戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ulmonary hypertension patients and may cause harm.
2  lead failure leading to significant patient harm.
3 or functions but must spare host tissue from harm.
4  donor KT) had greatest influence on benefit/harm.
5 er immunity but uncontrolled responses cause harm.
6 quickly learn to avoid actions that cause us harm.
7 umans learn quickly which actions cause them harm.
8 de clinically important treatment benefit or harm.
9  T-CPR in this manner results in preventable harm.
10  most plausible causal risk factors for self-harm.
11 ubsequently, the physician's decision caused harm.
12 ntify plausible causal risk factors for self-harm.
13 experiences and others' social cues to avoid harm.
14 ation effectiveness to protect patients from harm.
15 ted stress or confusion, and two (2%) denied harm.
16  caused extreme human suffering and economic harm.
17 ociated with the temporal variations in self-harm.
18 oves patient or caregiver outcomes or causes harm.
19  be beneficial among people at risk for self-harm.
20         Five of 117 families (4.3%) reported harm.
21 rm from genomic testing, no parents reported harm.
22 comorbidity, psychiatric diagnoses, and self-harm.
23 hat policymakers should consider to mitigate harm.
24 rly adept at learning to protect others from harm.
25 ly respond to the cues predicting benefit or harm.
26 potential for reproductive and developmental harm.
27  outcomes, with little to no risk of serious harm.
28  of continued treatment may not outweigh the harms.
29 ess opioid use disorder and drug use-related harms.
30 icient to assess the balance of benefits and harms.
31 d may result in long-term use and consequent harms.
32 ion; tobacco use cessation; health outcomes; harms.
33 en added to clinical evaluation, or reported harms.
34                         Nine trials reported harms.
35               No studies reported on testing harms.
36 lative benefits instead of imposing relative harms.
37 P = .16; [97.5% 1-sided confidence limit for harm, 10.2%]; P = .84).
38                   Crucially, endorsed social harms accounted for explained variance beyond simply hol
39 iders, must weigh the potential benefits and harms across these events when making decisions.
40  self-harm behaviour (i.e. any lifetime self-harm act regardless of suicidal intent) using data from
41  have data on their comparative benefits and harms against existing treatment options at the time of
42 the risk for gastrointestinal and neurologic harms (all moderate-certainty evidence).
43                      These policies severely harm American science by stripping it of talent and elim
44 vestigation into temporal variations in self-harm among asylum seekers, which may in turn lead to eff
45 mmediate graft function (IGF), but only with harms among recipients with DGF.
46         ESW was associated with benefits and harms among recipients with immediate graft function (IG
47                                    Regarding harms, an increased burden of vomiting or nausea was obs
48 gy in order to lessen the risk of collateral harm and avoid the crisis of resistance now facing conve
49 o determined country-specific net benefit or harm and cost-effectiveness of universal provision of MN
50 depression, PTSD, and suicidal ideation/self-harm and explained up to 0.6% of phenotypic variation (m
51 de-off between amounts of pathogen-inflicted harm and how effectively viruses position themselves wit
52 ld have a diverse diet, given no evidence of harm and some potential association of benefit in the pr
53  utility, adequacy of consent, and potential harms and benefits is lacking.
54 ped to counsel survivors about the potential harms and benefits of surveillance.
55 ferences for the allocation of environmental harms and benefits.
56 ross all 29 trials, only 1 trial reported on harms and found no statistically significant group diffe
57                           Longterm benefits, harms and the cost-effectiveness of the risk-adapted CRC
58  prespecified primary monitoring outcome for harm) and secondary outcomes were deaths from breast can
59  stigma can cause physical and psychological harm, and that affected individuals are less likely to r
60 many therapies, OIT is not without potential harms, and burdens, and the evaluation of patient-specif
61  treated with chest radiation, yet benefits, harms, and costs are uncertain.
62  review compares and contrasts the benefits, harms, and opportunity costs associated with these two a
63 phical summaries that integrate benefits and harms, and proposes that such summaries become standard
64 ty, quality of life, screening and treatment harms, and screening diagnostic yield.
65 , 95% CI 1.65-1.79, p < 0.001), suicide/self-harm (aOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.52-1.61, p < 0.001), rheumatolo
66 depression, PTSD, and suicidal ideation/self-harm are at least partially shared across global populat
67 r formulation and clinical effectiveness and harms are similar.
68 stand and potentially reduce cannabis-evoked harms are warranted.
69 he treatment effects, including efficacy and harm, are needed.
