ライフサイエンスコーパス: guess

1 guess and, when possible, a reason for their guess.

2 h is significantly better than 10% by random guess.

3 mental data, and could be characterized as a guess.

4 vers by using ROM's prediction as an initial guess.

5 onal methods without the need for an initial guess.

6 rrelation matrices alone to make an informed guess.

7 of unattended training from a random initial guess.

8 ulated according to treatment assignment and guess.

9 fast and relatively insensitive to starting guesses.

10 ld not perform better on average than random guesses.

11 or an actor and rated the certainty of their guesses.

12 accelerated by providing appropriate initial guesses.

13 ere equally certain of their right and wrong guesses.

14 e frequency of previous occurrences in their guesses.

15 have otherwise diverged with default initial guesses.

16 sponse times, and the distribution of second guesses.

17 secondary progressive MS better than random guessing.

18 h performed significantly better than random guessing.

19 ccurate and not statistically different from guessing.

20 hout experimental evidence (37.0%) or random guess (1.2%), demonstrating the importance of data quali

21 s aspect, we asked 218 adult participants to guess 50 parents' words from (muted) videos of their int

22 nd 2 types of generative AI images vs random guessing (57.0% [212 of 372]; OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.04-1.6

23 was thus compared for real images vs random guessing (60.3% [188 of 312]; OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.15-2.0

24 y marginal accuracy improvements over random guessing, a more detailed analysis reveals that particip

25 ower of NGS to be realized without having to guess about sampling depth or to ignore the problem of P

26 hidden Markov models (HMMs) based on a first guess about the importance of various residues.

27 ine Drawing Task, during which they reported guesses about the drawings' identities and made choices

28 The chapter then concludes with some guesses about the future of the field.

29 that are too brief to be recognized, or even guessed above chance on a forced-choice test, nonetheles

30 Quantitative modeling supported the fast guess account over accounts of payoff effects supported

31 Consistent with a fast guess account, fast responses were strongly biased towar

32 (unique guesses across participants) and on guess accuracy.

33 fidence depended on stimulus entropy (unique guesses across participants) and on guess accuracy.

34 known 3D structure, whether the most likely guesses agree with the observed domain structure.

35 concentrated on a few cells around the best-guess allele counts.

36 2: The brain uses a 'guess and check' heuristic in which visual feedback that

37 y decodable representations of participants' guess and response.

38 based mass peak width parameter as the first guess and self-adjusts to fit the data.

39 ed a confidence level (scale, 0-10) for each guess and, when possible, a reason for their guess.

40 2, participants had agency in the timing of guesses and choices.

41 refinement from reasonable initial structure guesses and it is not clear, a priori, that sufficient i

42 ses in a global dynamic ecosystem model, LPJ-GUESS, and preserves the model-simulated pools and fluxe

43 ases could be assigned correctly by randomly guessing, and as many as 32% could be recognised by triv

44 all aspects of the data, including apparent guessing, and outperforms slot models in formal model co

45 nts, the effects of random processes such as guessing, and the rate at which students appear in and d

46 ere, to solve this problem but avoid tedious guess-and-check experimentation, we built a virtual libr

47 l method optimization (e.g., univariate and "guess-and-check") can be time-consuming, costly, and oft

48 oach to resynchronization represents a "best guess" approach to achieving resynchronization by observ

49 These fast guesses are responses with chance accuracy and response

50 y possible with this method when the initial guesses are sufficiently close to the true values.

51 ms, CotQuest does not require users to input guesses as to the final values of parameters; rather, it

52 e uncorrected analysis was worse than random guess at some thresholds.

53 Although one can guess at the functions of these novel enzymes by conside

54 We can only guess at the kinds of organisms that will benefit from t

55 uence and secondary structure information to guess at the number of possible amino acids that could a

56 s circuits on the basis of the brain's "best guess" at the initial configuration of connections neces

57 its significance was compared with a random guess (AUC = 0.5) using the Noether test.

58 programming are often identified by informed guesses based on differential gene expression or known r

59 y classified into 3 strategies: (1) educated guesses based on known signaling pathways essential for

60 gned to one of three conditions: pretesting (guessing before reading), posttesting (retrieving after

61 , and 270 degrees ) using 3 techniques (best guess [BG], light reflex [LR], and a ruler measuring [RU

62 carbon monoxide (the worst possible initial guess), BO finds the global maximum of the available boi

63 go in the next few years is almost anybody's guess, but that it will move forward is a certainty.

