ライフサイエンスコーパス: hip replacement

1 d provided data for 92 series (215 676 total hip replacements).

2 ng (CABG), carotid endarterectomy, and total hip replacement.

3 aneurysm, 219 for CABG surgery, and 2668 for hip replacement.

4 ncordant for hip OA, as ascertained by total hip replacement.

5 , septic wrist, bacteremia, and septic total hip replacement.

6 y $30,000 per year for patients undergoing a hip replacement.

7 a total knee replacement and 825 had a total hip replacement.

8 lective surgical treatments, including total hip replacement.

9 422 individuals underwent arthritis-related hip replacement.

10 ; mean [SD] age, 74.3 [6.4] years) underwent hip replacement.

11 d to resistance training had undergone total hip replacement.

12 as well as in depression among patients with hip replacement.

13 er age limit for access to arthritis-related hip replacement.

14 uch events were known complications of total hip replacement.

15 minal aortic aneurysm repair, colectomy, and hip replacement.

16 minal aortic aneurysm repair, colectomy, and hip replacement.

17 of abdominal aortic aneurysm, colectomy, and hip replacement.

18 minor bleeding in patients undergoing total hip replacement.

19 espread implantation into patients requiring hip replacements.

20 ir (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47-0.89) and hip replacement (0.70; 95% CI, 0.51-0.96).

21 For total hip replacement, 10-year implant survival rate was 95.6%

22 bdominal aortic aneurysm repair ($5279), and hip replacement ($2436).

23 spital (AAA repair: 40.5%; colectomy: 25.8%; hip replacement: 32.5%; and pancreatectomy: 19.7%) compa

24 nt Registry of England and Wales for primary hip replacements (402,051, of which 31,171 were stemmed

25 tion ($63117 vs $21325; P < .001), and total hip replacement ($41354 vs $19028; P < .001).

26 67.6 years) were randomly assigned to total hip replacement (53 patients) or resistance training (56

27 e major source of payment (55.4% for primary hip replacements, 59.3% for primary knee replacements),

28 ing colectomy (12.1% vs 14.1%; P < .001) and hip replacement (6.9% vs 7.7%; P < .001).

29 ending 12% to 37% ($2,500 for total knee and hip replacement, $6,700 for colectomy, and $11,400 for l

30 Of these, 82 were conducted on patients with hip replacements, 75 on patients with knee replacements,

31 strongly associate with osteoarthritis total hip replacement: a missense variant, c.1141G>C (p.Asp369

32 rforming coronary artery bypass graft, total hip replacement, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, or co

33 The decline in rates of arthritis-related hip replacement after 75 to 79 years of age was gradual

34 alateral cognate joints (i.e., contralateral hip replacement after an initial hip replacement) have b

35 Total knee and hip replacement, although rare in the adolescent populat

36 The study included 3697 patients with hip replacement and 3110 patients with knee replacement

37 as 15.9 points in patients assigned to total hip replacement and 4.5 points in patients assigned to r

38 86 patients with idiopathic OA who underwent hip replacement and 414 who underwent initial knee repla

39 fied 63 158 patients who had undergone total hip replacement and 54 276 who had total knee replacemen

40 Among patients who had total knee or total hip replacement and received 4 to 10 days of postoperati

41 Nearly 600,000 hip replacements and 1.4 million knee replacements will

42 e interval [95% CI] 201,782-250,018) primary hip replacements and 431,485 (95% CI 397,454-465,516) pr

43 This was a 37% increase in primary hip replacements and a 53% increase in primary knee repl

44 allenges the increasing trend for more total hip replacements and total knee replacements to be done

45 AA repair, 13.6% after colectomy, 7.5% after hip replacement, and 16.3% after pancreatectomy.

46 cement, 214 patients who had undergone total hip replacement, and 520 controls from the UK.

47 strectomy, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, hip replacement, and coronary artery bypass.

48 an delivery, hysterectomy, knee replacement, hip replacement, and hip fracture repair), mortality was

49 who underwent coronary artery bypass (CABG), hip replacement, and knee replacement at Premier hospita

50 er comorbidity, admission FIM ratings, total hip replacement, and time to followup.

51 ; 29 388 (22.9%), colectomy; 91 168 (71.2%), hip replacement; and 2276 (1.8%), pancreatectomy.

52 Recipients of hip replacement are less likely to be Hispanic than are

53 undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, hip replacement, back surgery, or colectomy in IDS-affil

54 med a genome-wide association study of total hip replacements, based on variants identified through w

55 s, respectively, and four patients underwent hip replacement because of AVN.

56 th increased risk of readmission after total hip replacement: being older than 71 years (OR, 1.83; 95

57 s aged 66 to 99 years who underwent elective hip replacement between January 1, 2016, and December 31

58 pains from an early age leading to bilateral hip replacement by age 30, aortic insufficiency, and hyp

59 nt over time, especially in the provision of hip replacement, by degree of social deprivation.

