ライフサイエンスコーパス: hemodynamically

1 PHP is a hemodynamically active nitric oxide scavenger.

2 They produce hemodynamically active, proinflammatory microparticles t

3 8-fold increased deletion frequency and the hemodynamically affected (worse affected) PAD limb had a

4 PAD but in a distribution not limited to the hemodynamically affected limb.

5 cantly from their never-affected peers, both hemodynamically and electrophysiologically.

6 ion, and approximately 10% will decompensate hemodynamically and suffer high mortality, though identi

7 perflubron administration was well tolerated hemodynamically and was not associated with deterioratio

8 Development of chronic PH was confirmed hemodynamically, and animals were randomized to intratra

9 renal, and echocardiographic evaluations and hemodynamically assessed at euthanization.

10 ovascular coupling after stroke can confound hemodynamically based measurements of functional connect

11 Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is hemodynamically classified as pre-capillary (as seen in

12 Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a multifactorial, hemodynamically complex syndrome associated with high mo

13 overall transplant population, p < 0.05) and hemodynamically comprising rejection episodes (1.3 +/- 1

14 culated using 126 datasets collected from 31 hemodynamically compromised patients had a standard devi

15 ent surgery continues to be the standard for hemodynamically compromised patients with blunt hepatic

16 Hemodynamically compromised patients with pelvic fractur

17 he first diagnosis of SBP, the proportion of hemodynamically compromised patients with systolic arter

18 acute pulmonary embolism, especially in the hemodynamically compromised population.

19 d SBP, NSBBs increase the proportion who are hemodynamically compromised, time of hospitalization, an

20 helpful in detecting the human fetus that is hemodynamically compromised.

21 an ameliorative influence of pravastatin on hemodynamically compromising rejection after heart trans

22 Despite an increased number of early and hemodynamically compromising rejections, the long-term g

23 nsplant) frequency (p = 0.025) and severity (hemodynamically compromising) (p < 0.01) were independen

24 ctive cohort study included individuals with hemodynamically confirmed HFpEF from the Massachusetts G

25 The demonstration that hemodynamically derived stimuli can be strong modulators

26 , young children may remain well compensated hemodynamically, despite significant blood loss.

27 For patients with recurrent hemodynamically destabilizing ventricular tachycardia an

28 However, epinephrine bolus seems to be hemodynamically detrimental in circumstances of single-v

29 Twenty-nine hemodynamically different states were obtained pharmacol

30 sheep with surgically induced chronic AR, 18 hemodynamically different states were studied.

31 sheep with surgically induced chronic AR, 20 hemodynamically different states were studied.

32 to 20 weeks after surgically induced AR, 22 hemodynamically different states were studied.

33 k is a high-acuity, potentially complex, and hemodynamically diverse state of end-organ hypoperfusion

34 ffers a tool for investigating mechanisms of hemodynamically driven intimal hyperplasia and arterial

35 We speculate that TCPC may result in a more hemodynamically efficient circulation than APA because o

36 In contrast, the administration of AS at a hemodynamically equieffective dose not only failed to at

37 ered robust and elastic artery using a novel hemodynamically-equivalent pulsatile bioreactor.

38 S in restenosis and thrombosis might dictate hemodynamically favorable stent designs and deployment c

39 ation, the animal was permitted to stabilize hemodynamically for 4 mins.

40 d clinical trial testing the hypothesis that hemodynamically guided HF management decreases decompens

41 red SCUF because of congestion refractory to hemodynamically guided intensive medical therapy.

42 Hemodynamically guided management of patients with chron

43 Hemodynamically guided management of patients with HF wi

44 4 patients with advanced HF before and after hemodynamically guided therapy with vasodilators and diu

45 othelial nitric oxide synthase was tolerated hemodynamically in patients with PAH.

46 Since a relatively brief treatment with hemodynamically inactive doses of NO donors can induce l

47 s small and may have, in part, been due to a hemodynamically-induced deficit in energy substrates.

48 There was no procedural mortality and only 1 hemodynamically insignificant pericardial effusion was o

49 nic myocardial infarction (MI) is frequently hemodynamically intolerable and associated with multiple

50 niques have been described for unmappable or hemodynamically intolerable VT.

