ライフサイエンスコーパス: home range

1 roilers consistently creating similar sized "home ranges".

2 l gangs of the same "community" use the same home range.

3 much larger groups near the center of their home range.

4 es at home compared with outside Centaurea's home range.

5 s were located in the core (MCP75) of LF28's home range.

6 restrict their movements to a characteristic home range.

7 movements of individual animals within their home range.

8 ly populated protected areas closer to their home range.

9 her with sufficient size to encompass animal home range.

10 d how foraging changes when constrained to a home range.

11 otemporal dynamics of resources within their home range.

12 ments into a constrained spatial area: their home range.

13 ggression when within the other's peripheral home range.

14 e probability of migrating and the size of a home range.

15 ng portions of female-female and male-female home ranges.

16 aggression increasing towards the centre of home ranges.

17 pecies are sedentary as adults, with limited home ranges.

18 significantly more in same- and opposite-sex home ranges.

19 iety with a continuous mosaic of overlapping home ranges.

20 es only between locations within and outside home ranges.

21 er spatial reference memory developed larger home ranges.

22 le are obligate burrow dwellers with limited home ranges.

23 tions and random locations within individual home ranges.

24 ory movements, and larger, spatially-shifted home ranges.

25 ds, and core forests to examine the species' home ranges.

26 om 2000 to 2016 using simulated grizzly bear home ranges.

27 clude predators that typically require large home ranges.

28 as compared to wolves without LCDs in their home ranges.

29 gh variation in both RT and TtoR occurred in home ranges.

30 g than in non-overlapping portions of cougar home ranges.

31 n of pollen resources within an individual's home range(4), and spatial learning may be more pronounc

32 Annual and 16-day elliptical time density home ranges(8) were calculated by using GPS tracking dat

33 Within home ranges, a higher variation in both RT and TtoR was

34 ritoriality, defending core regions of their home ranges against neighbours, and mirror patterns comm

35 movements, including general roaming within home ranges along the coastline and seasonal migrations.

36 important general question, and mechanistic home range analysis (MHRA) provides the tools to address

37 this issue, Ellison et al. use a mechanistic home range analysis (MHRA) to uncover the drivers underl

38 Mechanistic home range analysis reveals drivers of space use pattern

39 Reduced size of home range and core area (i.e., areas of concentrated us

40 Home range and core home range size were measured using

41 male competitors on the edge of the pride's home range and far from the waterholes, suggesting that

42 bears actively forage for food over a larger home range and pandas often sit in a patch of bamboo and

43 the ratio of distances characteristic of the home range and the measurement window, along with an exp

44 greater than non-LCD sites and had decreased home ranges and activity as compared to wolves without L

45 ale reproductive success is linked to larger home ranges and better navigational skills.

46 We estimated home ranges and calculated resource selection functions

47 comparing overlap of home ranges (HR-HR), to home ranges and core areas (HR-CA), and in-turn between

48 pecifics can be evaluated using estimates of home ranges and core areas and used to understand factor

49 Home ranges and core areas were estimated for 54 wild pi

50 atures matured into adults, we analyse their home ranges and distances moved in the Bangweulu Wetland

51 axis-individuals that move more have larger home ranges and engage in more 'exploratory' movements.

52 sident females, had fewer cubs born on their home ranges and had fewer cubs survive to independence o

53 cterized by less frequent movements, smaller home ranges and longer residence times.

54 We quantified home ranges and measured morphometric and ecological fac

55 elated changes in spatial behaviour (smaller home ranges and movements to lower-density, lower-qualit

56 ategies involving frequent movements, larger home ranges and shorter stays in a given location.

57 lution, denser development, etc.) had larger home ranges and showed greater daily displacement and me

58 are known to increase the size of mammalian home ranges and territories.

59 We compared 2nd (position of home range) and 3rd (use within the home range) order se

60 e traveled, evenness of space use within the home range, and glucocorticoid concentrations.

61 objective was to use movements, estimates of home range, and resource selection analysis to identify

62 n their great diversity, comparatively small home ranges, and ability to disperse, arthropods make an

63 cord their movements as they developed their home ranges, and determined the location, timing and cau

64 Most animals live in home ranges, and memory is thought to be an important pr

65 persal limitation and fine-scale patterns of home-ranging) appeared to decrease from low to high inte

66 Territoriality and stable home ranges are a common space-use pattern among animals

67 uity of this space-use pattern suggests that home ranges are adaptive in a wide range of ecological c

68 clusive areas and that these colony-specific home ranges are determined by density-dependent competit

69 Initial indications suggest that rock python home ranges are larger than other pythons.

70 e linear relationship between group size and home range area and daily travel distance, which depict

71 analysis considered the relationship between home range area and sex, species, vegetation productivit

72 y decreases, but not the steep rate at which home range area increases.

