戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 e-Allier population raised in a conservation hatchery.
2 ring homing from the Bering Sea to the natal hatchery.
3 ted and destroyed, including the eggs at the hatchery.
4 n was isolated from samples collected at the hatchery.
5 ct with live young poultry from a mail-order hatchery.
6 ile bivalves produced by adult broodstock in hatcheries.
7 antial economic losses in salmonid farms and hatcheries.
8  fish allowed onto spawning grounds are from hatcheries and (2) the hatchery fish have high reproduct
9 o controllable freshwater influences such as hatcheries and habitat degradation, but the unknown mech
10   The disease is persistent and spreading in hatcheries and natural waters of several countries, incl
11 nificant economic losses in shrimp farms and hatcheries and poses a threat to food-security in many d
12 nt mortality to salmon fry within freshwater hatcheries and to smolts following transfer to seawater,
13 e absence of genetic differentiation between hatchery and natural-origin fish for each river.
14 tions, wastewater treatment plants, and fish hatchery and rearing units to river monitoring points.
15 hatchery fish were used as broodstock in the hatchery, and their offspring were released into the wil
16 ns in the Chesapeake Bay, USA has prompted a hatchery-based restoration program focused in the Chopta
17                                 Overall, the hatchery-based results and initial field-based populatio
18 al functions that may affect the capacity of hatchery-born smolts to migrate successfully in the ocea
19  that mcr-1, but not blaNDM, is prevalent in hatcheries, but blaNDM quickly contaminates flocks throu
20  likely to be associated with fish farms and hatcheries, but it is unclear if these patterns of assoc
21 er harbor seals from preying on fall runs of hatchery chum (O. keta) and Chinook (O. tshawytscha) sal
22 irect sample testing for blaNDM and mcr-1 in hatcheries, commercial farms, a slaughterhouse and super
23 ng a common-garden experiment under standard hatchery conditions and in response to an applied crowdi
24 opulations; (5) Effective population size in hatcheries could promote high levels of genetic variatio
25 tat degradation, over-zealous application of hatcheries designed to mitigate effects of other factors
26                                         Such hatchery effects on otolith development could have impor
27 analyses reveal that adaptation to the novel hatchery environment involved responses in wound healing
28  isotope analysis of fish collagen and state hatchery feed as well as Bayesian assignment tests of mi
29 e effective number of breeders producing the hatchery fish (broodstock parents; N(b)) was quite small
30 ation size of the total population (wild and hatchery fish combined) by nearly two-thirds.
31 l Ryman-Laikre effect whereby the additional hatchery fish doubled the total number of adult fish on
32                             First-generation hatchery fish had nearly double the lifetime reproductiv
33 ning grounds are from hatcheries and (2) the hatchery fish have high reproductive success in the wild
34                          The low N(b) caused hatchery fish to have decreased allelic richness, increa
35 om the ocean, wild-born and first-generation hatchery fish were used as broodstock in the hatchery, a
36  Our results represent crucial evidence that hatcheries for enhancement and conservation of populatio
37 ns are generally lacking, and the benefit of hatcheries for long-term fisheries and conservation goal
38                    Despite the common use of hatchery-grown subadult mussels (< 40 mm) for reintroduc
39                      Artificial selection in hatcheries has often been invoked as the most likely exp
40 e for managing parent flocks and eggs at the hatchery in case of Salmonella infection in parent flock
41                                 A mail-order hatchery in the western United States was identified in
42 o date have focused on finding signatures of hatchery-induced selection at the DNA level.
43 One Health approach involving the mail-order hatchery industry, feed stores, healthcare providers, ve
44 n increased immediately after release from a hatchery into the natal stream, and the expression of th
45 s, and environmental testing at a mail-order hatchery linked to the outbreak in order to identify the
46             We attempted to reconstruct the "hatcheries" of the first cells by combining geochemical
47 timate use of such a tool would be exploring hatchery origin restocking strategies.
48  is highly debated since fitness decrease of hatchery-origin fish in the wild has been documented.