51 0.0009) at the same flow rate in the resting hemodynamically isolated skeletal muscle microcirculatio

52 (RVHF) in which the right ventricle (RV) is hemodynamically loaded, the left ventricle (LV) is hemod

53 nts with ARDS and class III obesity tolerate hemodynamically LRM with high airway pressure.

54 eys with prior renal mass reduction triggers hemodynamically mediated processes that damage glomeruli

55 and pentobarbital, mechanically ventilated, hemodynamically monitored, and then challenged with Esch

56 as induced in conscious, fluid-resuscitated, hemodynamically-monitored rats.

57 Hemodynamically obstructive CAD defined as ICA fractiona

58 Hemodynamically obstructive CAD was defined as >90% diam

59 Hemodynamically obstructive CAD was present in 170/400 (

60 s those who failed to improve clinically and hemodynamically on calcium channel blockers, were treate

61 cross the conducting system while ensuring a hemodynamically optimal atrioventricular activation sequ

62 ntricular pacing at separately preidentified hemodynamically optimal AV delay (BiV-Opt) enhanced coro

63 40 ms, 120 ms, and separately preidentified hemodynamically optimal AV delay.

64 ing method could serve as an alternative and hemodynamically preferable approach for antibradycardia

65 FFR and CCTA plus CT perfusion for detecting hemodynamically relevant CAD.

66 ected ischemia in 4 patients (7%; ie, 27% of hemodynamically relevant cases, all true positive, none

67 al coherence tomography (OCT) in identifying hemodynamically severe coronary stenoses as determined b

68 oderate diagnostic efficiency in identifying hemodynamically severe coronary stenoses.

69 Of 546 arterial segments, 148 (27.1%) had a hemodynamically significant (>/= 50%) stenosis.

70 Hemodynamically significant (>50%) stenoses were identif

71 nd decreased an average of 6.3% +/- 2.1 when hemodynamically significant (>70%) stenosis of the super

72 Thirty-eight (41%) vessels were deemed hemodynamically significant (>90% stenosis or FFR</=0.80

73 y (CT) coronary angiography for detection of hemodynamically significant (>or=50%) stenoses by using

74 cm2/m2<indexed EOA< or =0.85 cm2/m2), or not hemodynamically significant (indexed EOA >0.85 cm2/m2).

75 ies were 97% and 89%, respectively, and, for hemodynamically significant abnormalities, 92% and 77%.

76 owed correct diagnosis of 22 (92%) of the 24 hemodynamically significant abnormalities.

77 in either kidney; this patient had bilateral hemodynamically significant accessory artery stenoses.

78 s, and challenges in determining if a PDA is hemodynamically significant and clinically relevant.

79 nd resting heart rate (RHR) in patients with hemodynamically significant aortic regurgitation (AR) is

80 ome of a large, asymptomatic population with hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis (AS).

81 In hemodynamically significant AR, coexistent MR is not unc

82 In patients with chronic hemodynamically significant AR, routinely measured DBP a

83 Most patients with asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant AS will develop symptoms wit

84 plaque rupture accelerate the progression of hemodynamically significant atherosclerotic lesions.

85 Hemodynamically significant CAD was diagnosed in 116 (41

86 crimination vs CT alone for the diagnosis of hemodynamically significant CAD when FFR determined at t

87 liable stenosis-specific method to determine hemodynamically significant CAD.

88 ccuracy of SPECT, PET, and CCTA in detecting hemodynamically significant CAD.

89 are no uniformly accepted cutoff values for hemodynamically significant CAD.

90 ld standard in the management of symptomatic hemodynamically significant carotid stenoses.

91 Nineteen women (38%) were known to have hemodynamically significant coarctation during pregnancy

92 during their pregnancy, 11 of whom (73%) had hemodynamically significant coarctation during that time

93 emission tomography can accurately rule out hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease and

94 Hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease is a

95 fractional flow reserve for the diagnosis of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.

96 asive fractional flow reserve for evaluating hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.

97 nd specificity of Blood(RT) for diagnosis of hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis was 98% an

98 A hemodynamically significant focal stenosis identified by

99 te of moderate or severe cellular rejection, hemodynamically significant graft dysfunction, a second

100 present the case of a 50-year-old woman with hemodynamically significant humoral rejection resistant

101 tients (17%), moderate in 168 (43%), and not hemodynamically significant in 154 (40%).

