戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 using the keywords "foramen of Winslow" and "hernia".
2 n to GERD (eg, central obesity, large hiatal hernia).
3 m 2113 underwent repair of a primary ventral hernia.
4 x located in the scrotum as the content of a hernia.
5 hnique, if there is no evidence of a femoral hernia.
6  development and natural history of a hiatal hernia.
7 nal wall reconstruction (AWR) for incisional hernia.
8 ons such as seroma, infection, and recurrent hernia.
9 ane oxygenation and congenital diaphragmatic hernia.
10 h materials for the repair of abdominal wall hernia.
11 n the surgical treatment of primary inguinal hernia.
12 ith a body mass index <35 kg/m and no hiatal hernia.
13 posed in patients at high risk of incisional hernia.
14 ases the likelihood of developing a perineal hernia.
15 nt with symptoms of an incarcerated inguinal hernia.
16 am to identify individuals that had a hiatal hernia.
17 e gold standard for umbilical and epigastric hernias.
18 tify the risk of incarceration of incisional hernias.
19  and NF-groups including subgroups of medial hernias.
20 y rare, accounting for 0.1% of all abdominal hernias.
21 who had primary, unilateral, reducible groin hernias.
22  elective surgical treatment of large hiatal hernias.
23 id decrease the number and size of chromatin hernias.
24 trend toward higher rates of pain in smaller hernias.
25  do not support mesh repair for large hiatus hernias.
26 ; redo Nissen for reflux - 1; paraesophageal hernia -1).
27                Patients who had a history of hernias (125 [39%]) were less likely to have umbilical h
28 olapse (26%), ischemia (16%), and parastomal hernia (19%).
29 patients in the step-up group had incisional hernias (23% vs 53%; P = .004), pancreatic exocrine insu
30 iable analysis revealed for smaller inguinal hernias a significant higher rate of pain at rest [EHS I
31 ted in an app for preoperative estimation of hernia after AS.
32                  The incidence of incisional hernias after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is high.
33  patients with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia and 1-year follow up from the Herniamed Registry
34 cepted definition for a radiographic ventral hernia and differentiating pseudorecurrence from recurre
35 es indicated a higher prevalence of inguinal hernia and mania/bipolar disorder respectively in male d
36 2 methods of hiatal closure for large hiatal hernia and to evaluate their strengths and flaws.
37 ut relevant complications, namely incisional hernias and neuralgia at the trocar sites, which can pot
38  cholecystectomy, 0.6% and 0.5% after 60,681 hernia, and 0.8% and 0.8% after 42,489 breast-conserving
39  Patients undergoing thyroid, lung, inguinal hernia, and face and extremity surgeries with clean or c
40  resolution inputs, emphysema, cardiomegaly, hernia, and pulmonary nodule detection had the highest f
41 30% of patients after repair of large hiatus hernias, and mesh repair has been proposed as a solution
42                Larger hernia defects, direct hernias, and recurrent hernias were associated with an i
43 n in obese patients with VHR results in more hernia- and complication-free patients at 2-years.
44                                  A recurrent hernia (any size) was identified in 39.3% after suture r
45                                       Hiatal hernias are common but the natural history of sliding an
46                           Symptomatic muscle hernias are not uncommon in the lower extremities and ar
47       The cumulative incidence of incisional hernias at 2-year follow-up after conventional closure w
48 ary endpoint was the incidence of incisional hernias at 2-year follow-up.
49                     Patients with incisional hernia benefit substantially from surgery concerning QoL
50 n anterior mesh repair of a primary inguinal hernia between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2014.
51  definitive treatment for incisional ventral hernias but is often deferred if the perceived risk of e
52 er disease, cerebral aneurysms, and inguinal hernias but less than that for urinary tract infections.
53 f patients operated on for a primary ventral hernia, but consensus is lacking on the management in wo
54 ent and treatment of patients with abdominal hernias by providing a more complete understanding of pa
55 thetic hiatal herniorrhaphy for large hiatal hernia cannot be endorsed routinely and the decision for
56  esophageal perforation (EP), paraesophageal hernia causing obstruction or gangrene (PEH) and perfora
57        Infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) are at an increased risk of respiratory mor
58          Rationale: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is an anomaly with a high morbidity and mor
59                     Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is one of the most common and lethal congen
60 ung development and congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH).
