ライフサイエンスコーパス: healthy eating index

1 et) to 1.86 (95% CI = 1.71-2.01; Alternative Healthy Eating Index).

2 lifestyles (smoking, physical activity, and Healthy Eating Index).

3 rsus lowest quintile of modified Alternative Healthy Eating Index).

4 ty was assessed using the ACS diet score and Healthy Eating Index.

5 cipants, as measured by a modified Alternate Healthy Eating Index.

6 Baseline Healthy Eating Index-15 (HEI-15) scores were compared to

7 The Healthy Eating Index 1999-2000 (HEI) and energy-adjusted

8 system was significantly associated with the Healthy Eating Index 2005 (P < 0.0001).

9 ween 2 index-based dietary patterns [ie, the Healthy Eating Index-2005 (HEI-2005) and alternate Medit

10 to a Mediterranean dietary pattern or to the Healthy Eating Index-2005 (HEI-2005) is associated with

11 sociation between 3 diet quality indices-the Healthy Eating Index-2005 (HEI-2005), Alternate Healthy

12 omparing the highest scores with the lowest: Healthy Eating Index-2005 (relative risk (RR) = 0.72, 95

13 In women, reduced risk was found with the Healthy Eating Index-2005 and increased risk with the me

14 The authors compared how four indexes-the Healthy Eating Index-2005, Alternate Healthy Eating Inde

15 nificantly decreased risk was found with the Healthy Eating Index-2005, although Alternate Healthy Ea

16 >/=1 CGM variable was associated with higher Healthy Eating Index-2005, whole plant food density, fib

17 Alternative Healthy Eating Index 2010 (AHEI) and Empirical Dietary I

18 thy Eating Index 2010 (HEI), the Alternative Healthy Eating Index 2010 (AHEI), the Alternate Mediterr

19 hort study was assessed with the Alternative Healthy Eating Index 2010 (AHEI-2010) in 1991-1994, 1997

20 Mediterranean (AMED) diets and the Alternate Healthy Eating Index 2010 (AHEI-2010) were calculated us

21 sess prepregnancy adherence to the alternate Healthy Eating Index 2010 (aHEI-2010), alternate Mediter

22 on 4 commonly used diet quality indices-the Healthy Eating Index 2010 (HEI), the Alternative Healthy

23 s study examined the association between the Healthy Eating Index 2010 (HEI-2010) and body fatness on

24 The Healthy Eating Index 2010 (HEI-2010) and mean adequacy r

25 Diet quality index scores on Healthy Eating Index 2010 (HEI-2010), Alternative HEI-20

26 ary quality was measured with the use of the Healthy Eating Index 2010 (HEI-2010).

27 ating Index 2010 [HEI-2010], the Alternative Healthy Eating Index 2010 [AHEI-2010], the alternate Med

28 d the associations between 4 DQI scores (the Healthy Eating Index 2010 [HEI-2010], the Alternative He

29 ics from fasting blood and 24-hour urine for Healthy Eating Index 2010 and Alternative Healthy Eating

30 l pregnancy diet was self-reported using the Healthy Eating Index 2010 questionnaire.

31 ed and Flexitarian-and exhibited the highest Healthy Eating Index 2010 scores.

32 or Healthy Eating Index 2010 and Alternative Healthy Eating Index 2010 to address measurement error f

33 for aMED, 0.94 (0.85, 1.03) for alternative healthy eating index 2010, 0.77 (0.70, 0.85) for DASH, 0

34 ohol intake, 8% and 11% for a high Alternate Healthy Eating Index 2010, 9% and 5% for being physicall

35 ces--the Alternate Mediterranean Diet Index, Healthy Eating Index 2010, Alternate Healthy Eating Inde

36 rds from the NPAAS-FS were used to calculate Healthy Eating Index 2010, Alternative Healthy Eating In

37 ulate Healthy Eating Index 2010, Alternative Healthy Eating Index 2010, alternative Mediterranean die

38 Index, Healthy Eating Index 2010, Alternate Healthy Eating Index 2010, and the Dietary Approaches to

39 nate Mediterranean Index (aMED), Alternative Healthy Eating Index 2010, dietary approaches to stop hy

40 t quality was assessed using the Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010 (AHEI).

41 idlife was ascertained using the Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010 (AHEI-2010) and Alternate Medi

42 e Mediterranean Diet (AMED), and Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010 (AHEI-2010) from dietary intak

43 Hypertension (DASH) diet, and the alternate Healthy Eating Index-2010 (AHEI-2010) in association wit

44 lthy Eating Index-2005 (HEI-2005), Alternate Healthy Eating Index-2010 (AHEI-2010), and alternate Med

45 ranean Diet Score (aMED) and the Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010 (AHEI-2010).

