戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 position to GERD (eg, central obesity, large hiatal hernia).
2 sence of endoscopic erosive esophagitis, and hiatal hernia).
3 ate the development and natural history of a hiatal hernia.
4 ients with a body mass index <35 kg/m and no hiatal hernia.
5 e program to identify individuals that had a hiatal hernia.
6 s were pulmonary artery-aorta dilatation and hiatal hernia.
7 ods for elective surgical treatment of large hiatal hernias.
8 duces comparable results for repair of large hiatal hernias.
9 ant PEH accounts for approximately 5% of all hiatal hernias.
10 ting, other diaphragm "stressors," and large hiatal hernias.
11  of dysphagia (3.7% vs. 3.3%), postoperative hiatal hernia (1.9% vs. 1.4%), need for esophageal dilat
12 tes (23.5% vs 11.4% vs 10.1%, P = 0.001) and hiatal hernia (28.3% vs 14.8% vs 20.3%, P = 0.01) for ob
13 ncter relaxations and their association with hiatal hernias; (3) the role of Helicobacter pylori in G
14 e findings showed wrap breakdown (42%), wrap-hiatal hernia (30%), or both (21%).
15 r in Barrett esophagus include chronic GERD, hiatal hernia, advanced age, male sex, white race, cigar
16 utcome was radiologically verified recurrent hiatal hernia after more than 10 years.
17                     Length of BE and size of hiatal hernia also were associated with persistent intes
18 ta were obtained, including age, gender, and hiatal hernia and Helicobacter pylori status.
19 paring 2 methods of hiatal closure for large hiatal hernia and to evaluate their strengths and flaws.
20 ntrast phase optimizes the ability to detect hiatal hernias and lower esophageal rings or strictures.
21 ho underwent recumbent imaging, 10 (77%) had hiatal hernias and nine (69%) had reflux.
22 re likely to have EGJ disruption (leading to hiatal hernia) and an augmented GEPG providing a perfect
23  U tests revealed that length of BE, size of hiatal hernia, and frequency of reflux, but not acid ref
24 ssociated with technical shortcomings, large hiatal hernias, and early postoperative vomiting.
25                                              Hiatal hernias are common but the natural history of sli
26 copic antireflux surgery and repair of small hiatal hernias are now routinely performed.
27 of prosthetic hiatal herniorrhaphy for large hiatal hernia cannot be endorsed routinely and the decis
28 nal risk factors (nocturnal reflux symptoms, hiatal hernia, elevated body mass index, tobacco use, an
29               In the LF group, 41% had large hiatal hernias (&gt;2 cm), 8 patients required Collis gastr
30 t lower esophageal sphincter relaxations and hiatal hernias have emerged as major and interacting fac
31  hypertriglyceridemia (OR 1.42 [1.29-1.57]), hiatal hernia (HH) (OR 4.07 [3.21-5.17]), and non-alcoho
32                                              Hiatal hernia (HH) is considered a risk factor of atrial
33 review addresses the historical evolution of hiatal hernia (HH) repair and reports in a chronological
34                           Many patients with hiatal hernias (HH) are asymptomatic; however, symptoms
35 0-74 years (HR = 2.8, 95% CI: 2.2, 3.6), and hiatal hernia (HR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.2, 2.7), while Black
36 gnoses in the 38 cases were gastritis in 19, hiatal hernia in four, benign ulcer in three, benign (n
37             This study aimed to determine if hiatal hernia influences vulnerability to reflux and tra
38 th protrusion of the right hemidiaphragm and hiatal hernia is an uncommon anomaly among all transposi
39  they had documented GERD and did not have a hiatal hernia larger than 2 cm, LES pressure less than 8
40 th either Stretta or LF according to size of hiatal hernia, LES pressure, Barrett's esophagus, and si
41                         Patients with larger hiatal hernias, LES pressure less than 8 mmHg, or Barret
42  therapy or surgery according to the size of hiatal hernia, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, Barr
43 n seven United States centers, patients with hiatal hernia &lt;/= 2 cm and abnormal esophageal acid expo
44 ophageal pH study (body mass index <35 kg/m, hiatal hernia &lt;3 cm, and absence of endoscopic Barrett d
45                       Patients with GERD and hiatal hernias &lt;/=2 cm were randomly assigned to groups
46 g an increase in size or change in type of a hiatal hernia may be clinically relevant to help underst
47 or incidence of recurrent reflux, dysphagia, hiatal hernia, need for esophageal dilation, revision of
48                     Twenty-one people had no hiatal hernia on initial UGI and over a median of 99 mon
49 logic gastroesophageal reflux and those with hiatal hernia or disordered esophageal peristalsis, alth
50 as undertaken for a patulous hiatus or large hiatal hernia or to buttress the repair of an esophagoto
51 for both groups which included recurrence of hiatal hernia or wrap migration (OR 2.01, 95% CI 0.92, 4
52 operating time, complications, recurrence of hiatal hernia or wrap migration, and reoperation.
53 g that the perturbed anatomy associated with hiatal hernia predisposed to eliciting tLESRs in patient
54 rbable mesh does not reduce the incidence of hiatal hernia recurrence 13 years postoperatively.
55 r solid foods after 3 years without reducing hiatal hernia recurrence rates compared with crural sutu
56                      The verified radiologic hiatal hernia recurrence rates were 11 of 29 (38%) in th
57  they were more likely to undergo concurrent hiatal hernia repair (35.1% vs 20.0%, p < 0.0001).
58                                              Hiatal hernia repair can be performed safely with a low
59 afluoroethylene mesh closure in laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair for treatment of GERD.
60 se (GERD), but the durability of concomitant hiatal hernia repair remains challenging.
61  practice for benign foregut procedures (eg, hiatal hernia repair, fundoplication, and Heller myotomy
62  with eventration of right hemidiaphragm and hiatal hernia reported from Pakistan providing insights
63 UGI and over a median of 99 months a sliding hiatal hernia (SHH) developed in 16 and a PEH developed
64              On ordinal logistic regression, hiatal hernia size and Milan Score category were indepen
65 orectal surgery (colectomy, proctectomy), or hiatal hernia surgery (paraesophageal hernia repair, Nis
66                                              Hiatal hernia surgery has evolved from anatomic repair t
67 idity between HSHs and LSHs for bariatric or hiatal hernia surgery.
68  LES pressures and a decreased prevalence of hiatal hernia than non-diabetics, which may be related t
69                                          All hiatal hernia types (I-IV) were collected.
70 /- 5.2 vs. 27.7 +/- 3.7 kg/m(2); p < 0.001), hiatal hernia was less frequent in T2D patients compared
71 er uric acid, smoking, alcohol drinking, and hiatal hernia were found to be significant associated fa
72 us prosthetic hiatal herniorrhaphy for large hiatal hernia were selected by searching PubMed, Medline
73 including band slippage, pouch dilation, and hiatal hernia were studied.
74                                    Recurrent hiatal hernias were detected in 17 of 79 patients studie
75 phragmatic crura were closed only when large hiatal hernias were present.
76 ric pneumatosis secondary to an incarcerated hiatal hernia with resultant portal venous gas involving
77 ases of band erosion, port/tube dysfunction, hiatal hernia, wound infection, and pouch dilation.