on the ra

94 Many grass crops that are vital to sustain the world's calori

95 pproach to ultimately improve salt-sensitive grass crops.

96 and leaf angle, a predictor of yield in many grass crops.

97 d C(4) photosynthetic pathways, whereas C(3) grasses decline after the mid-Pleistocene transition (MP

98 tion and soil characteristics (e.g., crop or grass designation, minimum annual LAI, soil coarse fragm

99 We found that C(4) grasses did not show consistently elevated Si concentrat

100 ave greater ecological value than unaffected grass dominated sites, particularly given the recent dec

101 Grass-dominated ecosystems are broadly distributed acros

102 ugh certain groups flourished in grazed only grass-dominated plots.

103 In a Mediterranean tree-grass ecosystem, we established three landscape-level (2

104 ath-like organ that surrounds the radicle in grass embryos, performs the same role in the grass weed

105 Grass endophytes have been shown to confer enhanced envi

106 mic approaches with the desiccation-tolerant grass Eragrostis nindensis and the related desiccation-s

107 f the Poaceae TPS-a subfamily arose early in grass evolution and the reactions catalyzed have become

108 re, we test the classic hypothesis that C(4) grasses evolved stronger mechanical defenses than C(3) g

109 velopment of Allergies] chip) and to timothy grass extract (ImmunoCAP).

110 n of the TPS-a subfamily in the Poaceae (the grass family), a plant family that contains important cr

111 on deficiency-responsive element 1), a known grass -Fe response CRE.

112 rences in wear patterns, with those of fresh grass feeders being similar to fresh and dry lucerne (ph

113 Additionally, fresh and dry grass feeders displayed differences in wear patterns, wi

114 ce could be used as a potential biomarker of grass feeding.

115 While the existence of an invasive grass-fire cycle is well known, evidence of altered fire

116 This includes the presence of grasses following both C(3) and C(4) photosynthetic path

117 modification of lignocellulosic biomass from grasses for improved biofuel and biochemical production

118 Rainfall variability was integral to grass-forb coexistence.

119 ckets form, diversity is reduced with little grass/forb cover, while transpiration and annual product

120 ed by the movement of grazers, which reduced grass fuel and fires, weakened the capacity of soils to

121 tant for domestication and/or yield in other grasses function differently in maize.

122 Using reported measurements, we developed grass functional trait values (physiological, structural

123 mplex has been promoted as a plant model for grass genomics with translation to small grain and bioma

124 ic reorganization and evolution in the model grass genus Brachypodium.

125 nts have been undertaken to dehusk and grind grass grain using stone artifacts.

126 ers, supporting previous reports that "fresh grass grazers" show less abrasion than unspecialized gra

127 C(4) grasses grow faster than C(3) species through a greater

128 We compiled a large dataset of grasses grown under controlled environmental conditions.

129 ing the study period, the estimated onset of grass growth advanced on average by 0.54 days/year in ea

130 ies Brachypodium distachyon as well as other grasses has revealed numerous features of the grass cell

131 Since their origin in the early Cretaceous, grasses have diversified across every continent on Earth

132 Bamboo grasses have evolved to rapidly deposit this combination

133 Grasses have numerous cell wall features that are distin

134 Grasses have varying inflorescence shapes; however, litt

135 heir growth strategies and root systems, the grass Holcus lanatus and the forb Rumex acetosa, to 2 wk

136 tic endophytic associations with cool-season grass hosts.

137 17) to at least one of the allergens: birch, grass, house dust mite, or cat.

138 asticity among 12 populations of an invasive grass (Imperata cylindrica), and to determine whether th

139 ulative field experiment with an annual C(4) grass in a forest understory to differentially track its

140 ) after posttreatment challenge (PTC) to rye grass in an environmental exposure unit after 1 interven

141 is a widely cultivated warm-season turf grass in subtropical and tropical areas.

142 and inoculant on the productivity of forage grasses in Brazil (Brachiaria spp. and Panicum spp.) was

143 Interestingly, the AGB of grasses in the control plots declined over time, resulti

144 w these findings may inform virus studies of grasses in the laboratory, field and natural settings.