61 ormations including congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH).
62 ariable analysis, the impact of EHS inguinal hernia classification (EHS I vs EHS II vs EHS III and/or
63      Patients with a VH from a single-center hernia clinic were prospectively enrolled between June 2
64 sociated with a higher rate of an incisional hernia compared with all other modalities (P < 0.001).
65 vs 45%; P = 0.002), mainly due to incisional hernia corrections (3% vs 14%; P = 0.047).
66 cal reintervention, mainly due to incisional hernia corrections.
67         The estimated "freedom of incisional hernia" curves (Kaplan-Meier estimate) were significantl
68 or Disease Control class II and III) ventral hernia (CVH) repair over 24 months.
69               This analysis of a multicenter hernia database demonstrates significantly increased pos
70                                         Mean hernia defect area was 606 cm (range 180-1280) and avera
71  or clean-contaminated operative field and a hernia defect at least 9 cm had a biosynthetic mesh (ope
72                                The impact of hernia defect size according to the EHS classification o
73                           Impact of inguinal hernia defect size as stratified by the European Hernia
74 r RCT, patients scheduled for elective LVHR (hernia defects 3 to 10 cm on computed tomography scan) w
75                                       Larger hernia defects, direct hernias, and recurrent hernias we
76          There are about 200 cases of muscle hernias described in the literature.
77 ively prevents the development of incisional hernia during 2 years, with an additional mean operative
78  networks targeting emphysema, cardiomegaly, hernias, edema, effusions, atelectasis, masses, and nodu
79 bowel obstruction, incisional, or parastomal hernia following laparoscopic or open surgery for rectal
80 owel obstruction, incisional, and parastomal hernia following laparoscopic versus open surgery for re
81 owel obstruction, incisional, and parastomal hernia following surgery.
82 was to examine if parity was associated with hernia formation requiring surgical repair.
83  obstruction, urinary stricture, urine leak, hernia formation, and delayed graft function.
84 rs, there was no difference in percentage of hernia-free and complication-free patients (72.9% versus
85            Primary outcome was percentage of hernia-free and complication-free patients at 2-years.
86  medical comorbidities, and incidence of PEH hernia gangrene.
87 geal atresia, biliary atresia, diaphragmatic hernia, gastroschisis, and Down syndrome with an associa
88  reinforcement was recommended for repair of hernias &gt;/= 2 cm (grade A).
89 lbladder as content in the case of abdominal hernias has only been reported in a few cases in the cur
90                             Smaller inguinal hernias have been identified as an independent patient-r
91                    Many patients with hiatal hernias (HH) are asymptomatic; however, symptoms may inc
92                      Half of conditions were hernias/hydroceles (49.6%), and 44% were injuries/wounds
93  index surgical conditions (injuries/wounds, hernias/hydroceles, breast masses, neck masses, obstetri
94 and validate a prediction score for internal hernia (IH) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).
95 ors independently associated with incisional hernia (IH) and demonstrate the feasibility of preoperat
96 ed tomography (CT) for diagnosis of internal hernia (IH) in patients who have undergone laparoscopic
97  report on the presence/absence of a ventral hernia in 73 cases (kappa = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.35-0.54; P <
98 (both lightweight) for the repair of a groin hernia in adult men in eastern Uganda who had primary, u
99 escribed in the content of an inguinofemoral hernia in one case to date.
100 nation confirmed an apple-sized, irreducible hernia in the right inguinal region.
101 on in 62.2%, surgically repair of incisional hernias in 21% after LDP, or an average 2.3 days longer
102                               These membrane hernias increase over time without affecting epithelial
103 renatally diagnosed congenital diaphragmatic hernia infants.
104  most effective method for repair of a groin hernia involves the use of a synthetic mesh, but this ty
105                     Tibialis anterior muscle hernia is a rare diagnosis and should be included in the
106 ed gallbladder in the content of an inguinal hernia is a rare finding.
107 al wall function in patients with incisional hernia is sparse.
