ライフサイエンスコーパス: hostility

1 actually is, which fosters mutual intergroup hostility.

2 rritability," depression, anxiety, and anger-hostility.

3 ith reduced risk of anxiety, depression, and hostility.

4 es of interest were depression, anxiety, and hostility.

5 roup bias and more corrosive forms of social hostility.

6 ency may be trait like and may be related to hostility.

7 rganization as well as more severe suspicion-hostility.

8 rian hallucinations-delusions, and suspicion-hostility.

9 as not correlated with severity of suspicion-hostility.

10 g 30 cases of nonfatal myocardial infarction hostility.

11 d groups, inflating beliefs about intergroup hostility.

12 phasizes how online contextual factors breed hostility.

13 2307 (15.1%) for anger, and 2564 (16.8%) for hostility.

14 ourse but also addressing affective partisan hostility.

15 ism, such as cognitive rigidity and outgroup hostility.

16 monia, deep vein thrombosis, depression, and hostility.

17 gistries with a behavioral measure of online hostility.

18 res of childhood environments predict online hostility.

19 thway toward durably mitigating division and hostility.

20 , with important implications for intergroup hostility.

21 ay of tackling resulting forms of intergroup hostility.

22 such relation was found for patient-reported hostility.

23 gdala activity and absence of infant-related hostility.

24 ly and less consistently linked to anger and hostility.

25 otenoids and tocopherols across quartiles of hostility.

26 ccurring endemic or epidemic diseases during hostilities.

27 ), depressive symptoms=1.19 (0.76-1.85), and hostility=0.95 (0.62-1.42).

28 motions like anxiety, anger, depression, and hostility; (2) reduced levels of social support; and (3)

29 g/dl) was associated with 14% higher odds of hostility (95% confidence interval of the odds ratio: 1.

30 treatment resistance of symptoms relevant to hostility/aggression (antisocial personality disorder [h

31 ndent relationship between baseline observed hostility and 10-year incident IHD in 1,749 adults of th

32 Type A behaviour and, more specifically, hostility and anger have been associated with increased

33 o study has reported the association between hostility and antioxidants, which may be mediators for a

34 which may help to explain the association of hostility and cardiovascular risk observed in other epid

35 The relation between hostility and CHD events was not mediated or confounded

36 chological symptoms, depression, anxiety, or hostility and child height, weight, or body mass index a

37 o evaluate the association between anger and hostility and coronary heart disease (CHD) in prospectiv

38 The relationship between hostility and disease is stronger in men than in women,

39 , reboxetine decreased subjective ratings of hostility and elevated energy.

40 owever, did not correlate with self-reported hostility and impulsivity.

41 is study was to examine the relation between hostility and incident ischemic heart disease (IHD) and

42 users can contribute to reducing intergroup hostility and its amplification online-especially at a t

43 splantation, and most of all condemnation of hostility and its replacement by peaceful resolution of

44 rce monitoring errors may be associated with hostility and lower IQ.

45 the BPRS subscales of anxiety/depression and hostility and the Simpson-Angus Rating Scale akathisia i

46 We tested the relationship between cynical hostility and two known markers of cellular aging, leuko

47 epression, positive affect, patient-reported hostility, and anger) risk factors.

48 Questionnaires monitoring mood, hostility, and anxiety were given before and after treat

49 ysical maltreatment, high levels of maternal hostility, and exposure to domestic violence.

50 l distress (symptoms of depression, anxiety, hostility, and family stress) was obtained by questionna

51 d ventral prefrontal cortex when rating face hostility, and greater activation in the left amygdala a

52 duced social support, lower optimism, higher hostility, and greater early life adversity.

53 individual cognitive tests, anger, anxiety, hostility, and heavy use of alcohol.

54 with a major depressive episode, aggression, hostility, and history of substance misuse increase risk

55 re, including romantic relationship quality, hostility, and loneliness.

56 index, systolic blood pressure, cholesterol, hostility, and neuroticism (rate ratio=0.76, p=0.002).

57 adverse side effects that include agitation, hostility, and overt acts of pathological aggression and

58 Measures of type A behavior, anger, hostility, and risk factors for CHD and AF were collecte

59 ely modulated (p <= 0.05) for anxiety, anger-hostility, and sadness-depression.

