ライフサイエンスコーパス: guild

1 tes infecting different tissue types (across guild).

2 ry occur at higher rates than into any other guild.

3 also on other arthropods in the same trophic guild.

4 ic competition in the East African carnivore guild.

5 orest in Borneo in relation to their feeding guild.

6 introduced species from their own functional guild.

7 niche shift in the smallest predator of the guild.

8 a competitive position within the predatory guild.

9 d relationship between body size and trophic guild.

10 ts to the non-vector within the same feeding guild.

11 he convergent origins of the ectomycorrhizal guild.

12 es were not evenly distributed among trophic guilds.

13 t patterns of animals from different feeding guilds.

14 ity structure in the euhaline and polyhaline guilds.

15 sation on non-natives within certain feeding guilds.

16 haline, mesohaline, polyhaline, and euhaline guilds.

17 he effectiveness of individual natural enemy guilds.

18 niche partitioning within and among congener guilds.

19 atus with training by apprenticeship through guilds.

20 lant quality vary within and between feeding guilds.

21 C. tigris is the smaller species in whiptail guilds.

22 the activity relationships within and among guilds.

23 pulations into heterotrophic and autotrophic guilds.

24 , decreases in 2 and no change in 7 foraging guilds.

25 en converging in association with pollinator guilds.

26 showed no clear relationship with pollinator guilds.

27 larger lineages in less-saturated herbivore guilds.

28 nses of tomato accessions to the two feeding guilds.

29 across both ectomycorrhizal and saprotrophic guilds.

30 ogical knowledge across multiple interacting guilds.

31 ong regions reflecting body mass and trophic guilds.

32 of specific methanogenic and methanotrophic guilds.

33 MBA in assessing the diversity of individual guilds.

34 physiological diversity exist within trophic guilds.

35 ce among herbivorous and predatory arthropod guilds.

36 y by mediating effects of multiple herbivore guilds.

37 n for overlapping resources within predatory guilds.

38 in primary producer, herbivore, and omnivore guilds.

39 ptiles exhibit the smoothest textures of all guilds.

40 rent mycorrhizal types and endophytic fungal guilds.

41 on by invertebrate and vertebrate scavenging guilds.

42 t of host was similar among all other fungal guilds.

43 partitioning the niches among species within guilds.

44 inked to a unique mouthpart type and feeding guild [4-9].

45 nd no negative pairwise correlations between guild abundances per plot, suggestive of weak signals of

46 Within families and guilds across carnivores and lizards, and with both intr

47 ican migratory bird species in seven dietary guilds across the full annual cycle using eBird occurren

48 reenness by migratory birds in other dietary guilds, across the full extent of their annual distribut

49 een mutualist species in the same functional guild affect the outcome of mutualistic interactions wit

50 pecies, the redistribution of the pollinator guild affected mostly the other plants with high visitor

51 odependency', whereby the composition of one guild affects the composition of the other.

52 s for coping with feast-famine cycles, these guilds align host metabolism with dietary patterns.

53 isitors to beans and potential natural enemy guilds also made use of non-crop plants, including pesti

54 r could be mediated by three major bacterial guilds: anaerobic VC-dechlorinators, methanotrophs, and

55 a commissioned group portrait of a surgeons' guild and an account of a public dissection.

56 onses of subordinate species within the same guild and challenge a widespread perception that lions u

57 nsitive to changing urban form at a species, guild and community level, so are ideal model organisms

58 were linked to habitat preferences, dietary guild and flocking behaviours.

59 ch interaction, which is selected for within-guild and is equivalent to playing the role of responder

60 ts helps to maintain coexistence within this guild and whether foraging modality can be used as a tra

61 ed with 2 main life-history traits: foraging guild and whether the species was solitary or gregarious

62 s to be stronger between than within feeding guilds and affects specialists as much as generalists.

