ライフサイエンスコーパス: hernia repair

1 caesarean delivery, appendectomy, and groin hernia repair.

2 idity and mortality associated with emergent hernia repair.

3 72 in cholecystectomy, and 0.060 in inguinal hernia repair.

4 ive alternative to currently used meshes for hernia repair.

5 for mortality, revision, and paraesophageal hernia repair.

6 omposite approach performed best for ventral hernia repair.

7 e most important complication after inguinal hernia repair.

8 se to polypropylene meshes commonly used for hernia repair.

9 Laparoscopic or open ventral incisional hernia repair.

10 surgical techniques available for parastomal hernia repair.

11 e products for specific applications such as hernia repair.

12 ith umb/epi and 256 patients with incisional hernia repair.

13 rnight stays after laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair.

14 ntralateral inguinal ring during ipsilateral hernia repair.

15 d forces to the midline wound at the time of hernia repair.

16 d failure rate observed following incisional hernia repair.

17 ctors on proficiency in laparoscopic or open hernia repair.

18 A total of 1983 patients underwent hernia repair.

19 for cholecystectomy to 7 cases for umbilical hernia repair.

20 rence and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic hernia repair.

21 f complications and recurrence after ventral hernia repair.

22 fferences in patient recovery after LA or GA hernia repair.

23 symptomatic cord lipomas after laparoscopic hernia repair.

24 ed with visceral complications or failure of hernia repair.

25 or hematoma, and 11 patients (2.7%) required hernia repair.

26 in traditional or laparoscopic preperitoneal hernia repair.

27 g patients undergoing ventral and incisional hernia repair.

28 nted for high-risk patients seeking elective hernia repair.

29 techniques are recommended for female groin hernia repair.

30 elective, unilateral, or bilateral inguinal hernia repair.

31 the risk of PUR after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

32 lypropylene after open retromuscular ventral hernia repair.

33 tors influencing the outcome in female groin hernia repair.

34 are no benefits of using HWM in OAM inguinal hernia repair.

35 ) techniques for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair.

36 tors influencing the outcome in female groin hernia repair.

37 oscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair.

38 urgical outcome in patients after incisional hernia repair.

39 h materials used to reinforce abdominal wall hernia repair.

40 All included studies performed Lichtenstein hernia repair.

41 pain and stiffness in open anterior inguinal hernia repair.

42 o 33.9 (central sub-Saharan Africa) per 1000 hernia repairs.

43 e use of sutures vs mesh for primary ventral hernia repairs.

44 toneal (TAPP), or modified Lichtenstein (ML) hernia repairs.

45 ins an appropriate solution for most ventral hernia repairs.

46 onal herniation and its effect on incisional hernia repairs.

47 s support this technique for complex ventral hernia repairs.

48 25.5 (Southern sub-Saharan Africa) per 1000 hernia repairs.

49 ncreasingly used to reinforce abdominal wall hernia repairs.

50 l resection (7.0%) and lowest after inguinal hernia repair (0.6%).

51 6%) and the least to outpatient open ventral hernia repair (0.7%).

52 After undergoing inguinal hernia repair, 1.5% of patients developed new persistent

53 tectomy (48.5%), appendectomy (16.2%), groin hernia repair (10.0%), abdominal exploration (nontrauma)

54 bectomy (+14.7%), minimally invasive ventral hernia repair (+10.6%), and parathyroidectomy (+10.0%).

55 than PRA (16.1% vs 0%, P=0.022) and need for hernia repair (12.9% vs 0%, P=0.050), respectively.

56 Of patients undergoing incisional hernia repair, 12.3% underwent at least one subsequent r

57 mmonly in the analyzed hospitalizations were hernia repairs (15.7%), bariatric (10.5%), mastectomy (9

58 er colectomy or proctectomy (18.1%), ventral hernia repair (16.7%), and hysterectomy (13.4%).

