ライフサイエンスコーパス: illusion

1 mechanistic account for a long-known visual illusion.

2 to this misprediction as the creative cliff illusion.

3 a metasurface device to generate an optical illusion.

4 nce rules is the underlying mechanism of the illusion.

5 sions as well as a non-geometrical, contrast illusion.

6 ion of self-representation during the Taylor illusion.

7 ical illusions and non-geometrical, contrast illusion.

8 racking whilst presenting an apparent motion illusion.

9 hat this effect is mediated by the ownership illusion.

10 real (disembodied) hand are affected by the illusion.

11 us (IPS), and the degree of the crossed-hand illusion.

12 self-consciousness induced by the full-body illusion.

13 those following the first-person perspective illusion.

14 ry (WM) task increases the perception of the illusion.

15 k and the size of the temporal window of the illusion.

16 nsistent with the perception of the Thatcher illusion.

17 showed normal sensitivity to a haptic shape illusion.

18 sual periphery, and the well-known curveball illusion.

19 ay, did not show response enhancement to the illusion.

20 l and visible rubber hand in the rubber hand illusion.

21 blished study, did elicit a negative calorie illusion.

22 istance information contribute to the Taylor illusion.

23 ies failed to replicate the negative calorie illusion.

24 tic hand if perceived as one's own during an illusion.

25 rain mechanism for mediating the size-weight illusion.

26 n mismatch theory explaining the size-weight illusion.

27 ure research based on this compelling visual illusion.

28 y by capitalizing on a well-known perceptual illusion.

29 the temporal window of the auditory-induced illusion.

30 evel of GABA and the magnitude of contextual illusion.

31 attempting to find common mechanisms across illusions.

32 tanding of the mechanisms behind geometrical illusions.

33 tween Ebbinghaus and Muller-Lyer geometrical illusions.

34 n, providing a new method to realize optical illusions.

35 nusual configuration of body parts can cause illusions.

36 perceptual processing observed during these illusions.

37 presentations should also produce brightness illusions.

38 There are many other sources of slope illusions.

39 e cardiac feedback can produce interoceptive illusions.

40 rise to an interesting phenomenon of optical illusions.

41 gures [1], faces [2], and a number of visual illusions [3-6].

42 In the "flash-beep illusion," a single light flash is perceived as multiple

43 It's just an illusion: Above a critical chain length, where oligomers

44 of context (large or small inducers) in this illusion affected size perception by comparing each to a

45 ersa, thereby giving rise to perfect optical illusion and cloaking devices, respectively.

46 effect has been called the negative calorie illusion and has been attributed to averaging the unheal

47 n implicit prejudice and magnitude of the RH illusion and proprioceptive drift.

48 and V4 when monkeys viewed a visual contour illusion and showed phase-to-amplitude coupling.

49 that S1 and M1 contribute to the rubber hand illusion and that, by taking advantage of plasticity in

50 tinct psychophysical tasks, captures several illusions and biases, and explains core aspects of human

51 the physical stimulus, as it does for visual illusions and binocular rivalry, the opportunity arises

52 Visual hallucinations, illusions and extrapyramidal tract signs were more frequ

53 The findings suggest early onset illusions and formed hallucinations are linked to amyloi

54 e underlying pathophysiological mechanism of illusions and formed hallucinations, with implications f

55 Visual illusions and hallucinations are hallmarks of serotonerg

56 rties of interval tuning as well as temporal illusions and intersensory timing.

57 rical illusions, but not between geometrical illusions and non-geometrical, contrast illusion.

58 pheral nervous system to induce multisensory illusions and ownership of artificial body parts, which

59 cts in the environment can evoke self-motion illusions and postural adjustments.

60 discrimination, proprioceptive and body part illusions and self/non-self differentiation).

61 Despite the strength of the illusion (and its popularity), there has been almost no

62 lts using paradigms such as the "rubber hand illusion" and "enfacement" [1-11].

63 motion of the 1-D features (the barber-pole illusion) and the direction of tracking eye movements.

64 n to be reproduced by its flat analogue (for illusions) and vice versa for cloaks.

