ライフサイエンスコーパス: host plant

1 ispersed spores away from the surface of the host plant.

2 of isolate-specific response pathways in the host plant.

3 ijacking underlying genetic machinery in the host plant.

4 ected flight orientation and oviposit on the host plant.

5 etic differentiation in L. trifolii than the host plant.

6 h, asexual development, and infection of the host plant.

7 SOM and transfer N contained therein to its host plant.

8 al, and elongated-branched, depending on the host plant.

9 structures to breach the outer surface of a host plant.

10 ant, it has a parasitic interaction with the host plant.

11 r genetic manipulation of the fungus and its host plant.

12 ted leaf- and root-feeding insects sharing a host plant.

13 e and salicylic acid in certain parts of the host plant.

14 trients, and facilitate infection within the host plant.

15 e mycorrhizas potentially transferred to the host plant.

16 whether the aphid response is influenced by host plant.

17 cted from different geographical regions and host plants.

18 effectors to promote infection in different host plants.

19 ibed fires can effectively promote butterfly host plants.

20 n of labor to facilitate the colonization of host plants.

21 ontrol and inoculum suppression, by removing host plants.

22 odor recognition systems to accept suitable host plants.

23 ndicate the possibility of new influences on host plants.

24 despite in many instances infecting the same host plants.

25 rameters and initial patterns of susceptible host plants.

26 table to speciation involving shifts between host plants.

27 nt hosts, defense suppression differed among host plants.

28 logical interplay between cyst nematodes and host plants.

29 6, and mutants thereof, in both host and non-host plants.

30 acterial communities in CPB fed on different host plants.

31 press plant defenses might help CPB adapt to host plants.

32 at maintain a complex interaction with their host plants.

33 stance traits, were strongly affected by the host plants.

34 greatly driven by directional selection from host plants.

35 porthe species obtained from three different host plants.

36 variation in the experimental population of host plants.

37 the nutritive and defensive traits of their host plants.

38 erent resistance mechanisms and on different host plants.

39 he specific resistance mechanisms as well as host plants.

40 he potential of AMF to enhance the growth of host plants.

41 ologously expressed in otherwise susceptible host plants.

42 g structures termed syncytia in the roots of host plants.

43 n successfully survive and reproduce on both host plants.

44 sses to promote the successful parasitism of host plants.

45 (LCO) signals to communicate with potential host plants.

46 d and less phosphorus (P) limited than their host plants.

47 y which cyst nematodes promote parasitism of host plants.

48 bundance, mediated by effects of weather and host plants.

49 ized to feed on fruits of seasonally limited host plants.

50 sticides and has no phytotoxic effect on the host plants.

51 orels form ectomycorrhizal associations with host plants.

52 intact foreign homologs acquired from legume host plants.

53 arasites can modify the global metabolome of host plants.

54 ociated herbivores migrated along with their host plants.

55 positively affected by R-AEF inoculation of host plants.

56 that replicates and spreads systemically in host plants.

57 eco-geographical constraints faced by their host plants.

58 age in sophisticated interactions with their host plants.

59 tion of this species to new environments and host plants.

60 most caterpillars to relocate to alternative host plants.

61 recognize, detoxify and digest a variety of host-plants.

62 in relation to durations of vector access to host plants?

63 lostrobin, trifloxystrobin) on their primary host-plant, A. syriaca.

64 mmunity of lepidopteran herbivores and their host plants across a mosaic of low-resource serpentine a

65 t monarchs migrate each year to locate these host plants across North American ecosystems now dominat

66 ally related or physicochemically similar to host plants affect host-seeking or ovipositional behavio

67 ed to loss of their milkweed (Asclepias sp.) host-plants after the introduction of herbicide-tolerant

68 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) protect host plants against diverse biotic and abiotic stresses,

69 s, indicating that PVCV was activated as the host plant aged.

70 eliloti is attracted to seed exudates of its host plant alfalfa (Medicago sativa).

71 ake across four light treatments between the host plant Allium vineale and two arbuscular mycorrhizal

72 Effects of host plant alpha- and beta-diversity often confound stud

73 Laccaria bicolor, we sought to determine if host plants also contain genes encoding effector-like pr

74 al nutrient exchange takes place between the host plant and fungus.

75 terminal differentiation is directed by the host plant and involves hundreds of nodule specific cyst

76 uires an intricate communication between the host plant and its symbiont.