63 and reproducible approach to define trophic guilds and apply recent advances in machine learning to

64 n use network analysis to identify 8 trophic guilds and Bayesian phylogenetic modeling to show that t

65 chanisms, a high degree of mutualism in both guilds and coexistence of more mutualistic and more expl

66 We classified mammals into trophic guilds and compared resource use (in terms of C(3)- and

67 fect of trap types and design features among guilds and families of forest insects would facilitate t

68 alyses to examine patterns in effects across guilds and families; we observed the following general p

69 availability cause replacement of functional guilds and functional changes within taxa.

70 in wide-ranging magnitudes of effects across guilds and functional groups.

71 Because competition is important in many guilds and humans are affecting resources of many types,

72 methylation genes across microbial metabolic guilds and indicate that primary degradation of polysacc

73 l change can differentially impact scavenger guilds and rates of carrion decomposition, our framework

74 bsequent recovery unevenly distributed among guilds and taxa.

75 ic connection between the growth kinetics of guilds and the dynamics of microbial populations.

76 co-infection by other haemoparasites (within guild) and (ii) effects of parasites infecting different

77 74 and 2002, and quantified intra- and inter-guild, and annual variation in diet between and within f

78 asite ecology at the individual, population, guild, and community scales.

79 s of mutualism on ecosystems at the species, guild, and whole-community levels.

80 ies representing different mobility, feeding guilds, and habitats were tested, through laboratory inc

81 nces in environmental filtering, pollination guilds, and relatedness, UAPs are omnipresent and there

82 rates and lower speciation rates than other guilds, and that overall net diversification is negative

83 ging decisions to develop more comprehensive guild- and community-level insights.

84 udes, whereas specialized grazer and browser guilds appear to predominate in tropical savannas.

85 e of other guild members, all species in the guild are coexisting, even though they all are ecologica

86 ld haplotypes, and the origins of ecological guilds are concentrated early in the radiation.

87 ractions within and between species in these guilds are expected to produce ecological drift versus c

88 were associated with the magnitude to which guilds are functionally resolved.

89 use insular communities are depauperate, and guilds are species-poor, it is often assumed that enhanc

90 within the mammaliaform insectivore feeding guild, as inferred from the range of body sizes.

91 on and diversity of the vertebrate scavenger guild, as well as carrion detection and consumption rate

92 results in the smallest projected changes to guild assemblages, but with significant losses for some

93 Based on FunGuild ecological guild assignments, saprotrophic and mycotrophic endophyt

94 of less defended mimics the three predatory guilds avoid the mimics because of the additive influenc

95 the highest average wood density among tree guilds based on dispersal mode.

96 leads to inconsistent definitions of trophic guilds based on expert opinion, especially when applied

97 Our guild-based approach, which is genome specific, database

98 Losses of functional guilds because of shifts in global climate may disrupt m

99 t during different seasons and for different guilds because of variation in resource availability and

100 chemical conditions, with diversity of these guilds being unique to each TMV.

101 Direction of change depended on trophic guild but was opposite between stable-isotope and stomac

102 SRB were confirmed as a methylating guild by amendment experiments showing significant sulfa

103 ted for convergence in LPJ shape and trophic guild by mapping the phylogeny onto the principal compon

104 ble to exercise partner choice can benefit a guild by selecting for mutualism in its partners, but is

105 s niche availability within these ecological guilds by regulating nutrient availability.

106 n phylogenetic modeling to show that trophic guilds can be predicted based on phylogeny and maximum b

107 omparative population genetics of ecological guilds can reveal generalities in patterns of differenti

108 ion and extinction dynamics of avian dietary guilds (carnivores, frugivores, granivores, herbivores,

109 Guild change was directly related to forest spatial chan

110 6 leaf traits and leaf damage by four insect guilds (chewers, gall formers, leaf miners and rollers)

111 heory to predict volatile induction: feeding guild (chewing arthropods > sap feeders), diet breadth (

112 We found that within guild co-infections were the strongest predictors of hae

113 a(15) N in chick feathers identified a three-guild community structure that was constant over a 13-ye

114 ing conventional diet data identified a four-guild community structure, distinguishing species that m

115 in geographically heterogeneous patterns of guild compensation.

