コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ns and include measures such as adherence to hand hygiene.
2 alth workers were more likely to comply with hand hygiene.
3 d a significant and sustained improvement in hand hygiene.
4 cluding increasing awareness and encouraging hand hygiene.
5 95 [8.98-15.89]), but significantly worse in hand hygiene (0.27 [0.17-0.43]) and waste management (0.
6 (80%), patient isolation or cohorting (70%), hand hygiene (50%), and environmental cleaning (40%); ne
9 of contacts, gowns for 77% of contacts, and hand hygiene after 69% of contacts, and when universal g
10 terval {CI}, .95-.98]) and more likely to do hand hygiene after contaminating tasks than after other
11 Healthcare workers were more likely to do hand hygiene after contaminating tasks than before criti
13 s after hand hygiene (group A) or care after hand hygiene alone (group B) before all patient and intr
16 projects to improve adherence to appropriate hand hygiene and best practices for central venous cathe
17 t of a sustained high level of compliance to hand hygiene and chlorhexidine bathings, screening and i
18 es should be useful for targeted surface and hand hygiene and disinfection of liquids, as part of inf
19 ion and control compliance, particularly for hand hygiene and disinfection, was inadequate in these o
20 imal, but improvements in health care worker hand hygiene and environmental cleaning were associated
25 was not associated with gender, occupation, hand hygiene and personal protective equipment (PPE) pra
26 reducing pathogen exposure through enhanced hand hygiene and reducing host susceptibility through an
27 connected healthcare worker did not practice hand hygiene and significantly lower when the least conn
29 al masking, patient lockdown, and reinforced hand hygiene) and "caseload responses" unwillingly resul
30 or patients colonized or infected with MRSA, hand hygiene, and a change in the institutional culture
32 universal surveillance, contact precautions, hand hygiene, and institutional culture change was assoc
33 s may cross-border movements of camels, poor hand hygiene, and overnight hospital stays with respirat
34 oad strategies of personal protection (mask, hand hygiene, and physical distancing), social distancin
36 patient care, especially the performance of hand hygiene before and after patient care; 3) rapid eva
38 Healthcare workers were less likely to do hand hygiene before critical tasks than before other tas
42 mic that resulted in substantially increased hand hygiene behaviors and resources in usual-care schoo
43 uoroquinolones) and macrolide antibiotics; a hand hygiene campaign; hospital environment inspections;
44 of alcohol-based hand sanitiser, a national hand-hygiene campaign, national auditing and inspections
45 1.71 to -0.21, P = .02), increased room-exit hand hygiene compliance (78.3% vs 62.9%, difference, 15.
46 a bundle, which was associated with improved hand hygiene compliance (pooled odds ratio [OR], 1.82; 9
47 ce prompt phase and post-intervention phase, hand hygiene compliance and nosocomial infection rates i
49 sh-language, peer-reviewed studies measuring hand hygiene compliance by healthcare workers in an ICU
54 ent control measures, such as increasing the hand hygiene compliance of HCWs and disinfection rate of
55 ygiene in an adult ICU setting, and reported hand hygiene compliance rates collected via observation,
57 view all studies on interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance to evaluate existing bundles and
58 ntaminating tasks occurring, and the odds of hand hygiene compliance using logistic regression for tr
60 ritical and contaminating tasks, but nurses' hand hygiene compliance was better than physicians' (aOR
61 spital stay of colonized patients, increased hand hygiene compliance, and a lower ratio of health-car
62 ion, frequency of health care worker visits, hand hygiene compliance, health care-associated infectio
68 toring MRSA and VRE rates in ICUs; promoting hand hygiene compliance; guaranteeing adequate staffing
70 fe enteric pathogen exposure, and that child hand hygiene could substantially prevent animal-child tr
72 zed as "passed" if an appropriate quality of hand hygiene, defined as a minimum 97% coverage of hand
74 xidine gluconate bathing of all patients and hand-hygiene education and adherence monitoring may have
75 hood, and the PAPR helmet assembly; repeated hand hygiene (eg, with hand sanitizer); and a final hand
76 contact precautions, private room/cohorting, hand hygiene, environmental cleaning, and antibiotic ste
81 D preventive measures (8/8); (5) appropriate hand hygiene for everyone (7/8); (6) environmental clean
83 (screening, chlorhexidine gluconate bathing, hand hygiene, geographic separation, and patient registr
84 ion and control practices into four domains: hand hygiene, glove use, disinfection of reusable equipm
85 ions in ILI during weeks 4-6 in the mask and hand hygiene group, compared with the control group, ran
86 to receive care with nonsterile gloves after hand hygiene (group A) or care after hand hygiene alone
91 infection control strategies (e.g., routine hand hygiene, implementation of infection-specific preve