64 When humans are trained to guess by observing only four labeled photos, their accur

65 We find that individual guesses by humans achieve 58.3% accuracy, better than ra

66 organizations should encourage more "theory-guessing" by budding young scientists, rather than incen

67 provide observational data to assist in best guess clinical practices.

68 In the listening and guessing condition, only a subgroup who reported eye con

69 automatic differentiation, with high-quality guesses constructed by minimizing a trajectory-dependent

70 sed approach to derive representative ("best guess") contaminant concentrations from data with censor

71 improvement at days 14 and 30 than did those guessing control (day 14, P = .02; day 30, P < .001).

72 women, children, and US soldiers; and second-guessing decisions.

73 Both variability and guessing decreased with the reduction in the number of o

74 Most people opt to stay with their initial guess, despite the fact that switching doubles the proba

75 r sequences up to 400 residues long and that guessing domain boundaries in this way can improve the s

76 versus control livers to design an "educated guess" drug screen, which led to the identification of n

77 mized trials is penetrable-since clinician's guesses exceed chance-and that only active placebo can a

78 ation bias is suggested by raters' treatment guesses exceeding chance.

79 We performed a probability guessing experiment with two split-brain patients and fo

80 In a probability guessing experiment, subjects try to guess which of two

81 t eliminate, reviewers' ability to correctly guess features of identity.

82 o methods can be used to generate an initial guess for those paths.

83 using the iMD-VR-sampled pathways as initial guesses for defining a path-based reaction coordinate fr

84 s up DFT calculations through better initial guesses for magnetic moments, determines the ground-stat

85 Using random initial guesses for the IRF, the NMF filter simultaneously recov

86 SHAP)-can provably fail to improve on random guessing for inferring model behavior.

87 Although typically used in the context of guessing friendships in social media, several applicatio

88 e were around ~50% similar to that of random guess from a one-sample binomial test.

89 esent emerging features that are not easy to guess from the elementary interactions of their microsco

90 r wrong answers on these examinations deters guessing from women more than men, disadvantaging female

91 Twenty human participants played a card guessing game for shared monetary outcomes with three pa

92 reversed reward probabilities during a card guessing game, dopamine release is observed in associati

93 sit 1-3 weeks later, they completed a reward-guessing game, the 'Doors' task, during fMRI in a drug-f

94 Using guessing games at the same kiosk, we find that children

95 ive reward properties within two independent guessing games.

96 on, which will present (to whom?) an optimal guess, given previous encodings of the environment - old

97 to select the correct answer alternative, or guess if it is unknown.

98 They guessed if each interviewee was a patient or an actor an

99 l was the result of driving subjects to fast guess in their experiment.

100 nment correctly; both groups allocated their guesses in similar proportions.

101 heir experiment encouraged and produced fast guesses in the higher speed-stress conditions.

102 ems seems to be refuted by the appearance of guessing in human responses.

103 ere participants and the experimenter had to guess, in turn, a word known by the other individual.

104 ary choice, they also had to report a second guess, indicating which of the remaining options they wo

105 re much smaller than that rendered by random guessing, indicating the existence of the correlation re

106 del, based on the assumption that the second guess is determined by the rank ordering of accumulated

107 It is demonstrated that this best guess is more accurate than those generated by other, de

108 ability to unity, thereby beating the random guessing limit.

109 eserve conscious vision, but show erroneous 'guess' localization of visual stimuli, poor saccades and

110 We have also implemented a 'best-guess' mapping algorithm for UniProt.

111 ecognition memory is mediated by a detect-or-guess mental-state model without recourse to concepts of

112 Here, we propose fortuna, a method that guesses novel combinations of annotated splice sites to

113 was not significantly different from random guessing (odds ratio [OR], 0.94; 95% CI, 0.69-1.29; P =

114 on per year, may be too low, and that a best guess of 150-175 petagrams of carbon per year better ref

115 Our findings (1) confirm an early guess of Dr.

116 solution from a random start in the initial guess of model parameters (i.e., rate constants and init

117 s prognostic estimate and a surrogate's best guess of that estimate); differences in belief (any diff

118 to transform a crude and trivially generated guess of the molecular density into an accurate ground-s

119 these models untrainable if no good initial guess of the optimal parameters is known.