59 rs of wound complications, whereas recurrent hernia repair (2.69, 1.14-6.35), biologic mesh (3.1, 1.6

60 er colectomy or proctectomy (25.8%), ventral hernia repair (26.5%), hysterectomy (28.8%), arthroplast

61 ty-nine patients were randomized to LA or GA hernia repair; 276 of these had an operation, with 138 p

62 ts, 12 609 (7.9%) underwent robotic-assisted hernia repairs, 32 337 (20.2%) laparoscopic repairs, and

63 ere more likely to undergo concurrent hiatal hernia repair (35.1% vs 20.0%, p < 0.0001).

64 access and 577,680 for non-critical access; hernia repair, 4291 for critical access and 300,410 for

65 orbidity than the standard approach: ventral hernia repair (58% for the composite vs 8% for the stand

66 In small epigastric and small umbilical hernia repair a flat polypropylene mesh repair was assoc

67 ection, laparoscopic gastric bypass, ventral hernia repair, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and low

68 l procedures (2008-2009): colectomy, ventral hernia repair, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and low

69 sed to assess the hazard ratio (HR) of groin hernia repair according to age, tumor risk category, and

70 dicate an increase in the incidence of groin hernia repair after radical prostatectomy.

71 However, rates of emergent incisional hernia repair among older men rose significantly, with 7

72 %-6.9%) for patients who underwent open mesh hernia repair and 3.7% (95% CI, 2.8%-4.6%) for patients

73 dence concerning incidence rates of emergent hernia repair and changes with time are unknown.

74 in this study who underwent complex ventral hernia repair and may serve as a suitable target for scr

75 Techniques for hernia repair and mesh design should take into account a

76 795 opioid-naive patients underwent inguinal hernia repair and met inclusion criteria.

77 ation between other utilization measures for hernia repair and no correlation between any of the util

78 ted to identify articles relating to ventral hernia repairs and the use of prosthetics in herniorrhap

79 lated for selected subcategories of emergent hernia repairs and time trends were evaluated.

80 Cholecystectomy, hernia repair, and bowel surgeries were more commonly pe

81 aluation for tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy, hernia repair, and circumcision between 2016 and 2023 at

82 r readmission, repeat AAA repair, incisional hernia repair, and lower extremity amputation.

83 omy, total hip or knee arthroplasty, ventral hernia repair, and lower extremity vascular bypass.

84 femoral hernia repair, appendectomy, ventral hernia repair, and partial colectomy), the proportion of

85 asily overlooked at the time of laparoscopic hernia repair, and this can lead to an unsatisfactory re

86 tacks, lack of prostate pathology, recurrent hernia repairs, and bilateral hernia repairs were signif

87 training (cholecystectomy, inguinal/femoral hernia repair, appendectomy, ventral hernia repair, and

88 and traditional preperitoneal approaches to hernia repair are analogous in principle and outcome and

89 long-term outcomes after elective parastomal hernia repair are poorly characterized.

90 aroscopic and open techniques for incisional hernia repair are recognized treatment options with pros

91 hese increasing rates of emergent incisional hernia repair are troublesome owing to the significantly

92 Given that roughly 800,000 inguinal hernia repairs are performed annually in the United Stat

93 excluded were those who underwent umbilical hernia repair as a part of another major planned procedu

94 SSIs increased for both cholecystectomy and hernia repair as the quantile of total costs increased (

95 of new persistent opioid use after inguinal hernia repair as well as its associated risk factors.

96 Ventral hernia repair at diagnosis is very cost-effective.

97 me (PHS) places patients undergoing elective hernia repair at increased risk for adverse postoperativ

98 secutive patients who underwent open ventral hernia repair at Penn State Milton S.

99 repair strategy, infants underwent inguinal hernia repair before neonatal intensive care unit discha

100 t patients who underwent elective parastomal hernia repair between January 1, 2007, and December 31,

101 stectomy, appendectomy, and inguinal/femoral hernia repair between November 1, 2013 and November 30,

102 s), and all but 1 patient underwent inguinal hernia repair between October 23, 2017, and February 2,

103 udy of 23 580 surgeons who performed ventral hernia repairs between 2010 and 2020, increasing experie

104 rt B with no managed care undergoing ventral hernia repairs between 2010 and 2020.

105 cholecystectomy, appendectomy, or incisional hernia repair) between 2014 and 2018.

