コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 2, which are potentially exploitable by any hospital laboratory.
2 rticipants were taken before the walk in the hospital laboratory.
3 f gram-negative organisms encountered in the hospital laboratory.
4 to assess feasibility and performance in the hospital laboratory.
5 and with other HPLC assays currently used in hospital laboratories.
6 or HIV according to standard practice in the hospital laboratories.
7 logy laboratory and, in some cases, at local hospital laboratories.
8 tients and 12 environmental isolates from 24 hospital laboratories across the United Kingdom on an Il
10 rove the diagnostic accuracy and capacity of hospital laboratories, allowing for timely and appropria
12 e laboratory were compared with those of the hospital laboratories and risk of transfusion-associated
13 re cultured from patient infections in 71 US hospital laboratories and were submitted to a central re
14 ncluding primary and secondary care centres, hospitals, laboratories, and universities) in Latin Amer
16 rveillance in Baltimore and Atlanta and from hospital-laboratory-based sentinel surveillance of 12 ho
18 g a tightly clustered set of isolates from 3 hospital laboratories consistent with an outbreak from a
20 g conducted in 11 of the participating ICARE hospital laboratories failed to pinpoint the factors res
22 vely that were examined independently by the hospital laboratory for the presence of the Demodex mite
23 specimens collected from children at 11 U.S. hospital laboratories from November 1997 to March 1998 a
25 rent control measures; isolates from 7 other hospital laboratories in London and southeast England we
26 . soudanense that were processed in a single hospital laboratory in Baltimore, Maryland, between 1 Ja
27 l age groups from its outpatient, inpatient, hospital laboratory, laboratory network, and surgical si
29 ood culture-confirmed enteric fever from the hospital laboratories not captured by inpatient or outpa
31 heid, Sunnyvale, CA) performed at a district hospital laboratory or (2) POC Xpert MTB/RIF test perfor
32 r commercial HMO enrollees for professional, hospital, laboratory, pharmaceutical, and ancillary serv
33 dy investigators, paediatricians in referral hospitals, laboratory staff, and committee members were
35 consider the diagnosis on presentation, U.S. hospital laboratory technologists have very limited expe
36 emographics, physiologic variables, standard hospital laboratory tests, and circulating cytokine conc
37 gration of demographics, bedside physiology, hospital laboratory tests, and circulating cytokines pre
38 erial input, including patient demographics, hospital laboratory tests, and plasma concentrations of
44 prospective data collection with linkage to hospital laboratories via automated feeds of 371 patient
46 h Cryptosporidium oocysts were recognized by hospital laboratories were collected from 218 patients w
47 s and drug susceptibility data directly from hospital laboratories, whereas the CDC-sponsored system
48 be due to the culturing methods employed in hospital laboratories, which are unable to detect the un