73 U-shaped relationship between group size and home range area, average daily distance traveled, evenne

74 Home range area, geographic range size and body mass are

75 o that of the relation between body mass and home range area, suggesting that maximum body size is de

76 % to 68% in daily travel distances and total home range area.

77 he identification of biologically meaningful home range areas will help advance the field.

78 The present work shows that stable home ranges arise when, in addition to scent-mediated co

79 uch an animal results in a slowly increasing home range, as shown for urban foxes (Vulpes vulpes).

80 data successfully predicts the formation of home ranges, as well as emergent properties of movement

81 Wildlife disease hosts vary in home range-associated foraging and social behaviours, wh

82 harithonia, a butterfly with well-documented home range behaviour, in Miami-Dade County, Florida, for

83 is directly linked to animals' space use and home range behaviour; however, because memory cannot be

84 the spatio-temporal pattern of resources in home ranging behaviour.

85 scaled and more directed than their typical home ranging behaviour.

86 ntial daily integrated PN exposure in the 56 homes ranged between 37 x 10(3) and 6.0 x 10(6) particle

87 Here we present a new model of home range-body size scaling based on fractal resource d

88 ere also highest for host species with large home ranges but were instead lowest for dietary generali

89 no universally constant scaling exponent for home range, but defines a possible range of values set b

90 tive periods while females constrained their home range, but increased in size to match the demands o

91 fidelity in the maintenance of large mammal home ranges by demonstrating the return of individuals t

92 ted by spatial ecologists to quantify animal home ranges can be modified for use in stable isotope ec

93 ity estimates by informing cryptic activity (home range) center transiency and improving estimation o

94 rs the closer they were to their neighbours' home range centres.

95 We then correlated the identified home-range changes to life-history events and possible e

96 d from radioactivity levels in each animal's home range combined with tissue concentrations of (134+1

97 vary seasonally, and males exhibited larger home ranges compared to females (M = 10.36 +/- 0.79 km(2

98 esidency in/near river pools and had smaller home ranges compared to large sub-adults.

99 However, encounters within core areas of the home range consistently elicited higher aggression, rega

100 pectations for Levy walks, regardless of the home-range constraint.

101 s a safe and stable social environment and a home range containing the resources required to survive

102 roductive success) and the proportion of the home range covered by a key grass species, H. lanatus, f

103 who increasingly produced the public good of home range defence as intergroup competition intensified

104 Home ranges, derived from kernel utilization distributio

105 mined from abstract cognitive assays, shapes home range development and variation, and suggests preda

106 irical studies have linked spatial memory to home range development or determined how selection opera

107 National Park to investigate their seasonal home range differences and habitat preferences.

108 NH males increased movement distances and home ranges during the mating season, while RH males dis

109 usly studied cases where spatially exclusive home ranges emerge from scent mark-mediated avoidance re

110 ased model for characterising and predicting home range emergence has been lacking.

111 onment, and (2) predict observed patterns of home range emergence in this experimental setting.

112 between exploration and exploitation during home range establishment, we conducted experimental tria

113 In Scandinavia, the home-range establishment and kill rates of gray wolves (

114 This study is the first to report mongoose home range estimates based on GPS telemetry, as well as

115 Mean (+/- SE) home range estimates from 19 mongooses in this study (14

116 med to be non-territorial due to their large home ranges, extensive range overlap, and limited inter-

117 t all village hunting territories and hunter home ranges fall within mining and logging concessions.

118 We employed 27 annual home ranges for 13 cougars to test whether home range ov

119 We estimated home ranges for two winter seasons that ranged between 7

120 Despite this constancy, efficient home-range foraging trajectories were less diffusive by

121 ugh movement ecology has leveraged models of home range formation to explore the effects of spatial h

122 ver the effect of these on the mechanisms of home range formation.

123 ipal movement mechanisms underlying observed home range formation.

124 with an explicit prescription to extract the home range from observations.

125 ed among beneficiaries residing in a nursing home ranged from 1% in 2016 to 12% in 2020.