106 sm repair, colectomy for cancer, and ventral hernia repair) between 2016-2020 were stratified by thei

107 ten used as an outcome measure after ventral hernia repair, but it is unknown whether reoperation rat

108 pertension, cataract surgeries, and inguinal hernia repair, but the patient is otherwise healthy.

109 supply costs and longer procedure times for hernia repair, but there was no correlation between othe

110 Hiatal hernia repair can be performed safely with a low inciden

111 surgical procedures (ie, ventral incisional hernia repair, colectomy, reflux surgery, bariatric surg

112 en had a 7-fold increased risk of undergoing hernia repair compared with nulliparous, in an age-adjus

113 he biomesh group underwent elective perineal hernia repair, compared to 7 patients (13%) in the prima

114 go elective cholecystectomy (study group) or hernia repair (controls) at 2 hospitals.

115 GA hernia repair cost 4% more than the same operation under

116 my, pancreatectomy, cholecystectomy, ventral hernia repair, craniotomy, hip replacement, or knee repl

117 tegies: elective laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (ELHR) or watchful waiting (WW).

118 cluding cholecystectomy, colectomy, inguinal hernia repair, femoral hernia repair, mastectomy, lumpec

119 es are currently available on the market for hernia repair, few comparisons exist to guide surgeons a

120 .0 [33.0] procedures per year), and inguinal hernia repair for children younger than 6 months of age

121 se who underwent unilateral initial inguinal hernia repair from 1998 to 2019.

122 One hundred patients who underwent ventral hernia repair from 2010-2011 at an academic health care

123 females [58.3%]) underwent emergent ventral hernia repair from 2011 to 2021.

124 umbilical/epigastric (umb/epi) or incisional hernia repair from a regional area of 2 million inhabita

125 ased significantly after separation of parts hernia repair from an average of 7640 to 8166 mL (P=0.01

126 terior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and hernia repair from December 31, 2004 to December 31, 201

127 ies of 4 surgical patients (cholecystectomy, hernia repair, gastric bypass, and hysterectomy) who dev

128 pinal fusion, appendectomy, eye enucleation, hernia repair, hand surgery, tonsillectomy and therapeut

129 Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair has created a niche for both expanded poly

130 Surgical mesh used in hernia repair has evolved over many years, from metal im

131 on, however its incidence following inguinal hernia repair has not been described.

132 Although the use of robotic-assisted ventral hernia repairs has increased significantly over the last

133 Rising rates of abdominal wall hernia repair have been described; however, population-b

134 the currently popular techniques of ventral hernia repair have specific disadvantages and risks.

135 ginal cholecystectomies, appendectomies, and hernia repairs, have been performed.

136 g, number of previous abdominal surgeries or hernia repairs, hernia defect size, and operative time.

137 ly used for reinforcing contaminated ventral hernia repairs; however, it is expensive and has been as

138 uinal hernia repair (LIH), and open inguinal hernia repair (IH).

139 morbid obesity before ventral and incisional hernia repair improves outcomes, as many as 25% of these

140 in 25 (16 after radiotherapy), mesh ventral hernia repair in 21, and other causes in 29.

141 plications following elective abdominal wall hernia repair in a population with complete follow-up.

142 ultrasonography-guided BRSB after umbilical hernia repair in children is associated with lower media

143 logic prosthetics are reasonable options for hernia repair in contaminated fields and for large abdom

144 The TEP procedure for primary inguinal hernia repair in men is associated with a low frequency

145 ure rates, obviating the need for subsequent hernia repair in most patients.

146 ment syndrome is a feared complication after hernia repair in patients with a "loss of abdominal doma

147 Inguinal hernia repair in preterm infants is common and is associ

148 superior method for umbilical and epigastric hernia repair in terms of complications.

149 s, and biologic prosthetics used for ventral hernia repair in terms of mechanics, cost, and the ideal

150 hort study including all elective incisional hernia repairs in Denmark from January 1, 2007, to Decem

151 76,495 OAM inguinal hernia repairs in male patients were included for statis

152 ll closures, resulting in 200,000 incisional hernia repairs in the United States each year.