65 ewed an ambiguous image, the Rubin face/vase illusion, and required them to report their perceived in

66 veloped a computational model to explain the illusion, and tested it in behavioral and neuroimaging e

67 urthermore, the magnitude of all geometrical illusions, and particularly the Ebbinghaus and Muller-Ly

68 We further found that this softness illusion appeared selectively when the touch activated a

69 The negative calorie illusion appears to be a function of the contrast betwee

70 The illusion appears to represent an inference about whether

71 Geometrical visual illusions are an intriguing phenomenon, in which subject

72 The dominant accounts of many visual illusions are based on experience-driven development of

73 Visual hallucinations and illusions are thought to be caused by specific cognitive

74 Accounts of this illusion argue that temporal auditory information interf

75 These results argue that this illusion arises from architectures for motion detection

76 ing the hypothesis that the negative calorie illusion arises from the use of a reference-dependent an

77 We used visual contextual illusion as a perceptual assay since the illusion dissoc

78 d analyzed vividness and authenticity of the illusion as well as brain activation patterns.

79 , Ponzo, and vertical-horizontal geometrical illusions as well as a non-geometrical, contrast illusio

80 visual /ba/ and acoustic /fa/ and hear /ba/ (illusion-ba), the visual input weakens the weighting of

81 ory evoked potential when subjects perceived illusion-ba, and a reduced N1 when they perceived illusi

82 mental transitions, the ubiquity of semantic illusions between such transitions, the emergence of ite

83 l guidelines for engineering electromagnetic illusions but can be extended to shape the near and far-

84 ot trajectory and the tilted lines cause the illusion, but also highlight that higher-level cortical

85 stent with patterns observed in other bodily illusions, but less robust.

86 ot only for the likely explanations of these illusions, but more generally, for the nature-nurture ar

87 havioral judgments of all tested geometrical illusions, but not between geometrical illusions and non

88 l 16 participants extinguished the ownership illusion by using visuomotor asynchrony, with all else e

89 tered visual feedback through body ownership illusions can influence motor performance in a process t

90 This "double-drift" illusion causes a dramatic mismatch between retinal and

91 sses considerable efforts to design acoustic illusion cloak that produces the desired scattered field

92 Acoustic illusion cloaks that create illusion effects by changing

93 ror-sensory synaesthesia and the rubber hand illusion comparable to relationships between hypnotisabi

94 ion was compared with a well-matched in-body illusion condition, in which the sense of bodily self wa

95 left sensorimotor cortex, whereas the Taylor illusion correlated with higher beta/gamma power over fr

96 particularly the Ebbinghaus and Muller-Lyer illusions, correlated with local gray matter density in

97 Brightness illusions demonstrate that an object's perceived brightn

98 evidence indicates that the Rotating Snakes illusion depends critically on eye movements, yet the sp

99 we show that the strength of the embodiment illusion depends on the child-like voice feedback being

100 agical thinking, overvalued ideas, recurrent illusions, depersonalization, derealization, undue suspi

101 nstance, subjects experiencing a rubber hand illusion develop a sense of ownership of a mannequin han

102 rication and experimental verification of an illusion device working at microwave frequencies.

103 triguing application of TO is the idea of an illusion device.

104 es to the design and application of acoustic illusion devices and may have deep implications in many

105 in two visual phenomena called double-flash illusion (DFI) and fusion effect (FE), both consisting o

106 e auditory- and tactile-induced double flash illusion (DFI), a phenomenon where two interleaved beeps

107 s, such as the auditory-induced double flash illusion (DFI).

108 Yet the possibility of generating acoustic illusion directly for a sound source still remains unexp

109 ual illusion as a perceptual assay since the illusion dissociates perceptual content from stimulus co

110 ta show that afterimage drifts in the Taylor illusion do not only depend on the physical hand positio

111 ence illusion effectiveness, even though the illusion does not involve actual limb movement.

112 Here, we assessed whether the Taylor illusion does not just depend on the physical hand posit

113 This three-part framework predicts specific illusions (e.g., truthiness, illusory truth), offers way

114 the scattered field to generate the desired illusion effect near curved boundaries.

115 ation were performed, allowing us to map the illusion effect.

116 se biomechanical constraints would influence illusion effectiveness, even though the illusion does no

117 Acoustic illusion cloaks that create illusion effects by changing the scattered wave have man

118 Responses to Kanizsa illusions emerge later than the responses to the contras

119 The result was a strong body-ownership illusion equally for C and A.

120 sive perception of weight (brightness-weight illusion; Exp.

121 visual /fa/ and acoustic /ba/ and hear /fa/ (illusion-fa), the visual input strengthens the weighting

122 ion-ba, and a reduced N1 when they perceived illusion-fa, mirroring the N1 behavior for /ba/ and /fa/

123 However, perceptual body illusions - famously the rubber hand illusion (RHI) - ca

124 Here we propose to produce arbitrary illusion for an airborne sound source with no need to re

125 darken the blurring lens, can eliminate the illusion for many viewing conditions.