60 For hip replacement, CCGs with the highest concentration of

61 year survival of primary, conventional total hip replacement constructs in patients with osteoarthrit

62 herwise known as revision, following primary hip replacement depends in part on the prosthesis implan

63 We took data about hip replacements done in England and Wales between April

64 bisphosphonate, it eventually leads to total hip replacement due to collapse of femoral head.

65 re hospitals performing at least 10 elective hip replacements during the study period.

66 .71 [95% CI, 0.53-2.90]) and PROMIS-fatigue (hip replacement: EE, -0.65 [95% CI, -1.12 to -0.18]; kne

67 ant difference in improvement on the EQ-VAS (hip replacement: effect estimate [EE], 1.66 [95% CI, 0.5

68 was more pronounced among persons undergoing hip replacement for osteoarthritis compared with recipie

69 The 25-year pooled survival of hip replacements from case series was 77.6% (95% CI 76.0

70 ts that the satisfaction of demand for total hip replacement, given agreed criteria for surgery, is a

71 ssion score was significantly reduced in the hip replacement group (EE, -0.60 [95% CI, -1.01 to -0.18

72 patients (9%) who had been assigned to total hip replacement had not undergone surgery, and 12 patien

73 hether a secular decrease in death caused by hip replacement has occurred in England and Wales and wh

74 ntralateral hip replacement after an initial hip replacement) have been evaluated, the evolution of e

75 rthroplasty (HR, 3.79; 95% CI, 3.21-4.47 for hip replacement; HR, 2.68; 95% CI, 2.10-3.42 for knee re

76 s of CABG, carotid endarterectomy, and total hip replacement in 158 hospital-referral regions (79 hos

77 r-service Medicare patients undergoing total hip replacement in 2016 at hospital systems identified i

78 the population requirement for primary total hip replacement in England.

79 on wisdom tooth extraction and primary total hip replacement in the UK National Health Service.

80 NDINGS: The survival rates of total knee and hip replacements in adolescents are lower compared with

81 a review of the current implant guidance for hip replacements in older patients.

82 cades of the 21st century, arthritis-related hip replacement incidence increased by 50% to 100% among

83 he last decades in Denmark, and the observed hip replacement incidence suggests that age is currently

84 f the population undergoing fracture-related hip replacement increased by 50% to 70%, with modest var

85 The overall rate of hip replacement increased from 27 to 36 per 10,000 perso

86 Total hip replacement is a common and highly effective operati

87 Total hip replacement is a commonly performed orthopedic proce

88 Death within 90 days after total hip replacement is rare but might be avoidable dependent

89 Total hip replacement is routinely recommended for severe hip

90 hagectomy, pancreatectomy, rectal resection, hip replacement, knee replacement, and bariatric surgery

91 of adults who underwent elective craniotomy, hip replacement, knee replacement, spinal procedure, or

92 imed to answer the question: how long does a hip replacement last?

93 lse rate, lower bone density, higher odds of hip replacement, lower odds of high cholesterol or chole

94 section (2%), esophageal resection (1%), and hip replacement (<1%).

95 , pulmonary resection (n = 91758), and total hip replacement (n = 307399) between 2009 and 2012.

96 omorbidity, admission FIM ratings, and total hip replacement, OA was associated with a longer rehabil

97 CAHs vs non-CAHs persisted for 3 procedures: hip replacement (odds ratio, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.01-3.57), c

98 st strongly associated with prophylaxis use (hip replacement: odds ratio 6.2, 95% confidence interval

99 o secondary causes of bone loss admitted for hip replacement, of whom 30 women had acute hip fracture

100 viduals homozygous for rs532464664 had their hip replacement operation 13.5 years and 4.9 years earli

101 ontrolled trials specifically compared total hip replacement or meniscal repair with non-operative ca

102 g revision surgery in patients who had total hip replacement or total knee replacement over the age o

103 ce Research Datalink who had undergone total hip replacement or total knee replacement.

104 ot AAA repair (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.73-1.19), hip replacement (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.91-1.03), or pancre

105 stectomy, ventral hernia repair, craniotomy, hip replacement, or knee replacement.

106 marizes the recent studies of total knee and hip replacement outcomes in adolescent patients, as well

107 s significant only for men who had undergone hip replacement (P = 0.016, odds ratio 1.48, 95% confide

108 rdiac related procedures, lung lobectomy and hip replacement (partial and total) were identified and

109 ne samples obtained from the femoral neck of hip replacement patients.

110 Rates of arthritis-related hip replacements peaked for individuals aged 75 to 79 ye

111 s, of which 42 825 involved fracture-related hip replacement procedures.

112 rgoing colectomy, hysterectomy, and knee and hip replacement procedures.

113 urgery, esophagectomy, knee replacement, and hip replacement; ranging from OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-1.0

114 le the proportion receiving fracture-related hip replacement remained relatively constant after 75 ye

115 thritis and an indication for surgery, total hip replacement resulted in a clinically important, supe

116 in the tribological layer in metal-on-metal hip replacements retrieved from patients.