153 istry undergoing primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair including a 1-year follow-up were selected

154 techniques have been developed for inguinal hernia repair, including the transabdominal preperitonea

155 The use of synthetic mesh in incisional hernia repairs increased from 34.2% in 1987 to 65.5% in

156 Laparoscopic hernia repair involves the fixation of the prosthetic me

157 Inguinal hernia repair is a common operative procedure.

158 edominant factor in successful preperitoneal hernia repair is adequate dissection with complete expos

159 Incisional hernia repair is associated with high cumulative rates o

160 andard of care soft tissue repair meshes for hernia repair is highly inflammatory and initiates a dys

161 Laparoscopic hernia repair is infrequently used and associated with l

162 Umbilical hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed gene

163 Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed oper

164 Inguinal hernia repair is the most common procedure in general su

165 conditions in clinical practice and inguinal hernia repair is the most common procedure performed by

166 Inguinal hernia repair is the prototype educational surgical proc

167 LA hernia repair is thought to be safer for patients, cause

168 raft, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia repair, knee arthroplasty, and spinal fusion).

169 laparoscopic cholecystectomy, open inguinal hernia repair, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, part

170 asure was the rate of reoperative incisional hernia repair, length of hospitalization, and hospital c

171 cholecystectomy (LC), laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIH), and open inguinal hernia repair (IH

172 Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR), using a transabdominal preperitone

173 y artery bypass grafting, colectomy, ventral hernia repair, lower extremity vascular bypass, lung res

174 Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (LPEHR) is associated with a high recurren

175 patients who underwent laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) performed by 4 surgeons using a sta

176 Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) using mesh is a well-established in

177 using the technique of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR).

178 s bridged repair during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR).

179 er prosthetics and approaches to the ventral hernia repair, many surgeons do not fully understand the

180 mesh-based techniques dominate the inguinal hernia repair marketplace.

181 , colectomy, inguinal hernia repair, femoral hernia repair, mastectomy, lumpectomy, hip arthroplasty,

182 7 625 patients underwent elective parastomal hernia repair (mean [SD] age, 73.3 [9.1] years; 10 059 f

183 shington state patients underwent incisional hernia repair (mean age 58.7 +/- 15.6, 64% female).

184 st frequent in the chronic hernia model, and hernia repairs mechanically disrupted at a lower force c

185 l study of patients undergoing emergent open hernia repairs, mesh use was associated with decreased r

186 umbilical hernia repair (n = 19), and hiatus hernia repair (n = 10).

187 olecystectomy (n = 22), ventral or umbilical hernia repair (n = 19), and hiatus hernia repair (n = 10

188 Patients who underwent elective hernia repair (N = 73,596) were identified from the Nati

189 y), or hiatal hernia surgery (paraesophageal hernia repair, Nissen fundoplication), were included.

190 an alternative to conventional open inguinal hernia repair (OIHR).

191 n-free polypropylene mesh repair (MR, n = 8) hernia repair on postoperative day (POD) 35.

192 This was a retrospective review of 280 hernia repairs on 217 patients performed by a single sur

193 sented for a inguinal, umbilical, or ventral hernia repair or were hospitalized primarily related to

194 fidence interval (CI), 0.53-0.93; P = 0.03], hernia repair (OR 0.28, 95% CI, 0.20-0.40; P < 0.001), a

195 ], 1.62; 95% CI, 1.34-1.95) and open ventral hernia repair (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.09-1.24).

196 CI, 1.23-1.46]), minimally invasive ventral hernia repair (OR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.15-1.27]), minimally

197 res (OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.43-1.63); recurrent hernia repair (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.27-1.52); femoral her

198 ds for 4 of 7 operations (MIS paraesophageal hernia repair [OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.47-0.71; P < .001]; M

199 1; 95% CI, 0.46-0.57; P < .001]; MIS ventral hernia repair [OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.56-0.77; P < .001]).

200 w to moderate (eg, cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia repair), or high risk (eg, major cancer or joint

201 reference-sensitive elective operations: (1) hernia repair, or (2) cholecystectomy.

202 ctive laparoscopic cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia repair, or breast lumpectomy in healthy adults.

203 es of LVHR with the outcomes of open ventral hernia repair (OVHR) for PVHs.

