ライフサイエンスコーパス: grooming

1 e during two distinct movements (running and grooming).

2 hair grooming and 538 (16.2%) reported never grooming.

3 tor outputs such as feeding, locomotion, and grooming.

4 yopia) in old wild bonobos, exhibited during grooming.

5 s and motivations associated with pubic hair grooming.

6 e sufficient to specifically elicit antennal grooming.

7 ly occurring cooperative interaction: social grooming.

8 were preferentially active during eating and grooming.

9 and pup-directed aggression and induces pup grooming.

10 cial interactions with conspecifics, such as grooming.

11 affolding gene, Sapap3, results in excessive grooming.

12 ence mimicking effects of rodent licking and grooming.

13 ed relatively high levels of repetitive self-grooming.

14 behaviors, and an acute 12-fold increase in grooming.

15 ow decreased pausing, hanging, drinking, and grooming.

16 o natural rewards such as sucrose and social grooming.

17 nt for eliciting stress-induced anorexia and grooming.

18 but not CeA, decreases feeding and increases grooming.

19 d evoke escape responses, and both stimulate grooming.

20 CNS previously implicated in the control of grooming.

21 from a chair, using the toilet, eating, and grooming.

22 vities such as scratching, yawning, and self-grooming.

23 reduced non-social activities of rearing and grooming.

24 ally manifests clinically after intense hair grooming.

25 WV) and the proportion and intensity of self-grooming.

26 on and may explain their negative impacts on grooming.

27 the ventral striatum resulted in repetitive grooming.

28 d that it was sufficient to induce excessive grooming.

29 approximately 22 cases per 100 persons) and grooming (17-19% vs. 7-15%; attributable disability, app

30 , 5674 of 7456 (76.1%) reported a history of grooming (66.5% of men and 85.3% of women [weighted perc

31 Grooming, a common behavior in animals, serves the impor

32 ple days generated a progressive increase in grooming, a mouse behavior related to OCD.

33 Grooming, a response to the stress of an open field or f

34 This repetitive grooming abnormality in NL1 KO mice is associated with a

35 mount of time spent performing body-directed grooming actions and leg-directed actions.

36 increase of exploratory motor behaviors and grooming activity also is observed, consistent with a gl

37 nt of this behavior based on measurements of grooming activity and its sequencing.

38 Relaxed grooming allowed the colonization of large worm species

39 resume friendly interactions, because prior grooming alone did not elicit approach.

40 ce with GRN mutations displayed OCD and self-grooming (an OCD-like behavior in mice), respectively.

41 lutamatergic neurons promote repetitive self-grooming, an asocial behavior.

42 hese women, 2778 (83.8%) reported pubic hair grooming and 538 (16.2%) reported never grooming.

43 s mediate the rewarding effects of receiving grooming and affect anxiety-related behaviors.

44 ng, anxiolytic effects, suggesting a role in grooming and affiliative behavior.

45 All grooming and aggression interactions between individuals

46 tions between individuals were recorded, and grooming and aggression social networks were created for

47 elationship between variation in pup licking/grooming and arched-back nursing (LG-ABN) and offspring

48 ircuit is organized to both command antennal grooming and control its duration.

49 deletions exhibit self-injurious repetitive grooming and deficits in social interaction.

50 ge behaviours including locomotion, rearing, grooming and drinking for up to 7 weeks post occlusion,

51 pproximately equal levels of activity during grooming and eating and maximal activity during explorat

52 Both increased grooming and evoked firing were reversed by chronic fluo

53 Other active behaviors such as grooming and feeding were reversibly inhibited and hamst

54 nies and inhabiting temporary nest bivouacs, grooming and feeding with workers, but also consuming th

55 Hoxb8 mutant mice exhibit compulsive grooming and hair removal dysfunction similar to humans

56 unexpected behavior manifested by compulsive grooming and hair removal, similar to behavior in humans