108                                     Treating hernias is one of the oldest challenges in surgery.
109 l history of sliding and paraesophageal type hernias is poorly understood.
110 megaly, pancreatic pseudocyst and epigastric hernia, less common causes being carcinoma of the stomac
111 l pH study (body mass index <35 kg/m, hiatal hernia &lt;3 cm, and absence of endoscopic Barrett disease)
112              There is variability in ventral hernia management.
113 crease in size or change in type of a hiatal hernia may be clinically relevant to help understand cha
114     Among 30,998 patients with an incisional hernia (mean age 58.1 +/- 15.9 years; 52.7% female), 23,
115 he bioscaffold is evaluated in a rat ventral hernia model.
116 , biliary atresia [n = 3,877], diaphragmatic hernia [n = 6,176], gastroschisis [n = 4,845], Down synd
117 e presence or absence of a recurrent ventral hernia on CT scans was compared among 9 blinded reviewer
118              Twenty-one people had no hiatal hernia on initial UGI and over a median of 99 months a s
119   Compared with laparoscopic IPOM incisional hernia operation, the MILOS repair is associated with si
120      Propensity score matching of incisional hernia operations comparing the results of the MILOS ope
121         Six hundred fifteen MILOS incisional hernia operations were included.
122 s of the testis, compatible with an inguinal hernia or hydrocele.
123 ng time, complications, recurrence of hiatal hernia or wrap migration, and reoperation.
124 ence interval (95% CI) 4.21-5.09], abdominal hernia (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.97-2.15), perforated esophagus
125 citis (OR 3.22, 95% CI 2.73-3.78), abdominal hernia (OR 3.49, 95% CI 3.29-3.70), perforated esophagus
126 enced postoperative surgical site infection, hernia, or small-bowel obstruction, and none died.
127 tients presenting with acute para-esophageal hernia (PEH); and (ii) to determine if a hospital volume
128 dicitis, incarcerated/strangulated abdominal hernia, perforation of esophagus, small or large bowel,
129 the reduction in the incidence of parastomal hernia (PH) after placement of prophylactic synthetic me
130 previous clinical diagnosis of left inguinal hernia presented to the nephrologist with recent onset o
131  describe a case of tibialis anterior muscle hernia presenting with persistent dull pain and swelling
132 is study was to determine whether parastomal hernia (PSH) rate can be reduced by using synthetic mesh
133 s to investigate the incidence of parastomal hernias (PSHs) after end-colostomy formation using a pol
134 y and longitudinal validity of the Abdominal Hernia-Q (AHQ), a novel ventral hernia (VH) patient-repo
135 t reported outcomes (PRO) tool-the Abdominal Hernia-Q (AHQ).
136 c, and primary small umbilical or epigastric hernia qualified for inclusion.
137        A significantly lower 1-year perineal hernia rate after biological mesh closure is a promising
138 oom time falls below 172 minutes, or robotic hernia rate is less than 5%.
139                     Postoperative incisional hernia rates were expectedly higher in open (vs laparosc
140                                              Hernia recurred in 93 patients(13%), with cumulative HR
141    The primary study outcomes were umbilical hernia recurrence and death.
142 were significantly associated with umbilical hernia recurrence and mortality.
143 ary outcome measures were reoperation due to hernia recurrence and postoperative 30-day complications
144  included overall Kaplan-Meier estimates for hernia recurrence and postoperative wound infection rate
145  in VHR is important and was associated with hernia recurrence and wound complications in this popula
146                            Primary outcome - hernia recurrence assessed by barium meal X-ray and endo
147                    The primary outcomes were hernia recurrence at 1 year and postoperative complicati
148 in surgical site occurrence, eventration, or hernia recurrence between groups.
149 he benefits of mesh for reducing the risk of hernia recurrence or the long-term risks of mesh-related
150                                              Hernia recurrence rate after 24 months was 2.4% for the
151                                              Hernia recurrence rate was 17% (n = 16).
152                                          The hernia recurrence rate was 6.0% (n = 20) at a mean 3.1 y
153 mesh are associated with increased umbilical hernia recurrence rates.
154 rted chronic biomaterial infections and high hernia recurrence rates.
