戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ive mobility rehabilitation intervention for hemianopia.
2 ing the efficacy of prismatic treatments for hemianopia.
3 e could be visualized at longer durations of hemianopia.
4              All participants had homonymous hemianopia.
5  neuritis, and residual vision in homonymous hemianopia.
6 w pointed to the side contralateral to their hemianopia.
7 effective in restoring visual sensitivity in hemianopia.
8 ifically are critical for residual vision in hemianopia.
9 ere shifted contralaterally in patients with hemianopia alone and ipsilaterally in patients with hemi
10 6 patients with adult-acquired or congenital hemianopia and 12 age-matched controls.
11 point were also shifted contralaterally with hemianopia and ipsilaterally with hemi-neglect.
12 how the degeneration varies with duration of hemianopia and location of insult.
13 ural scans from 39 patients (12 female) with hemianopia and occipital lobe damage.
14  training, shown to improve visual fields in hemianopia and optic nerve damage, might comprise such a
15 ological disorders like hemispatial neglect, hemianopia and other deficits after stroke.
16 maging, with particular reference to work on hemianopia and the controversial suggestion of cortical
17        Thirty-three patients with homonymous hemianopias and 50 normal subjects were tested with SAP
18 ients' test times were 40 seconds longer for hemianopias and 90 seconds longer for optic neuropathies
19 n the first SITA standard test by 0.82 dB in hemianopias and by 0.71 dB in optic neuropathy patients.
20  Examination demonstrated a right homonymous hemianopia, and magnetic resonance imaging revealed an e
21 unction in hemianopia.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Hemianopia (blindness on one side of space) is widely co
22 patients with an incomplete right homonymous hemianopia, but no reading deficit, viewed single words
23 ted in patients with severe right homonymous hemianopia, commensurate with their inability to perform
24                                              Hemianopia commonly complicates stroke and, less frequen
25 eaders and have shown how a right homonymous hemianopia disrupts the motor preparation of reading sac
26             Patients with stable, homonymous hemianopia due to unilateral occipital infarcts and cont
27 e 18 years or older with complete homonymous hemianopia for at least 3 months and without visual negl
28 ficantly greater in the controls than in the hemianopia groups (P < 0.001).
29                                   Homonymous hemianopia had a negative impact on patients' QoL by lim
30                                Patients with hemianopias had lesions of the retrochiasmal visual syst
31       The mean RNT in the eyes with temporal hemianopia (here called the 'crossing-fibre defect' eyes
32              The mean RNT in eyes with nasal hemianopia (here called the 'non-crossing-fibre defect'
33 in a group of seven patients with homonymous hemianopia; here a negative straight line relationship w
34                  Individuals with homonymous hemianopia (HH) are permitted to drive in some jurisdict
35 designed to examine the effect of homonymous hemianopia (HH) on detection of pedestrian figures in mu
36 ight patients with stroke-induced homonymous hemianopia (HH) were randomized into 2 training arms: in
37  The hypothesis that drivers with homonymous hemianopia (HH) would take a lane position that increase
38                                   Homonymous hemianopia (HH), a common visual impairment resulting fr
39 ty of life (QoL) in patients with homonymous hemianopia (HH).
40 al nerve fibre loss in congenital homonymous hemianopia in humans is well recognized from clinical ob
41  with concentric peripheral defect, temporal hemianopia, inferotemporal defect, near total loss, supe
42                                   Homonymous hemianopia is the commonest form of acquired homonymous
43  of the OT occurs in acquired and congenital hemianopia, is correlated with visual field loss, and is
44                                              Hemianopia, loss of vision in half of the visual field,
45 age to the primary visual cortex (V1) causes hemianopia, many patients retain some residual vision; k
46            However, defects in patients with hemianopias may be missed because of the presence of sca
47 sic symptoms (eg, motor weakness, dysphasia, hemianopia, monocular visual loss) but no consensus on s
48 ith left hemianopia, two patients with right hemianopia, nine patients with left hemi-neglect and nin
49 age >18 years at time of testing; homonymous hemianopia; no other ophthalmic or neurological disorder
50 ogic examination showed mild left homonymous hemianopia, normal gait with no cerebellar signs, and pr
51         Patients with an acquired homonymous hemianopia often adapt over a period of a few months to
52 0 volunteers (100%) successfully simulated a hemianopia on the first and second fields.
53 cortex (V1) causes a loss of vision known as hemianopia or cortically-induced blindness.
54   Nine study participants (15%) demonstrated hemianopia or quadrantanopia, and an additional 36% had
55   Sensitivities were higher in patients with hemianopias or optic neuropathies using SITA standard co
56        No patient had isolated gaze paresis, hemianopia, or neglect.
57 t for the optic neuropathy patients; for the hemianopia patients the difference in values were betwee
58  direct future rehabilitation strategies for hemianopia patients.
59              Dyslexia, incomplete homonymous hemianopia, preserved color identification with abnormal
60  seen with FDT testing in some patients with hemianopia, probably due to light scatter across the ver
61 ed, resulting in a complete right homonymous hemianopia, rightward saccades during text reading are d
62                         In the patients with hemianopia, scattered abnormal test locations with FDT t
63 tive method for restoring visual function in hemianopia.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Hemianopia (blindness
64 row pointed to the side ipsilateral to their hemianopia than they did when the arrow pointed to the s
65 tween the Matrix and SAP in the detection of hemianopias, the sensitivity of SAP was higher, probably
66 ng line bisection in five patients with left hemianopia, two patients with right hemianopia, nine pat
67                                              Hemianopia (unilateral blindness), a common consequence
68 nts with a relative homonymous or bitemporal hemianopia were tested with both conventional perimetry
69             Two people with homonymous right hemianopias were tested on a number of measures of non-c
70 re alexia ("alexia without agraphia") and no hemianopia, who read words slowly using a letter-by-lett