204 nguinal hernia repair, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, partial mastectomy without sentinel lymph

205 years and older, with 71.3 and 42.0 emergent hernia repairs per 100,000 person-years for men and wome

206 nias was observed from 16.0 to 19.2 emergent hernia repairs per 100,000 person-years in 2001 and 2010

207 ient admission within 90 days of an elective hernia repair performed in an ambulatory surgery center.

208 e the presence of an attending surgeon, open hernia repairs performed by junior residents were associ

209 Hernia repairs performed by supervised residents vs spec

210 perative outcome exist between open inguinal hernia repairs performed by surgical trainees and those

211 34.3), mastectomy (PFS, 16.5-35.0), inguinal hernia repair (PFS, 15.5-22.1), and abdominal wall herni

212 repair (PFS, 15.5-22.1), and abdominal wall hernia repair (PFS, 21.6-26.1).

213 s experience utilizing preperitoneal ventral hernia repair (PP-VHR).

214 Types of inguinal hernia repair previously performed were: open (10), lapa

215 ntify 73,724 individuals undergoing an index hernia repair, primary total or partial thyroidectomy, l

216 e 12/146 (8%) patients who underwent ventral hernia repair: primary closure 7/109 (6%), ADA 3/30 (10%

217 al mesh was guided by clinical feedback from hernia repair procedures, which were also being modified

218 ister study with 76,495 consecutive inguinal hernia repairs, recruited from the national Swedish Hern

219 Data on femoral hernia repairs registered in the Danish Hernia Database

220 All OAM groin hernia repairs registered in The Swedish Hernia Register

221 e of best choice in open prosthetic inguinal hernia repair remains a subject of ongoing debate.

222 D), but the durability of concomitant hiatal hernia repair remains challenging.

223 Meshes for hernia repair require optimal characteristics with regar

224 portant for the increased incidence of groin hernia repair seen after radical prostatectomy or radiat

225 Female groin hernia repair should be performed with the TEP or TAPP l

226 The use of mesh in parastomal hernia repair significantly reduces recurrence rates and

227 cohort of 92,444 subjects with self-reported hernia repair surgeries (9,701 cases and 82,743 controls

228 unintended consequences of delaying ventral hernia repair surgery for surgical optimization, includi

229 reflux symptoms between cholecystectomy and hernia repair surgery patients.

230 Commercially available meshes used for hernia repair (Surgisis and Ultrapro) were compared with

231 ized controlled trial of 3 methods of hiatus hernia repair; sutures versus absorbable mesh versus non

232 g a bilateral total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP-IHR) (>24 hours).

233 ad a significantly higher incidence of groin hernia repair than the control cohort: HR: 3.95 (95% con

234 all abscess that developed after an inguinal hernia repair that utilized synthetic mesh.

235 ed at the time of laparoscopic preperitoneal hernia repair, the anatomy of the lipomas was studied bo

236 After umb/epi and incisional hernia repair, the cumulative risks of reoperation and o

237 Among 23 000 patients undergoing ventral hernia repair, the mean (SD) age was 53.9 (14.3) years,

238 ol/Tisseel for MEsh fixation in LIchtenstein hernia repair [TIMELI]; trial NCT00306839) was conducted

239 ]) performed enough robotic-assisted ventral hernia repairs to achieve necessary volume nationally to

240 pendectomy, and groin (inguinal and femoral) hernia repair--to quantify the potential risks of expand

241 All patients received an open mesh inguinal hernia repair under local anesthesia.

242 Patients undergoing hernia repairs under local anesthesia with intravenous s

243 r primary umbilical/epigastric or incisional hernia repair underestimated overall risk of recurrence

244 geons completed initial training programs in hernia repair, underwent interval proficiency assessment

245 ion for recurrence (parastomal or incisional hernia repair) up to 5 years after surgery.

246 ional surgical procedure: midline incisional hernia, repair ureteral fistula, and repair enterocutane

247 der who underwent emergent inpatient ventral hernia repair used 100% Medicare administrative claims d

248 of new persistent opioid use after inguinal hernia repair using a national database of de-identified

249 Exposures: Hernia repair using mesh performed by either open or lap

250 trospective analysis of adults with emergent hernia repair using National Center for Health Statistic

251 Ventral hernia repairs using mesh is one of the most common surg

252 were prospectively measured before and after hernia repair, using computer analysis of abdominal CT s

253 The presence of contamination during ventral hernia repair (VHR) poses a significant challenge.

254 Ventral hernia repair (VHR) with mesh remains one of the most co

255 ered to patients scheduled to have a ventral hernia repair (VHR).