145 ent evolution of herbaceous lineages such as grasses in young habitat types may drive coexistence of

146 The spikelet is the basic unit of the grass inflorescence.

147 et most Land Surface Models (LSMs) summarise grasses into two generic PFTs based primarily on differe

148 fire regimes, coupled with the importance of grass invasion in modeling these differences, suggest th

149 rrence, size, and frequency as a function of grass invasion, in addition to anthropogenic and ecologi

150 rmination by coleorhiza-enforced dormancy in grasses is an example of the convergent evolution of mec

151 The Miscanthus genus of perennial grasses is grown for bioenergy and biorenewable feedstoc

152 er in (a) tropical vs temperate regions; (b) grass/legume mixtures vs grass monocultures; and (c) soi

153 Awns, bristle-like structures extending from grass lemmas, provide protection against predators, cont

154 Overall, treatments of lemon grass (LG) and clove (CL) oils could induce sprouting wh

155 needles with enhanced long-range order, and grass-like curved microwires with interlinkages.

156 ertilisation and lime treatments of the Park Grass long term experiment at Rothamsted Research, UK.

157 istinct phytolith/silica contents (lucerne < grass < bamboo).

158 : miscanthus > poplar > switchgrass > native grasses ~ maize stover (residue) > restored prairie ~ ea

159 enetic manipulation of CAldOMTs conserved in grasses may serve as a potent strategy to improve bioref

160 Rapid sexual maturation in grasses means that seeder distributions, relative to fir

161 allows complex trait dissection within this grass model species.

162 typic and biomass properties between the two grass model systems highlight the challenges and opportu

163 perate regions; (b) grass/legume mixtures vs grass monocultures; and (c) soil pH of 5-6 vs other pHs.

164 We randomized 95 patients to receive either grass (N = 47) or birch AIT (N = 48).

165 ally important browsers of coastal saltmarsh grasses of eastern North America and the Caribbean.

166 at ~2.7 Ma indicating the expansion of C(4) grasses on the landscape was concurrent with the first a

167 re, CD4(+) T cells from donors sensitized to grass or birch pollen were stimulated with autologous al

168 influenced vegetation composition, favouring grasses over Calluna vulgaris, and led to a reduction in

169 oup) were statistically significant for both grass (P = 0.02) and birch (P = 0.02) allergens.

170 ifferent types of perennial crops (perennial grasses, palms, and woody plants) with different end use

171 mentation (Co): FoCo fed high-quality Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum), FeCo supplemented maize si

172 g mechanisms of salt tolerance in halophytic grasses, plants that thrive in salt conditions, may be a

173 In grasses (Poaceae), the position of the AZ differs among

174 Allergic rhinitis to grass pollen (ARg) was defined as upper airway symptoms

175 Higher ambient levels of grass pollen 2 days before (lag 2) were associated with

176 Increased levels of grass pollen a day before (lag 1) were associated with i

177 Mucosal grass pollen allergen exposure by SLIT resulted in highl

178 Grass pollen allergen induced cT(FH)-cell proliferation

179 this study was to evaluate the usefulness of grass pollen allergen molecules for prediction of grass

180 oded antibodies that were specific for major grass pollen allergens and able to elicit basophil activ

181 ne response during allergic sensitization to grass pollen allergens.

182 (R)35 cells were quantified in patients with grass pollen allergy (seasonal allergic rhinitis [SAR] g

183 (SLIT) intervention improves the control of grass pollen allergy by maintaining allergen tolerance a

184 pollen allergen molecules for prediction of grass pollen allergy during childhood and up to adolesce

185 Grass pollen allergy is one of the most common allergies

186 ILIT gives a substantial reduction in grass pollen allergy symptoms and use of rescue medicati

187 ing from allergic rhinoconjunctivitis due to grass pollen allergy were randomized to receive subcutan

188 omogenates were collected from patients with grass pollen allergy with CRSwNP and nonallergic control

189 s a hitherto unrecognized early indicator of grass pollen allergy, in addition to Phl p 1.

190 nd may help clinicians improve prediction of grass pollen allergy.

191 nvestigate the correlation between birch and grass pollen concentrations during the birch and grass p

192 l with a linear regression model of cSMS and grass pollen counts was developed.

193 , tricolor granulocyte activation test using grass pollen demonstrated MRGPRX2 upregulation associate

194 The association between grass pollen exposure and early markers of asthma exacer

195 stigated the associations between short-term grass pollen exposure and lung function and airway infla

196 Grass pollen exposure was associated with eosinophilic a

197 was defined as upper airway symptoms during grass pollen exposure.