57 T+ Itpr3tf/J (BTBR), reduced repetitive self-grooming and high marble burying scores in BTBR, and red

58 imb stereotypy, hindlimb clasping, excessive grooming and hypo-activity prior to death between 7 and

59 No association was found between grooming and income, relationship status, or geographic

60 s in mice, which manifests as excessive self-grooming and increased anxiety-like behaviors, and is al

61 tion of mGluR5 activity attenuates excessive grooming and instrumental learning differentially, and r

62 uding repetitive stereotyped behaviors (self-grooming and marble burying), sociability (3-chamber soc

63 However, maternal simulation of pups (e.g., grooming and milk ejection) consistently produced rapid,

64 f central nervous system processes including grooming and nursing, depression and stress, and drug ab

65 enabled social bonding at larger scales than grooming and other bonding mechanisms available in ances

66 ny type of recent interaction, because prior grooming and prior aggression influenced their behavior

67 They have deficits in grooming and rearing behaviour and show reduced explorat

68 his test by tracking the emergence of social grooming and regurgitated food donations among previousl

69 tism, and Shank3 mutant mice show repetitive grooming and social interaction deficits.

70 tion of MC4R signaling, normalize compulsive grooming and striatal electrophysiologic impairments in

71 H->LSv terminals elicits stress-related self-grooming and strong photostimulation causes fear-related

72 ice and then transferred to the pelage after grooming and subsequently to the environment allowing an

73 PGRN knockout mice abolished excessive self-grooming and the associated hyperexcitability of medium

74 urvey (two summers, one with and one without grooming) and a 48 h survey during the first ever intens

75 investigation, contact time), comfort (i.e., grooming), and locomotion (i.e., contact time, cage clim

76 sulted in a significant decrease in freezing grooming, and climbing and caused a significant increase

77 ed deficits in social interaction, excessive grooming, and decreased exploration of a novel environme

78 cific behavior such as ambulation time, self-grooming, and inactivity.

79 Friendly interaction, grooming, and locomotion were associated with 5-HT(1A) B

80 ecifics such as sexual behavior, yawning, or grooming, and not as much-as is often observed in humans

81 on infants' social interactions (aggression, grooming, and play) and self-scratching (a proxy indicat

82 ring development, such as postpartum licking/grooming, and that effects of Peg3 are dependent on the

83 als and with a score consisting of huddling, grooming, and time inside the nest.

84 tion of the KO mice exhibited high levels of grooming; and (2) the average duration of nose contact w

85 valuated for OCD-relevant phenotypes of self-grooming, anxiety-like behaviors, and increased striatal

86 t with more bystanders, initiators gave less grooming at the beginning of the bout and were more like

87 t vampire bats selectively escalate low-cost grooming before developing higher-cost food-sharing rela

88 ial challenges (male immigration, changes in grooming behavior after the death of a close relative, a

89 Moreover, the grooming behavior and presence of cuticular wax aids in

90 t sensory input-independent mechanisms guide grooming behavior at short time scales.

91 entrations were associated with increases in grooming behavior in rats treated with the highest conce

92 urons (MSNs) and its relevance to repetitive grooming behavior in Shank3B mutant mice.

93 Treatment of OCD-like grooming behavior in Slitrk5, SAPAP3, and laser-stimulat

94 We use the grooming behavior of Drosophila melanogaster as a model

95 , tremors, jumps, rears, wet-dog shakes, and grooming behavior precipitated by subcutaneous administr

96 Importantly, the repetitive grooming behavior was rescued by selectively enhancing t

97 dramatic increase in repetitive, stereotyped grooming behavior, a potential autism-relevant abnormali

98 in the dorsal striatum (DSt), alterations in grooming behavior, and enhanced sensitivity to the stere

99 head bobbing, rearing/sniffing, turning, and grooming behavior.

100 tations in the Hoxb8 gene exhibit compulsive grooming behavior.