77 odynamic modules describing toxic effects on host plant and symbionts.

78 s conditioned upon the genotypes of both the host plant and the hrrP-expressing rhizobial strain, sug

79 the complex molecular interplay between the host plant and the invading virus.

80 Mycorrhizal fungi live in the roots of host plants and are crucial components of all forest eco

81 ations (functional and phylogenetic) between host plants and butterflies in 561 seminatural grassland

82 on reduced the phylogenetic congruence among host plants and butterflies indicating that closely rela

83 Analysis of possible co-evolution with host plants and in-planta up-regulation in particular, a

84 complexity of chemical cues it uses to find host plants and mates.

85 t kairomones and pheromones in locating both host plants and mates.

86 clude (d) climate change effects on milkweed host plants and the dynamics of breeding, overwintering,

87 y intimate mutualisms, such as those between host plants and their protective ants.

88 ular interactions of tospoviruses with their host plants and vectors has expanded.

89 s include: mechanisms of RNA modification of host plants and viruses; coevolution of virus-host inter

90 were detected, often from lineages of known host plants and with an increasing number of HGT events

91 Diet (host plant) and butterfly population had much more limit

92 ecological interactions between butterflies, host plants, and the environment at the University of Ca

93 ironment while interacting with their insect hosts, plants, and each other.

94 ion of glucosinolates from the brassicaceous host plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) into paras

95 e 16 Bacillus strains were tested on the non-host plant Arabidopsis thaliana, B. cereus PK6-15, B. su

96 burning on population dynamics of butterfly host plants are poorly understood.

97 I use herbivorous insects and their host plants as a model, but the proposed ideas apply to

98 Here, we explore historical native host plant associations and diversity of the cosmopolita

99 ng angiosperm radiation, each defined by its host-plant associations (gymnosperm or angiosperm) and e

100 the context of phenological coincidence and host plant availability.

101 Therefore, mechanisms of resistance and host plants available in the field are both important fa

102 argely explained by reads that mapped to the host plant, Brassica oleracea, and a facultative symbion

103 climber or on direct physical contact with a host plant, but without direct preservation of twining [

104 ce the phosphorous and nitrogen nutrition of host plants, but little is known about their role in pot

105 likely to oviposit on or choose any treated host plants, but particularly avoided garlic, spearmint,

106 eted by filamentous fungi, are phytotoxic to host plants, but their functions have not been well defi

107 tant ecological role in interaction with the host plant by enhancing aerial growth.

108 fungus Magnaporthe oryzae gains entry to its host plant by means of a specialized pressure-generating

109 Genetic transformation of host plants by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and related spe

110 indings identify a novel defence strategy of host plants by exporting specific miRNAs to induce cross

111 abundance in understanding the selection of host plants by invasive generalist herbivores in diverse

112 immunity and promote pathogenicity on their host plants by manipulating specific physiological proce

113 signaling that modulate immune responses in host plants by regulating transcription of downstream ta

114 that aphids facilitate their colonization of host plants by secreting salivary proteins into host tis

115 wth potential of C. formicarius on these two host plants by using population projection.

116 ncreases the surface temperature of infected host plants (by an average of 2 degrees C), while also s

117 of specialist Drosophila species to specific host plants can exhibit parallel changes in their adult

118 of RNA interference (RNAi)-inducing dsRNA in host plants can trigger specific fungal gene silencing a

119 au (Saturniidae) caterpillars feeding on the host plant Casearia nitida (Salicaceae) in two different

120 uch as rhizobia, are able to transfer DNA to host plant cells when they are provided with Agrobacteri

121 rred DNA (T-DNA) and virulence proteins into host plant cells.

122 of a rice leaf, enabling the fungus entry to host plant cells.

123 identify strong candidate genes for mate and host plant choice behaviors.

124 ae cell densities fluctuate regularly during host plant colonization.

125 are feeding in a nutrient-poor, yet suitable host plant compared to a tractable and nutrient-rich die

126 unrecognized by the host and lead to harmful host plant damage.

127 ndophytic fungi can affect the expression of host plant defenses and other ecologically important tra

128 tease in aphid saliva that elicits effective host plant defenses and warranted the theory of host spe

129 oxidant stress responses that defend against host plant defenses.

130 indicating that resistance to parasitism is host plant-dependent.

131 Mixtures of host plant-derived compounds are often required to elici

132 h colder microclimates in winter and greater host plant desiccation in summer.