126 Rates of discharge home ranged from 73.5% for patients who did not require

127 Home ranges from five FRDDs were highly variable in size

128 Animals living in stable home ranges have many potential cues to locate food.

129 space-use overlap when comparing overlap of home ranges (HR-HR), to home ranges and core areas (HR-C

130 ee distinct strategies: (i) Stay in breeding home range; (ii) make return migrations to a specific ar

131 highest at the periphery of an individual's home range in areas where they had less experience and o

132 turtles however the loggerhead used a larger home range in the week after the storm.

133 lated to plant functional traits in the host home range in yearlings or adult sheep.

134 , resource preferences, and the formation of home ranges in nature.

135 ster of S. neurona infections in otters with home ranges in southern Monterey Bay and a coastal segme

136 us, animals that navigate particularly small home ranges in the wild.

137 We apply the model to predict that home range increases with habitat fragmentation, and tha

138 that at the broader scale, placement of the home range is not affected by the presence of sympatric

139 Home ranging is a near-ubiquitous phenomenon in the anim

140 at a group moves away from the center of its home range, its odds of winning an interaction decrease

141 s landscape use expanded away from his natal home range (likely central Indiana).

142 As expected, home range location was highly selective in such landsca

143 thin the study area, areas of overlap within home ranges, locations within areas of overlap, and enco

144 imals confine their activities to a discrete home range, long assumed to reflect the fitness benefits

145 sion when accessing areas within neighbours' home ranges may be an advantage for the maintenance of i

146 time that migrants spend within a resident's home range (migration duration), and the timing of migra

147 r of migratory animals entering a resident's home range (migration intensity), the amount of time tha

148 ory are used to analyse a spatially explicit home range model for interacting wolf packs.

149 hem resource selection analysis, statistical home-range modelling and mechanistic movement modelling.

150 Mechanistic home-range models combine the benefits of these approach

151 Using mechanistic home-range models, we explore meerkat (Suricata suricatt

152 At the scale of their home range, mongooses preferentially used dry forest and

153 that smaller-bodied mammal species utilizing home ranges more intensively experience greater risk for

154 or several years before they abandoned their home range mostly to move quickly to new areas where the

155 The consequences of variation in host home range movement and space use on wildlife disease dy

156 r results suggest that variation in wildlife home range movement behaviour increases the spatial spre

157 of sensory perception, the role of memory in home-range movement behavior lacks definitive evidence i

158 mals and transport of spores closely tracked home range movements.

159 Home-range movements that were close together in time we

160 Here, we measured home range of 147 grey reef sharks, Carcharhinus amblyrh

161 s an allometric scaling relation between the home range of an individual and its body size: Larger ma

162 icle content in soils within the approximate home range of an individual deer increased its odds of i

163 Here we report that soil microbes from the home range of the invasive exotic plant Centaurea maculo

164 d simulated wild turkey nests throughout the home ranges of 20 GPS-collared wild pigs to evaluate nes

165 ose dispersal distances as larvae exceed the home ranges of adults, decisions on the size of reserves

166 A theory is provided for the estimation of home ranges of animals from displacement measurement pro

167 lared cattle spent 2914 collar-nights in the home ranges of contact-collared badgers, and 5380 collar

168 lared badgers, and 5380 collar-nights in the home ranges of GPS-collared badgers, we detected no dire

169 uantified spatial overlap between the winter home ranges of GPS-collared elk and three measures of pr

170 ses with habitat fragmentation, and that the home ranges of larger species should be much more sensit

171 We analyzed the home ranges of rock pythons using Auto correlated Kernel

172 As are now sufficiently large to protect the home ranges of this species, including males, across its

173 ach to compare wolf habitat selection within home ranges of wolves that were either sympatric or allo

174 gnature of local micro-mammals, the broadest home-range of the macro-mammals and with modern plant sa

175 rrows exhibit interannual fidelity to winter home ranges on the scale of tens of meters and ii) the p

176 sity, and vegetation complexity within their home range, on short-term (seasonal) and long-term (life

177 either move outside of their territories and home ranges or adopt altogether different space-use stra

178 ition of home range) and 3rd (use within the home range) order selection across species and examined

179 Mongooses displayed high home range overlap (general overlap index, GOI = 82%).

180 Home range overlap among mongooses and FRDDs was interme

181 Consequences of home range overlap are also discussed.

182 as intermediate (GOI = 50%) and greater than home range overlap by FRDDs (GOI = 10%).