101 and the Slitrk5-deficient mice, the abnormal grooming behaviors are associated with enhanced anxiety

102 Repertoires of grooming behaviors critical to survival are exhibited by

103 of novel mouse genetic models with excessive grooming behaviors have begun to shed light on the molec

104 A study of grooming behaviors in Drosophila suggests a neuronal mec

105 e to social cues with robust repetitive self-grooming behaviors relative to saline treated controls.

106 SKF83959-induced locomotor and grooming behaviors were eliminated in D1 receptor knocko

107 rease in prepulse inhibition, an increase in grooming behaviors, an impairment in nest-building activ

108 Excessive grooming behaviors, cleansing rituals, and self-mutilati

109 s limited information about finer aspects of grooming behaviors, which are important to understand mo

110 open field and show deficits in interactive grooming behaviors.

111 and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)-like grooming behaviors.

112 hesus monkeys during natural (e.g., walking, grooming) behaviors.

113 ng social interaction deficit and repetitive grooming behaviour could be rescued, while anxiety and m

114 ap3 exhibit increased anxiety and compulsive grooming behaviour leading to facial hair loss and skin

115 Subsequent models incorporate grooming bout duration, which also contributes significa

116 f the bout and were more likely to abandon a grooming bout, while bouts were less likely to be recipr

117 Lip-smacking at the beginning of grooming bouts was significantly more often followed by

118 res governing transitions between individual grooming bouts.

119 Additionally, grooming can be evaluated in reference to the regional d

120 ocial communication through touch and mutual grooming can convey highly salient socio-emotional signa

121 Studies of rodent grooming can provide valuable insight for dopamine contr

122 This care is often in the form of grooming, carrying, support in agonistic interactions, a

123 Sequential super-stereotypy of grooming chains may be particularly advantageous for mod

124 le sequences of movements known as syntactic grooming chains.

125 symptoms of withdrawal measured as increased grooming, chewing, scratching, and shaking, plus the app

126 In mice, grooming consists of a series of stereotyped patterned s

127 inct multimodal oral gesture produced during grooming, coordinated this activity.

128 esting that contrary to current assumptions, grooming decisions are not based on trust, or bonds, wit

129 luding Sniffing and Licking (increased), and Grooming (decreased/blocked).

130 aring, forepaw tremor, increased locomotion, grooming, diarrhea, tachypnea and ptosis.

131 transferring disability, and 6-8% evidenced grooming disability.

132 duced the number of crossings and seconds of grooming during preference testing.

133 It has been suggested that the grooming dysfunction results from a nociceptive defect,

134 in a variety of natural behaviors, including grooming, eating, and free tactile exploration.

135 However, antennal grooming effectively removed female pheromone from males

136 esion after simulated conflicts, measured as grooming eigenvector centrality.

137 ind differences in the durations of antennal grooming elicited by neurons in the different layers, su

138 The frequency and duration of each grooming episode is sensitive to changes in stress level

139 oring the time of onset and duration of each grooming episode, and are often performed on grooming ep

140 grooming episode, and are often performed on grooming episodes triggered by stress exposure, which ma

141 analysis of forepaw movement during distinct grooming episodes.

142 n unaltered during the execution of distinct grooming episodes.

143 le the GABAergic subpopulation inhibits self-grooming, even in a nonsocial context.

144 48 h survey during the first ever intensive grooming event.

145 ber of grooming partners vs. the duration of grooming events).

146 ons suggest that the excessive, pathological grooming exhibited by these mice results from CNS abnorm

147 ngham et al.[1] - the proportion of high-arm grooming featuring palm-to-palm clasping - we found that

148 atecholamine plasma levels while stimulating grooming, feeding behaviors, gastric transit and acid se

149 The findings suggest that beach grooming for wrack removal is not justified as a microbi

150 Grooming frequency and degree of grooming (ie, removing

151 of grooming, hairiness, instrument used, and grooming frequency, men who removed all their pubic hair

152 ted spontaneously upon decapitation, namely, grooming, grasping, righting, and quivering.