70 ded value' by industry can generate consumer harms as free market 'externalities', and how obesogenic
71 nt, punitive sanctions by those not directly harmed, as key for norm enforcement.
72 vidence to understand OUD and its associated harms, as well as in obtaining the evidence today that w
73             Firearm violence, including self-harm, assault, and unintentional injury, affects the hea
74 ntional strategies to mitigate the potential harm associated with fluid accumulation.
75 g reports of abuse and evidence of potential harms associated with gabapentin use, it is important th
76 th cancer; however, whether the benefits and harms associated with heparin differ by cancer type is u
77 fusion was not significantly associated with harm at any haemoglobin concentration-ie, the OR of deat
78  hungry was associated with higher scores on harm avoidance among participants in the remitted anorex
79  of vital life-preserving functions, such as harm avoidance, adaptive social interactions and efficie
80 at may perpetuate the cycle of impulsive and harm-avoidance behaviours.
81 ollment was stopped early due to concern for harm based on interim data from this trial and from anot
82 WAS) on lifetime self-harm ideation and self-harm behaviour (i.e. any lifetime self-harm act regardle
83 scores (PRS) for self-harm ideation and self-harm behaviour predict suicide attempt, suicide thoughts
84  suicide thoughts and NSSH, and PRS for self-harm behaviour predicted suicide thoughts and suicide at
85 d with self-harm ideation and four with self-harm behaviour.
86  assessing welfare were the presence of self-harm behaviours and the provision of social enrichment.
87 um women, and compared clinical outcomes and harms between women who were and were not screened; diag
88 t the recommendation would do more good than harm, but there was little direct evidence.
89 identified risk factors associated with self-harm, but these associations can be subject to confoundi
90 dividuals respond in kind to being helped or harmed by others.
91                                      Benefit/harm calculations were restricted to aspirin-naive parti
92                              Some benefit or harm cannot be ruled out, however, because the confidenc
93 ficient and that the balance of benefits and harms cannot be determined.
94 utrition; documenting examples of unintended harm caused by some undernutrition-focused programmes on
95 s produces defective nascent chains that can harm cells.
96  in domestic households causes public health harm concentrated in developing nations.
97 ssion should include the potential benefits, harms, costs, and patient's preferences.
98 ovals on the basis of incomplete benefit and harm data.
99                                 Time of self-harm, day, and month of occurrence were investigated acr
100 men being exposed to lead at levels that may harm developing fetuses or breastfeeding infants.
101  many needed to reduce consumption of health-harming drinks.
102 IDSA-SHEA guideline, carries a potential for harm due to delayed diagnosis and treatment.
103 certain characteristics associated with self-harm (e.g., gender, country of origin), as the Departmen
104  considering the allocation of environmental harms (e.g., building new polluting facilities) than whe
105 rrier to protect the host from the potential harming effects of inhaled environmental particles and t
106          The highest and lowest monthly self-harm episode rates for the whole asylum seeker populatio
107 in the frequency and characteristics of self-harm episodes across the Australian asylum seeker popula
108  was to examine how the distribution of self-harm episodes and method(s) of self-harm used across the
109                                              Harms evidence reported in trials was judged to be insuf
110 d: what is the imminence and severity of the harm expected without intervention?
111 d, RCTs were not powered to assess important harms, few data were available in men aged 18 to 50 year
112 ent on patient outcomes, including potential harms, finding no significant differences in health-rela
113  simple and reliable to perform but that can harm fish.
114              Despite increasing awareness of harms, fluoroquinolones are still frequently prescribed
115  inappropriate and associated with potential harm for DLBCL patients.
116 linical scenarios and may lead to unintended harms for individual patients.
117 k of overtreatment and antibiotic-associated harms for patients who are not infected.
118 antibiotic overuse and antibiotic-associated harms for this subset of the population.
119 opioid-associated emergencies, drowning, and harm from CPR to victims not in cardiac arrest.
120 ould be considered for patients with risk of harm from DDIs.
121 ly, fitness decreases tend to decelerate and harm from deleterious mutations shrinks during the accum
122 f the families for whom clinicians perceived harm from genomic testing, no parents reported harm.
123 st tumors have the highest benefit and least harm from the screening, with only a relatively small ef
124  their child's results, and denied regret or harm from undergoing sequencing.
125 infrequent and minor, but the evidence about harms from in utero exposure was inconclusive.
126 broad sense (non-suicidal and suicidal) self-harm has not been characterised on the molecular level.
127 or cell binding and killing in vitro without harming healthy B cells.