60 Our data suggest that depression, anxiety, hostility, and stress are not related to coronary-artery

61 essed for depression, anxiety, somatization, hostility, and stress.

62 Measures of anxiety symptoms, hostility, anger experience, and anger expression were e

63 ssess depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, hostility, anger experience, and anger expression.

64 ogic variables (depression, type A behavior, hostility, anger, and negative emotion).

65 Negative emotions such as depression and hostility/anger are important risk factors for cardiovas

66 Although depression, anxiety, and hostility/anger have each been associated with an increa

67 f depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and hostility/anger in predicting subclinical atheroscleroti

68 s of depression, but perhaps not anxiety and hostility/anger, may play an important role in the earli

69 osocial factors like job strain, depression, hostility, anxiety, and social isolation tend to cluster

70 The current review suggests that anger and hostility are associated with CHD outcomes both in healt

71 Results show that high levels of hostility are associated with increased risk of all-caus

72 in most countries, and political and social hostility are endemic.

73 Optimism and cynical hostility are independently associated with important he

74 Higher levels of negative symptoms and hostility are specifically associated with the lack of f

75 uated prospectively to determine the role of hostility as a risk factor for secondary CHD events (non

76 Cook-Medley hostility assessment data were collected at baseline fro

77 However, no studies have compared methods of hostility assessment or considered important psychosocia

78 ty were assessed by use of the Interpersonal Hostility Assessment Technique.

79 The presence of any observed hostility at baseline was associated with a 2-fold incre

80 Strong mutual distrust and hostility between Democrats and Republicans in the Unite

81 id to exacerbate polarization by platforming hostility between groups.

82 concerning because of its link to interparty hostility, but it remains unclear what drives this pheno

83 he Life Orientation Test-Revised and cynical hostility by the cynicism subscale of the Cook Medley Qu

84 re, it is unknown whether all expressions of hostility carry equal risk or whether certain manifestat

85 Poor sensitivity, hostility, criticism, or disinterest characterize matern

86 ach of the psychosocial factors of TUI, ASC, hostility, depression, and anxiety in 5 separate logisti

87 CAD are addressed: acute and chronic stress, hostility, depression, social support, and socioeconomic

88 rary to prediction, relatives' criticism and hostility did not predict how well patients did in the y

89 of depression, anxiety, somatization, anger-hostility, dissociation and 'limbic irritability' were a

90 r verbal abuse on anxiety, depression, anger-hostility, dissociation, "limbic irritability," and drug

91 a period of disenchantment, or even outright hostility, during the second half of the twentieth centu

92 erventions individually to address anger and hostility effectively and to develop theoretically sophi

93 cle incidents, physical assaults, robberies, hostilities, electric shocks, fires, drownings, work acc

94 The recent worldwide surge of warfare and hostilities exposes increasingly large numbers of indivi

95 of other people, leading to attributions of hostility for otherwise benign actions.

96 ed hostility is superior to patient-reported hostility for the prediction of IHD in a large, prospect

97 changes were produced only by ketamine, and hostility, grandiosity, and somatic concern were stimula

98 Participants with any observed hostility had a greater risk of incident IHD than those

99 Those with any observed hostility had a significantly greater risk of incident I

100 Cynical hostility has been associated with increased cardiovascu

101 Since Darwin, intergroup hostilities have figured prominently in explanations of

102 nificantly higher on self-report measures of hostility, impulsiveness, and sensation seeking.

103 nts treated at the USAISR from the outset of hostilities in Iraq in April 2003 to May 2005.

104 rature regarding combat ocular trauma during hostilities in Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Fre

105 ethods to estimate the prevalence of extreme hostility in a large dataset of Twitter messages harvest

106 y variables empirically related to anger and hostility in Iraq and Afghanistan veterans.

107 t has been treated with ambivalence and even hostility in medicine.

108 ed with controls, patients perceived greater hostility in neutral faces and reported more fear when v

109 fective treatments for negative symptoms and hostility in order to improve the probability of patient

110 pressions of ingroup solidarity and outgroup hostility in posts correlate with engagement on Ukrainia

111 Reducing hostility in social media interactions is a key public c

112 ychological management focusing on anger and hostility in the prevention and treatment of CHD.