183 toriality benefits" hypothesis-where reduced home range overlap leads to reduced opportunities for pa

184 in the wet season, driven by an increase in home range overlap towards the end of the dry season.

185 l home ranges for 13 cougars to test whether home range overlap was better explained by land tenure,

186 gratory, by means of three methods: seasonal home range overlap, spatio-temporal separation of season

187 s the primary driver explaining variation in home range overlap.

188 often than were expected based on degrees of home range overlap.

189 using inter-group encounters, transfers and home range overlap.

190 , and a spatial network based on patterns of home-range overlap among individuals.

191 cial group and spatial distribution (monthly home-range overlap and distance) on wild pig contact.

192 th of overlap varied by season with wild pig home ranges overlapping more during the dry season.

193 movements that fall outside of the territory/home range paradigm, receiving less attention.

194 ansiency and improving estimation of the SMR home range parameter.

195 cability of MHRA to capturing and predicting home range patterns beyond the previously studied cases

196 sis (MHRA) to uncover the drivers underlying home range patterns in a passerine that is non-territori

197 ioural mechanisms that give rise to observed home range patterns is thus an important general questio

198 d areas, accurately captures long-tailed tit home range patterns.

199 To remain within their home ranges, polar bears responded to the higher westwar

200 However, using home range quality as a covariate rather than a CONT/FRA

201 For certain other species, however, home ranges reach a stable state.

202 Home ranges reflect a trade-off between the costs and be

203 d predation-risk factors and the size of two home-range regions (HRR), defined as areas of different

204 opulations maximized resource patches within home ranges (Resource Dispersion Hypothesis [RDH]) or oc

205 , captured by social networks and overlap in home ranges, respectively.

206 y, Group Size, Home Range Size, and Residual Home Range) revealed that relative fascia dentata and CA

207 for this connection has been produced at the home range scale.

208 We predicted that within home range selection of understory densities, measured w

209 elled per night (mean = 3.31 +/- 2.64 km) or home range size (95% mean = 1.56 +/- 0.62 km(2), 50% mea

210 ere both significantly predicted by species' home range size (after correcting for body size).

211 Understanding variation in home range size (HR) provides important insights into th

212 Sex-specific drivers of home range size across space and time-in the context of

213 istoric sleep locations can reliably recover home range size and geometry.

214 gh human disturbance or climatic changes) on home range size and habitat selection, our work sets the

215 ean, and variance of RT and TtoR) influences home range size and hierarchical habitat selection.

216 and anthropogenic factors related to jaguar home range size and movement parameters.

217 trategies that varied in movement frequency, home range size and site fidelity.

218 Home range size decreased with increasing net productivi

219 Among sexes, home range size did not vary seasonally, and males exhib

220 Males increased home range size during reproductive periods while female

221 range of magnitudes and variances in weekly home range size for raccoons.

222 Androgenization has a strong effect on home range size in both sexes: AGD had a positive relati

223 of species used for roosting increased, that home range size increased (before: mean 0.14+/-SD 0.08 h

224 Variability in weekly home range size increased RABV spread rates by 1.2-fold

225 We tested the hypothesis that variation in home range size increases RABV spread and decreases vacc

226 A comparison is provided between home range size inferred from our method and from other

227 We examined how variable home range size influenced the relative effectiveness of

228 habitat productivity hypothesis posits that home range size is inversely related to habitat quality.

229 Our findings suggest that individual home range size is shaped by the trade-off between energ

230 Thus, home range size may be used as a proxy for habitat quali

231 The larger home range size of large sub-adults can be attributed to

232 We examined spatiotemporal drivers of home range size of the federally endangered ocelot (Leop

233 e effect of spatiotemporal variation in host home range size on the spatial spread rate, persistence

234 ffect of behavioral PCs on changes in winter home range size using a set of multiple linear regressio

235 Home range size varied from 1.4 ha to 8.1 km(2) and aver

236 Annual home range size was determined, and spatial gradients in

237 We found mean home range size was largest during late gestation for fe

238 ple size (N = 15 weeks) the effect of PC3 on home range size was weak and should be viewed with cauti

239 Home range and core home range size were measured using 95% and 50% autocorr

240 iet Breadth, Population Density, Group Size, Home Range Size, and Residual Home Range) revealed that

241 h higher daily distance travelled and larger home range size, but not with age or sex.