116 amined mechanisms involved in reducing intra-guild competition and allowing coexistence of four avian

117 ot, suggestive of weak signals of both inter-guild competition and top-down regulation of herbivores

118 nity-weighted mean body size and the feeding guild composition of invaded arthropod communities was c

119 ained the largest proportion of variation in guild composition, confirming species sorting (i.e., env

120 embly, and lead to greater homogenization of guild composition, especially in northern Asia and Afric

121 regulate migratory behaviour across dietary guilds, consumer levels and migration tactics.

122 Relative abundance of the lotic guilds declined in the two closer reaches, but increased

123 estedness, which did not differ among fungal guilds, declined significantly with increasing mean annu

124 limit across continents, orders, and trophic guilds, despite differences in geological and climatic h

125 ng that N(2)O affected susceptible microbial guilds differently.

126 r, overlap among predator-prey or competitor guilds does not vary with disturbance, suggesting that n

127 Inoculation with symbionts from different guilds (e.g. mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia) yields stro

128 lized interactions with different pollinator guilds (e.g., bees, butterflies, birds), motivating the

129 Three clusters form from different microbial guilds, each one encompassing one gene involved in CO2 f

130 e overlap is not everything; complex feeding guild effects indicate important indirect interactions.

131 In contrast, the evidence for across-guild effects of parasites utilizing different tissue on

132 icrowear textural analysis (DMTA) to dietary guilds encompassing both archosaurian and lepidosaurian

133 Triassic predatory guild evolution reflects a period of ecological flux spu

134 Apart from Neotropical insectivores, guilds exhibited consistent cross-regional activity in r

135 rally correlated with patterns in stability: guilds exhibited less variation in abundance in low-inte

136 microbiome: the health-promoting foundation guild (FG) and the proinflammatory pathobiont guild (PG)

137 Hosts and parasitoids are a popular guild for study, and quantitative webs have traditionall

138 ssociated with a shift within the functional guild for syntrophic propionate oxidation, with Firmicut

139 disagree on the assignment of broad trophic guilds for more than 20% of species, which hampers compa

140 und broad support across an array of dietary guilds for phenological coupling between vegetation gree

141 s study samples ecologically dominant fungal guilds for which there were previously no symbiotic geno

142 outcomes as dispersal distance and degree of guild functional resolution increase.

143 odulate these effects: diet breadth, feeding guild, habitat/environment, type of bottom-up effects, t

144 Competition between these two fungal guilds has long been hypothesized to lead to suppression

145 To the extent that intact ungulate guilds help to suppress populations of small animals tha

146 Among functional guilds, herbivores are disproportionately likely to be d

147 their interactions with species outside the guild (i.e. resources, predators, mutualists).

148 Conversely, some initial functional guilds (i.e. endophytes and yeasts) persisted all along

149 Distribution of species among foraging guilds (i.e. insectivore, frugivore, omnivore, nectivore

150 for the further study of this key N-cycling guild in all estuarine systems.

151 the C4 grass functional guild, the dominant guild in nearby native grasslands, reduced the major lim

152 n scavenging patterns in a complex scavenger guild in Southwestern Montana.

153 e only clear representatives of this trophic guild in the Mesozoic have been an enigmatic and apparen

154 active sulfur-oxidizing and sulfate-reducing guilds in all four TMVs across a range of physiochemical

155 All guilds in HMLs except insectivores presented larger isot

156 ctions among fungi from different functional guilds in host plants in field conditions.

157 engers in one of the most diverse scavenging guilds in Masai Mara National Reserve, Kenya.

158 interconnected by the activity of different guilds in sediments or wastewater treatment systems.