113 participants and to explore the influence of hostility in the subset that had a nonfatal CVD event du

114 has been associated with elevated anger and hostility in veterans from previous conflicts.

115 nd aggression score and with the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory assault score in patients with perso

116 and the assault subscale of the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory, and the total score and motor impul

117 Hostility is a personality trait associated with increas

118 Online intergroup hostility is a pervasive and troubling issue, yet experi

119 red with patient-reported measures, observed hostility is a superior predictor of IHD.

120 Hostility is associated with a significantly increased r

121 Hostility is associated with incident coronary disease i

122 by showing for the first time that out-group hostility is dramatically reduced by mobility.

123 offer an important reminder that much online hostility is rooted in offline experiences and stable di

124 ease (IHD) and to determine whether observed hostility is superior to patient-reported hostility for

125 We find that, while outgroup hostility is typically the dominant predictor of engagem

126 diated the associations of prenatal parental hostility (latent construct) with adolescent externalizi

127 These results suggest that a high hostility level may predispose young adults to coronary

128 Hostility may be a risk factor for CVD mortality among h

129 entity, which suggests that perceived racial hostility may be activating a stronger group identity.

130 ed to type A behavior, measures of anger and hostility may be more productive avenues for research in

131 Mediators of interest were caregiver support/hostility measured observationally during the preschool

132 iated with the different facets of anger and hostility measured.

133 This study examined the association between hostility, measured by the eight-item Cynical Distrust S

134 NEO anger/hostility mediated the relationship between left ITG thi

135 Here we investigated the hypothesis that hostility might impact health by promoting cellular agin

136 s labeled psychological health, psychopathy, hostility, narcissism, emotional dysregulation, dysphori

137 wardness (positive predictors) and NEO Angry Hostility (negative predictor) scales accounted for 25%

138 ow and may be a therapeutic target to induce hostility of the niche to leukemia blasts.

139 limitations in target antigen selection, the hostility of the tumor microenvironment and the logistic

140 Hostility often co-occurs in parents and associates with

141 ntriguingly, the harmful effect of anger and hostility on CHD events in the healthy populations was g

142 The harmful effect of anger and hostility on CHD has been widely asserted, but previous

143 chanism mediating the detrimental effects of hostility on men's health.

144 l volume were mediated by caregiving support/hostility on the left and right, as well as stressful li

145 ersisted but not after either termination of hostilities or emigration.

146 oneliness (1.21%; P = 0.06), but not cynical hostility or negative affect, and some evidence that inc

147 anxiety (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.99), and hostility (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.93) after adjustmen

148 icant symptoms of anxiety, depression, anger-hostility, or somatization.

149 and "turn down the temperature" on partisan hostility, others continued to engage in inflammatory rh

150 in the depression-dejection (P<.001), anger-hostility (P<.001), and fatigue-inertia (P<.001) scales,

151 In recent years during enhanced hostility periods, the population of Southern Israel exp

152 High hostility predicted future low levels of some serum caro

153 We test how ingroup solidarity and outgroup hostility predicted social media users' engagement with

154 Whether hostility predicts recurrent coronary events is unknown.

155 noses completed The Ambiguous Intentions and Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ) to assess their tendency

156 = -0.07, P=0.08), anxiety (r=-0.07, P=0.10), hostility (r=-0.07, P=0.10), or stress (r=-0.002, P=0.96

157 t correlations with standardized measures of hostility (r=0.23), negative affect (r=0.25), and percei

158 r (RR=1.2; 95% CI, 1.0 to 1.4; P=0.008), and hostility (RR=1.3; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.5; P=0.003) were pre

159 ear 7 of the lowest and highest quartiles of hostility score at year 0 were 3.9 and 3.3 microg/liter

160 0 carotenoids nor tocopherols predicted the hostility score at year 5.

161 Compared with women in the lowest hostility score quartile, women in the highest quartile

162 POMS testing showed that the anger-hostility score was significantly higher during the HPA

163 ewhat weaker than for those using the global hostility score.

164 race, and field center comparing those with hostility scores above and below the median of the distr

165 onal attainment, current employment, cynical hostility scores and depressive symptoms.

166 Hostility scores at year 0 were unrelated to year 7 lyco

167 year follow-up, while the patients with high hostility scores had almost twice as many readmissions.

