コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 acters are primitive and like those of later hominids.
2 apes as well as with African apes and later hominids.
3 nderstanding, closer to that of monkeys than hominids.
4 including our closest relatives, within the hominids.
5 omoplasy-free, to elucidate the phylogeny of hominids.
6 ormations that characterize the evolution of hominids.
7 ume, to a size comparable with that of early hominids.
8 ters are shared exclusively with all younger hominids.
9 an explanation for the handedness unique to hominids.
10 nge and/or savannah habitat in the origin of hominids.
11 zees and ancient (Neanderthal and Denisovan) hominids.
12 lved the phylogenetic history of these early hominids.
13 the anterior cingulate cortex of pongids and hominids.
14 applied to the study of sexual dimorphism in hominids.
15 rontal cortex of macaques relate to those in hominids.
16 enetic inference in many lineages, including hominids.
17 hat distinguishes modern humans from extinct hominids.
18 genetic and exhibit cospeciation patterns in hominids.
19 otypes and other key individuals with extant hominids.
20 icantly promoted diversification of MHC-A in hominids.
21 erging trajectories of the gut microbiome of hominids.
22 tcranial similarities between hylobatids and hominids.
23 activity of its cognate enhancer diverged in hominids.
24 in mammals with relatively thick enamel like hominids.
25 iotic relationships of seven species of wild hominids.
26 nduced mutagenesis patterns across different hominids.
27 ply to the evolution of division of labor in hominids.
28 Over 15% of all binding sites are unique to hominids.
29 me (hg38) and appear to be unique to archaic hominids.
30 of non-human primates (NHPs), from lemurs to hominids.
31 notypic differences between humans and other hominids.
32 ovide insights into the evolution of archaic hominids.
33 hat a low IMMR is the primitive condition in hominids.
34 tive efflorescence of later Plio-Pleistocene hominids.
37 of bipedal gait is a key adaptive feature in hominids,(1)(,)(2)(,)(3)(,)(4)(,)(5)(,)(6)(,)(7)(,)(8)(,
41 C resulted in a similar dimer interface with hominid A3C, the key amino acid contacts were different.
46 dditional loci carried a strong footprint of hominid adaptation, including elevated nucleotide substi
47 iest Hominidae and helps to define the basal hominid adaptation, thereby accentuating the derived nat
49 Colourful and diverse players, such as early hominids, agriculturalists, conquistadors and various an
50 A molecule appears to represent mtDNA from a hominid ancestor that has been translocated to the nucle
54 difications among Ethiopian Plio-Pleistocene hominid and faunal remains at Asa Issie, Maka, Hadar, an
55 show that some conventions routinely used by hominid and other mammalian paleontologists are unwarran
56 lation are intrinsic to the aging process in hominids and are side effects neither of extended human
58 ve of both cetacean suborders in addition to hominids and elephants suggests that these particular ne
61 also have implications for the prehistory of hominids and for the genetic origins and recent emergenc
62 es between Neanderthals and the Skhul/Qafzeh hominids and indicate that a significant shift in human
63 ounger than previous age estimates for these hominids and indicate that H. erectus may have survived
64 radial morphology differs from that of later hominids and non-knuckle-walking anthropoid primates, su
67 of a host switch from a non-human primate to hominids and that the extant populations did not origina
69 easurements of fossil postcrania from female hominids, and also compared with estimates of female bod
70 can apes, approaching the condition in later hominids, and indicating that O. tugenensis was bipedal.
71 f MEIs to date spanning chimpanzees, ancient hominids, and modern humans and reveals new aspects of M
72 rds, the evolution of speech and language in hominids, and the evolution of echolocation in bats.
74 tarrhines, that is, in Old World monkeys and hominids (apes, including humans), having become a pseud
76 comparative evolutionary dynamics of African hominids are central to interpreting living ape adaptati
78 tween Gigantopithecus and extinct and extant hominids are wide ranging but difficult to substantiate
79 a, yet retained the size and pleomorphism of hominid astroglia, and propagated Ca2+ signals 3-fold fa
80 ults of the functional analyses suggest that hominids at both sites were exploiting woody and starchy
81 ctional changes in the gut microbiome across hominids at different timescales, we perform high-resolu
82 the Upper Paleolithic and Middle Paleolithic hominids at these sites were broad-based foragers capabl
83 , South Africa, demonstrates that this early hominid ate not only fruits and leaves but also large qu
84 consensus holds that the 3-million-year-old hominid Australopithecus africanus subsisted on fruits a
85 ere, we show using fossil teeth that several hominids (Australopithecus africanus, Paranthropus robus
87 ing of fossil bovid teeth collected from the hominid-bearing levels at these sites gave mean ages of
89 d on the cognitive architecture of ancestral hominids because they, unlike other tool-using species,
90 e surfaces of ancient bones to infer ancient hominid behaviors such as slicing, chopping, and percuss
91 It is still debated, however, whether these hominids belong in their own species, Homo neanderthalen
93 ties in evolutionary genomics, insights into hominid biology, and an extensive database of variation
94 to undergo layer-specific switches in recent hominid brain evolution between layers V and III, i.e.,
98 have the same principles of organization as hominid brains, with the notable exception of sulci in t
99 appear in pluripotent stem cells from other hominids but not in more distantly related species lacki
100 region that make them unique not only among hominids but possibly among terrestrial mammals in gener
101 source of sPD-L1 and is highly conserved in hominids, but lost in mice and a few related species.