155          We sought to determine the rates of hernia recurrence(HR) and surgical site occurrences(SSOs
156 entify predictors of wound complications and hernia recurrence, respectively.
157                        To reduce the risk of hernia recurrence, the optimal timing of elective repair
158 ound dehiscence), abdominal eventration, and hernia recurrence.
159 , however, be associated with an increase in hernia recurrence.
160 sus about the factors that lead to umbilical hernia recurrence.
161  factors associated with long-term umbilical hernia recurrence.
162 sociated with reliable diagnosing in ventral hernia recurrence.
163 cations (3.01, 1.69-5.39) were predictors of hernia recurrence.
164 io 3.08, length of stay odds ratio 1.11; and hernia recurrence: porcine cadaveric mesh odds ratio 5.1
165 s searched included surgical mesh, abdominal hernia, recurrence, infection, fistula, bioprosthesis, b
166 25 [39%]) were less likely to have umbilical hernia recurrences (chi21 = 4.65, P = .03).
167                 In all, there were 53 (5.2%) hernia recurrences and 36 (3.9%) in the synthetic repair
168    The study cohort was based on the Swedish Hernia Register and consisted of 61,161 cases of male pa
169 oin hernia repairs registered in The Swedish Hernia Register between January 1, 2005 and December 31,
170 old, consecutively registered in the Swedish Hernia Register for a TEP primary repair in 2005 to 2009
171 repairs, recruited from the national Swedish Hernia Register, demonstrated that repairs with regular
172 OM) and open sublay repair from other German Hernia registry institutions was performed.
173  were prospectively documented in the German Hernia registry with 1 year questionnaire follow-up.
174 ion-related bleeding (18% vs 0%; P = .01) or hernia-related complications (18% vs 0%; P = .01) than i
175 smoker, body mass index 30 or greater, and a hernia-related inpatient admission.
176          A standardized method for measuring hernia-related PRO has not been identified.
177 d the pre- and post-operative AHQ forms, the Hernia-Related Quality of Life Survey (HerQLes) and the
178 ivatives, heart malformations, diaphragmatic hernia, renal hypoplasia and ambiguous genitalia.
179 l resection (7.0%) and lowest after inguinal hernia repair (0.6%).
180 rs of wound complications, whereas recurrent hernia repair (2.69, 1.14-6.35), biologic mesh (3.1, 1.6
181 ere more likely to undergo concurrent hiatal hernia repair (35.1% vs 20.0%, p < 0.0001).
182 uinal hernia repair (LIH), and open inguinal hernia repair (IH).
183  cholecystectomy (LC), laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIH), and open inguinal hernia repair (IH
184 s bridged repair during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR).
185 fidence interval (CI), 0.53-0.93; P = 0.03], hernia repair (OR 0.28, 95% CI, 0.20-0.40; P < 0.001), a
186 s experience utilizing preperitoneal ventral hernia repair (PP-VHR).
187 g a bilateral total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP-IHR) (>24 hours).
188                                      Ventral hernia repair (VHR) with mesh remains one of the most co
189 ered to patients scheduled to have a ventral hernia repair (VHR).
190      In small epigastric and small umbilical hernia repair a flat polypropylene mesh repair was assoc
191 795 opioid-naive patients underwent inguinal hernia repair and met inclusion criteria.
192 ation between other utilization measures for hernia repair and no correlation between any of the util
193  excluded were those who underwent umbilical hernia repair as a part of another major planned procedu
194  SSIs increased for both cholecystectomy and hernia repair as the quantile of total costs increased (
195  of new persistent opioid use after inguinal hernia repair as well as its associated risk factors.
196                                      Ventral hernia repair at diagnosis is very cost-effective.
197 me (PHS) places patients undergoing elective hernia repair at increased risk for adverse postoperativ
198 stectomy, appendectomy, and inguinal/femoral hernia repair between November 1, 2013 and November 30,
199                                       Hiatal hernia repair can be performed safely with a low inciden
200 en had a 7-fold increased risk of undergoing hernia repair compared with nulliparous, in an age-adjus
201 terior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and hernia repair from December 31, 2004 to December 31, 201
202                        Surgical mesh used in hernia repair has evolved over many years, from metal im
203 on, however its incidence following inguinal hernia repair has not been described.