133 tent to which heritable trait variation in a host plant determines the assembly of its associated ins

134 es for divergence in pheromone detection and host plant discrimination, respectively.

135 , can significantly modify the expression of host plant disease.

136 Here, while controlling host plant diversity, we examined variation in herbivore

137 from a seasonally late to a seasonally early host plant drove more rapid development during diapause

138 the same fragmented southern refugia as its host plant during the last glaciation, and that little l

139 associated with the lack of available larval host plants during the dry season.

140 tion-dependent replication (RDR), which need host plant factors to be carried out.

141 rainforest was significantly impacted by the host plant family and environment.

142 irulence in F. graminearum In the absence of host plant, FgANK1 resides in the cytoplasm.

143 arthropod taxa commonly found on the primary host plant for their propensity to consume immature mona

144 cialized nitrogen source (i.e. insects) with host plants for photosynthate.

145 n species of pasture grasses and protect the host plant from insect herbivory.

146 all regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) are delivered to host plants from diverse pathogens and parasites and can

147 of trophic interactions associated with each host-plant genotype.

148 We found that trait variation among host-plant genotypes was associated with resistance to i

149 y of knowledge of how parasitic plants sense host plants, germinate, form parasitic haustorial connec

150 ation of Sinorhizobium fredii HH103 in three host plants: Glycine max, Cajanus cajan and the IRLC leg

151 a new area, likely due to the wide range of host plants, good flying capability, and high egg produc

152 otential core microbiome members improve non-host plants growth and salt tolerance.

153 mold disease and infects a broad spectrum of host plants (> 500), including soybean with yield losses

154 e of egg source and diet indicated that that host plant had a greater impact on gut communities.

155 . fredii HH103 bacteroids, regardless of the host plant, had deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) contents, ce

156 een found on trunk compressions of potential host-plants has been questioned [5] (see Supplemental In

157 Consequently, host plants have developed a transport network to delive

158 is not recessive, abundant refuges of non-Bt host plants have substantially delayed resistance.

159 e, and that of its milkweed (Asclepias spp.) host plant, have been linked to genetically modified (GM

160 , location, sample type (faeces or leaf) and host plant identity all significantly explained the comm

161 rasitic haustorial connections, and suppress host plant immune responses.

162 in the production profiles of endophyte and host plant imply a symbiotic cross-species biosynthesis

163 -emergence galls to different plots of their host plant in the Brazilian Cerrado.

164 ribute to locating and selecting an adequate host plant in the environment).

165 e growers to the selection or eradication of host plants in an integrated control strategy for C. for

166 f CFN in Rlv and emphasise the importance of host plants in controlling Rhizobium diversity.

167 in Alaska that have been described on other host plants in different parts of the world, indicating

168 d actions to promote the re-establishment of host plants in these sites.

169 s N uptake and distribution among and within host plants in ways that appear to be context dependent

170 d identified isolation-by-environment (e.g., host plant) in Sao Paulo and Minas Gerais states, where

171 The list of host plants includes 155 taxa from 89 genera and 49 fami

172 s to attenuate the defense response of their host plants, including convergent evolution of complex p

173 We sampled ECMs from 226 Pinaceae host plant individuals, both planted individuals and rec

174 surfaces and for the secretions involved in host plant infection by parasitic plants.

175 sights into a process that is fundamental to host plant infection.

176 These results demonstrate that host plants influence herbivore gut bacterial communitie

177 h the long history of coevolution with their host plants, insects have developed sophisticated mechan

178 Our results provide insights into RKN-host plant interactions, creating new opportunities for

179 esting taxon-specific histories of herbivore-host plant interactions.

180 through an intermediary species, such as in host-plant interactions.

181 Our findings indicate that host plant is a major driver shaping gut microbiota, but

182 the interaction between H. schachtii and its host plant is important for developing a sustainable man

183 Moreover, the host plant is likely to also be a climber based on its o

184 nt-mediated variation in the traits of their host plants is central to our understanding of the nutri

185 e adaptation of herbivorous insects to their host plants is hypothesized to be intimately associated

186 migratory ectoparasitic nematodes to modify host plants is unknown.

