コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 l traits-almost complete coverage for 'plant growth form'.
2 c single cells to a filamentous pseudohyphal growth form.
3 species, plasticity was not associated with growth form.
4 asonal drought alters the response of either growth form.
5 mycorrhizal affiliation, leaf hydraulics or growth form.
6 in mating system, life-history strategy and growth form.
7 mation of biofilms, a sessile, multicellular growth form.
8 roorganisms have developed a unique ramified growth form.
9 ts such as seed dispersal syndrome and plant growth form.
10 or nitrogen differentiate into a filamentous growth form.
11 fferentiate into a filamentous, pseudohyphal growth form.
12 fferentiate into a filamentous, pseudohyphal growth form.
13 thetic capacity than biochemical subtypes or growth forms.
14 aboveground death) among the leaf habits or growth forms.
15 ng species with different leaf habits and/or growth forms.
16 and closely associated with shifts in plant growth forms.
17 ta and assigned species to areas, biomes and growth forms.
18 leading to a rich variety of polycrystalline growth forms.
19 ted into almost every climate, with manifold growth forms.
20 ems and roots, contributing to diverse plant growth forms.
21 2) were isolated from species with different growth forms.
22 develops from a motile form into a sessile, growth form, a transition that involves drastic changes
23 he strong relationship between seed mass and growth form across present-day species and with the avai
24 titioned substantially by leaf habit but not growth form along a trade-off axis between traits that s
25 gle vegetation model takes into account this growth form, although such efforts could greatly improve
26 st majority exhibit a filamentous, branching growth form and are aerobic chemoorganotrophs that deriv
30 osissima and M. claussenii differed in their growth form and exhibited contrasting strategies of wate
31 ve advantage over native SAPs as a result of growth form and greater light-use efficiency that promot
33 g phylogenetic relatedness, climatic ranges, growth form and mycorrhizal associations, we quantified
34 habitats and are minimally affected by plant growth form and phylogenetic ancestry, suggesting that t
35 heory are consistent with this evidence that growth form and seed size evolve in a coordinated manner
38 ributed across wild and domesticated plants, growth forms and biomes, and to identify crucial knowled
41 : (i) constancy in the relative abundance of growth forms and maintained dominance by long-lived, slo
42 (phylogenetic diversity), and the variety of growth forms and resource use strategies (functional div
43 s maintained across Koppen climate zones and growth forms and strongest in the wet tropics and within
44 shifts and evolutionary transitions between growth forms and test for phylogenetic biome conservatis
46 role of epistasis in determining biological growth, form, and shape and for the resolution of develo
48 oapplications; when both plant community and growth form are known, this study allows the isolation o
51 iotemporal distribution of plant tissues and growth forms but are agnostic toward food plant species
53 belowground strategy and performance across growth forms, but it will be critical to incorporate pla
54 s the classical C(4) biochemical subtypes or growth forms, but showed that growth temperature and mea
56 grouped according to previously established growth form categorizations within specific abiotic cond
57 ition was not consistently associated with a growth form change, though we found evolutionarily labil
58 isual manipulations known to alter axial eye growth: form deprivation by translucent occluders, spher
59 s plants suggest that their physiologies and growth forms differed substantially from most types of m
60 d residues are deleted no longer supports T7 growth, forms dimers, or interacts with either T7 DNA po
61 differences in the relative response between growth forms does not support the hypothesis that elevat
62 ies, photosynthetic pathway (C3 vs. C4 ), or growth form (drought-deciduous shrub vs. evergreen shrub
63 e biogeography and trajectories of biome and growth form evolution across the Caesalpinia Group (Legu
64 pogenic drivers hold for plants of different growth forms, for different latitudinal zones, and for b
66 rbs to supercentennial trees, to examine how growth form, habitat, and phylogenetic relationships str
68 y status, flower size, pollination mode, and growth form had no significant effects on flower longevi
69 s leukemia cells accumulate mutations during growth, forming heterogeneous cell populations that are
70 erlying the evolutionary success of the tree growth form: high genetic diversity, extensive gene flow
71 ntium aciphyllum / Polytrichum strictum) and growth form (hummock / bank) are the major determinants
72 esponses of eight species, representing four growth forms: (i) graminoids (Carex bigellowii and Eriop
75 ogenetic switch from budding yeast to hyphal growth form in response to a variety of stimuli and grow
78 idering the disparity of coral morphological growth forms in shelter provision for reef fishes, we in
85 variation in these dimensions using species' growth form, leaf physiology, and population response to
87 gs are consistent across stress types, plant growth forms, life histories, origins (invasive vs. nati
88 s a wide range of diversity in floral color, growth form, mating system and tolerance to environmenta
89 t reproduction is higher in plants with tree growth form, multiple reproductive episodes, more specia
91 techniques to assess how transitions between growth forms occur in the moss Physcomitrella patens.
92 Pseudohyphal differentiation, a filamentous growth form of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisia
95 plant species, each representing a different growth form or functional type, is changing the fundamen
96 kely that it is a result of a change in tree growth form or that it is predominantly caused by CO(2)
97 d at local scales and generally for specific growth forms or specific habitat types, for example, gra
101 itch between yeast, pseudohyphal, and hyphal growth forms (polymorphism) is one of the most investiga
103 een unicellular yeast cells and filamentous, growth forms), secreted aspartyl proteases and phospholi
106 they demonstrate that competition from other growth forms, such as lianas, slow forest thinning and u
107 mbining hydraulic traits with leaf habit and growth form, suggesting integrating life history traits
108 ment comparing interactions between Spartina growth forms (tall-form from low marsh and short-form fr
109 consistently associated with divergences in growth form than with divergences in any other variable.
110 re more often associated with divergences in growth form than with divergences in dispersal syndrome
111 hich results in a semiclonal or clonal shrub growth form that appears to be ubiquitous in global dese
112 ons between budding, pseudohyphal and hyphal growth forms that promote the virulence of this pathogen
114 pathogen Candida albicans switches from one growth form to another; at the same time, insights are b
115 ements are rarely coupled empirically across growth forms to identify whether belowground strategies
116 integrated with the functional axis of plant growth forms to study phenotypic convergence along large
117 nse caveolin-1 exhibit anchorage-independent growth, form tumors in immunodeficient mice and show hyp
118 se in flowering activity may persist in some growth forms until checked by nutrient limitation or by
122 out after fire and/or have graminoid or herb growth forms were particularly affected by postfire weat
123 e the potential relationships of climate and growth form with total ray and axial parenchyma fraction
124 al of the ubiquitous coral, Porites (massive growth form), with variable survival (15 to 61%) across