117 In the 1960s, total hip replacement revolutionised management of elderly pat

118 The Readmission After Total Hip Replacement Risk Scale was developed to predict read

119 models, such as the Readmission After Total Hip Replacement Risk Scale, can identify high-risk patie

120 e used to create the Readmission After Total Hip Replacement Risk Scale, which was applied to the val

121 specific incidence rates of hip fracture and hip replacement stratified on fracture-related vs arthri

122 s were 27% more likely to have total knee or hip replacement surgeries (OR 1.27 [95% CI 1.26-1.28]).

123 e less likely to have elective total knee or hip replacement surgeries compared with their urban coun

124 eas are more likely to undergo total knee or hip replacement surgeries.

125 patients and nondiabetic controls (C) during hip replacement surgery and from T2DM patients undergoin

126 in patients with osteoarthritis who undergo hip replacement surgery are noted.

127 registry of patients who had undergone total hip replacement surgery over an 8-year period at a singl

128 The requirement for total hip replacement surgery was estimated on the basis of pa

129 icular cartilage from 22 participants having hip replacement surgery with and without DDH (9 DDH-OA,

130 ne a primary or revision total knee or total hip replacement surgery.

131 other family member also had undergone total hip replacement surgery.

132 Today, young patients present for hip-replacement surgery hoping to restore their quality

133 For total hip replacement there was no significant change in behav

134 For hip replacement, there was no rurality effect; for knee

135 218940 patients at 1056 hospitals), or total hip replacement (THR) (231774 patients at 1831 hospitals

136 Mortality and complication rates after total hip replacement (THR) are inversely associated with the

137 .23-1.77]) and for patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) for HRQOL on the 36-item Short For

138 Nearly 100,000 people underwent total hip replacement (THR) in the United Kingdom in 2018, and

139 Total hip replacement (THR) is extremely common.

140 Implant survival after conventional total hip replacement (THR) is often poor in younger patients,

141 Total hip replacement (THR) is successful in treating hip arth

142 d with patients undergoing an elective total hip replacement (THR) operation.

143 nd spending for beneficiaries who need total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR), y

144 risk for venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR).

145 ge hip osteoarthritis (OA) who undergo total hip replacement (THR) preferentially require subsequent

146 estigated the revision rate of primary total hip replacement (THR) reported in the National Joint Reg

147 sthetic femoral fracture (POPFF) after total hip replacement (THR) requires complex surgery and is as

148 core, decrease in MJS of > or =0.5 mm, total hip replacement (THR), and increase in lower extremity d

149 s in patients with hip OA undergoing a total hip replacement (THR), as compared with disease-free con

150 nd is used as a standard outcome after total hip replacement (THR), but may not fully represent the p

151 varied widely for patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR), colectomy, and pancreaticoduodene

152 progression of the disease required a total hip replacement (THR).

153 enderness, hip pain or tenderness, and total hip replacement (THR).

154 predictive validity (association with total hip replacement [THR] and signs and symptoms a mean of 7

155 cordant for primary OA (ascertained by total hip replacement [THR] or total knee replacement), were g

156 eplacements (TKRs), and 537 women with total hip replacements (THRs) from the Nottingham case-control

157 rvice beneficiaries undergoing TKRs or total hip replacements (THRs) in New York State from 2016 to 2

158 e 7 procedures examined ranged from 0.3% for hip replacement to 10.7% for craniotomy.

159 e biased, patients and surgeons can expect a hip replacement to last 25 years in around 58% of patien

160 anging from OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-1.00, for hip replacement to OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.94-1.26, for bari

161 tion of male patients ranged from 37% (total hip replacement) to 77% (abdominal aortic aneurysm repai

162 erectomy, reduction of femur fracture, total hip replacement, total knee replacement, partial colecto

163 underwent future targeted procedures (total hip replacement, total knee replacements) or nontargeted

164 f Medicare beneficiaries undergoing elective hip replacements, vertical integration of SNFs in a hosp

165 Many systems have concentrated hip replacement volume at relatively high-cost hospitals

166 Adjusted total episode payments for hip replacement were 4% lower in IDS-affiliated hospital

167 characteristics of patients undergoing total hip replacement were abstracted.

168 ry artery bypass graft (CABG), colectomy, or hip replacement were identified using 100% Medicare Inpa

169 409,096 primary hip replacements were done to treat osteoarthritis.

170 Recipients of hip replacements were significantly less likely to be Hi

171 cordant for primary OA (ascertained by total hip replacement), were genotyped for 36 microsatellite m

172 s dictate that further developments in total hip replacement will be governed by their cost-effective

173 andomized, controlled trial to compare total hip replacement with resistance training in patients 50

174 ROMs except the EQ-5D-5L among patients with hip replacement, with a 2.10-point increase on the EQ-VA

175 f variation in episode spending around total hip replacement within and across hospital systems.

176 All hip replacements would eventually fail if in situ long e