46 ned association of 3 diet-quality indicators-Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI), Whole Plant Foods Densi

47 ents and micronutrients, 2) dietary quality [Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI)], and 3) beverage catego

48 the association of two dietary indices, the Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI-2010) and the alternate M

49 quality of intake for lunch, measured by the Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI-2010) score (range, 0-100

50 of the following 4 diet-quality indexes [the Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI-2010), the Alternative HE

51 re adjusted for confounders, including other Healthy Eating Index-2010 components.

52 dietary quality assessed by the Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010 score, whereas better dietary

53 baseline to 60 years) using the Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010 score, which was assessed 3 ti

54 Healthy Eating Index-2010 score, which we used to assess

55 d refined grain intake contributed to higher Healthy Eating Index-2010 scores among HIP participants

56 week, diet in the top 40% of the Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010, and 0.1 to 14.9 g/day of alco

57 n Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS), Alternate Healthy Eating Index-2010, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hy

58 ing the Healthy Eating Index-2020, Alternate Healthy Eating Index-2010, Mediterranean Diet Score (Med

59 ined dietary patterns, namely, the Alternate Healthy Eating Index-2010, the Dietary Approaches to Sto

60 he Healthy Eating Index-2020 and Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010, with scores calculated based

61 To date, Healthy Eating Index 2015 (HEI-2015) scores have not bee

62 y), and overall healthy eating, as scored by Healthy Eating Index 2015 (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.98/1

63 gher scores indicating healthier diets), the Healthy Eating Index 2015 (range, 0-100, with higher sco

64 Findings were similar for Healthy Eating Index 2015.

65 compared with 1 = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.50, 0.87), Healthy Eating Index-2015 (aHR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.59, 0.97

66 Between-visit mean Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI) scores (min = 0, max = 1

67 (HPSs) derived from cafeteria purchases and Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-15) scores derived from d

68 We used factor analyses and the Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015) score to derive mat

69 cross 17 food groups, 2 nutrient groups, and healthy eating index-2015 diet quality score.

70 577, age: 20-65yrs) was performed using the healthy eating index-2015 framework in conformation with

71 e association between these problems and the healthy eating index-2015 remains unknown.

72 We examined the association between Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores and death from all caus

73 was to assess total usual nutrient intakes, Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores, and nutritional biomar

74 e data from 24-h recalls were used to derive Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores.

75 ed associations of participation status with Healthy Eating Index-2015 total and component scores in

76 Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), the Healthy Eating Index-2015, and the Mediterranean-DASH In

77 ohol consumption, physical activity, and the Healthy-Eating-Index-2015.

78 olute macronutrients, macronutrient density, healthy eating index 2020 score, and intake timing.

79 Dietary patterns were assessed by the Healthy Eating Index-2020 and Alternative Healthy Eating

80 Diet quality was scored using the Healthy Eating Index-2020 and categorized as higher or l

81 ty of dietary groups that contributed to the Healthy Eating Index-2020 score.

82 The Healthy Eating Index-2020 was calculated to assess diet

83 Diet quality was measured using the Healthy Eating Index-2020, Alternate Healthy Eating Inde

84 Diet quality was measured with the Healthy Eating Index-2020.

85 et, (3) Panagiotakos Mediterranean diet, (4) Healthy Eating Index, (5) Alternate Healthy Eating Index

86 iet, (4) Healthy Eating Index, (5) Alternate Healthy Eating Index, (6) American Heart Association (AH

87 ty as assessed with the use of the Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI) 2 y later.

88 ify major dietary patterns and the Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI) and the alternate Mediterran

89 aimed to investigate whether the Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI) and the clinically abbreviat

90 dentify proteomic markers of the Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI) and the Dietary Approaches t

91 A priori diet scores such as the Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI) and the food-based a priori

92 nate measures of diet quality, the Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI) and the Recommended Food Sco

93 Mediterranean diet (aMED), and the Alternate Healthy Eating Index (aHEI) diet-quality scores with car

94 s to Stop Hypertension (DASH), and alternate Healthy Eating Index (aHEI) dietary patterns with risk o

95 High scores on the Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI) have been associated with lo

96 e healthy eating index (HEI) and alternative healthy eating index (AHEI) of a breastfeeding mother's

97 ats" (FPM) dietary pattern and the Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI)) and three complementary mea

98 FQ data were used to calculate the Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI), a measure of diet quality t

99 Adherence to alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI), alternate Mediterranean die

100 quency questionnaire to derive the Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI), an 11-component diet qualit

101 the Healthy Eating Index (HEI), Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI), and alternate Mediterranean

102 ernate Mediterranean Diet Score, Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI), and Prudent, plus Western (

103 on the Healthy Eating Index (HEI), Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI), Diet Quality Index Revised

104 althy dietary pattern, such as the Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI), is associated with a lower

105 hy diet, as defined by using the Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI), was prospectively associate

106 assessed diet quality using the Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI)-2010, the alternative Medite

107 e Mediterranean diet score (aMED), alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI)-2010, the Dietary Approaches

108 ng Index (HEI)-2005, HEI-2010, and Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI)-2010-in relation to ovarian

109 iet quality was assessed using the Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI).