159 ocodylomorphs ascending to top-tier predator guilds in the equatorial regions of Pangea prior to the

160 production of insects within the planthopper guild, including the brown planthopper (BPH) Nilaparvata

161 All major guilds, including those involved in pest control, pollin

162 this study, we investigate the role of intra-guild indirect interactions and adaptive foraging in sha

163 , and 2) a motif analysis tracking the intra-guild indirect interactions of colonizing species throug

164 thods to study the effects of species' intra-guild indirect interactions on community assembly.

165 scale-how interactions between the different guilds influence their growth and spatial distribution,

166 lt from competition within and among dietary guilds, influenced by the deep-time availability and pre

167 derstand how the reduction of this scavenger guild influences the fate of carrion resources and effic

168 ation distance within the context of dietary guild (insectivore and omnivore) and level of dietary pl

169 Inter-guild interaction strengths did not vary with mean annua

170 ally on functional diversity and patterns of guild interaction, regardless of species richness.

171 the densities of bird species and functional guilds involved in pest control and seed dispersal incre

172 ing (SIP) was used to identify the bacterial guilds involved in utilizing (13)C-biphenyl (unchlorinat

173 modating any number of microbial species (or guilds) involved.

174 at the number of species in an assemblage or guild is a poor proxy for the intensity of interspecific

175 sectivores is especially timely because this guild is experiencing the steepest and most widespread d

176 nse signaling to different herbivore feeding guilds is emerging.

177 One such guild, large mammalian herbivores, are well-known ecosys

178 tified 23 oak gall wasp morphotypes in three guilds (leaf detachable, leaf integral, and stem galls).

179 creasing the likelihood of a bird species or guild learning to associate that pattern with harmless p

180 entional process model calibrated at the NOB guild level.

181 uthors found mixed responses at the foraging guild level.

182 played a role in underpinning community- and guild-level responses, with disturbances associated with

183 he existence of five estuarine salinity fish guilds: limnetic (salinity = 0-1), oligohaline (salinity

184 ronology, and the study of panel maker's and guild marks on the painting's reverse to gain insights i

185 ity in thermal affinity within the piscivore guild may therefore buffer against the impact of warming

186 In contrast, if each guild member directly limits itself more than it limits

187 its density-dependent effects on every other guild member.

188 ctions between ecto- and ericoid mycorrhizal guild members appear to determine the late-stage organic

189 f more than it limits the abundance of other guild members, all species in the guild are coexisting,

190 relatedness, physical proximity and feeding-guild membership.

191 e also found that larger members of the same guild moved less than smaller members, supporting the 'g

192 for nine bat species from different feeding guilds (nectarivory, frugivory, sanguivory, piscivory, c

193 tal mercury concentrations in eggs, foraging guild, nor to a species life history strategy as charact

194 il a faunal turnover redefined apex predator guild occupancy during the final 20 million years of the

195 Initial declines among these guilds occurred prior to the arrival of the now-widespre

196 f invertivorous birds (but not other trophic guilds) occurs, on average, at 960 m, ca. 450 m higher t

197 Foraging guild of a species did explain near significant variatio

198 xperiment showed that in a tropical island's guild of army ant-following birds, a new behavioural phe

199 This Guild of Barbers and Surgeons, forerunner of the Royal C

200 Despite the exclusion of an entire guild of dominant scavengers, we saw little effect on sc

201 e empirical testing, we consider models of a guild of ecologically equivalent competitors feeding on

202 h and the plasticity of foraging traits in a guild of generalist predators of arthropods with a range

203 insect-host plant associations for an entire guild of insect herbivores using plant DNA extracted fro

204 Using a guild of larval trematode parasites (six species) and an

205 n of an apex predator impacts an established guild of mesopredators.

