コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 fer long-lived protection if needed (eg, for health-care workers).
2 ributed to drug diversion by an HCV-infected health care worker.
3 ent stepped-care program led by a nonmedical health care worker.
4 ion of the parenteral narcotic fentanyl by a health care worker.
5 risk persons, such as exposed inpatients and health care workers.
6 rect contact or via the hands or clothing of health care workers.
7 occupational exposures and infections among health care workers.
8 tified among close contacts or 2038 screened health care workers.
9 d with either MDR-TB or XDR-TB than were non-health care workers.
10 nlisted, female, White, Reservist, Army, and health care workers.
11 t is associated with illicit narcotic use by health care workers.
12 wing a needlestick is an important threat to health care workers.
13 cing great stress on health care systems and health care workers.
14 th carriage of the organisms on the hands of health care workers.
15 nvironmental sources as well as patients and health care workers.
16 socomial outbreak involving 3 patients and 2 health care workers.
17 ic while prioritizing allocation of masks to health care workers.
18 cation of false-positive results in low-risk health care workers.
19 s have seen high psychiatric morbidity among health care workers.
20 denovirus diseases in vaccine recipients and health care workers.
21 The analysis included 3601 women and 176 health care workers.
22 o November for 2013 and 2014 and interviewed health-care workers.
23 happen rapidly, needing a rapid response by health-care workers.
24 n, particularly when identified in women and health-care workers.
25 uman mAb-based immunotherapy, especially for health-care workers.
26 ong females, children under age 5 years, and health-care workers.
27 ut and stress are common, linked problems in health-care workers.
28 epted by index patients, their contacts, and health-care workers.
29 eduction of bacterial counts on the hands of health-care workers.
31 iate personal protection equipment (PPE) for health care workers; 3) role of the Emergency Department
33 t 31, 2011, and Dec 23, 2012, we sampled 198 health-care workers, 40 environmental locations, and 185
35 t differ between health care workers and non-health care workers (55% vs. 57%); however, among HIV-in
36 tive, but cultures of the hands of 10 of 165 health care workers (6 percent) were positive for P. aer
40 the needs of medical centers, patients, and health care workers across services and roles, including
42 reak of seven cases (in six patients and one health care worker, all of whom had AIDS) of multidrug-r
44 4 patients (65%) were men, and 14 (38%) were health care workers; among the health care workers, noso
47 We analyzed serologic data collected from health care workers and first responders in New York Cit
48 collected cultures from the infants and the health care workers and from the health care workers' pe
49 utional generosity is critical in supporting health care workers and in enabling health care organiza
50 (-)CD127(-) effector memory cells in exposed health care workers and in patients with acquired immuni
52 for handling body fluids are recommended for health care workers and patients and their family member
53 a policy requiring universal masking of all health care workers and patients in a large health care
57 ety needle to reduce needlestick injuries to health care workers and the RPD to improve safety and ou
59 nt, and increased remuneration of specialist health-care workers and government support for childhood
60 t-prevalence survey, 9 additional infants, 1 health care worker, and 12 of the health care workers' p
61 ients, the 9 additional colonized infants, 1 health care worker, and 3 of the 12 dogs had identical p
62 tcoming in knowledge of influenza among many health care workers, and a paucity of clinical data and
63 d local leadership, including policy makers, health care workers, and funders, to propose an agenda t
65 ximally effective, increases in HIV testing, health care workers, and infrastructure are needed, in a
66 of professional activities for HCV-infected health care workers, and persons should not be excluded
68 sis, diagnosis, management, implications for health-care workers, and ethical and medicolegal aspects
69 lls for nations to gather health data, train health-care workers, and raise awareness in regard to AS
70 le, even when performed by minimally trained health-care workers, and when compared with point-of-car
71 he risk of COVID-19 exposure to patients and health care workers; and 3) to limit resource utilizatio
72 ing for symptomatic individuals by community health-care workers; and quarantine centres, for househo
73 occupational postexposure prophylaxis (PEP), health care workers are increasingly receiving inquiries
76 munication difficulties between refugees and health-care workers are another major hurdle, and every
77 ines or protocols articulating this role and health-care workers are trained in some settings, but ge
78 on was confirmed in a young, immunocompetent health care worker as viral genomes derived from the fir
79 nization and disease stages for patients and health care workers, as well as an isolation ward and bo
82 onavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) seropositivity among health care workers at a New York City-based health syst
86 Median nasal carriage rate of S aureus in health-care workers at 4-weekly timepoints was 36.9% (IQ
87 ction (PCR) in seropositive and seronegative health care workers attending testing of asymptomatic an
91 gement of neonatal resuscitation (skills) of health care workers before the intervention and after 6
92 scribes SARS-CoV-2 PCR test positivity among health care workers before, during, and after implementa
94 (3 with laboratory-confirmed cases) and in 2 health care workers (both with laboratory-confirmed case
96 tion designed for clergy was adapted for the health care worker committed to developing skills in the
97 ong 217 household contacts and more than 200 health care worker contacts whom we identified, MERS-CoV
98 key attitudes and perceptions may influence health care workers' decisions regarding vaccination.