102 kidneys and the percentage of patients with hemodynamically significant isolated stenoses of accesso

103 serve, and RFR were lower for vessels with a hemodynamically significant lesion (2.01+/-0.78 versus 2

104 Development of a hemodynamically significant lesion following renal arter

105 ated on for mitral regurgitation as a single hemodynamically significant lesion were studied.

106 While FFR identifies hemodynamically significant lesions likely to produce is

107 ed to avoid the development of what may be a hemodynamically significant level of auto-PEEP.

108 ismatch (80+/-3% and 65+/-5%; P=0.026) or no hemodynamically significant mismatch (85+/-3% and 74+/-5

109 (P=0.0008) than patients with moderate or no hemodynamically significant mismatch.

110 idence interval 1.3 to 7.4; P=0.009) than no hemodynamically significant mismatch.

111 op an easily measured screening variable for hemodynamically significant MR.

112 surgical) (6 [8.0%] of 75) device closure of hemodynamically significant muscular VSDs.

113 yocardial infarction, even in the absence of hemodynamically significant obstruction of left ventricu

114 in right ventricular hypertrophy, confirming hemodynamically significant PAH.

115 PDA (BF10 = 2.90; 10 studies), moderate for hemodynamically significant PDA (BF10 = 3.77; 3 studies)

116 Of 754 infants with hemodynamically significant PDA (mean [standard deviatio

117 t analysis, each additional month of PDA and hemodynamically significant PDA exposure was associated

118 h clinical and echocardiography diagnoses of hemodynamically significant PDA was conducted at 3 terti

119 -alpha) levels are elevated in patients with hemodynamically significant pressure and volume overload

120 In patients with hemodynamically significant pulmonary embolism, physiolo

121 Fifteen pigs after 6 weeks of hemodynamically significant RAS were studied before and

122 bility from using poststenotic PSV to detect hemodynamically significant renal arterial stenoses, but

123 eater than 20% was present in 36 (59%) of 52 hemodynamically significant renal artery stenoses, and s

124 Eighty-seven kidneys in 68 patients had hemodynamically significant renal artery stenoses.

125 scularization, which indicated that they had hemodynamically significant renal artery stenoses.

126 y improving sensitivity for and depiction of hemodynamically significant shunts and valvular regurgit

127 s was present in nine (75%) of 12 unilateral hemodynamically significant stenoses but in only one con

128 Electron-beam CT angiography can depict hemodynamically significant stenoses in the LAD and LCX

129 Identification of hemodynamically significant stenoses may be confounded b

130 interventions, which are indicated whenever hemodynamically significant stenoses occur.

131 Two patients had coexistent hemodynamically significant stenoses of accessory and ma

132 gioplasty (CAS) is increasingly utilized for hemodynamically significant stenoses of the extracranial

133 overall sensitivity of electron-beam CT for hemodynamically significant stenoses was 88%, and specif

134 our accessory arteries in three patients had hemodynamically significant stenoses.

135 nsitive test in predicting the presence of a hemodynamically significant stenosis and that shunt stat

136 % (n = 21), FFR(CT) excluded lesion-specific hemodynamically significant stenosis in 8 cases (38%).

137 Hemodynamically significant stenosis in at least 1 coron

138 The prevalence of a hemodynamically significant stenosis isolated to an acce

139 rtension and (b) angiographically documented hemodynamically significant stenosis of any renal artery

140 In patients with unilateral hemodynamically significant stenosis or occlusion, mean

141 Hemodynamically significant stenosis was confirmed in 19

142 present in 71 of 72 (99%) cases in which no hemodynamically significant stenosis was seen.

143 sufficiency was eliminated without producing hemodynamically significant stenosis.

144 sfactory image quality and excellent NPV for hemodynamically significant stenosis.

145 symptoms occur in only 50% of patients with hemodynamically significant SVC obstruction.

146 tients treated with surgical reconstruction, hemodynamically significant TRAS occurred at or within 1

147 ged <5 years with underlying CHD, especially hemodynamically significant underlying CHD, as compared

148 rity stenosis and an FFR <0.75 considered as hemodynamically significant.

149 demonstrating whether a coronary stenosis is hemodynamically significant.