206 exchange of goods and/or services, where one guild of mutualists plays the role of proposer (proposin

207 This study examined interactions between a guild of obligate and opportunistic coral-feeding butter

208 By quantifying transmission of an entire guild of parasites (larval trematodes) within 902 amphib

209 date or parasitize olive flies, one from the guild of parasitoids (Psyttalia concolor) and two from t

210 itoids (Psyttalia concolor) and two from the guild of predators (Pardosa spider species and the rove

211 Lygodactylus keniensis) and invertebrate (a guild of symbiotic Acacia ants) animal species in a semi

212 caused ~94% of the competitive deaths in the guild of trematodes infecting its host snail in its inva

213 ata from Plasmodium falciparum, we show that guilds of ApiAP2 genes are expressed in different stages

214 ars, of the status and trends of seven major guilds of carnivores, herbivores, and architectural spec

215 ritical experiments necessary to disentangle guilds of ecologically equivalent species from those exp

216 erent sorghum compartments and in functional guilds of fungi.

217 ulating mir1 expression to different feeding guilds of insect herbivores.

218 tic conservatism of herbivory by two feeding guilds of insects (leaf chewers and leaf miners) and 11

219 dentifies the mechanisms associated with two guilds of insects - bark beetles and defoliators - which

220 ed communities of trees, butterflies and two guilds of moths in the disturbed and undisturbed forests

221 f plant species (1) associating with similar guilds of mycorrhizal fungi, (2) of increasing phylogene

222 and pervasive host switching among foraging guilds of obligate carnivores; (ii) mammalian carnivores

223 Both major feeding guilds of parrotfishes (scrapers and excavators) exhibit

224 gly, co-occurrence networks among functional guilds of rhizosphere fungi and leaf bacteria were stren

225 Less known is whether guilds of shared seed predators can induce a negative de

226 equencing to address the feedback of various guilds of soil fungi on the density dependence of trees.

227 experiments have documented the existence of guilds of such neutral species embedded in real food web

228 ungal endophytes are one of the most diverse guilds of symbiotic fungi found in the photosynthetic ti

229 However, its impact on guilds of vole-eating predators remains unknown.

230 In terms of functional guilds, on Norikura there were trends towards increased

231 rmation are essential at species, ecological guild or reproductive group levels to help derive sustai

232 ligible impact on on-target organisms in the guilds or predators and parasitoids.

233 endent of ecology (i.e., body mass, foraging guild, or initial abundance) or phylogenetic affiliation

234 Microbial guilds, particularly from the Lachnospiraceae and Prevot

235 he production of goods and services, such as guilds, partnerships and modern corporations, have domin

236 uild (FG) and the proinflammatory pathobiont guild (PG).

237 al wounding or by insects of various feeding guilds (piercing aphids, generalist chewing caterpillars

238 etition among species from different thermal guilds played little part in limiting tropicalisation, r

239 s trend was consistent for different trophic guilds (primary producers, grazers, filter feeders, pred

240 , all beneficial for diatom biodiversity and guilds producing high biomass.

241 ies flocks based on co-occurrence models and guild proportionality models suggest that competitive in

242 bly models: (i) co-occurrence patterns; (ii) guild proportionality; and (iii) constant body-size rati

243 is retrieved through transitions from other guilds rather than from omnivore speciation.

244 However, there were no consistent size- or guild-related trends, no two tropical forests had identi

245 his study, we identified the major microbial guilds responsible for Hg methylation along a trophic gr

246 Detailed analyses of functional guilds revealed different prediction patterns for differ

247 ent large marine ecosystem, several predator guilds seasonally undertake north-south migrations that

248 above- and belowground taxa from 14 trophic guilds spanning a disturbance and resource availability

249 in resources resulted in season-specific and guild-specific distributional patterns.

250 teraction data are typically habitat- and/or guild-specific, exactly how those interactions connect h

251 in the dark septate endophyte, ERM, and ECM guilds strongly correlated with permafrost N uptake for

252 data did not provide evidence of changes in guild structure associated with a suggested decline in A

253 We examined guild structure changes at coarse (primary, high-level,

254 nmental niche-based changes to their dietary guild structure under 0, 500, and 2000 km-dispersal dist

255 d theories involving resource heterogeneity, guild structure, resource partitioning, resource utiliza

256 Distinct metabolic guild structures are observed for the subglacial populat

257 Soil fungi belonging to different functional guilds, such as saprotrophs, pathogens, and mycorrhizal

258 with significant losses for some regions and guilds, such as South American insectivores.