126 ssing long-range apparent motion stimuli, an illusion for which no clear neuronal mechanisms have yet

127 ase (PD) psychosis refers to the spectrum of illusions, formed hallucinations and delusions that occu

128 t empirically testing the similarity between illusions has been notoriously difficult because illusio

129 Among them, the "Rotating Snakes Illusion" has generated a large amount of interest in th

130 neural mechanisms underlying this continuity illusion have been studied mostly with schematic stimuli

131 ecies, but theories proposed to explain this illusion have remained difficult to test.

132 sions has been notoriously difficult because illusions have very different visual appearances.

133 y-five years ago, Nijhawan used a perceptual illusion he called the flash-lag effect (FLE) to argue t

134 f physiological variables, or "interoceptive illusions." Here we ask whether it is possible to produc

135 ople can experience in-the-moment perceptual illusions, however, they can also be deceived about how

136 der comes from studies of the "Thatcher face illusion": humans and monkeys notice changes in the orie

137 Human experiments on the rubber hand illusion implicate similar regions, but since such exper

138 This study investigated a potential auditory illusion in duration perception induced by rhythmic temp

139 similar to the fly's may also underlie this illusion in humans.

140 tion of the neural correlates of the Kanizsa illusion in mice and the first causal demonstration of t

141 ack controls the neural responses to Kanizsa illusion in V1.

142 We describe and explore a novel illusion in which the center of a static wheel stimulus

143 Optical illusions in the curtain eruptions resulting from a comb

144 t temporal Gestalt induces auditory duration illusions in typical listeners, but that musical experts

145 e (tens of milliseconds) did not abolish the illusion, indicating that knowledge of instantaneous whi

146 We conclude that this new flickering illusion is a unique way to experience the alpha rhythms

147 s display over the court, and the quality of illusion is associated with mating success.

148 We conclude that the Thatcher face illusion is correlated with a pattern of activity in the

149 This illusion is known as thermal referral (TR).

150 hands are stimulated while crossed, and the illusion is known to be acquired in early childhood.

151 This revealed that the illusion is not a mistake of perception, but rather refl

152 y to determine whether susceptibility to the illusion is present immediately after birth; however, el

153 This illusion is shared by diverse vertebrate species, but th

154 at perceptual interference in the flash-beep illusion is similar to within-modality interference from

155 These results show that the size-weight illusion is smaller when size and weight information is

156 is prediction, we found that the Rubber Hand Illusion is stronger in CD patients as compared to healt

157 The key feature of this illusion is that the stimulus fluctuations are experienc

158 s (Ptilonorhynchus nuchalis) induce a visual illusion known as forced perspective for the female view

159 orporate the black RH and presented lower RH illusion magnitude and a smaller proprioceptive drift fo

160 tudy that included measurement of individual illusion magnitude and structural MRI scanning.

161 ly, parietal GABA level correlated with size illusion magnitude but not with orientation or brightnes

162 pital GABA level correlated with orientation illusion magnitude but not with size or brightness illus

163 on magnitude but not with size or brightness illusion magnitude.

164 itude but not with orientation or brightness illusion magnitude; in contrast, occipital GABA level co

165 is less able to move one of our hands if an illusion makes us feel like the hand does not belong to

166 n only two are presented (the "triple-flash" illusion) most often when the interflash delay matches t

167 We used the "triple-flash" illusion: Occasional perception of three flashes when on

168 t clearly succeeded in giving the mantis the illusion of 3D depth.

169 a linearly polarized light beam, the optical illusion of a 'vase' is perceived.

170 apid beeps together with a flash induces the illusion of a second flash.

171 Here we show that participants can have the illusion of agency over the walking of a virtual body ev

172 c conditions resulted in a strong subjective illusion of body ownership and agency over the VB, but n

173 hnology eliminates bias, blind spot, and the illusion of control.

174 unteers (N = 140), we show that a perceptual illusion of having the opposite-sex body is associated w

175 trolled experiments; and a proxy form of the illusion of knowledge (according to which randomized eva

176 ay out of the egg to break the ill-conceived illusion of nanomedicine.

177 point to the exacerbating role played by the illusion of objectivity.

178 tuting the real body, was used to induce the illusion of ownership over the VB.

179 showed the positive emotional impact of the illusion of owning a child's body, opening up possibilit

180 istance task, before and after eliciting the illusion of owning an invisible body.

181 Face pareidolia is the compelling illusion of perceiving facial features on inanimate obje

182 sight into the neural machinery of a classic illusion of perceptual awareness: binocular rivalry.

183 sed in the initial selection and provide the illusion of progress.