150 ients, specifically examining the effects on hemodynamically significant/fatal graft rejection, coron

151 Statins also decreased the odds of hemodynamically significant/fatal rejection (odds ratio,

152 d survival of mitral regurgitation (MR) plus hemodynamically-significant chronic aortic regurgitation

153 tory support (FM) and the remaining 132 were hemodynamically stable (NFM).

154 l variables that trigger RBC transfusions in hemodynamically stable adults and children.

155 Consecutive patients who were hemodynamically stable after pulmonary endarterectomy we

156 Adrenaline use in hemodynamically stable anaphylaxis patient was independe

157 Adrenaline use in hemodynamically stable anaphylaxis patients was associat

158 Among these, 21 (37.5%) were hemodynamically stable and allowed mapping of the circui

159 patients with saddle pulmonary embolism are hemodynamically stable and do not require thrombolytic t

160 Patients who were hemodynamically stable and had no signs of peritonitis w

161 Nine hemodynamically stable and optimally hydrated infants we

162 ring a 15-month period, 78 patients who were hemodynamically stable and required no immediate surgery

163 Fifty hemodynamically stable and spontaneously breathing patie

164 on among hospitalized adult patients who are hemodynamically stable and the length of time RBCs shoul

165 On postoperative day two the patient was hemodynamically stable and weaning off mechanical ventil

166 dels produce acute hypoxemia in an otherwise hemodynamically stable animal.

167 In situ splitting of selected livers from hemodynamically stable cadaveric donors was performed at

168 rial (April 2012-May 2015) that involved 975 hemodynamically stable children and adolescents younger

169 Among hemodynamically stable children treated in an ED followi

170 Among patients in hemodynamically stable condition with STEMI and multives

171 ements of Li-CCO and Li-PCO were made during hemodynamically stable conditions.

172 venous lactate concentrations are similar in hemodynamically stable critically ill patients, b) Even

173 Dogs in the 10 nm group remained hemodynamically stable during all BAL treatments, wherea

174 -linked immunosorbent assay.All animals were hemodynamically stable during the experimental procedure

175 tensive after blunt abdominal trauma and not hemodynamically stable enough to undergo diagnostic CT,

176 m-negative bacteremia, who were afebrile and hemodynamically stable for at least 48 hours, were rando

177 hylactic IABP strategy after primary PTCA in hemodynamically stable high risk patients with AMI does

178 In 14 consecutive patients with hemodynamically stable monomorphic ventricular tachycard

179 em blockers to improve long-term survival in hemodynamically stable myocardial infarction patients wi

180 n in the United States for older adults with hemodynamically stable NSTEMI and outcomes associated wi

181 maps that are a useful guide for ablation of hemodynamically stable or unstable VT.

182 ment, we found measurements of PPG in awake, hemodynamically stable patients at least 24 hours after

183 First-line acute therapy for hemodynamically stable patients includes vagal maneuvers

184 Twenty hemodynamically stable patients undergoing mechanical ve

185 ica, on performing a mandatory sternotomy in hemodynamically stable patients was that a sternotomy wa

186 Randomized trials of hemodynamically stable patients who require urgent surge

187 evaluation and decision-making algorithm for hemodynamically stable patients who sustained abdominal

188 Hemodynamically stable patients with a grade IV or V BRI

189 All hemodynamically stable patients with a hemopericardium c

190 pressures but not increase cardiac output in hemodynamically stable patients with a variety of causes

191 In hemodynamically stable patients with acute pulmonary emb

192 with acute DVT and a proportion of selected hemodynamically stable patients with acute pulmonary emb

193 ought to assess whether use of adrenaline in hemodynamically stable patients with anaphylaxis could p

194 rative management could safely be applied to hemodynamically stable patients with blunt hepatic injur

195 Between January 2009 and July 2011, 171 hemodynamically stable patients with blunt splenic injur

196 ents with intrinsic splenic pathology, and 6 hemodynamically stable patients with isolated stab wound

197 tabolic status may be particularly useful in hemodynamically stable patients with mild-to-moderate lu

198 Many hemodynamically stable patients with sepsis and low acui

199 spiral CT plays a valuable role in selecting hemodynamically stable patients with splenic vascular in