187 d, on one hand, a decrease in reflectance of host plant leaves in the near-infrared portion of the ra

188 hed data on host plant ranges and associated host plant-Lepidoptera interactions from across the cont

189 f reflectance, phytohormonal composition and host plant location behavior (behavioral processes that

190 ation of aphid salivary proteins involved in host plant manipulation, and plant receptors involved in

191 e hampered by the need to work with detached host plant material and the difficulty of maintaining th

192 ic distance and odor similarity, relative to host plants, may be an important, underexploited tactic

193 in large part due to their ability to modify host plant metabolomes to their benefit.

194 P. sojae race 25 successfully attacked a non-host plant, Nicotiana benthamiana as well as resistant s

195 and enhanced fitness of A. gossypii through host plant nutrient enrichment.

196 eding to feeding on aboveground parts of the host plant occurs.

197 L. sayanuka is the host plant of a planthopper, Nilaparvata muiri.

198 gardens with milkweeds, the obligate larval host plants of the monarch.

199 n and abundance of violets (Viola spp.), the host plants of the threatened eastern regal fritillary (

200 Recurrent specialization on similar host plants offers a unique opportunity to unravel the e

201 re, we investigate differential selection by host plants on the diversity of Rlv.

202 taxonomic composition, how this varies with host plant or location, nor whether snails selectively c

203 s of regulation in response to presence of a host plant or other environmental signals.

204 cted by the magnitude of mismatch with their host plants or parasitoids, or direct impacts of tempera

205 ion, either indirectly, through the infected host plant, or directly, after acquisition of the pathog

206 llus thuringiensis (Bt) relies on refuges of host plants other than cotton that do not make Bt toxins

207 Host plant penetration is the gateway to survival for ho

208 llectively suggest that monarch responses to host-plant pesticides are largely sublethal and more pro

209 Furthermore, prolonged host plant phloem exposure to salivation by RSV-infected

210 Host plants play an important role in shaping the gut ba

211 lar and parasitoid community structure among host plant populations.

212 The role of insects on host-plant populations can be elucidated via several met

213 The role of insects on host-plant populations can be elucidated via several sta

214 nd, most importantly, calcium spiking in the host plant Populus in a CASTOR/POLLUX-dependent manner.

215 The host plant potato is not able to efficiently secrete cou

216 RI1043, was examined during infection of the host plant potato.

217 st pest Colorado potato beetle (CPB) and its host plant, potato, as a model system.

218 bridizing butterflies with distinct mate and host plant preferences, a finding that supports a polyge

219 In return, the host plants provide sugars and lipids to its fungal part

220 on aphid performance, or indirectly through host plant quality or the effects of predators.

221 ic responses by generalist herbivores to low host plant quality.

222 Compared to control host plants, R-AEF inoculation caused, on one hand, a de

223 However, host plant-R-AEF interactions and R-AEF as biological co

224 Here, we collate published data on host plant ranges and associated host plant-Lepidoptera

225 e analyse temperature response functions and host plant ranges for hundreds of potentially destructiv

226 le strains ("C" and "R") that have different host plant ranges.

227 discuss the potential fitness benefits that host plants receive from altering their primary metaboli

228 fe stages while minimising opportunities for host plant recognition.

229 ts mediated by warming-driven changes in its host plant, red alder (Alnus rubra): changes in resource

230 rgent pathogens upon sensing the presence of host plants remain obscure.

231 d for efficient attachment to the roots of a host plant, resembling the biological role of cellulose

232 , the most durable and promising category of host plant resistance, is largely unknown.

233 rulence and genetically determined levels of host-plant resistance and tolerance.

234 ghlight progress in our understanding of the host plant response to infection and focus on the nemato

235 ogenic and pathogenic endophytes in terms of host plant response, colonization strategy, and genome c

236 rovide some tolerance to K(+) deprivation to host plants, revealed that AM symbiosis modulates the ex

237 Exposure of hydrated cysts to host plant root exudates resulted in different transcrip

238 derived N, their exploration capacity beyond host plant root systems into deep, cold active layer soi

239 Cyst nematodes induce host-plant root cells to form syncytia from which the ne

240 logenetically distant from fungi, employ the host plant's Argonaute (AGO)/RNA-induced silencing compl

241 eus) because of indirect effects through its host plant (Sedum sp.).

242 cues used by the cabbage root flies in their host plant selection.

243 ides an excellent model for investigation of host-plant selection of insects, although the molecular

244 hogen Microbotryum lychnidis-dioicae and its host plant Silene latifolia.

245 ces may contribute to the divergence between host plant specialized biotypes.