153 ntions: A questionnaire examining pubic hair grooming habits.

154 assessment of contemporary female pubic hair grooming habits.

155 After adjustment for age, duration of grooming, hairiness, instrument used, and grooming frequ

156 The 'grooming handclasp' is one of the most well-established

157 gham et al.[1] reduced the cultural scope of grooming-handclasp behavior by showing that grooming-han

158 y corroborating our original conclusion that grooming-handclasp behavior can represent a group-level

159 grooming-handclasp behavior by showing that grooming-handclasp style convergence is "explained by ma

160 previously reported cultural differences in grooming-handclasp style preferences in captive chimpanz

161 of sensorimotor events including locomotion, grooming, head movement, chewing, auditory stimuli, and

162 In this study, behaviors (open field, grooming, hind-leg gait, water maze, and acoustic startl

163 otonin reuptake inhibitor, reduces excessive grooming, hyperanxiety and social behavioral impairments

164 in mice, which display similar pathological grooming, hyperanxiety and social impairment deficits.

165 howing an increased frequency of pup licking/grooming (i.e., high-LG mothers) that was associated wit

166 Grooming frequency and degree of grooming (ie, removing all pubic hair) are independent r

167 ation and engaged in stereotypic jumping and grooming immediately after making an error.

168 WT mice but failed to induce any sensitized grooming in A(2A) KO mice.

169 ique in causing both seizures and compulsive grooming in adult mice.

170 ce to streamline the analysis of spontaneous grooming in biomedical research studies.

171 -HFS significantly suppressed excessive self-grooming in both genetic lines.

172 the discovery of these principles governing grooming in D. melanogaster demonstrates the utility of

173 Grooming in Drosophila melanogaster is characterized by

174 ot be entirely representative of spontaneous grooming in freely-behaving mice.

175 Excessive grooming in mice has been promoted as a model of human o

176 nt of individual forepaws during spontaneous grooming in multiple freely-behaving mice.

177 the network that can be maintained by social grooming in other primates.

178 e behavior within established relationships (grooming in primates [10-13]).

179 Social grooming in primates is an example of an interaction tha

180 Post-natal behaviours, notably licking and grooming in rats, cause decreased behavioural indices of

181 The complex patterning of grooming in rodents, which usually proceeds in a cephalo

182 in this pathway reduced excessive repetitive grooming in the mutant mice.

183 Importantly, excessive grooming in these mice was prevented by inactivating nuc

184 data show STN-HFS suppresses excessive self-grooming in two autism-like mouse models, raising the po

185 asping (PPC) is a distinct style of high-arm grooming in which the grooming partners clasp each other

186 High-arm grooming is a form of chimpanzee grooming in which two individuals mutually groom while e

187 ips strongly influence the style of high-arm grooming in wild chimpanzees of the Kanyawara community.

188 DOPA treatment produced gradually sensitized grooming in WT mice but failed to induce any sensitized

189 The grooming increase was temporally coupled with a progress

190 compulsive-like behaviors such as compulsive grooming increased in frequency by the end of the mangan

191 ntake, enhanced pain response, and excessive grooming induced by intracerebroventricular NMU administ

192 by longer and reciprocated bouts than silent grooming initiations.

193 ing their lifespan had an increased risk for grooming injury (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.97; 95% CI

194 l and the effect of bystander presence using grooming interactions of wild chimpanzees.

195 Pubic hair grooming is a common practice that can lead to injury an

196 Grooming is a commonplace, robust behavior in rodent spe

197 Grooming is a complex and robust innate behavior, common

198 High-arm grooming is a form of chimpanzee grooming in which two i

199 Importance: Pubic hair grooming is an increasingly prevalent trend.

200 le sexual practices, and sharing of personal grooming items.

