1  cardia without hiatus hernia and 26.2% with hiatus hernia.

2 s trial do not support mesh repair for large hiatus hernias.

3 , while 38.6% had incompetent cardia without hiatus hernia and 26.2% with hiatus hernia.

4          In 1926, Akerlund proposed the term hiatus hernia and classified HH into the 3 types that we

5         Caucasian ethnicity, the presence of hiatus hernia, and alcohol consumption were all associat

6 ed with reflux of stomach acid and usually a hiatus hernia, and it strongly predisposes to esophageal

7 reasing length of Barrett esophagus, size of hiatus hernia, and severity of acid reflux.

8 nificant differences were seen for recurrent hiatus hernia, and the clinical differences were unlikel

9  up to 30% of patients after repair of large hiatus hernias, and mesh repair has been proposed as a s

10                         Six subjects without hiatus hernia had endoclips placed at the squamocolumnar

11 ents without hiatus hernia (NHH), and 7 with hiatus hernia (HH) were studied.

12                              Repair of large hiatus hernia is associated with radiological recurrence

13 nts had Barrett's esophagus (n = 25, 51.0%), hiatus hernia (n = 26, 53.1%), esophagitis (n = 10, 20.4

14 ormal subjects (NL), 9 GERD patients without hiatus hernia (NHH), and 7 with hiatus hernia (HH) were

15 ble or nonabsorbable mesh in repair of large hiatus hernias reduces the risk of recurrence, compared

16 ral or umbilical hernia repair (n = 19), and hiatus hernia repair (n = 10).

17  randomized controlled trial of 3 methods of hiatus hernia repair; sutures versus absorbable mesh ver

18  confirmed a gastric adenocarcinoma within a hiatus hernia, which had fistulated to the pericardium.