168 Men with hostility scores in the top quartile were at more than t

169 High Cook-Medley hostility scores were associated with greater body mass

170 of having abnormal depression, anxiety, and hostility scores.

171 G, and as a trend, negatively with NEO Angry Hostility scores.

172 ysical aggression, verbal aggression, anger, hostility, self-directed aggression), i.e., PA had a dir

173 ry markers, alcohol consumption, depression, hostility, self-reported medical conditions) were measur

174 ngagement, whereas posts expressing outgroup hostility show smaller associations.

175 icidal ideation, lethality of past attempts, hostility, subjective depressive symptoms, fewer reasons

176 was directed to emotional aspects of faces (hostility, subjects' fearfulness) vs. nonemotional aspec

177 and paternal hostility was assessed with the hostility subscale of the Brief Symptom Inventory at thr

178 ts or social media companies-can curb online hostility, such policies may suppress valuable as well a

179 evere target symptom (aggression, agitation, hostility, suspiciousness, hallucinations, or delusions)

180 nalyses of the disorganization and suspicion-hostility symptom scales.

181 idential mobility indeed have less out-group hostility than those with low mobility.

182 ope, sometimes reaching levels of intergroup hostilities that ended in the utter destruction of entir

183 erspective and focus on the offline roots of hostility, that is, offline experiences and stable indiv

184 ger and female), possibly to communicate non-hostility, the chimpanzees showed both upper and lower t

185 ns male at birth) rose during and just after hostilities: then, a year or so later, they declined to

186 SSRI administration reduced focal indices of hostility through a more general decrease in negative af

187 climate action and could signal the court's hostility to a wide range of future regulations within a

188 Energy subsidies, hostility to foreign investment, and inefficiencies of i

189 re negative memories also attributed greater hostility to other people's actions (r = 0.47) and repor

190 (AIHQ) to assess their tendency to attribute hostility to other people's actions and the Autobiograph

191 nderstandings could lead people to attribute hostility to others' actions.

192 of type A behavior, expressions of anger, or hostility to predict incident coronary heart disease (CH

193 ctive relation between measures of anger and hostility to the development of AF in men.

194 pivotal role in AML microenvironment immune hostility toward endogenous T cells as well as adoptivel

195 ngness to work, invest, collaborate, or show hostility toward out-groups, and accept or reject variou

196 e., prosocial in-group support combined with hostility toward the out-group.

197 s, concern about "supplies," depression, and hostility toward the therapist.

198 otives towards an ingroup (ingroup-love) and hostility towards an outgroup (outgroup-hate).

199 Here we test an intervention to reduce hostility towards Muslims, a frequently targeted outgrou

200 Hostility towards outgroups contributes to costly interg

201 tion limit the participation of, and promote hostility towards, members of minoritized groups within

202 e lowest quartile group, the adjusted OR for hostility was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.76-1.47) for quartile 2; 1

203 Maternal and paternal hostility was assessed with the hostility subscale of th

204 Prenatal maternal but not paternal hostility was associated with smaller total gray matter,

205 In this study, hostility was found to be an independent risk factor for

206 opherols were measured at years 0 and 7, and hostility was measured at years 0 and 5.

207 ubmissiveness trait, which is independent of hostility, was related to future risk of CHD in the gene

208 Signs of hostility were assessed by use of the Interpersonal Host

209 Among young adults, TUI and hostility were associated with a dose-response increase

210 Anger and hostility were associated with increased CHD events in t

211 findings suggest that maternal and paternal hostility were each associated with smaller gray matter,

212 Effects of optimism and cynical hostility were independent.

213 ty, chronic stress, depressive symptoms, and hostility were measured using validated scales, and phys

214 f the measures of anger, type A behavior, or hostility were related to incident CHD; however, trait-a

215 Low levels of negative symptoms and hostility were significantly associated with having a cl

216 e logistic regression models, higher TUI and hostility were significantly associated with risk of dev

217 n [VA], indirect aggression [IA], anger, and hostility) were measured using the Chinese version of th

218 mediate the association of prenatal parental hostility with child externalizing behaviors.

219 this study was to assess the association of hostility with CVD mortality in the subsequent 16 years

220 and treatment, the association of anger and hostility with poor prognosis persisted.

221 ociations of prenatal and childhood parental hostility would be associated with maternal, paternal, a