120 a surrogate's actual estimate and their best guess of the physician's estimate).

121 ic definition, but only allow an approximate guess of the tumor histopathology.

122 od is parameter-free and requires no initial guesses of charge states, total mass, or subunit mass.

123 ly influenced by biosphere model-based first guesses of seasonal and annual mean fluxes.

124 widefield fluorescence images provides only guesses of spatial frequency information along the optic

125 The output of this algorithm is the "best guess" of the imputed image, and a pixel-wise image of v

126 scious object identification, but preserved 'guess' of the location of a stimulus, preserved reflexiv

127 le pathways of small systems without initial guesses on pathways.

128 standing of how the brain makes 'intelligent guesses' on the basis of limited information to form vis

129 response would generally be classified as a guess or report of an incorrect item, suggesting that su

130 ven the option of staying with their initial guess or switching to the other unopened door.

131 rrors and have been attributed previously to guesses or variability in precision are shown to arise a

132 al expression being displayed, but could not guess other types of emotional or non-emotional stimuli.

133 were not significantly different from random guessing (P = .70 and .28 for 3D and 2D images, respecti

134 The slope, location, and guessing parameters determined reasonable accurate items

135 to identify intermediate structures along a guess path.

136 This process frequently amounts to 'guessing' PCR primers on top of unreliable gene predicti

137 are extremely close to equilibrium (accurate-guessing) predictions, and shift as payoffs change, just

138 The findings suggest that a fast guess process, biased by payoff and triggered by stimulu

139 block neither above nor below chance but by guessing randomly.

140 To counteract AEB, we introduce the Correct Guess Rate Curve (CGRC), a statistical tool that can est

141 evealed that video game players have a lower guessing rate than CONs, and higher drift rates than CON

142 nversely, PD was associated only with higher guessing rates.

143 tatistics-based methods rely on global 'best guess' reference panels to model the genetic correlation

144 as opposed to the current standard of 'best guess' reference panels, we observed a 28% decrease in m

145 s model succeeds, provided that his original guesses regarding the values of two parameters of his mo

146 pants were scanned while performing a number guessing reward task that included the periods of win an

147 l than deterministic forecasts using a 'best guess' scenario to address this sort of problem.

148 These second guesses show a distribution that is consistent with subj

149 are thus more likely to rely on explanatory "guesses." Specifically, we investigated whether scientif

150 eemingly the resultant of mixing this stable guessing state with an additional stable detect state.

151 unambiguously interpreted as arising from a guessing state.

152 all tasks successfully, without resorting to guessing strategies or responding to continuous variable

153 they improve task performance over a random guessing strategy.

154 ctions, even when the quality of the initial guess structures are degraded, while reducing the number

155 hastened behavioral responses, and increased guess switching, consistent with the idea that reward ab

156 ERP responses to win and loss feedback in a guessing task and to pleasant versus neutral pictures in

157 ERP responses to win and loss feedback in a guessing task and to pleasant versus neutral pictures in

158 eted a functional magnetic resonance imaging guessing task involving monetary reward.

159 A rewarded guessing task was conducted during each scan to evaluate

160 nctional magnetic resonance imaging during a guessing task with monetary reward, genotyping for two P

161 ard positivity was measured using a monetary guessing task, their current depressive symptoms were as

162 s use different strategies when performing a guessing task.

163 the decision-maker can even report a second guess that is clearly informed by the sensory evidence.

164 s to the converged solutions with an initial guess that is closer to the real solutions.

165 This is an educated guess that may be helpful in planning the treatment of p

166 e to learn the whole of the sequence, cannot guess the bit value correctly.

167 ocess, state inference, requires an agent to guess the current state of the world given a set of obse

168 draw beads from one of two hidden jars or to guess the identity of the hidden jar, in order to minimi

169 tion of motion; instead, the goalkeeper must guess the likely direction of the kick, and dive in anti

170 This property might be used to guess the locations of protein domain boundaries.

171 the number of dots they contain and then to guess the respective number of dots in each image.