100 nfidence interval (CI): 1.47, 7.17); correct health care worker diagnosis (OR = 2.59, 95% CI: 1.39, 4
103 andomized controlled trial (n = 20 clinics), health care workers either were trained in guidelines fo
104 person (e.g., a patient's family member or a health care worker) either before or after exposure to M
105 d by some, influenza vaccination rates among health care workers, even in pandemics, remain below opt
108 s of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in health care workers exposed to a disaster, in order to f
109 e a low health care worker-patient ratio (98 health care workers for 3200 beds), to operate these uni
110 vel tuberculosis (TB) vaccines and to screen health care workers for latent tuberculosis infection (L
111 and virus culture remained inconclusive, the health care worker formed a transmission cluster with 3
113 fter accidental needlestick exposure in five health care workers, four of whom developed acute hepati
116 mptomatic, whereas 2 anti-spike-seropositive health care workers had a positive PCR test (0.13 per 10
119 nts was 36.9% (IQR 35.7-37.3), and 115 (58%) health-care workers had S aureus detected at least once
120 for surveillance cultures were obtained from health care worker hands, central venous catheter insert
121 ntroduced into the intensive care nursery on health care workers' hands after being colonized from pe
122 l environmental conditions, transmission via health-care workers' hands, contaminated medical product
125 ealth-care facilities, and the emigration of health-care workers have led to a progressive decline in
126 primary health care facilities, and explored health care worker (HCW) perspectives on providing HIV t
127 nt- or parent-collected (self-collected) and health care worker (HCW)-collected pharyngeal swabs for
128 rately using pooled sera from latex-allergic health care workers (HCW) and spina bifida (SB) patients
130 ribed, as are the results of surveillance of health care workers (HCWs) and patients with potential e
131 patterns of dissemination among patients and health care workers (HCWs) and to quantify the contribut
133 onducted a cross-sectional study in low-risk health care workers (HCWs) at a single U.S. center to co
134 ol and Prevention to recommend that infected health care workers (HCWs) be reviewed by an expert pane
135 possibility of nosocomial transmission, 338 health care workers (HCWs) exposed and 288 HCWs unexpose
136 ompare the prevalence of H5N1 antibody among health care workers (HCWs) exposed to H5N1 case-patients
137 can offer graduate-level academic courses to health care workers (HCWs) in resource-limited settings
139 MRV) is a common condition of employment for health care workers (HCWs) to ensure compliance with nat
140 cal attention and thereby potentially infect health care workers (HCWs) who would not, in turn, have
141 ed patients, contaminated and uncontaminated health care workers (HCWs), and bacterial load in enviro
143 individuals, including 91 inpatients and 290 health care workers (HCWs), were included in the investi
150 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies in some patients and health care workers in a pediatric dialysis unit after c
151 e provision of cardiovascular care may place health care workers in a position of vulnerability as th
153 e rates of drug-resistant tuberculosis among health care workers in countries with high tuberculosis
155 is, or malaria, yet are virtually unknown by health care workers in North America, because they occur
156 ONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: While a majority of health care workers in one midwestern state reported rec
162 Tuberculosis is also a major problem in health-care workers in both low-burden and high-burden s
164 on receiving care from non-physician primary health-care workers in Nigeria, a stepped-care, problem-
169 lth care workers versus 11.9 per 100,000 non-health care workers (incidence rate ratio, 5.46 [95% CI,
170 alth care workers versus 1.1 per 100,000 non-health care workers (incidence rate ratio, 6.69 [CI, 4.3
171 cently emerged as a significant challenge to health-care workers, including those involved in dentist
175 re randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either health-care worker instruction or induction to obtain sp
176 d 481 patients, of whom 213 were assigned to health-care worker instruction versus 268 assigned to in
177 e hospital population comprised patients and health-care workers, interacting with its larger communi
178 selors, parents of children with clefts, and health care workers involved in the treatment or follow-
180 n several days of exposure (to assess if the health care worker is already infected with HCV) and 6 m
184 gnosis more frequently than instruction by a health-care worker, it is more costly, does not result i
185 effective method to improve and sustain the health care workers' knowledge and skills in neonatal re
186 need to be targeted to physicians and other health care workers, laboratorians, administrators, paye
187 We aimed to find out whether vaccination of health-care workers lowers mortality and the frequency o
188 ional-research program that brought together health care workers, manufacturers, and scientists to em
191 14 (38%) were health care workers; among the health care workers, nosocomial transmission was implica
192 y was to define whether rapidly reallocating health care workers not experienced with PP for performi
193 ies and other injuries from sharp objects to health care workers occur annually in the United States
194 ne than infants who were not exposed to this health care worker (odds ratio, 41.2; 95 percent confide
198 ty precautions are not overly burdensome for health care workers or for patients and their families.
199 tum obtained either under instruction from a health-care worker or through induction can improve case
200 rmine how often S aureus is transmitted from health-care workers or the environment to patients in an
201 regiver's reporting the child's fever to the health care worker (OR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.32, 3.62).