204  the currently popular techniques of ventral hernia repair have specific disadvantages and risks.
205 plications following elective abdominal wall hernia repair in a population with complete follow-up.
206       The TEP procedure for primary inguinal hernia repair in men is associated with a low frequency
207 superior method for umbilical and epigastric hernia repair in terms of complications.
208 istry undergoing primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair including a 1-year follow-up were selected
209 andard of care soft tissue repair meshes for hernia repair is highly inflammatory and initiates a dys
210                                    Umbilical hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed gene
211                                     Inguinal hernia repair is the prototype educational surgical proc
212 ient admission within 90 days of an elective hernia repair performed in an ambulatory surgery center.
213 al mesh was guided by clinical feedback from hernia repair procedures, which were also being modified
214                                 Female groin hernia repair should be performed with the TEP or TAPP l
215  of new persistent opioid use after inguinal hernia repair using a national database of de-identified
216                                   Exposures: Hernia repair using mesh performed by either open or lap
217 ary veteran patients who underwent umbilical hernia repair was studied between January 1, 1998, and D
218 s older than 18 years who underwent elective hernia repair were included.
219 weight meshes in open anterior mesh inguinal hernia repair were not associated with an increased risk
220                           Elective umbilical hernia repair with mesh should be considered in patients
221 y who had undergone primary unilateral groin hernia repair with the Lichtenstein, Shouldice, TEP or T
222 hether an inguinal neurectomy at the time of hernia repair would reduce the risk of postoperative pai
223                                      Ventral hernia repair(VHR) is one of the most commonly performed
224                    After undergoing inguinal hernia repair, 1.5% of patients developed new persistent
225 femoral hernia repair, appendectomy, ventral hernia repair, and partial colectomy), the proportion of
226  training (cholecystectomy, inguinal/femoral hernia repair, appendectomy, ventral hernia repair, and
227 pertension, cataract surgeries, and inguinal hernia repair, but the patient is otherwise healthy.
228  supply costs and longer procedure times for hernia repair, but there was no correlation between othe
229  surgical procedures (ie, ventral incisional hernia repair, colectomy, reflux surgery, bariatric surg
230 ies of 4 surgical patients (cholecystectomy, hernia repair, gastric bypass, and hysterectomy) who dev
231  laparoscopic cholecystectomy, open inguinal hernia repair, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, part
232 y artery bypass grafting, colectomy, ventral hernia repair, lower extremity vascular bypass, lung res
233 y), or hiatal hernia surgery (paraesophageal hernia repair, Nissen fundoplication), were included.
234 reference-sensitive elective operations: (1) hernia repair, or (2) cholecystectomy.
235 nguinal hernia repair, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, partial mastectomy without sentinel lymph
236 ntify 73,724 individuals undergoing an index hernia repair, primary total or partial thyroidectomy, l
237 geons completed initial training programs in hernia repair, underwent interval proficiency assessment
238          All patients with primary umbilical hernia repair, with or without a concurrent unrelated pr
239  techniques are recommended for female groin hernia repair.
240 tors influencing the outcome in female groin hernia repair.
241 are no benefits of using HWM in OAM inguinal hernia repair.
242 ) techniques for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair.
243 tors influencing the outcome in female groin hernia repair.
244 oscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair.
245 urgical outcome in patients after incisional hernia repair.
246 h materials used to reinforce abdominal wall hernia repair.
247  for mortality, revision, and paraesophageal hernia repair.
248 e most important complication after inguinal hernia repair.
249 for cholecystectomy to 7 cases for umbilical hernia repair.
250 ized controlled trial of 3 methods of hiatus hernia repair; sutures versus absorbable mesh versus non
251          Given that roughly 800,000 inguinal hernia repairs are performed annually in the United Stat
252                          76,495 OAM inguinal hernia repairs in male patients were included for statis
253 perative outcome exist between open inguinal hernia repairs performed by surgical trainees and those
254                                All OAM groin hernia repairs registered in The Swedish Hernia Register
255 s of age) undergoing open, elective, ventral hernia repairs with mesh placed in the retromuscular pos
256 ister study with 76,495 consecutive inguinal hernia repairs, recruited from the national Swedish Hern
257  25.5 (Southern sub-Saharan Africa) per 1000 hernia repairs.