242 tracking data of male H. amphibius to assess home range size, movement mode (e.g. residency and migra

243 Home range size, or the area used by individual organism

244 aviour such as migration, predator escape or home range size.

245 ersity and abundance were related to smaller home range size.

246 motion) had a marginal significant effect on home range size.

247 compared to simulations that assumed a fixed home range size.

248 associated with intraspecific differences in home range size.

249 hat long RT and short TtoR result in a small home range size.

250 rmediate-sized groups exhibiting the largest home-range size and greater variation in space use.

251 -term population size depends nonlinearly on home-range size and spatial distribution.

252 ance to predators, distance to conspecifics, home-range size, and habitat use.

253 , but having more young in the group reduced home-range size.

254 involved distances larger than the original home-range size.

255 7) We investigate the correlates of elephant home range sizes across diverse biomes.

256 es, with carnivores increasing their monthly home range sizes by 35% (wild dogs) to 66% (leopards).

257 Differences in home range sizes could not be connected to body mass.

258 More variable host home range sizes decreased relative vaccination effectiv

259 veness by 71% compared to less variable host home range sizes under conventional vaccination conditio

260 centrations in eggs collected at the smaller home range spatial scale of analysis.

261 udied by focusing either on geographic (e.g. home ranges, species' distribution) or on environmental

262 We have expanded on previous home-range studies by testing the effects of two previou

263 with greater spatial memory and larger core home ranges, suggesting selection may operate on spatial

264 as higher and TtoR lower within the selected home range than outside, and moose home ranges were smal

265 fewer cubs survive to independence on their home ranges than generalist males.

266 snakes displayed greater movement and larger home ranges than RH rattlesnakes across behavioral seaso

267 mum body size is determined by the number of home ranges that can fit into a given land area.

268 Wandering males, in contrast, have expansive home ranges that overlap many males and females.

269 ght hours bedded, and selected bed sites and home ranges that reduced risk of experiencing heat stres

270 mall area approximately the size of a single home range-this arises from exposing fewer individuals t

271 stalled climate loggers in each individual's home range to collect ambient temperature readings (over

272 ify the plant functional traits present in a home range to describe the quality of vegetation present

273 a song functions as an announcement of one's home range to nearby conspecifics.

274 Groups also avoided larger groups' home ranges to a greater extent, consistent with stronge

275 tions reaches a steady state, causing stable home ranges to emerge from the territorial dynamics.

276 of these early humans as they expanded their home ranges to include coastlines and followed the shift

277 residing within smaller core areas of their home range, to 'explorers' that moved greater distances

278 , focusing on five distinct movement phases: home ranges, transient residences, excursions, post-rele

279 s into resident animal (i.e., non-migratory) home ranges (transport effects) and exert trophic effect

280 constraints on defense cause exclusivity of home range use to decrease with increasing body size.

281 Wolves with LCDs within their home ranges used areas adjacent to LCDs greater than non

282 quantified habitat selection patterns within home ranges using resource selection functions and GPS d

283 ords into reliable location data to estimate home ranges, using 30 years of sleep-site data from 11 w

284 rch performance; (2) habitat preference; (3) home range utilization patterns; (4) social network stru

285 Our results suggest that home range variation is a response to environmental cond

286 The mastodon's early adolescent home range was geographically restricted, with no eviden

287 The distribution of home range was then compared to local MPA sizes.

288 Additionally, throughout the year, smaller home ranges were associated with larger proportions of n

289 A total of 68 home ranges were estimated using kernel density estimati

290 However, average annual home ranges were large, with high individual variability

291 selected home range than outside, and moose home ranges were small.

292 Home ranges were split into two regions (HRR): the 'core

293 rticularly different movement phases outside home ranges, when assessing habitat selection, especiall

294 ely due to constraints on establishing large home ranges where infrastructures are widespread and int

295 ls, where each animal or animal group has a "home range" which overlaps with a number of others, and

296 areas, EDMD clusters matched observed group home ranges, whilst in others, discrepancies likely aros

297 ts suggest that simple bad luck-inhabiting a home range with high vector density-may play a much larg

298 We found marked differences in seasonal home ranges, with all groups showing a range contraction

299 escribe habitat associations at four scales, home ranges within the study area, areas of overlap with

300 mal species divide space into a patchwork of home ranges, yet there is little consensus on the mechan