200 tive transfusion threshold for hospitalized, hemodynamically stable patients with the acute coronary

201 A delayed strategy is advised in hemodynamically stable patients, and an immediate approa

202 leeding, driven primarily by transfusions in hemodynamically stable patients, and no apparent excess

203 d as a single combined procedure in 13 (93%) hemodynamically stable patients, and there was no periop

204 In hemodynamically stable patients, complete revascularizat

205 erial (triple-contrast) was performed in 200 hemodynamically stable patients, including 169 men (age

206 rocedure artificial nutrition was started in hemodynamically stable patients, stimulating oral intake

207 least 24 hours after placement to TIPS into hemodynamically stable patients, without sedation (early

208 ombolytics or catheter thrombectomy even for hemodynamically stable patients.

209 s been a paradigm shift in the management of hemodynamically stable patients.

210 ot result in significant cortical hypoxia in hemodynamically stable piglets.

211 ipopolysaccharide-induced hyperlactatemia in hemodynamically stable rats is caused by a net decrease

212 isk of sudden cardiac death in patients with hemodynamically stable sustained ventricular tachycardia

213 e post-angiography follow-up the patient was hemodynamically stable the entire time and was treated c

214 support whereas those in Group III remained hemodynamically stable throughout experimentation withou

215 s the sole screening tool to rule out IAI in hemodynamically stable trauma patients, it may be used i

216 ed electrophysiologically guided therapy for hemodynamically stable ventricular tachycardia after rem

217 y in postinfarction patients presenting with hemodynamically stable ventricular tachycardia treated w

218 The use of computed tomography (CT) for hemodynamically stable victims of penetrating torso trau

219 Patients were hemodynamically stable with no need for cardiopulmonary

220 pulmonary embolism, including those who were hemodynamically stable with right ventricular dysfunctio

221 to patients with pulmonary embolism who are hemodynamically stable without right ventricular dysfunc

222 nter randomized clinical trial recruited 255 hemodynamically stable women with a diagnosed persisting

223 lactated Ringer's solution in normal adults (hemodynamically stable) does not falsely increase circul

224 donors (16-40 yr, body mass index >27 kg/m, hemodynamically stable) or "standard" donors (as traditi

225 ent a computed tomography scan (if they were hemodynamically stable) or immediate celiotomy (if they

226 When patients were hemodynamically stable, a TED probe was placed into the

227 patients who did not have peritonitis, were hemodynamically stable, and had a reliable clinical exam

228 ved entrainment/activation mapping if VT was hemodynamically stable, and voltage mapping with electro

229 All patients were hemodynamically stable, had no indication for emergency

230 nded for hospitalized adult patients who are hemodynamically stable, including critically ill patient

231 ire exchanges of central venous catheters in hemodynamically stable, monitored patients.

232 ons; (2) do not transfuse red blood cells in hemodynamically stable, nonbleeding ICU patients with an

233 ty trial, we randomly assigned patients with hemodynamically stable, recent-onset (<36 hours), sympto

234 Intubated, anesthetized, hemodynamically stable, spontaneously breathing piglets

235 rwent radiofrequency catheter ablation of 15 hemodynamically stable, sustained VTs and in whom an IDP

236 without significant medical history and were hemodynamically stable, with normal liver function and s

237 itiated kidney replacement therapy, and were hemodynamically stable, with planned intermittent hemodi

238 ntation he was febrile at 40.1 degrees C but hemodynamically stable.

239 t was then performed if the patient remained hemodynamically stable.

240 Among the 386 patients, 169 (43.8%) were hemodynamically stable.

241 The patient was hemodynamically stable.

242 Group 1 was the most hemodynamically stable; the incidence of PRS in group 1

243 ure and is increased in hearts that are more hemodynamically stressed.

244 It was hemodynamically superior to AVN ablation with either r-R

245 the foot and calf together [IPCfoot+calf] is hemodynamically superior to IPC of the foot, its clinica

246 umed that stentless aortic bioprostheses are hemodynamically superior to stented bioprostheses.

247 early stages of reperfusion while patient is hemodynamically supported on cardiopulmonary bypass.