102 ertals that make them unique, not only among hominids, but possibly among all other terrestrial mamma
103 ed LCA.The pattern of body size evolution in hominids can provide insight into historical human ecolo
104 diagnostic craniodental remains, the largest hominid canine yet recovered, and the earliest Australop
105 go, the dietary capabilities of the earliest hominids changed dramatically, leaving them well suited
108 milar to the evolutionarily related nonhuman hominids (chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, and orangutans
114 ric analysis of general shape, that the five hominid crania from Dmanisi in Georgia represent a singl
116 oximately 2.8- to 2.6-million-year-old early hominid cranium (Stw 505) from Sterkfontein, South Afric
118 the ratio of older to younger adults in four hominid dental samples from successive time periods, and
121 These deposits have now yielded the earliest hominids, described in an accompanying paper and dated h
124 d phylogenies require between four and seven hominid dispersal events between southern Africa, easter
125 of Meganthropus as a Pleistocene Indonesian hominid distinct from Pongo, Gigantopithecus and Homo, a
126 es-specific bacterial symbionts that predate hominid diversification, many of which have undergone ac
127 re premature to posit extensive late Miocene hominid diversity on the basis of currently available sa
128 volution of lethal intergroup violence among hominids during the 2.9-million-year Paleolithic time sp
129 e to dietary sources of ethanol increased in hominids during the early stages of our adaptation to a
130 or C4 plants is lacking prior to 7-8 Ma, and hominid ecosystems at 4.4 Ma show no isotopic evidence f
132 Some currently accepted estimates of early hominid endocranial capacity may be inflated, suggesting
134 and construction for hunting in the earliest hominids, especially given our observations that females
135 y diverged from modern human mtDNAs early in hominid evolution about 770,000 years before present.
136 ge (Ye) began amplifying relatively early in hominid evolution and continued propagating at a low lev
137 ides ecological insight into a key period of hominid evolution and valuable information for future st
138 ssil evidence of Late Miocene-Early Pliocene hominid evolution is rare and limited to a few sites in
140 taxa has been maintained throughout African hominid evolution, and these microbial groups are also s
141 een cardiac output and energy expenditure in hominid evolution, we study a surrogate measure of cardi
155 over the importance of the arboreal niche in hominid evolution.(1)(,)(2)(,)(3)(,)(4)(,)(5)(,)(6) Gori
157 Pan-Gorilla clade, and suggests that bipedal hominids evolved from a knuckle-walking ancestor that wa
160 of substantial and accurately dated African hominid fossils from between 100,000 and 300,000 years a
164 scribe the characterization of these extinct hominids from a new perspective, based on the developmen
165 to estimate the deleterious mutation rate in hominids from the level of selective constraint in DNA s
167 nd Orrorin, the two other named late Miocene hominid genera, implies that these putative taxa are ver
172 ese Late Miocene fossils are assigned to the hominid genus Ardipithecus and represent the earliest de
175 on ancestor (LCA) of humans and chimpanzees, hominids (great apes and humans), or hominoids (all apes
177 rates of spermatogenesis have likely had in hominids (great apes), considering a model that approxim
178 ave been recognized as a distinctive extinct hominid group that occupied Europe and western Asia betw
179 s of strain-level bacterial diversity within hominid gut microbiomes revealed that clades of Bacteroi
180 ta suggest that brain N-glycome evolution in hominids has been characterized by an overall increase i
182 joint complexes relative to the Skhul/Qafzeh hominids, have led some researchers to conclude that sig
183 tions requires an understanding of monkey to hominid homologies, particularly whether and how sulci a
185 sm in hominins and suspension in great apes (hominids); however, fossil evidence has been lacking.