202 ary care), other medical or social services, health-care workers, or agencies, and emergency referral
203 eedle patch, all administered by an unmasked health-care worker; or received a single dose of (4) ina
204 duckbill) during extended use or reuse among health care workers over 2 days in April 2020 in the UCS
206 recipients but also to the community and to health care workers, particularly in the absence of effe
207 m, augmented by telemedicine to enable a low health care worker-patient ratio (98 health care workers
210 infants, 1 health care worker, and 12 of the health care workers' pet dogs had positive cultures for
211 nts and the health care workers and from the health care workers' pets, since this organism has been
214 risk assessment and management algorithm for health-care workers potentially exposed to Ebola virus a
215 method for risk assessment and management of health-care workers potentially exposed to Ebola virus a
217 Regarding health care workers safety, four health care workers presented with potential COVID-19 re
218 y and substantial mortality, are a threat to health-care workers, prohibitively expensive to treat, a
219 hese guidelines to help physicians and other health care workers provide optimal care for renal trans
221 therefore poses the single greatest risk to health care workers regarding occupational transmission
222 current pandemic, demands the generosity of health care workers-requiring them to make sacrifices wh
224 protection in children and adults (including health care workers) resulting from the hepatitis B vacc
225 -work considerations for exposed or infected health care workers, risk stratification and management
226 Universal glove and gown use also decreased health care worker room entry (4.28 vs 5.24 entries per
229 n at the Stanford Hospital and Clinics for a health care worker screening program revealed a critical
230 m non-outbreak situations means that routine health-care worker screening and S aureus eradication ar
232 on recommendations pertaining to susceptible health care workers, suggesting a need for provider educ
234 ata inform how states might optimally enlist health care workers' support in achieving vaccination go
237 2008 study in Seattle, Washington, of female health-care workers that exclusively worked night or day
239 inal cohort study, we systematically sampled health-care workers, the environment, and patients over
240 through task sharing in different groups of health-care workers: the mean difference was -5.34 mm Hg
241 n sulphate in vials or ampoules and requires health care workers to be trained in dose calculation or
243 derable problem despite numerous attempts by health care workers to reduce risk of transmission.
244 itically ill COVID-19 patients, reallocating health care workers to targeted medical tasks beyond the
245 sibility of rapidly training and fit testing health care workers to use elastomeric half-mask respira
246 ensive medical infrastructure who present to health care workers too late for postexposure prophylaxi
248 nces of transmission to patients (seven from health-care workers, two from the environment, and 16 fr
249 The analysis favors prior vaccination of health care workers unless the likelihood of any attack
250 tion of cases, were: hand-washing (11%-27%), health-care worker vaccination (6%-19%), prevaccination
251 XDR-TB hospitalizations was 7.2 per 100,000 health care workers versus 1.1 per 100,000 non-health ca
252 MDR-TB hospitalization was 64.8 per 100,000 health care workers versus 11.9 per 100,000 non-health c
253 ween the microneedle patch administered by a health-care worker versus the intramuscular route for th
254 acquisition, MRSA acquisition, frequency of health care worker visits, hand hygiene compliance, heal
255 Of 4624 women, 40 (0.9%) reported a trained health care worker was present at birth; 97% (4475/4612)
260 contamination of uncovered skin and hair of health care workers wearing personal protective equipmen
261 and monitoring exposed patients and assigned health care workers were at the core of the control meas
263 -TB were women (78% vs. 47%; P < 0.001), and health care workers were less likely to report previous
264 IV-infected patients, a higher percentage of health care workers were receiving antiretroviral medica
266 lowing an air disaster, 355 military medical health care workers were studied over an 18-month follow
269 ence of standard infection control measures, health-care workers were infrequently sources of transmi
270 ence of standard infection control measures, health-care workers were infrequently sources of transmi
272 demonstrated that 17 of these infants and 1 health care worker who had onychomycosis had the same cl
273 Multivariate logistic regression of data on health care workers who cared for victims of the air dis
274 tics (including doctor-nurse differences) of health care workers who did and did not receive the pand
277 tors associated with improved performance of health care workers who treat ill children in developing
279 here were 8, 904 nurses and 3, 977 non-nurse health care workers who were selected using simple rando
281 well as providing additional protection for health-care workers who are inadvertently exposed over t
282 thologists, radiation oncologists, and other health-care workers who are needed for cancer care.
284 rnational group of physicians and associated health-care workers who have expertise in therapeutic mo
287 r percentage of health care workers than non-health care workers with MDR-TB or XDR-TB were women (78
289 c CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells were detected in health care workers with occupational exposure to HBV an
290 merase-specific CD8(+) T cells in vaccinated health care workers with occupational exposure to HBV.
291 ong-term protection by the HBV vaccine in 90 health care workers with or without occupational exposur
292 , and respiratory protection, especially for health care workers with prolonged exposure to LHR plume
293 e UK government vaccinated approximately 300 health care workers with vaccinia virus (VACV) strain Li
294 e inadequate; is implemented by a variety of health care workers with varying levels of expertise; an
296 spirators versus medical masks for frontline health care workers working with patients with COVID-19,
297 lti-drug resistant phenotype that challenges health care workers worldwide is caused by an array of r
300 rocedure in our screening program for 14,830 health care workers yielded an indeterminate result rate