184 enerated visual motion signals can cause the illusion of self-motion in space (vection) and correspon

185 selection on non-social traits can give the illusion of social cheating in the social amoeba Dictyos

186 Moreover, the stretch causes an immediate illusion of touching a harder object that does not depen

187 he biased local motion signals into a global illusion of trajectory perception.

188 ts, the haptic display induced the realistic illusion of walking on three different types of floor su

189 than the suppression accompanying continuity illusions of a simple tone.

190 The results show strong illusions of body ownership, agency and walking, in the

191 o or more techniques, can lead to persistent illusions of knowledge.

192 s of participants while they observed visual illusions of lightness or brightness.

193 ng, together determine the occurrence of the illusion on a trial-by-trial basis.

194 Here, we explore the impact of ownership illusions on the temporal dimension of multisensory inte

195 magnitude of illusion through onset time to illusion only for the black RH.

196 t, augmented RHI responses in form of faster illusion onset and increased vividness ratings.

197 RHI responses, again evident in accelerated illusion onset and increased vividness ratings.

198 etween geometric metasurface and the optical illusion opens a pathway for new applications related to

199 to examine what governs the strength of the illusion or to develop a clear account of its phenomenol

200 as associated with the occurrence of sensory illusions or hallucinations (odds ratio: 8.68, P < 0.001

201 factor data in patients who go on to develop illusions or hallucinations within 3-4 years of follow-u

202 The current study used the enfacement illusion paradigm to investigate the role of affective t

203 Typically, multisensory illusion paradigms emphasise the importance of synchrono

204 Illusion perception under high load was associated with

205 ibility to two well-known geometrical visual illusions, Ponzo [1] and Muller-Lyer [2], immediately af

206 enomenon called the Pulfrich effect [2], the illusion poses an apparent paradox: blur reduces contras

207 of their experience, but unlike other bodily illusions, positive changes in subjective experience wer

208 to which partisans displayed the objectivity illusion predicted subsequent bias in their perception o

209 ) or relied on inadequate stimuli (pictorial illusions presented on a monitor at a fixed distance [11

210 ividual differences in the magnitudes of the illusion produced by either type of context were correla

211 sometimes rhythmic spiking responses for the illusion-promoting configurations compared with controls

212 inal theoretical account of the triple-flash illusion proposed by Bowen in 1989.

213 ment in which we used a standard size-weight illusion protocol with sequential lifts of small and lar

214 These illusions provide a great opportunity to decipher neural

215 Visual illusions provide an experimental paradigm to study thes

216 This illusion raises two fundamental questions: first, given

217 ontrast association that accounts for motion illusions, rather than the distribution of movements in

218 om stimulus content and the magnitude of the illusion reflects the effect of visual inhibition.

219 and modulated neural oscillations underlying illusion-related crossmodal interactions.

220 Brain imaging and a novel 'body-swop' illusion reveals distinct parietal-premotor and parietal

221 s perceptual phenomenon, known as the slalom illusion, reveals a mismatch between the veridical motio

222 al body illusions - famously the rubber hand illusion (RHI) - can be elicited experimentally in healt

223 The rubber hand illusion (RHI) demonstrates that under some circumstance

224 ship sensation as induced by the Rubber Hand Illusion (RHI) with dark rubber hands.

225 During the rubber hand illusion (RHI), subjects experience an artificial hand a

226 ms in body representation is the Rubber Hand Illusion (RHI).

227 mulus to determine what factors modulate the illusion's strength.

228 The results reveal that the illusion seems to depend more on the overall specific lo

229 l areas per se, then the two versions of the illusion should be subtended by the same neurophysiologi

230 Experimental work on body ownership illusions showed how simple multisensory manipulation ca

231 ticipants performing the sound-induced flash illusion (SIFI) and a verbal n-back task (0-back, low lo

232 this question using the sound-induced flash illusion (SIFI), a phenomenon in which the integration o

233 the temporally-dependent sound-induced flash illusion (SIFI).

234 hat macaque monkeys perceive a size-distance illusion similarly to humans.

235 ects presented in isolation was unrelated to illusion strength and did not correlate with V1 area.

236 An optical illusion, such as "Rubin's vase", is caused by the infor

237 act visual processing and even induce visual illusions, such as the auditory-induced double flash ill

238 , enlarged and shrunk the temporal window of illusion, suggesting that alpha oscillations might repre

239 This illusion suggests that the topographic pattern of neural

240 d that high compared with low load increased illusion susceptibility and modulated neural oscillation

241 nts performed the sound-induced double-flash illusion task and found positive correlation between ind

242 and in fifteen young adults, using a mirror illusion task.