172 ical blindness, could nevertheless correctly guess the type of emotional facial expression being disp

173 trol subjects performed the task, where they guessed the colour of the next marble drawn from a jar b

174 visual system) tells you whether or not you guessed the location correctly, and you use this informa

175 ves all measured time-domain data points and guesses the missing data points by an iterative process.

176 onally, the blinded markers were tasked with guessing the authorship of the submissions on a four-poi

177 Guessing the boundaries of structural domains has been a

178 h language were more accurate than chance at guessing the intended referent of the vocalizations for

179 prediction markets for economic derivatives (guessing the values of important macroeconomic statistic

180 When asked to rate jokes and guess their likeliest source, participants evaluate joke

181 e associated with the ability of patients to guess their treatment allocation correctly-namely, treat

182 n and comparator were masked, and only ~ 40% guessed their group assignment with no difference in acc

183 At multiple times up to 1 month, patients guessed their treatment allocation (vertebroplasty or co

184 36.8% of participants guessed their treatment assignment correctly; both group

185 reatment was vertebroplasty versus those who guessed their treatment was control intervention.

186 in pain score differed between patients who guessed their treatment was vertebroplasty versus those

187 haracteristics of the patients and correctly guessing their randomized treatment assignment.

188 and beckoning forth a cilium-who would have guessed this is how polarized epithelial cells coordinat

189 gorithm has been developed to assign initial guesses throughout an image based on a segmentation anal

190 ere simulated starting from a random initial guess to confirm the capabilities of our model and appro

191 al sensors, post-impact examination and best-guess to glaze our vehicles.

192 tinuously as it transitioned from uninformed guesses to informed choices as a function of processing

193 (MS), where the infectious agent is unknown, guesses to its identity are made.

194 hat our human participants often made a fast guess toward the higher reward rather than integrating s

195 Most patients and raters accurately guessed treatment allocation.

196 aseline factor significantly associated with guessing treatment correctly at 14 days (P < .01).

197 with an explicate dependency on the initial guess values.

198 Control patients guessing vertebroplasty had significantly greater pain i

199 The second guess was clearly informed by the amounts of sensory evi

200 ationship between change in pain and patient guess was noted.

201 was assessed via heartbeat tapping when: (1) guessing was allowed; (2) guessing was not allowed; and

202 tapping when: (1) guessing was allowed; (2) guessing was not allowed; and (3) experiencing an intero

203 ected feedback about whether trial-and-error guesses were correct or incorrect.

204 veloped a simple mixture model in which fast guesses were represented by a simple normal distribution

205 Qualitative reasons for guesses were tabulated according to treatment assignment

206 nding on the role in the dyad: listening and guessing were associated with increased eye contact comp

207 s of an object with another probed item) and guessing were computed.

208 ilst in AD lower target detection and higher guessing were the main sources of error.

209 First, the researcher does not have to guess what the regulatory sequences of a gene are, as te

210 times difficult since the endoscopist has to guess where the tip is.

211 cruited via an English-language website, who guessed whether each vocalization was infant-directed.

212 hose where to reach, yet were at chance when guessing whether the reach was chosen or directed.

213 r reporting their use, leaving biologists to guess which details and files are relevant.

214 follow-up visits, participants were asked to guess which intervention they received.

215 robability puzzle in which a player tries to guess which of three doors conceals a desirable prize.

216 n probability puzzle in which players try to guess which of three doors conceals a prize.

217 ability guessing experiment, subjects try to guess which of two events will occur next.

218 to one of two peripheral targets, and had to guess which target would ultimately receive the majority

219 s on each trial and, under a timed deadline, guessed which one concealed a smiling face.

220 er conversing with each candidate, the judge guesses which one is the real human.

221 luid without the necessity of determining or guessing which other protein components may be competito

222 ct (CMIP5) models to form priors as a "first guess", which are then updated using satellite observati

223 fast deconvolution process generates initial guesses, which are further refined by least squares fitt

224 lus posture but did not detect the mismatch, guessing with a response bias or responding on the basis

225 thetic MIPs by the raters was akin to random guessing with an AUC of 0.58.

226 of 54 patients offered 64 reasons for their guesses, with 16 (25%) reasons based on procedural exper

227 mpounds is usually based on ad hoc qualified guesses, with computational methods playing a lesser rol

228 and esterified sterols allowed to hazard the guess, worthy of further investigations, that esterified