110 mine whether a conventional index [Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI)] or a novel index [Women's H

111 diterranean Diet Score (MDS-P) and Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI-P).

112 scores (2 Mediterranean and the Alternative Healthy Eating Index [AHEI]) were computed.

113 erranean style diet score [MDS], Alternative Healthy Eating Index [AHEI], and Healthy Eating Index [H

114 nal) disease, higher scores on the alternate Healthy Eating Index (aHR quartile 4 compared with 1 = 0

115 o-fiber ratio), and indices of diet quality (healthy eating index, alternate healthy eating index, di

116 The alternative Healthy Eating Index and a biomarker of flavanol intake

117 idual nutrients, dietary patterns (Alternate Healthy Eating Index and Alternate Mediterranean Diet Sc

118 diterranean-style diet score and Alternative Healthy Eating Index and lower risk for all-cause mortal

119 nificantly lower indicators of diet quality (Healthy Eating Index and Mean Adequacy Ratio) and intake

120 2 dietary indexes: the modified Alternative Healthy Eating Index and the Diet Risk Score.

121 dietary patterns (assessed by the Alternate Healthy Eating Index) and was attenuated by healthy diet

122 l activity, alcohol consumption, Alternative Healthy Eating Index, and diabetes.

123 Health guidelines, diet quality by using the Healthy Eating Index, and weight-loss intention and phys

124 t risk have focused on specific nutrients or healthy eating indexes but not on identifiable dietary g

125 ing was shifted to 75 years, the Alternative Healthy Eating Index diet showed the strongest associati

126 iet quality (healthy eating index, alternate healthy eating index, dietary approaches to stop hyperte

127 come-to-needs ratio, Area Deprivation Index, Healthy Eating Index, educational level, and insurance s

128 r lifestyle factors and a modified Alternate Healthy Eating Index (excluding overlapping components),

129 All 4 healthy eating indexes had inverse associations with epi

130 e correlation of 4 diet quality indexes [the Healthy Eating Index (HEI) 2010, the Alternate Mediterra

131 umes; processed meat; and saturated fat) and Healthy Eating Index (HEI) 2015 score (range, 0-100).

132 e scores of items consumed, against: (a) the Healthy Eating Index (HEI) 2015; (b) clinical risk facto

133 to investigate the relationship between the healthy eating index (HEI) and alternative healthy eatin

134 of adherence to the Mediterranean diet, the Healthy Eating Index (HEI) and Alternative HEI (AHEI), t

135 We sought to examine how the Healthy Eating Index (HEI) and its 13 subgroups, the hea

136 and bottom quintiles were compared on the US Healthy Eating Index (HEI) and on the amounts of specifi

137 ions between diet quality measured using the Healthy Eating Index (HEI) and urinary metabolomic profi

138 The Healthy Eating Index (HEI) is a 100-point analytic scori

139 The Healthy Eating Index (HEI) is a measure of diet quality

140 The healthy eating index (HEI) measures the concordance of d

141 nsumption, within diets of both high and low healthy eating index (HEI) quality, was associated with

142 sociations between alcohol and diet quality (Healthy Eating Index (HEI) scores) using cross-sectional

143 P cycle and their macronutrient consumption, Healthy Eating Index (HEI) scores, and fruit and vegetab

144 ar regressions examined associations between Healthy Eating Index (HEI) scores, dietary iron, and iro

145 the diet quality of LMD adults by using the Healthy Eating Index (HEI) to 1) identify potential and

146 ogic Studies-Depression (CES-D) scores, 2005 Healthy Eating Index (HEI) values, and dual-energy X-ray

147 For both questionnaires, a Healthy Eating Index (HEI) was developed as an indicator

148 Adherence to the DGA was measured by the Healthy Eating Index (HEI), 2010 and 2005 editions (HEI-

149 Diet-quality scores on the Healthy Eating Index (HEI), Alternate Healthy Eating Ind

150 to healthy dietary patterns, measured by the Healthy Eating Index (HEI), Alternative Healthy Eating I

151 erformance was repeatedly tested against the Healthy Eating Index (HEI), an independent measure of a