243 In the thermal grill illusion (TGI), alternating non-noxious warm and cold te

244 tual interpretations over time, creating the illusion that a constant stimulus is changing.

245 an artifact of early detection, creating the illusion that early intervention is associated with impr

246 We used a novel bistable motion illusion that induced alternating and mutually exclusive

247 ifferences cause a previously unknown motion illusion that makes people dramatically misperceive the

248 face distortion effect" (FFDE) is a powerful illusion that may reveal important properties of how fac

249 ts away increased stimuli size producing the illusion that stimuli moved away from or approached part

250 based choices, and predicts a new preference illusion that we validate with empirical data.

251 ably behavioral correlates of body-ownership illusions that occur as a function of the type of body i

252 na - belief polarization and the size-weight illusion - that are not obviously explained by performan

253 ign examined the dynamics of the objectivity illusion, the belief that the views of "my side" are obj

254 In the Ebbinghaus illusion, the context surrounding an object modulates it

255 edback signals, taking advantage of a visual illusion, the Flash-Grab Effect, to disassociate the fee

256 A well-known illusion, the McGurk Effect, consists of incongruent aud

257 In the Taylor illusion, the perceived afterimage that is projected on

258 In the Taylor illusion, the size of an afterimage projected on one's h

259 ion is influenced by the body: in the Taylor illusion, the size of an afterimage projected on one's h

260 In the size-weight illusion, the smaller object from two equally weighted o

261 We show that, during the illusion, the temporal window for integrating touch on t

262 The motion illusion-the reverse Pulfrich effect-and the paradigm we

263 This recently discovered illusion-the reverse Pulfrich effect-is caused by optica

264 the retina is not necessary to perceive the illusion: the flicker can also be perceived on the after

265 For example, positive illusions: "The traditional textbook definition of menta

266 ias on proprioceptive drift and magnitude of illusion through onset time to illusion only for the bla

267 We developed a novel mirror box illusion to investigate whether motoric, but not spatial

268 y: The optimal stimulus onset asynchrony for illusion to occur was correlated, across human subjects

269 ight changes greatly reduced the size-weight illusion to perceptual biases below discrimination thres

270 d tested our ability to deliver stereoscopic illusions to praying mantises.

271 or novel experimental manipulations that use illusions to study interoceptive processing.

272 ensory integration paradigm, the Rubber Hand Illusion, to investigate the role of affective, top-down

273 f generating three-dimensional (3D) acoustic illusions under detection of broadband signals still rem

274 We conclude that this sensory illusion underlies a novel, bodily mechanism of socio-af

275 gated the empirical boundaries of the slalom illusion using psychophysical methods.

276 hat male great bowerbirds construct a visual illusion, using display object gradients, that affects m

277 This imagery-induced ventriloquist illusion was also associated with increased effective co

278 The creative cliff illusion was attenuated among those with high levels of

279 lved in a social interaction, an out-of-body illusion was elicited, in which the sense of bodily self

280 The rate change illusion was instead linked to changes in neural phase p

281 We report a study in which a crossed-hands illusion was investigated in autistic children.

282 Importantly, the illusion was not elicited when the electrical stimulatio

283 The illusion was proposed to result from superposition of tw

284 Interestingly, the illusion was reported to disappear when the middle digit

285 ic change in space perception consequent the illusion, we also assessed peripersonal space, e.g., PPS

286 adapted version of a well known multisensory illusion, we investigated the neural basis of mental ima

287 Relying on the rubber hand illusion, we manipulated hand ownership, so that partici

288 Relying on the somatic rubber hand illusion, we manipulated hand ownership, such that parti

289 Using the McGurk illusion, we show that visual context primes phonetic re

290 The illusions were induced only during bouts of directed whi

291 eries of experiments, multisensory full-body illusions were used to modulate feelings of ownership ov

292 r example, in the sound-induced double-flash illusion, when two beeps are presented within approximat

293 d a time course compatible with the reported illusion: when alpha amplitude was strong, the probabili

294 rt this hypothesis and report a novel visual illusion where stationary objects in the visual peripher

295 type of fixational eye movement--drives the illusion, whereas microsaccades produced during attempte

296 ress this issue, we combined the rubber hand illusion, which allows experimental manipulation of body

297 tal results from the quartet apparent motion illusion, which is a prototypical intermittent rivalry s

298 econciled with existing research on positive illusions, which finds that positive appraisals of stres

299 ce of rotation during the observation of the illusion while we simultaneously recorded their eye move

300 with PD, n=115 (27%) reported predominantly illusions with the median time of onset at 19.5 months f