49 anosensory systems prior to release from the hatchery, potentiating reduced survival after release.
50 t conditions, and the improvement of current hatcheries practices to manage and conserve salmon resou
51 e history stages of pinto abalone and inform hatchery practices under future climate change scenarios
52 , Maryland consisting of the mass release of hatchery-produced juveniles from local, wild broodstock.
53 effective number of breeders (N(b)) over the hatchery production cycle with microsatellite-based pare
54                               The release of hatchery-propagated fish and shellfish is occurring on a
55  in different rivers that exchanged fish for hatchery propagation share more of their ancestry recent
56 pulation augmentation from translocations or hatchery propagation.
57           Here, we use growth data from both hatchery-raised and wild populations of a large freshwat
58               Vaterite spherulites from both hatchery-reared (juvenile) and wild (adult) Lake Sturgeo
59 nd wildlife management, and introgression of hatchery-reared animals into wild populations is of glob
60 ethylation and variation at the DNA level in hatchery-reared coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) with
61 lemetry array, we tested whether survival of hatchery-reared juvenile Snake River spring Chinook salm
62 esent report, we explore the hypothesis that hatchery-reared juveniles might exhibit morphological de
63 normal, aragonite-containing otoliths, while hatchery-reared juveniles possessed a high proportion of
64 ore superficial lateral line neuromasts than hatchery-reared juveniles, although the number of hair c
65 und to have significantly larger brains than hatchery-reared juveniles.
66  and coastal ocean relative to a downstream, hatchery-reared population from the Yakima River.
67          Shared epigenetic variation between hatchery-reared salmon provides evidence for parallel ep
68 explanatory mechanism for reduced fitness in hatchery-reared salmon.
69 otic (turbulent flow, current) sources among hatchery-reared steelhead, in turn predicting reduced su
70                                 In brains of hatchery-reared underyearling juvenile chum salmon (Onco
71 parallel epigenetic modifications induced by hatchery rearing in the absence of genetic differentiati
72  organic substrates common in fish farms and hatchery-rearing units.
73               Interventions performed at the hatchery reduced, but did not eliminate, associated huma
74 ge, and increasing competition from wild and hatchery-released salmon, have tended to delay maturatio
75  selective exploitation and competition with hatchery releases for finite foraging resources.
76 d down in response to predator cues, whereas hatchery salmon did not change travel speed.
77                                              Hatchery salmon had the least predator experience, follo
78 ial for practical application in a dedicated hatchery setting.
79 tillarum culture efforts in potential future hatchery settings and improves the viability of scalable
80 uperficially similar, one strain (Scientific Hatcheries, SH) responded to social perturbation, wherea
81 d River, Oregon, by matching 12 run-years of hatchery steelhead back to their broodstock parents.
82 e precipitous decline in fitness observed in hatchery steelhead released into the Hood River in Orego
83 n the offspring of wild and first-generation hatchery steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) reared in
84 ha) fry in California's Central Valley (CCV) hatcheries swam in corkscrew patterns and died at unusua
85 eparate breeder farms that supplied a single hatchery that in turn provided chicks to a single grow-o
86                   After interventions at the hatchery, the number of human infections declined, but t
87  as surrogate breeding, could be utilized by hatcheries to retain or improve natural gamete productio
88 tore sturgeon populations through the use of hatcheries to supplement natural reproduction and to rei
89  larval geoduck clam culture in a commercial hatchery to investigate the molecular underpinnings of t
90 e aquaculture industry to produce land-based hatcheries using broodstock conditioning.
91                              Poulvac E. coli hatchery vaccination protected birds against mortality b
92 t disparities in survival-to-adulthood among hatchery- versus wild-origin juveniles persist.
93 ead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) from two different hatcheries were compared to wild-origin juveniles on sev
94 tions linked to live poultry from mail-order hatcheries were documented.
95 FW) kept in a commercial Scottish freshwater hatchery with that of their full-siblings after seawater
96 nd eubacterial cells from their hydrothermal hatchery, within which the LUCA itself remained confined