戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 xisting with one of the parental species (M. guttatus).
2 l population of yellow monkeyflower (Mimulus guttatus).
3 pulation of the yellow monkeyflower (Mimulus guttatus).
4 us caespitosa, Mimulus tilingii, and Mimulus guttatus).
5 PRDM9 ortholog, the corn snake (Pantherophis guttatus).
6 ted populations of the monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus.
7 e t and F in a natural population of Mimulus guttatus.
8 d compensatory nuclear coevolution within M. guttatus.
9 ing predators, X. gladius, T. obesus, and L. guttatus.
10 morphism for drive within a population of M. guttatus.
11 between two divergent populations of Mimulus guttatus.
12 time, and male fitness components of Mimulus guttatus.
13 aracters of the yellow monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus.
14  primarily outcrossing population of Mimulus guttatus.
15  outcrossing population of the plant Mimulus guttatus.
16  magnitude and directionality of HSI with M. guttatus.
17 wering (MCD) in yellow monkeyflower (Mimulus guttatus) accessions from a geothermal soil mosaic in Ye
18 monkeyflower (Mimulus) hybrids, a driving M. guttatus allele (D) exhibits a 98:2 transmission advanta
19 recombinants demonstrated that a dominant M. guttatus allele at each Rf locus was sufficient to resto
20 tically mapped this sterility effect: the M. guttatus allele at the hybrid male sterility 1 (hms1) lo
21  genome, 9 of which generate an excess of M. guttatus alleles and a deficit of M. nasutus alleles.
22 owering does not indicate re-use of known M. guttatus alleles, but strong candidate genes nonetheless
23                               HSI between M. guttatus and M. decorus is common and strong, but popula
24                   Patterns of HSI between M. guttatus and M. decorus, as well as within M. decorus, c
25 es coincident with HSI within and between M. guttatus and M. decorus.
26  (M. peregrinus), and progenitor species (M. guttatus and M. luteus).
27 ely related species of monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus and M. nasutus.
28  an interspecific map constructed between M. guttatus and M. nasutus.
29 age map of an interspecific cross between M. guttatus and M. nasutus.
30                                           M. guttatus and M. nudatus differ in the pattern and timing
31 rms a potent reproductive barrier between M. guttatus and M. nudatus.
32  mechanism for the hybrid barrier between M. guttatus and M. nudatus.
33 at male sterility in hybrids between Mimulus guttatus and Mimulus nasutus is due to interactions betw
34 ely related species of monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus and Mimulus tilingii, to characterize the mecha
35 of yellow monkeyflowers, outcrossing Mimulus guttatus and selfing M. nasutus.
36 g from hybridisation between diploid Mimulus guttatus and tetraploid Mimulus luteus, two species that
37 ibe one such barrier between diploid Mimulus guttatus and tetraploid Mimulus luteus.
38  endosperm and embryo development in Mimulus guttatus and the closely related, serpentine endemic Mim
39 actions between a mitochondrial gene from M. guttatus and two tightly linked nuclear restorer alleles
40 hree nested ecological scales within Mimulus guttatus: annual vs perennial life history races, perenn
41       Here, we use the plant species Mimulus guttatus as a case study for understanding genetic struc
42 h one that differentiates ecotypes within M. guttatus, but the larger effect QTL appears unique to M.
43             Leaf trichome density in Mimulus guttatus can be altered by the parental environment.
44  resistance, and tolerance traits in Mimulus guttatus challenged with a generalist pathogen, Cucumber
45 r of 8 is ancestral, reconstruction of 14 M. guttatus chromosomes requires at least eight fission eve
46 g time within natural populations of Mimulus guttatus, collecting the early- and late-flowering plant
47 Katsuwonus pelamis, Xiphias gladius, Lampris guttatus, Coryphaena hippurus, Taractichthys steindachne
48 at most songs of the hermit thrush (Catharus guttatus) favor simple frequency ratios derived from the
49 thocyanin-activating MYB expressed in the M. guttatus flowers.
50 tifying and targeting regions of the Mimulus guttatus genome containing large numbers of candidate pe
51 lar, are expressionally dominant over the M. guttatus genome in hybrid embryos and especially their e
52 e and create a framework for transferring M. guttatus genome resources across the entire genus.
53 hat selection would likely favor the same M. guttatus genotypes whether CMV is present or not.
54                                      Mimulus guttatus harbors extensive variation in critical photope
55  copper mine soils in the wildflower Mimulus guttatus identified a locus that appeared to cause coppe
56 al instructions of imbalanced dosage from M. guttatus imprints.
57                                    * Mimulus guttatus in adjacent contrasting plant community situati
58 d in colonized roots of thermal soil Mimulus guttatus in both isolated plants supporting AMF for only
59 lly explains the ecological incumbency of C. guttatus in temperate North America during winter, and o
60       We use an annual population of Mimulus guttatus in which, in nature, seeds germinate in both fa
61 population of yellow monkey flowers, Mimulus guttatus, in Copperopolis, California, which recently ev
62                 Our genetic analyses show M. guttatus is highly dispersive and maintains large metapo
63                 The corn snake (Pantherophis guttatus) is a new model species particularly appropriat
64  segmental synteny between M. lewisii and M. guttatus maps, with essentially 1-to-1 correspondence ac
65 he short-distance migrant, Hermit Thrush (C. guttatus), may be in relative phenotypic (ecological) st
66 argentimaculatus (n = 17), and Scomberomorus guttatus (n = 15).
67 arrested endosperm and seed abortion when M. guttatus or M. luteus is seed parent, respectively, and
68                     Cornsnakes (Pantherophis guttatus or Pantherophis slowinskii) and ratsnakes (Pant
69 viduals, corresponding to either diploid (M. guttatus) or polyploid (M. luteus and M. x robertsii) sa
70 owering between yellow monkeyflowers Mimulus guttatus (outcrosser, summer flowering) and Mimulus nasu
71 owering between yellow monkeyflowers Mimulus guttatus (outcrosser, summer flowering) and Mimulus nasu
72 15 h, paralleling range-wide variation in M. guttatus; plants from thermal habitats flower under sign
73 ion is not exceptional compared with what M. guttatus populations may typically experience when adapt
74 erous errors (misplaced sequences) in the M. guttatus reference genome and confirms or detects eight
75  traits for 52 annual populations of Mimulus guttatus sampled from 10 altitudinal transects.
76 s to build integrated genetic maps of the M. guttatus species complex (section Simiolus, n=14) and th
77 us: a group of cryptic species within the M. guttatus species complex that are largely reproductively
78 etween closely related species within the M. guttatus species complex, an important ecological model
79 ral adaptation and speciation in the Mimulus guttatus species complex, we constructed a genetic linka
80 ons of annuals and perennials in the Mimulus guttatus species complex.
81 rosatellite data for a population of Mimulus guttatus that has an intermediate selfing rate.
82 m of endothermy in a fish, the opah (Lampris guttatus), that produces heat through the constant "flap
83 uality genome of the corn snake Pantherophis guttatus The assembly is 1.71 Gb long, with an N50 of 16
84  wild population of the monkeyflower Mimulus guttatus to precisely locate over 400,000 boundaries of
85   We grew in- and outbred progeny of Mimulus guttatus under six abiotic stress treatments (control, w
86 g (Philaenus spumarius) herbivory in Mimulus guttatus using a diallel cross-grown in a greenhouse.
87 ing this method to two datasets from Mimulus guttatus, we infer a strong signal of adaptive divergenc