201 ing from <5% (M group, Mahale) to >30% dyads grooming (Kanyawara, Kibale), and in a large free-rangin

202 Hoxb8 show, with 100% penetrance, excessive grooming leading to hair removal and lesions.

203 that varied in the frequency of pup licking/grooming (LG) (i.e., High or Low LG).

204 diating the transmission of maternal licking/grooming (LG) from mother to offspring.

205 ing for warmth (no cost), then conditionally grooming (low cost), and eventually providing coalitiona

206 red with high levels of maternal licking and grooming (low LG offspring) in early postnatal life show

207 owever, Gnal haploinsufficiency altered self-grooming, motor coordination, and apparent motivation in

208 We find that the initial choice of grooming movement is determined by the ratio of sensory

209 nt trace of this excitation induces the next grooming movement once the previous one is performed.

210 tween body parts is essential for organizing grooming movements in sequence.

211 Flies perform grooming movements spontaneously, but when covered with

212 ctivate sensory neurons that elicit specific grooming movements.

213 ct mouse models demonstrating excessive self-grooming, namely the Viaat-Mecp2(-/y) and Shank3B(-/-) l

214 ents in fine- and sensorimotor tasks such as grooming, nest building and acoustic startle as early as

215 iduals who were more well-connected in their grooming network interacted more frequently with humans

216 Thus, grooming of the antennae and other sensory appendages is

217 Maternal grooming of young did not vary with suckling location.

218 regularly attack and consume bark scorpions, grooming only briefly when stung.

219 during palpation and exploration than during grooming or passive stimulation.

220 the network that can be maintained by social grooming or touching in other primates.

221 sure prior to the birthing process, maternal grooming, or encounters with contaminated environments.I

222 the recruitment call of an unrelated recent grooming partner caused subjects to move in the directio

223 ts were most likely to approach their former grooming partner when they had also heard her recruitmen

224 inct style of high-arm grooming in which the grooming partners clasp each other's raised palms.

225 l interaction is defined (e.g. the number of grooming partners vs. the duration of grooming events).

226 we only detected a decrease in the number of grooming partners.

227 Several grooming patterning analysis methods are described in th

228 Increased grooming persisted for 2 weeks after stimulation cessati

229 er demonstrate that the increased repetitive grooming phenotype can be rescued in adult mice by admin

230 euronal survival and results in an excessive grooming phenotype caused by dysregulation of Sap90/Psd9

231 these two phenotypes are separable, with the grooming phenotype derived from the hematopoietic lineag

232 hium treatment ameliorated a repetitive self-grooming phenotype in Shank3 knockout mice.

233 ing number of rodent models that have strong grooming phenotypes, this high-throughput in-depth analy

234 g smaller, less diverse, and less integrated grooming, play, proximity and contact-sitting networks.

235 bjective: To characterize current pubic hair grooming practices in the United States.

236 tify injury-prone groomers and lead to safer grooming practices.

237 injury and develop recommendations for safe grooming practices.

238 on to better counsel patients and understand grooming practices.

239 that, following stimulation by an irritant, grooming progresses gradually from an early phase domina

240 Fifty-six women did not answer the grooming question; consequently, 3316 women were include

241 r, the frequency of active behaviors such as grooming, rearing, burrowing and locomotion increased.

242 Naltrexone increased the amount of grooming received by mothers from other group members an

243 Repetitive self-grooming, reduced ultrasonic vocalizations, and deficits

244 oral risk factors associated with pubic hair grooming-related injuries to characterize individuals wi

245 Grooming-related injury history (yes or no), high-freque

246 Grooming-related injury was reported by 1430 groomers (w

247 are food only after first having established grooming relationships.

248 Traditional approaches to analyze grooming rely on manually scoring the time of onset and

249 lude antibiotic glandular secretions, mutual grooming, removal of diseased individuals from the nest,

250 We therefore conclude that antennal grooming removes excess native cuticular lipids and fore

251 riments, young crayfish exhibited a directed grooming response to all worm species, but were unable t

252 nd stored to elicit a delayed and sequential grooming response.