128 able pronunciation only, hyperactivity, self-harm, hetero-aggressive behaviour, facial dysmorphism, l
129 24 possible individual risk factors for self-harm (i.e., mental health vulnerabilities, substance use
130  identified seven genes associated with self-harm ideation and four with self-harm behaviour.
131  association studies (GWAS) on lifetime self-harm ideation and self-harm behaviour (i.e. any lifetime
132 whether polygenic risk scores (PRS) for self-harm ideation and self-harm behaviour predict suicide at
133 thermore, in the target sample, PRS for self-harm ideation were significantly associated with suicide
134 involve antiretrovirals (ARVs) tend to cause harm if unrecognized, especially in the context of comor
135 he Middle East, 11 in Latin America) and net harm in 24 countries (22 in Africa, one in Asia, and one
136 ighlights the overriding imperative to avoid harm in caring for patients with SR-aGVHD.
137 acy and was associated with increase risk of harm in critically ill patients.
138 l benefit; KT only began showing evidence of harm in scenarios where CFRs were substantially higher f
139                                         Self-harm in the Australian asylum seeker population was foun
140 use of routine preoperative testing leads to harm in the form of delayed surgery and falls in Medicar
141 ) of these participants reported having self-harmed in their lifetime.
142 ucted an observational study of all 949 self-harm incidents reported across the Australian asylum see
143 sed, and the risk of this causing widespread harm increases in step with the rapid march of technolog
144  and schizophrenia were associated with self-harm independently of diagnosis and medication.
145 eview data, and product labels that reported harms information.
146     Identifying causal risk factors for self-harm is essential to inform preventive interventions.
147                  Paranoia is the belief that harm is intended by others.
148 f hybrid individuals, but the nature of this harm is poorly understood.
149 ed to effectively reduce preventable patient harm is provided.
150 taract surgery long enough to cause clinical harm is unknown.
151                      Since the allocation of harms is an inevitable part of operations of both govern
152               The likelihood to be helped or harmed (LHH) was calculated as ratio of NNH to NNT.
153 ogenic (man-made) sound has the potential to harm marine biota.
154 ross all other processing arrangements, self-harm more commonly occurred among community-based asylum
155 nts was used for the 5-year number needed to harm (NNH(5)) estimations.
156 ent one ASCVD event and the number needed to harm (NNH) to incur one incident case of T2D.
157 tio=1.81, 95% CI=1.35-2.41; number needed to harm (NNH)=33, 95% CI=22-77) and of cardiac anomalies (N
158 lly depression, anxiety, and deliberate self-harm (nonsuicidal self-injury).
159 empt, suicide thoughts and non-suicidal self-harm (NSSH) in an independent target sample of 8,703 Aus
160 requently associated with the probability of harm occurring during action execution.
161 are often associated with the probability of harm occurring.
162                      To quantify the benefit/harm of KT in this context, we conducted a simulation st
163  to interpret results about the benefits and harms of active interventions within placebo-controlled
164                             The accuracy and harms of brief cognitive tests for identifying clinical
165 ng on the clinical indication, the potential harms of delaying or withholding group II or group III G
166 his review aims to evaluate the benefits and harms of eHealth interventions to support self-managemen
167 at might improve the benefits and reduce the harms of existing breast cancer screening and prevention
168 ive, multi-level interventions to reduce the harms of firearm violence.
169 vention and treatment is key to reducing the harms of firearm violence.
170 irect evidence for the clinical benefits and harms of HBV screening vs no screening.
171  adult height will be increased, or what the harms of long-term therapy might be.
172  the standard against which the benefits and harms of many active interventions are measured.
173 nical uncertainty regarding the benefits and harms of prescribing statins in healthy subjects >=70 ye
174 , the USPSTF concludes that the benefits and harms of primary care-based interventions to prevent ill
175 ctions to shield participants from potential harms of re-identification from data sharing.
176  of Physicians address the effectiveness and harms of remdesivir treatment in patients with COVID-19.
177         No studies evaluated the benefits or harms of screening and the effect of treating childhood
178    Evidence on the overall effectiveness and harms of screening for anxiety is insufficient.
179 ectly evaluated the overall effectiveness or harms of screening for anxiety.
180 icient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for bacterial vaginosis in pregnant p
181  is lacking, and the balance of benefits and harms of screening for cognitive impairment cannot be de
182 icient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for cognitive impairment in older adu
183 icient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for high blood pressure in children a
184 icient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for unhealthy drug use in adolescents
185 d by screening; and evaluating the potential harms of screening, including the impact on quality of l
186         No studies evaluated the benefits or harms of screening.
187 ere is no direct evidence on the benefits or harms of screening.