259 structural patterns across latitude and host guilds, suggesting that there may be basic rules for how

260 ed groups has remarkable similarities to the guild system of the middle ages.

261 cularly in understudied terrestrial systems, guilds, taxonomic groups and top-down controls (e.g. pat

262 connected bacteria, we reveal two competing guilds (TCG) as the resilient core of the microbiome: th

263 ometimes greater across grazing and browsing guilds than within them.

264 core bacterial members aggregate into stable guilds that contributed to phosphatase activity.

265 ron acceptors, which dictates the ecological guilds that dominate distinct gut regions.

266 but the consequences of this for soil fungal guilds that mediate key ecosystem functions remain uncle

267 rbivores, omnivores, and carnivores were the guilds that most incorporated C(4) carbon in HMLs.

268 ganisms are commonly grouped into ecological guilds that reflect their shared resource use and simila

269 esence and relative abundance of five insect guilds that we define.

270 Furthermore, functional guilds that were not abundant initially became enriched

271 Residents of the C4 grass functional guild, the dominant guild in nearby native grasslands, r

272 xtratropical), taxonomic groups, and trophic guilds throughout the Eocene-Oligocene (ca. 56 to 23 Ma)

273 To identify metabolically active BLO guilds, tidal microcosms were spiked with six (13)C-labe

274 ty models for 26 species and 3 multi-species guilds using distance sampling methodology.

275 partitioned species into generalized trophic guilds using published stomach content analyses and quan

276 Effects on feeding guilds vary according to type of fungi; for example, aph

277 Dietary guilds vary considerably in their global geographic prev

278 Despite differences in feeding guilds, we found that transcriptional responses of Arabi

279 flowering time, plant height, and ecological guild were examined.

280 n after 15 Myr of ecosystem rebuilding, some guilds were apparently still absent-small fish-eaters, s

281 not geographic co-occurrence patterns among guilds were associated with the magnitude to which guild

282 periment, species in each of four functional guilds were introduced, as seed, into 147 prairie-grassl

283 d dispersing, insect eating, and pollinating guilds were more resilient to low-intensity land use tha

284 e utilization of all tested organic compound guilds were observed after fungal exposure to food prese

285 from the three major VC-degrading bacterial guilds were present in 99% and expressed in 59% of the s

286 ated by macroinvertebrates in all functional guilds were split roughly 50:50 between terrestrial and

287 ng bacterial and fungal diversity and fungal guilds, were predominantly regulated by changes in soil

288 .05, FDR corrected) in plant pathogen fungal guilds which represented 19% of the fungal community.

289 duces co-occurrences within and among fungal guilds, which could have important consequences for belo

290 odel, there are both costs and benefits to a guild whose players have control over interactions.

291 overing a wider range of species and feeding guilds, will be essential to further our understanding o

292 t high demands (and so for mutualism) in the guild with control.

293 co-occur, they comprise a powerful predatory guild with synergistic impacts.

294 nd per capita interactions among autotrophic guilds with respect to seasonal patterns.

295 ete Eunice norvegica occupy the same trophic guild, with high delta(13)C signatures (-14.00 +/- 1.08

296 daptations based on rarity, size and feeding guild, with more nocturnality among the 59 rarer special

297 mmunity development across all major trophic guilds, with a doubling in overall abundance and 50% gre

298 idespread declines across a range of trophic guilds, with subsequent recovery unevenly distributed am

299 Since these sharks comprise a predatory guild within the Southern California Bight (SCB), we pre

300 st, inoculation with symbionts from the same guild yields weak relationships, with co-inoculation not