198 her in NHS ester-coated slides after timothy grass pollen extract stimulation appearing a suitable su

199 Three proteins (kappa-casein, timothy grass pollen extract, polyclonal anti-human IgE) were pr

200 followed by 5 alternate day challenges with grass pollen extract.

201 Spring grass pollen gave the largest count, at 30% of the total

202 Grass pollen is the world's most harmful outdoor aeroall

203 ; however, sensitization to birch as well as grass pollen Phl p 1 and cat Fel d 1 allergen molecules

204 Patients with grass pollen rhinoconjunctivitis were treated with 3 ILI

205 ironmental exposure unit after 1 intervening grass pollen season (GPS1).

206 s pollen concentrations during the birch and grass pollen season defined via the EAACI criteria, and

207 loads reported by PHD users during birch and grass pollen season.

208 ecies richness steadily accumulates over the grass pollen season.

209 To identify grass pollen sensitization and predict later ARg, allerg

210 Prescription of grass pollen SLIT tablets reduced the dispensing of AR a

211 ollicular regulatory (T(FR)) cells following grass pollen subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and subli

212 Grass pollen subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is associ

213 In areas of high exposure to grass pollen, allergic patients are frequently sensitize

214 mmunotherapy (SLIT) for allergy to temperate grass pollen, predominantly to ryegrass pollen (RGP; Lol

215 cT(FH) cells were initially evaluated in the grass pollen-allergic (GPA) group (n = 28) and nonatopic

216 Grass pollen-driven T(H)2 cell proliferation and cytokin

217 ides are in development for the treatment of grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.

218 Grass pollen-induced basophil, T-cell, and B-cell respon

219 Grass pollen-specific immunotherapy involves immunomodul

220 lins and skin and nasal provocation tests to grass pollen.

221 47 grass-pollen-allergic patients were enrolled in a double

222 In daily practice, AIT for grass pollens may be a cost-effective option only in pat

223 lent Biome, an assemblage of succulent-rich, grass-poor, seasonally dry tropical vegetation distribut

224 stover >> miscanthus ~ switchgrass ~ native grasses ~ poplar > early successional >= restored prairi

225 he similarities with productive native mixed-grass prairie.

226 Additionally, we assessed whether invasive grass presence is a significant predictor of altered fir

227 However, perennial grasses productivity can be limited by severe freezing c

228 yrosine hydroxylase in the brain of the Nile Grass rat (NGR), a novel and potentially significant fin

229 ems of maize and different species of forage grasses remain poorly understood.

230 significantly as the replacement of forbs by grasses resulted in changes in relative abundance across

231 by funder mandates, institutional policies, grass-roots advocacy, and changing attitudes in the rese

232 cyltransferase in the cell wall of the model grass S. viridis.

233 heterogeneity also could have influenced the grass's genetic diversity.

234 gest a prominent role for agriculture in the grass's western spread, although glacial history and env

235 Unlike other thus far investigated grasses, S. italica contains TPSs producing all three en

236 ese BAHD genes in the cell wall of the model grass Setaria viridis.

237 ne (RIL) population created between the C(4) grasses Setaria viridis and S. italica.

238 dary, repeated measures of IgE and IgG(4) to grass showed significant between-group difference and wi

239 Fossil grass silica short cell phytoliths (GSSCP) have been use

240 This relative of the well studied grass smut Ustilago maydis is the only smut fungus adapt

241 ic clines among continents of the intertidal grass Spartina alterniflora within its invasive and nati

242 ntial, growth, and flowering of the dominant grass species (Bouteloua gracilis).

243 ere acquired recently from distantly related grass species [5, 11, 16], to test the hypothesis that t

244 sful LGT has been reported between different grass species [5, 8, 11, 16-19].

245 ween fire regimes experienced by hundreds of grass species and their persistence strategy, within a p

246 uvate carboxylase (Ppc) gene from three C(4) grass species could drive M-cell-specific expression of

247 s in maize and rice suggests a divergence in grass species of the Poideae subfamily.

248 Brachypodium distachyon is a weedy grass species that is firmly established as a model for

249 is tillering effect was transferable between grass species, and overexpression of LNJ in barley and r

250 phylogenetic comparative experiment with 74 grass species, conceptualising morphogenesis as the bran

251 both consume grasses, and feedbacks between grass species, their functional traits, and consumers ha

252 dational resource with implications in other grass species.