246 ly modified according to the requirements of host plant species and applied to a wide range of microh

247 hose of corn earworm collected from the same host plant species at the same site.

248 pest M. persicae is able to colonise diverse host plant species in the absence of genetic specialisat

249 assessed how one clonal lineage responds to host plant species of different families.

250 show with unprecedented resolution that each host plant species supports colonization by one of 17 di

251 Using Arabidopsis as a host plant species, we conducted a comparative analysis

252 are associated with and adapted to specific host plant species.

253 aging preferences of Bombus impatiens in (i) host-plant species, (ii) pollen isolated from these host

254 ant species, (ii) pollen isolated from these host-plant species, and (iii) nutritionally modified sin

255 se nutrients in pollen can vary widely among host-plant species.

256 aphids are modulated through changes in the host plant, squash (Cucurbita pepo L.) nutrient profile.

257 ared between individuals adapted to the same host plant, suggesting that these sequences may contribu

258 (2) Do odors from non-host plants that are not phylogenetically related or phy

259 Refuges of host plants that do not make Bt toxins can promote survi

260 When infecting a host plant, the fungus Fusarium oxysporum secretes sever

261 This nutrient has to be provided by the host plant through molybdate transporters.

262 teal sugars, water, and other nutrients from host plants through a haustorial connection.

263 s tolerance, and may be reduced by enhancing host plant tissue antioxidant capacity though genetic im

264 redistribution of resources within and among host plant tissues remains unstudied.

265 ifying the genome segments of a nanovirus in host plant tissues we show that they rarely co-occur wit

266 ause of their intimate feeding contacts with host plant tissues, are especially prone to horizontal g

267 at R-AEF manipulate the suitability of their host plant to attract herbivorous insects.

268 field experiment, we manipulated the aphid's host plant to create ecological conditions that either f

269 endoparasites that have co-evolved to modify host plants to create sophisticated feeding cells and su

270 Although farmers plant refuges of non-Bt host plants to delay pest resistance, this tactic has no

271 mefaciens pathogens genetically modify their host plants to drive the synthesis of opines in plant tu

272 gues of alkalinizing peptides found in their host plants to increase their infectious potential and s

273 curring trans-species small RNAs are used by host plants to silence mRNAs in pathogens.

274 ted in the R strain are also induced by both host plant toxins and pesticide in a tissue-specific man

275 ure) and indirectly (e.g. through changes in host plant traits).

276 on is a result of plant diversity effects on host plant traits.

277 ting colouration confer high survival in one host-plant treatment.

278 that govern how specialist herbivores switch host plants upon introduction.

279 marily driven by reduction in the breadth of host plant use by generalist species, rather than by cha

280 lutionary lability and genetic complexity of host plant use in the Lepidopteran subfamily Heliothinae

281 obial communities to constrain or facilitate host plant use in the Melissa blue butterfly (Lycaeides

282 t have emerged on insect gene expression and host plant use, and outline the questions and approaches

283 size and diet breadth (i.e. the diversity of host plants used) for prey partitioning.

284 et, to identify genes putatively involved in host plant utilization.

285 o's ability to enhance aphid reproduction on host plants, vacuole localization disappears when aphids

286 ehavior and may explain observed patterns of host-plant visitation across the landscape.

287 The non-host plant volatile terpenoids adversely affected the ca

288 al pathogens have been shown to affect their host plants' volatile and non-volatile metabolites, whic

289 sexes, than racemic fuscumol and a blend of host plant volatiles commonly used as an attractant for

290 ption of both male and female moths with non-host plant volatiles may be a promising alternative pest

291 is known, however, about the impacts of non-host plant volatiles on intersexual pheromonal communica

292 The sieve plate plugging structures of host plants were shown to have different composition in

293 occupy higher and warmer regions of infected host plants when displaced from cooler regions by compet

294 sponses to environmental cues throughout the host plant, which, in return, delivers carbohydrates to

295 (Diptera: Anthomyiidae)] to a host plant (white cabbage cabbage Brassica oleracea var.

296 However, in a host plant with an innate immune system involving analog

297 nts of the genus Cuscuta penetrate shoots of host plants with haustoria and build a connection to the

298 fection on plants may affect interactions of host-plants with their herbivores, as well as the herbiv

299 s relating to the presence or absence of the host plant within the landscape, or patterns of the host

300 radication attempts often involve removal of host plants within a certain radius of detection, target