248 Hemodynamically, the mean transvalvular gradient signifi

249 Hemodynamically, the rate of pressure change (dP/dt) max

250 acute systemic application of W-7 and H-8 is hemodynamically tolerated and indicate that kinase inhib

251 Ablation of all hemodynamically tolerated arrhythmias should be attempte

252 e after the diagnosis (HR: 2.98; p = 0.028), hemodynamically tolerated sustained monomorphic ventricu

253 enuous exercise after the diagnosis of ARVC, hemodynamically tolerated sustained monomorphic ventricu

254 with structural heart disease and at least 1 hemodynamically tolerated VT undergoing ablation, we ret

255 a primary cure in patients who present with hemodynamically tolerated VT.

256 revious myocardial infarction and recurrent, hemodynamically tolerated VT.

257 A total of 21 VTs, 12 of which were hemodynamically-tolerated and 9 of which were not, were

258 Muscle from the hemodynamically unaffected (less affected) PAD limb show

259 namically loaded, the left ventricle (LV) is hemodynamically unloaded, while both are exposed to the

260 of tests to predict fluid responsiveness in hemodynamically unstable adult patients who were defined

261 test for predicting fluid responsiveness in hemodynamically unstable adults.

262 ge and from donors who were identified to be hemodynamically unstable at the time of organ retrieval.

263 Most of the patients were hemodynamically unstable at the time of pericardiocentes

264 rospective study of T4 in critically ill and hemodynamically unstable children appears warranted.

265 esuscitation may adversely affect outcome in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients.

266 Fifty-one grafts were removed from hemodynamically unstable donors on high-dose vasopressor

267 fits patients with renal failure who are too hemodynamically unstable for intermittent hemodialysis.

268 Hemodynamically unstable high-risk, or massive, pulmonar

269 mixed venous oxygen saturation (S(MV)O2) in hemodynamically unstable intensive care patients and, ad

270 in the management of patients with multiple hemodynamically unstable monomorphic VTs.

271 For patients who are hemodynamically unstable or highly symptomatic or who ha

272 s was that the proportion of donors who were hemodynamically unstable or marginal in other ways was t

273 Hemodynamically unstable organ donors without clinically

274 In the hemodynamically unstable patient healthcare providers sh

275 g gastrointestinal bleeding, particularly in hemodynamically unstable patients and in cases with susp

276 Hemodynamically unstable patients followed similar patte

277 hypothermia could be a therapeutic option in hemodynamically unstable patients independent of cardiac

278 ere have been concerns that early feeding in hemodynamically unstable patients might cause bowel infa

279 The response to iNO in hemodynamically unstable patients with acute right heart

280 In hemodynamically unstable patients with new onset AF, con

281 , be used with caution when extrapolating to hemodynamically unstable patients.

282 Hemodynamically unstable VA was defined as malignant VA.

283 c, n = 11) with structural heart disease and hemodynamically unstable VT were performed with either p

284 -organ perfusion despite extended periods of hemodynamically unstable VT.

285 ntable cardioverter defibrillator-treated or hemodynamically unstable VTA.

286 nterventional treatments; those patients are hemodynamically unstable with acute pulmonary embolism,

287 ry interventions, were sedated, unconscious, hemodynamically unstable, developmentally delayed for th

288 included age, sex, prior sustained VA ( 30s, hemodynamically unstable, or implantable cardioverter-de

289 ncluded age, sex, prior sustained VA (>=30s, hemodynamically unstable, or implantable cardioverter-de

290 Patients who were hemodynamically unstable, unevaluable, peritonitic, or e

291 stable) or immediate celiotomy (if they were hemodynamically unstable- blood pressure < or = 90 mmHg)

292 present in 21.8% of patients, and 40.2% were hemodynamically unstable.

293 fter AMI, and were excluded if patients were hemodynamically unstable.

294 y challenging, particularly when they become hemodynamically unstable.

295 te control of hemorrhage, the patient became hemodynamically unstable.

296 oversion is recommended for patients who are hemodynamically unstable.

297 e as a safe sedative agent for intubation in hemodynamically-unstable patients in the ED.

298 lower risk of post-intubation hypotension in hemodynamically-unstable patients in the emergency depar

299 icular ejection fraction < 0.45 were studied hemodynamically using echocardiography and blood pressur

300 ntilation with perfiubron was well tolerated hemodynamically, was not associated with deterioration o