253 ss resulting in areas dominated by perennial grass species.

254 mechanisms of multiple closely related C(4) grass species.

255 h of which exhibit strong synteny with other grass species.

256 Secondary outcomes were changes in grass specific immunoglobulins and skin and nasal provoc

257 Here, we identify the grass-specific TCP transcription factor COMPOSITUM 1 (CO

258 ugs (Leptoglossus phyllopus, Hemiptera), (2) grass stinkbugs (Mormidea pama, Hemiptera), (3) Asian la

259 This review focuses on genetic regulation of grass stomatal development and prospects for the future,

260 Grass stomatal development follows a trajectory striking

261 he evolution of life-cycle strategies in the grass subfamily Pooideae and test if transitions between

262 r density of fine roots produced by palisade grass, subtly decreased nitrate leaching potential throu

263 The Australian grass subtribe Neurachninae contains closely related spe

264 To improve nitrogen capture, grasses such as brachiaria are increasingly used, especi

265 about 19% of the S. italica TPSs in related grasses supports a common ancestry of selected pathway b

266 could explain sustained clinical benefit of grass tablet sublingual immunotherapy.

267 wth depends on ecological context, with C(4) grasses tending to promote resource capture under compet

268 c landscape of 35S rDNA in an allotetraploid grass that exhibits ND, Brachypodium hybridum (genome co

269 sitivity varies between different species of grass that flower at different times, but it is not know

270 Miscanthus is a perennial wild grass that is of global importance for paper production,

271 wever, the genetic elements that distinguish grasses that are sensitive versus tolerant to extreme dr

272 emmas of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and other grasses that contribute to photosynthesis and play a rol

273 y represents a novel regulatory mechanism in grasses that is largely different from that in Arabidops

274 ceae constitute a taxon of flowering plants (grasses) that cover almost all Earth's inhabitable range

275 olved stronger mechanical defenses than C(3) grasses through increased phytolith deposition, in respo

276 d organic acids changed the taste from lemon/grass to a more bitter/pungent dill-related taste.

277 stead, we propose that the tendency for C(4) grasses to outcompete C(3) species under hot, dry condit

278 avoidance mechanism of cool season perennial grasses to persist well under harsh summer conditions.

279 l functioning across three vegetation zones: grass, transitional, and shrub in a coastal grassland.

280 m (Sorghum bicolor) and its relatives in the grass tribe Andropogoneae bear their flowers in pairs of

281 In grasses, two pathways yield abundant phasiRNAs during an

282 In grasses, two types of phased, small interfering RNAs (ph

283 Because C(3) and C(4) grasses typically dominate in different climates, with t

284 t the MPT, lead to the local decline of C(3) grasses under conditions of decreased water availability

285 Brachypodium distachyon is an annual C3 grass used as a monocot model system in functional genom

286 is produces fast growth in different ways in grasses using C(4) and C(3) photosynthesis, and in annua

287 ruct pseudomolecules for allotetraploid lawn grass utilizing PacBio long reads in combination with re

288 A world collection of sugarcane and related grasses (WCSRG) maintained at Miami, FL contains > 1,200

289 into the evolution of C(4) photosynthesis in grasses, we examined leaf gas exchange, anatomy and ultr

290 grass embryos, performs the same role in the grass weed Avena fatua (common wild oat).

291 red from sympatric potato, mint, mustard and grasses were characterized genotypically with microsatel

292 mmunities with higher biomass of resident C4 grasses were more resistant to colonization by legume, n

293 nscription factor function, we turned to the grasses, where interactions between B-class MADS box pro

294 However, for grasses, which mature faster, the relationships between

295 is particularly troublesome when evaluating grasses, whose members represent our most agriculturally

296 Perennial grasses will account for approximately 16 billion gallon

297 oss- and gain-of-function mutations in black-grass with genotype specificity and measurable changes i

298 degradation via xerification, which replaces grasses with shrubs and bare soil patches.

299 tional capacity varied, with C. fulviceps (a grass-wood-feeder) gut microbiome samples containing mor

300 ription factor binding in leaves of the C(4) grasses Zea mays, Sorghum bicolor, and Setaria italica a