188 tegy to maximize the benefits and reduce the harms of screening.
189 ould be given to the balance of benefits and harms of SGLT2 inhibitors and risk mitigation strategies
190  on the current evidence of the benefits and harms of testosterone treatment in adult men with age-re
191 nt, and consideration of benefits versus the harms of the surveillance interventions while attaining
192                    Limited data on long-term harms of treatment and no treatment trials in pregnant o
193 sive treatment of an older adult in whom the harms of treatment outweigh the benefits (38; 53.5%) or
194 y of screening instruments, and benefits and harms of treatments in adolescent girls and adult women.
195                 Evidence on the benefits and harms of using hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine to trea
196                  We examine the benefits and harms of using ID as a transplant eligibility criterion,
197 eviewed available evidence on the causes and harms of weight stigma and, using a modified Delphi proc
198                                           No harm or adverse effects were found.
199 l ability in all animals signaling potential harm or benefit of ingestive behavior.
200 , depending on whether controlled agents are harmed or helped by contact with automatic agents; globa
201 ctly compared statin-associated benefits and harms or examined heterogeneity by population subgroups
202 equential monitoring boundaries for benefit, harm, or futility (adjusted CI, 0.72-1.10).
203  patients with malaria but could potentially harm others.
204 or requires learning how our actions help or harm others.
205 aking was prioritized when learning to avoid harming others compared to oneself.
206 ingulate cortex (sgACC), and switching after harming others was associated with stronger connectivity
207 be insufficient or of low certainty for most harm outcomes.
208 25), depression (P = .015), thoughts of self-harm (P = .025), and health-related unhappiness (P = .01
209 beta-adrenoceptor antagonists would severely harm patients with recommended indications, such as hear
210 herapeutic interventions, and may ultimately harm patients.
211  congenital heart surgery disproportionately harms patients and the healthcare system, yet much remai
212 er population may have implications for self-harm prevention and public health policy.
213 rs, which may in turn lead to effective self-harm prevention strategies.
214 ans are as good at learning to avoid others' harm (prosocial learning) as they are at learning to avo
215 d the most convincing and attractive benefit-harm ratio for patients with acute pain from non-low bac
216 ter a recent ischemic stroke and the benefit:harm ratio of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulan
217 ectional referrals from and to comprehensive harm reduction (CHR) programs and office-based opioid th
218 litan areas, including some with substantial harm reduction and medical programs targeted to PWID.
219                                   Adopting a harm reduction approach, including expansion of syringe
220               Results reinforce the need for harm reduction interventions among couples and those who
221                         Increasing access to harm reduction interventions could help prevent these in
222 , including community preventive strategies, harm reduction interventions to reduce adverse sequelae
223 ective, open-label, observational trial at a harm reduction organization's drop-in center in Washingt
224                                  In Vietnam, harm reduction programs to control HIV among people who
225 co-associated disease but may also provide a harm reduction strategy for current tobacco users.
226          Issues addressed include leveraging harm reduction tools and improving integrated prevention
227 gent need for enhanced infection prevention, harm reduction, and addiction services aimed at communit
228 in low-resource jurisdictions facing gaps in harm reduction, including illegality of syringe exchange
229 f medications, behavioral interventions, and harm-reduction interventions.
230               Incorporating psychosocial and harm-reduction services into differentiated care models
231 s (SSPs) are effective venues for delivering harm-reduction services to people who inject drugs (PWID
232  allograft survival while minimizing patient harm related to global suppression of recipient immune r
233 ted with mortality from psychiatric and self-harm-related conditions.
234 SVR rates greater than 5% and few short-term harms relative to older antiviral therapies.
235 g healthcare systems and clinical workflows, harm resulting from potential false positives, and ident
236 ng remains owing to concerns about potential harms resulting from screening in the absence of randomi
237 sential treatment because of potential fetal harm risks a poor outcome for both mother and child.
238     Response to repeated pain increases when harm risks are high (sensitization) and decreases in the
239 vely assembled understanding that you are in harm's way based on non-conscious memories, schemas, and
240 ng those outside the manipulated group, into harm's way.
241 rning) as they are at learning to avoid self-harm (self-relevant learning).
242 gree to which suicidal and non-suicidal self-harm share a common genetic aetiology.
243                        When an automated car harms someone, who is blamed by those who hear about it?
244  of substance abuse, alcohol abuse, and self-harm/suicide were associated with long-term opioid use.