256 Ventral hernia repair(VHR) is one of the most commonly performed

257 Incremental robotic-assisted hernia repair volume.

258 Inguinal hernia repair was commenced via an open surgical approac

259 Primary paraesophageal hernia repair was completed laparoscopically in 55 patie

260 ted adverse event rates after abdominal wall hernia repair was determined.

261 ality and selection of studies of parastomal hernia repair was done with a modified MINORS.

262 Incidence of incisional hernia repair was higher after open AAA repair (19 vs 23

263 An almost 4-fold increase in groin hernia repair was observed after radical prostatectomy c

264 In the late repair strategy, hernia repair was planned after discharge from the neona

265 ary veteran patients who underwent umbilical hernia repair was studied between January 1, 1998, and D

266 ot reversed, the hazard of repeat parastomal hernia repair was the same for patients whose ostomy was

267 increasing experience with robotic-assisted hernia repairs was associated with improved long-term re

268 Rates of emergent incisional hernia repair were high but relatively stable among olde

269 054 patients who underwent an abdominal wall hernia repair were identified (17% laparoscopic, 83% ope

270 s older than 18 years who underwent elective hernia repair were included.

271 weight meshes in open anterior mesh inguinal hernia repair were not associated with an increased risk

272 differences in recurrence at the site of the hernia repair were observed (11.4% vs 11.4%; P = .99).

273 A total of 3970 primary femoral hernia repairs were analyzed; 27.3% occurred in men.

274 Hernia repairs were divided into the following 4 groups:

275 All emergent hernia repairs were identified during the study period.

276 2086 patients who underwent 2499 inguinal hernia repairs were identified.

277 1 683 primary groin and 7777 primary ventral hernia repairs were included in this study.

278 An estimated 2.3 million inpatient abdominal hernia repairs were performed from 2001 to 2010; of whic

279 inety-nine laparoscopic and 81 open inguinal hernia repairs were performed on 192 male patients and 2

280 Mesh hernia repairs were performed on a second group of rats

281 The TV appendectomies and ventral hernia repairs were pure NOTES, through a SILS port in t

282 ogy, recurrent hernia repairs, and bilateral hernia repairs were significant predictors of postoperat

283 mies, 24 TV appendectomies, and 6 TV ventral hernia repairs, were performed.

284 pair with low-cost mesh and those undergoing hernia repair with commercial mesh.

285 Laparoscopic and robotic ventral hernia repair with intraperitoneal mesh have comparable

286 adoption of the robotic platform for ventral hernia repair with intraperitoneal mesh in the United St

287 differ significantly between men undergoing hernia repair with low-cost mesh and those undergoing he

288 Elective umbilical hernia repair with mesh should be considered in patients

289 Open hernia repair with or without mesh use and with or witho

290 assigned ICD9 procedure codes for incisional hernia repair with or without synthetic material (mesh).

291 resiting, 2744 (15.6%) underwent parastomal hernia repair with ostomy resiting, and 7566 (42.9%) und

292 iting, and 7566 (42.9%) underwent parastomal hernia repair with ostomy reversal.

293 y who had undergone primary unilateral groin hernia repair with the Lichtenstein, Shouldice, TEP or T

294 s of age) undergoing open, elective, ventral hernia repairs with mesh placed in the retromuscular pos

295 ly assigned to open or laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs with mesh.

296 All patients with primary umbilical hernia repair, with or without a concurrent unrelated pr

297 s underwent another parastomal or incisional hernia repair within 5 years of surgery.

298 least one subsequent reoperative incisional hernia repair within the first 5 years after initial rep

299 , 7315 patients (41.5%) underwent parastomal hernia repair without ostomy resiting, 2744 (15.6%) unde

300 hether an inguinal neurectomy at the time of hernia repair would reduce the risk of postoperative pai