186 y center of ossification, which is unique to hominids (i.e., all taxa related to the human clade foll
188 that was distinct from all extant and fossil hominids in overall facial shape and shared many feature
190 ighly autapomorphic (uniquely derived) among hominids in the structure of its skull and postcranial s
192 ing gut bacteria are congruent with those of hominids, indicating that nuclear, mitochondrial, and gu
193 floresiensis by Falk et al. implies that the hominid is an insular dwarf derived from H. erectus, but
194 drove the diversification and divergence of hominid KIR, with six positions in the HLA class I bindi
196 tern portion of Olduvai Gorge indicates that hominid land use of the eastern paleobasin extended at l
197 ly eating mostly fruit and leaves, and early hominids left this environment for the savannah and grea
199 hat occurred some 6 million years ago in the hominid lineage and subsequent rearrangements, including
200 omosomal rearrangements that occurred in the hominid lineage and that relates to the evolution of lan
201 n of the human mitochondrion occurred in the hominid lineage driven by the need to optimize the aerob
208 son activity have slowed particularly within hominid lineages when compared to rodents or monkeys.
213 sitize a wide range of hosts; and (iv) early hominids may have first acquired Trichinella on the Afri
215 yclically structured vocal sounds in ancient hominids may have preluded the evolution of recursion in
216 g apes and propose that canal size in fossil hominids may provide an indication about the motor coord
219 these mutations occurred after the suggested hominid migration out of Africa [100-150 000 years befor
221 ysis of the hand remains of the Skhul/Qafzeh hominids, Neanderthals, early and late Upper Paleolithic
224 thiopia's Afar Rift, now illuminates earlier hominid paleobiology and aspects of extant African ape e
226 the biogeographic patterns implied by early hominid phylogenies and compared them to the known dispe
228 200,000 years, suggesting that the ancestral hominid population at this time was widely dispersed acr
230 raced their origin back to the beginnings of hominid primate evolution, approximately 18 to 25 millio
233 ermore, the level of selective constraint in hominid protein-coding sequences is atypically low.
234 fferences in the oral microbiomes of African hominids provide insights into human evolution, the ance
237 response in humans compared with our closest hominid relative, the chimpanzee, includes the progressi
241 However, such claims about Plio-Pleistocene hominids rely mostly on very small assemblages of bony r
242 n collected from east of Lake Rudolf include hominid remains and the earliest dated stone artefacts k
244 compares the ability of six theta-defensins (hominid retrocyclins 1-3 and rhesus theta-defensins 1-3)
245 dence indicate that the 65,250 base pairs of hominid sequence so far identified in the library are of
247 geochemical analyses that link the Kamoya's Hominid Site (KHS) Tuff(9), which conclusively overlies
248 of genetic mutation and, in contrast to the hominid slowdown of single-base-pair mutations, there ha
249 and the fragmentary data available on early hominid social formations and their geographical distrib
251 Fossil ECVs and dental measurements from 13 hominid species both support significantly increasing PG
253 mens, many phylogenies identify at least one hominid species that dispersed in the direction opposite
254 level of variation in gene expression among hominid species, including humans and chimpanzees, despi
259 well as increased expression of full-length hominid-specific LINE-1s that produce bidirectional RNAs
261 R-A (small NF90-associated RNA isoform A), a hominid-specific noncoding RNA that promotes cell prolif
266 However, depending on the ages of critical hominid specimens, many phylogenies identify at least on
267 nding these and other contentious Indonesian hominid specimens, we used occlusal fingerprint analysis
268 raise additional questions about the claimed hominid status of Orrorin tugenensis, recently described
269 zzling features of the prehistoric record of hominid stone tools is its apparent punctuation: it cons
270 extant African apes and candidate ancestral hominids such as Ardipithecus, Orrorin and Sahelanthropu
273 and taphonomic evidence associated with the hominids, suggest that they occupied a wooded biotope ov
274 on of the microbiota within humans and other hominids suggests an ancient assembly that has been sele
275 itude and rate of morphological evolution in hominids suggests that many independent and incremental
280 icates that the fossils probably represent a hominid taxon that postdated the divergence of lineages
284 pid cognitive or morphological change in the hominids that created the tools, or replacement of one s
285 ing bipedalism is a key derived behaviour of hominids that possibly originated soon after the diverge
286 etacean species a pattern similar to that in hominids, the VENs being larger than neighboring layer V
288 we suggest that during the evolution of the hominids, this same pantomime mechanism could have been
289 lines of evidence suggest that in ancestral hominids, this younger generation typically comprised im
291 thought to have influenced the evolution of hominids, via the aridification of Africa, and may have
292 ngs represent a case of temporally recursive hominid vocal combinatorics in the absence of syntax, se
293 e habitats towards drier, open ones affected hominid vocal communication, potentially setting stage f
294 verage genomes for Denisovan and Neanderthal hominids, we conducted a screen for endogenized retrovir
295 ected ancestral uricases obtained from early hominids, we show that their expression on HepG2 cells i
296 tionary timeline of spoken language; a vocal hominid went in and, millions of years later, out came a
297 and across mammalian lineages including the hominids which are known to exhibit marked variability i
298 nism as a new source of genomic variation in hominids with a strong potential for functional conseque
299 rn, to Middle Upper Paleolithic early modern hominids, with the Levantine Middle Paleolithic early mo