253 Conversely, adult crayfish did not exhibit grooming responses to any worm species.

254 odel whereby suppression drives a Drosophila grooming sequence that is induced by simultaneous activa

255 tion of different sensory pathways elicits a grooming sequence that resembles the naturally induced s

256 ppression of the next movement, allowing the grooming sequence to progress down the hierarchy.

257 ppression, was successful in reproducing the grooming sequence.

258 t recapitulates the key features of observed grooming sequences at several time scales.

259 ooming, support the hypothesis that antennal grooming serves a similar function in a wide range of in

260 lth care professionals and those who provide grooming services can use this information to better cou

261 airments were not correlated with compulsive grooming severity.

262 acial expressions, vocalizations, and social grooming.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Our brain continuously d

263 and the presence of a partner on locomotion, grooming, singing, and other behaviors that make up an a

264 disease, including identifying perseverative grooming states in a rat model of fragile X syndrome.

265 ide array of behaviors (locomotion, rearing, grooming, stereotypies) including a microstructural anal

266 and drinking while concomitantly increasing grooming, stereotypies, and ethological plus traditional

267 e-to-male, male-to-female and female-to-male grooming strength decreased after simulated intrusions c

268 ated intrusions compared to female-to-female grooming strength.

269 ividuals maintained lifelong fidelity to the grooming style of their mothers.

270 We agree with them that grooming styles could be transmitted by different mechan

271 effort to assess whether the transmission of grooming styles within two captive groups in Chimfunshi

272 ks function to coordinate and prolong social grooming, suggesting that this oral signal is an example

273 tica), which use different modes of antennal grooming, support the hypothesis that antennal grooming

274 6 and included muscle weight, functionality (grooming tests, muscle strength), electrophysiology and

275 es were more likely to engage in feeding and grooming than a sham control.

276 ith larger swellings, and spending more time grooming these females.

277 features (for example, walking, turning and grooming), thus producing the highest-resolution etholog

278 put strength to the head will cause anterior grooming to occur first.

279 The impacts of beach grooming, to remove wrack, were investigated at Cowell B

280 ogaster), greatly increases partner-directed grooming toward familiar conspecifics (but not strangers

281 reduced aggression and increased licking and grooming toward intruder males.

282 ofound increase in the length of the forepaw grooming trajectories.

283 the inclusion of a simple rule that modifies grooming transition probabilities over time yields a gen

284 the syntactic rules underlying probabilistic grooming transitions possess action duration-dependent s

285 by the recipient was high, for instance when grooming vulnerable body parts.

286 Beach grooming was generally associated with either no change

287 When antennal grooming was prevented in the American cockroach, Peripl

288 Surprisingly, behaviors such as resting and grooming were also affected.

289 tivity, as measured by center crossings, and grooming were also reduced by subchronic treatment with

290 Demographic differences in grooming were found, which may reflect cultural variatio

291 regression, several factors associated with grooming were found.

292 ith grooming, with all groups reporting less grooming when compared with white women.

293 ly to produce lip-smacks during face-to-face grooming where the visual aspect of the signal could be

294 responding for high-fat diet and compulsive grooming, whereas group-housed female mice display incre

295 -specific deletion of Mecp2 causes excessive grooming, which is rescued by restoring striatal Sapap3

296 independently of its effect to promote self-grooming, while the GABAergic subpopulation inhibits sel

297 al behaviors including adult-onset excessive grooming with mild-to-severe hair loss and self-injury.

298 ties, samples of at least 100 observed dyads grooming with raised hands showed PPC frequencies varyin

299 Race was also significantly associated with grooming, with all groups reporting less grooming when c

300 specifically male-to-male and female-to-male grooming) would increase after conflict, and aggression