245 t best available evidence about benefits and harms, taken in the context of costs and patient values
246 nical value, and in some cases might do more harm than good, an even-handed assessment of the potenti
247 ir may provide similar benefits to and fewer harms than a 10-day course.
248                            Despite potential harm that can result from polypharmacy, real-world data
249 ave identified a heritable component to self-harm that is partially independent from comorbid psychia
250 ave the potential to cause severe unintended harms that could result in greater inequity, the stigmat
251 ic, have altered the balance of benefits and harms that informed current (pre-COVID-19) guideline rec
252 D are uncertain; that there is potential for harms; that screening is not a wise use of resources, ev
253 outgroup party and support for policies that harm the country and flout democratic norms to favor the
254  Exposure to nicotine during adolescence can harm the developing brain, which may affect brain functi
255 but that is also devoid of toxins that might harm the sensitive neural tissues.
256       This implies that many archaic alleles harmed the fitness of hybrid individuals, but the nature
257 h the increase in industries and their waste harming the environment and ecosystems.
258  can selectively eradicate E. coli while not harming the survival rate, development, and biological f
259  the numbers needed to treat for benefit and harm, the benefit-risk ratio, and Incremental Net Benefi
260 hical to take actions or policies that might harm them.
261 help protect patients or family members from harming themselves or others by restricting firearm poss
262 e show that temperature stress modulates the harm threatened by a common enemy, and thereby induces a
263 hich imply limited precision and the risk of harm through collateral thermal damage to the adjacent h
264 e of the sources of institutional racism and harm through transparency and accountability measures is
265  lysed and released cellular content, likely harming tissues.
266 o self (n = 67), harm to others (n = 86), or harm to both self and others (n = 84).
267           Upon follow-up, one (1%) confirmed harm to child and parent related to negative results/no
268 iciently kills pathogens potentially without harm to exposed human tissues.
269 allows for appropriate computation of future harm to guide action selection.
270                         Understanding of the harm to health from lifestyle causes among the general p
271 d during their lifecycles and possibly cause harm to humans and ecosystems.
272 vasive species currently causing significant harm to local aquaculture communities.
273 support these various policies that threaten harm to many people tend to believe that the victims are
274 ed for concerns about harm to self (n = 67), harm to others (n = 86), or harm to both self and others
275 ostomy in COVID-19 does not cause additional harm to patients if performed after 2 weeks from intubat
276      The ERPOs were filed for concerns about harm to self (n = 67), harm to others (n = 86), or harm
277               The use of racemates may cause harm to the public and may contribute to antimicrobial r
278 icacious decontamination reduces the risk of harm to those directly affected and prevents the uncontr
279 ndrome-related financial toxicity, including harms to their mental and physical health, increased rel
280 atheter/Harms trabeculotome, and <180-degree Harms trabeculotome trabeculotomies were significantly d
281 , 270-degree to 360-degree combined catheter/Harms trabeculotome, and <180-degree Harms trabeculotome
282  impersonal terms, and endorsed other social harms unrelated to immigration (e.g., the death penalty
283  of self-harm episodes and method(s) of self-harm used across the Australian asylum seeker population
284  likely play a role in the aetiology of self-harm using multivariate genetic designs for causal infer
285 n during the perioperative period and assess harms versus benefits of treatment.
286 nvironmental level to reduce firearm-related harm was examined.
287 studies, no consistent evidence of increased harm was found.
288 tiveness of the UK Biobank sample, that self-harm was self-reported, and the limited power of some of
289 ocessing arrangements, we observed that self-harm was significantly more likely to occur in August (2
290                            While evidence on harms was limited, it indicated no increased risk of ser
291  differences associated with deliberate self-harm were consistent with the overall findings.
292                                 All reported harms were considered, including general adverse events,
293                                           No harms were identified in 7 studies (n = 3458) reporting
294 ion, PTSD, and suicidal ideation and/or self-harm) were scored by interviewers using valid Spanish qu
295  wearing masks likely outweigh the potential harms when SARS-CoV-2 is spreading in a community.
296 al incompatibility between the allocation of harms, which is seen as an inherently unfair action, and
297 e/tazobactam was 5, and the number needed to harm with AKI with a polymyxin/aminoglycoside was 4.
298  high clinical utility and low likelihood of harm with first-tier RGS of infants in ICUs with disease
299          Recent evidence suggested potential harm with low blood pressure targets in patients with pe
300 r, and lifetime cannabis use) predicted self-harm, with effect sizes ranging from odds ratio (OR) = 1

 
Page Top