152 red by the Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII), Healthy Eating Index (HEI), and Diet Quality Index (DQI)

153 utrient Intake (PANDiet) diet quality index, Healthy Eating Index (HEI), and Dietary Inflammatory Ind

154 Overall diet quality indices, such as the Healthy Eating Index (HEI), are preferred for epidemiolo

155 The healthy eating index (HEI), developed at the US Departme

156 Dietary quality was evaluated using the Healthy Eating Index (HEI), in which a higher score indi

157 nship of dietary quality, as measured by the Healthy Eating Index (HEI), to the prevalence of ECC in

158 asured with the US Department of Agriculture Healthy Eating Index (HEI), was associated with only a s

159 Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2005 values were estimated wi

160 udy evaluated 3 index-based dietary patterns-Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2005, HEI-2010, and Alternate

161 SH), Mediterranean dietary score (MeDS), and Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2010-and ~6-y incidence of ac

162 oral changes in diet quality measured by the Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2015 and in the prevalence of

163 Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2015 and the Children's Dieta

164 usted Dietary Inflammatory Index (E-DII) and Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2015 scores were computed.

165 al Dietary Inflammatory Pattern (rEDIP), and Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2015 scores, and tested their

166 d a prospective analysis of adherence to the Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2015, alternative HEI-2010, a

167 the alternate Mediterranean diet (aMED), the Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2015, and the healthful plant

168 d the Alternative Healthy Index (AHEI)-2010, Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2015, the Dietary Approach to

169 es to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet, and the Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2015-and used multivariate me

170 DQ was assessed by the Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2015.

171 of high interest in research, including the Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2020, the Alternative HEI 201

172 Diet quality was assessed using the Healthy Eating Index (HEI).

173 ivity (PA), and diet quality measured by the Healthy Eating Index (HEI).

174 the non-SSB diet was measured using the 2015 Healthy Eating Index (HEI).

175 ding supplementary calcium (DQI-Ca), and the Healthy Eating Index (HEI)] and biomarkers of inflammati

176 At age 2 y, dietary quality [healthy eating index (HEI)] and parental feeding practic

177 Food Certification Program criteria and 2005 Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2005) scores, food-group intak

178 Alternative Healthy Eating Index [AHEI], and Healthy Eating Index [HEI]) were calculated as averages

179 t, diet quality as measured by the Alternate Healthy Eating Index improves, and the risk of these hea

180 Using the alternative Healthy Eating Index in all participants and a urine-bas

181 st vs lowest tertile of modified Alternative Healthy Eating Index [mAHEI]; 23.2%, 18.2-28.9 for lowes

182 xes-the Healthy Eating Index-2005, Alternate Healthy Eating Index, Mediterranean Diet Score, and Reco

183 index (BMI) z-score; and (2) an abbreviated Healthy Eating Index (mini-HEI, 1 m window, as mean of z

184 scoring in the top quintile of the Alternate Healthy Eating Index or bottom quintile of a Western-typ

185 editerranean-style diet score or Alternative Healthy Eating Index, or both, in European ancestry part

186 lthy criterion met: high-scoring Alternative Healthy Eating Index, physically active, healthy body ma

187 easurements and high-quality diet (Alternate Healthy Eating Index-Pregnancy score 75th percentile) an

188 In addition, the Healthy Eating Index provides a single summary measure o

189 iet (top two fifthsof the modified Alternate Healthy Eating Index), regular exercise (>=150 min/week

190 ealthy Eating Index-2005, although Alternate Healthy Eating Index results were similar.

191 idence interval (CI): 0.62, 0.83); Alternate Healthy Eating Index (RR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.61, 0.81); Me

192 Diet quality was assessed using the Spanish Healthy Eating Index (S-HEI; a higher score denotes grea

193 turated fats, trans fatty acids, Alternative Healthy Eating Index score, vegetable/fruit and meat/fri

194 rranean-style diet score and the Alternative Healthy Eating Index score.

195 Healthy Eating Index scores and nutrient analysis were p

196 healthier quintiles of modified Alternative Healthy Eating Index scores had a significantly lower ri

197 e scores (0-6 points) were assigned based on Healthy Eating Index scores, physical activity (metaboli

198 alculate scores from the 2015 version of the Healthy Eating Index (scores range from 0 [worst diet] t

199 re eaten over the prior day to report a SPAN Healthy Eating Index (SHEI) score and subscores for spec

200 nsecurity with diet quality, as indicated by Healthy Eating Index-Toddlers-2020, in United States chi

201 calculated scores on 4 recommendation-based healthy eating indexes using a validated 110-item Block

202 hort, we estimated effects on the mean Youth Healthy Eating Index (YHEI) score in early childhood of