258 arge bowel, and incarcerated or strangulated hernias respectively.In England (where follow-up was ava
259 eans to repair large, complex, and recurrent hernias resulting in a low recurrence rate.
260 ference was found in infections, concomitant hernias, SF-36 questionnaire, Von Korff pain score, and
261  over a median of 99 months a sliding hiatal hernia (SHH) developed in 16 and a PEH developed in 5 pe
262 comes for individuals with reducible ventral hernia, simulating a cohort of 1 million individuals for
263 ia defect size as stratified by the European Hernia Society (EHS) classification I to III on the rate
264 ellent reliability, and effectively measures hernia-specific changes in QoL following VHR.
265 sial and despite earlier studies no reliable hernia-specific data exist.
266  psychometric properties of a novel, ventral hernia-specific patient reported outcomes (PRO) tool-the
267 y and reliability of AHQ scores in measuring hernia-specific PRO.
268  change in QoL after LVHR using a validated, hernia-specific survey (1 = poor QoL and 100 = perfect Q
269 tion, which were measured using a validated, hernia-specific survey (modified Activities Assessment S
270 ere remains a need for a broadly applicable, hernia-specific tool that incorporates patient viewpoint
271                           AWR for incisional hernia specifically improved long-term abdominal wall mu
272 patient data in the Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group registry between January 1, 2007, and
273                            A panel of expert hernia-surgeons was assembled.
274  surgery (colectomy, proctectomy), or hiatal hernia surgery (paraesophageal hernia repair, Nissen fun
275 onal, competency-based training paradigm for hernia surgery in underserved countries.
276 etween HSHs and LSHs for bariatric or hiatal hernia surgery.
277                                              Hernias through the foramen of Winslow are extremely rar
278 a, or vague epigastric pain depending on the hernia type and severity.
279                                   All hiatal hernia types (I-IV) were collected.
280 8 consecutive patients with large incisional hernia undergoing AWR with linea alba restoration.
281 y invasive transhernial repair of incisional hernias using large retromuscular/preperitoneal meshes w
282  colon cancer, diverticulitis, appendicitis, hernias, varicose veins, diabetes, atherosclerosis, and
283 he Abdominal Hernia-Q (AHQ), a novel ventral hernia (VH) patient-reported outcomes measure (PROM).
284  best practices in the management of ventral hernias (VH).
285 on or Tenth Revision diagnosis of incisional hernia was conducted from 2010 to 2017 in 15 hospitals o
286   An increased risk of developing a perineal hernia was found for patients submitted to omentoplasty
287 ngs, a diagnosis of tibialis anterior muscle hernia was made.
288                         Surgery for internal hernia was the most common abdominal procedure.
289  acid, smoking, alcohol drinking, and hiatal hernia were found to be significant associated factors f
290 tectomy and Bassini's repair of the inguinal hernia were performed safely.
291 rnioplasty for a primary unilateral inguinal hernia were randomized to a self-gripping polyester mesh
292 thetic hiatal herniorrhaphy for large hiatal hernia were selected by searching PubMed, Medline, Embas
293 ernia defects, direct hernias, and recurrent hernias were associated with an increased risk of reoper
294 arge bowel, and incarcerated or strangulated hernias) were identified from English Hospital Episode S
295 med a gastric adenocarcinoma within a hiatus hernia, which had fistulated to the pericardium.
296 ith a primary, reducible unilateral inguinal hernia who underwent day-case TEP repair were eligible.
297 , $91195-$139936]), congenital diaphragmatic hernia (WIQR, $43948; median, $154730 [IQR, $129764-$173
298  oxygenation and/or congenital diaphragmatic hernia with an intelligence quotient greater than or equ
299 after a repair of a congenital diaphragmatic hernia, with ultrasound signs of acute bowel wall necros
300 bowel obstruction, incisional and parastomal hernia within 5 years, and the current article reports o

 
Page Top