92 sal chlorhexidine body-washing combined with hand hygiene improvement for 6 months (phase 2), followe
93 es that evaluated an intervention to improve hand hygiene in an adult ICU setting, and reported hand
95 terature describing interventions to improve hand hygiene in ICUs, to evaluate the quality of the ext
96 sition of VRE, and improving compliance with hand hygiene in the hemodialysis unit may decrease the r
97 ection control interventions included strict hand hygiene, including glove use; isolation precautions
98 eps, resulted in higher compliance with both hand hygiene indications and technique, as compared to t
100 es and included environmental restructuring, hand hygiene infrastructure provision, cues and reminder
101 nts focused on 5 areas of infection control: hand hygiene, injection safety and medication handling,
104 tion in hazard of infection in the increased hand hygiene intervention arm was 37.0% [8.3%, 57.8%], w
107 failure mode and effects analysis including hand hygiene, isolation of infection, vital signs, medic
108 revention of nosocomial infections, adequate hand hygiene, isolation of patients who harbor resistant
110 care providers used clean gloves, gowns, and hand hygiene less frequently than required for contacts
112 These findings suggest that face masks and hand hygiene may reduce respiratory illnesses in shared
113 es, including social distancing and rigorous hand hygiene, may benefit the population as a whole, as
114 cipant characteristics, experimental design, hand hygiene measurement, intervention characteristics,
117 liance rates in a hospital with an automated hand hygiene monitoring system during the COVID-19 pande
122 re randomly assigned to direct gloving, with hand hygiene not required before donning gloves (interve
124 mothers (AOR 1.98, 95% CI (1.07, 3.66), poor hand hygiene of children (AOR 3.20, 95% CI (1.77, 5.77),
126 the studied region was associated with poor hand hygiene of mothers (AOR 1.98, 95% CI (1.07, 3.66),
127 ation between use of antiseptic products for hand hygiene of staff and reductions in nosocomial infec
128 terized voice prompts for failure to perform hand hygiene on room exit; and phase III was electronic
130 s/gloves were sampled at room exit (prior to hand hygiene or glove removal) and then evaluated for th
132 unsolved but well-identified causes such as hand hygiene, overuse of catheters, and to a lesser exte
134 icted that a 12% improvement in adherence to hand-hygiene policies might have compensated for staff s
136 n, delivered at the facility, to improve the hand hygiene practices among midwives and caregivers dur
137 r baseline measures, assessed differences in hand hygiene practices between intervention and control
138 12.1 to 14.5; p<0.0001), and health workers' hand hygiene practices during childbirth increased by 12
140 this controlled before-and-after study, the hand hygiene practices of all caregivers present along t
141 dal behaviour change intervention to improve hand hygiene practices that are critical to maternal and
143 wever, the following were observed: improved hand hygiene practices, increased utilization of insecti
144 e incorporated into interventions to improve hand hygiene practices, particularly before critical tas
147 vering attention to adherence to appropriate hand hygiene procedures; and attention to the details of
148 mented in an iterative fashion, including 1) hand hygiene program with refresher education campaign,
149 vironmental cleaning education and feedback, hand hygiene promotion, and health care worker education
150 interventions (such as latrine utilization, hand hygiene promotion, food safety, home-based water tr
153 orld Health Organization's "Five Moments for Hand Hygiene," published since 2009, were included.
155 P < .001) even when controlling for baseline hand hygiene rates, unit type, and universal gloving pol
156 study examined whether use of face masks and hand hygiene reduced the incidence of influenza-like ill
161 that a direct-gloving strategy without prior hand hygiene should be considered by health care facilit
162 suggest that measures such as wearing masks, hand hygiene, social distancing, and strategic testing o
163 n-campus facilities; face mask use; enhanced hand hygiene; social distancing recommendations; dedensi
164 adherence to World Health Organization (WHO) hand-hygiene standards; adoption of evidence-based pract
165 aspects of prevention, including education, hand hygiene, sterile technique, skin cleansing, choice
166 ve care unit rooms; environmental aspects of hand hygiene, such as water risks, sink design/location,
167 n experimental setting, a simplified, 3-step hand hygiene technique for applying alcohol-based hand r
170 ce and microbiological efficacy between both hand hygiene techniques in routine clinical practice.
172 ls, flexible family visitation policies, and hand hygiene training were associated with reduced rates
173 These findings underscore the importance of hand hygiene, transmission-based precautions, and partic
174 hen video auditors observed a HCW performing hand hygiene upon entering/exiting, they assigned a pass
177 g methods to adjust for confounders, such as hand hygiene, when examining the effect of disinfecting