コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ndirect MR arthrography and 45 unenhanced MR imaging examinations).
2 during one free-breathing magnetic resonance imaging examination.
3 as well as 5 minutes and 30 minutes after MR imaging examination.
4 a 3D MRSI examination added to a clinical MR imaging examination.
5 amples were performed in connection with the imaging examination.
6 examination from the SI ratio at the last MR imaging examination.
7 es to increase the specificity of the hybrid imaging examination.
8 T/MR imaging and to learn how to optimize an imaging examination.
9 infarction (n = 20) underwent cardiac PET/MR imaging examination.
10 e greatest relative benefit at the second MR imaging examination.
11 nt and washout are found in a single dynamic imaging examination.
12 ical data for scientific purposes before the imaging examination.
13 ases of additional cancer were missed at all imaging examinations.
14 CI underwent three yearly magnetic resonance imaging examinations.
15 of 2 weeks between serial magnetic resonance imaging examinations.
16 underwent two temporally separated 1.5-T MR imaging examinations.
17 (98%) of the 52 patients who completed both imaging examinations.
18 e, 2-week, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up MR imaging examinations.
19 nsional (temporal resolution, 15 seconds) MR imaging examinations.
20 appropriate evaluation and use of diagnostic imaging examinations.
21 nt 236 diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging examinations.
22 d screening examination, and with most other imaging examinations.
23 A defect was seen in 45 of 47 ankle MR imaging examinations.
24 rteen of the 37 patients underwent follow-up imaging examinations.
25 s by use of serial systemic, ophthalmic, and imaging examinations.
26 derwent spirometry and two separate 1.5-T MR imaging examinations.
27 nd nonenhanced, nonsedated abdominopelvic MR imaging examinations.
28 r risk to patients than that associated with imaging examinations.
29 y a small proportion of outpatient high-cost imaging examinations.
30 eactions among 30 373 gadobutrol-enhanced MR imaging examinations (0.32%), and severe reactions are r
31 usion and exclusion criteria, including 3524 imaging examinations: 1963 direct MR arthrography examin
32 enrollees underwent a total of 30.9 million imaging examinations (25.8 million person-years), reflec
34 edian time from initial CT to last follow-up imaging examination, 54 weeks; range, 0.3-302 weeks).
35 s who underwent intravenous GBCA-enhanced MR imaging examinations (55 patients with primary brain tum
37 ds A total of 121 consecutive whole-spine MR imaging examinations (63 men; mean age +/- standard devi
39 of injury was detected on magnetic resonance imaging examination (9.4T; T2 weighted) in 14 of 15 sele
42 he animals were sacrificed after the last MR imaging examination, after which high-spatial-resolution
46 of 3934 screening studies (1977 screening MR imaging examinations and 1957 screening mammograms) perf
48 a substantially decreased rate of low-yield imaging examinations and a markedly increased percentage
49 stablished a large-scale database of cardiac imaging examinations and associated clinical data in ord
51 use of high-cost (CT and magnetic resonance imaging) examinations and a 1.4-fold increase in RVUs pe
54 r rates, and exposures typical of diagnostic imaging examinations are in the range that epidemiologic
55 dized baseline 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examination, as well as neuropsychological asses
56 uthors assessed the efficacy of an automated imaging examination assignment system for enhancing the
57 were assessed with a magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examination at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and 2
58 medical imaging procedures before undergoing imaging examinations at 16 teaching and nonteaching hosp
59 dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, and DW imaging examinations at 3.0 T and either had received a
62 Retrospective review of screening breast MR imaging examinations at the institution from 1996 throug
64 rial volume at index imaging, and additional imaging examinations between 2007 and 2014 were recorded
66 e mammography registry were used to identify imaging examinations, clinical consultations, interventi
67 00 consecutive scheduled outpatient advanced imaging examinations (computed tomography, magnetic reso
69 ing abdominal and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging examinations could significantly reduce costs, m
70 e number of patients, number of each type of imaging examination, date of the examination, and the es
71 ory, and on the basis of ophthalmoscopic and imaging examinations diabetic macular edema was diagnose
73 ients enrolled on the study received four MR imaging examinations during neoadjuvant therapy with acq
75 in systemic treatments, emergency and urgent imaging examinations (eg, 1.9% more parenteral systemic
76 fter myocardial ischemia, MTET during one MR imaging examination enabled simultaneous differentiation
78 ery common and account for a large number of imaging examinations, especially in emergency department
79 thiasis requires clinical manifestations and imaging examination findings suggesting a stone in the c
80 arametric diagnostic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examination followed by MR imaging-guided biopsy
81 d EF was performed with a magnetic resonance imaging examination, followed immediately by a transthor
82 tomographic (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examinations for hepatocellular carcinoma survei
83 ontact with the patient's skin during all MR imaging examinations for patients unable to communicate,
84 by subtracting the SI ratio at the first MR imaging examination from the SI ratio at the last MR ima
86 oskeletal radiologist's workflow by triaging imaging examinations, helping with image interpretation,
88 lunteers underwent a magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examination in which images were acquired before
92 , institutional review board-approved study, imaging examinations in 99 patients with urolithiasis we
94 retation, reporting, and data collection for imaging examinations in patients at risk for hepatocellu
95 6- and 12-month groups, a 6-month follow-up imaging examination, in the context of a formal concorda
100 the first symptoms, after performing various imaging examinations, including bone scintigraphy as wel
102 is, the AUC for predicting pCR at the second imaging examination increased from 0.70 for volume alone
103 ncerning the rationale for ordering specific imaging examinations, intervals for follow-up imaging, a
104 ardial perfusion and viability assessment MR imaging examination is feasible and does not involve add
106 went a research dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging examination just prior to a clinical MR imaging-
107 rt (CDS) by all providers who order advanced imaging examinations (magnetic resonance imaging; comput
109 a 3D MRSI examination added to a clinical MR imaging examination may help define the presence and spa
110 titative 1H MR spectroscopy to the breast MR imaging examination may help to improve the radiologist'
112 o underwent either surgery (n = 82) or an MR imaging examination (n = 217) because of suspicion of ap
115 sus 24.2% (fingolimod) of magnetic resonance imaging examinations (odds ratio = 0.05, 95% CI = 0.00-0
116 ic resonance imaging (MRI) is the diagnostic imaging examination of choice in lumbar spine evaluation
119 iew board-approved study evaluated 66 PET/MR imaging examinations of 33 pediatric patients (mean age,
120 ere 292 specific imaging statements based on imaging examinations of 6537 patients in the primary ana
121 aluated a training set of images from 100 MR imaging examinations of patients suspected of having app
123 100 consecutive patients underwent 1.5-T MR imaging examinations of the cervical spine within 48 hou
125 ittal proton density-weighted images from MR imaging examinations of the neck and upper chest were ob
126 of having breast lesions underwent breast MR imaging examinations on comparable 1.5-T and 3-T clinica
128 ctive study reviewed consecutive male breast imaging examinations over a 12-year period (between 2005
130 tcome was the number of outpatient high-cost imaging examinations per patient per year ordered by the
131 ally unapparent adrenal mass detected during imaging examination performed for reasons other than the
132 ount for a minor fraction of all noninvasive imaging examinations performed and fees reimbursed.
133 zed 318 366 reports obtained from diagnostic imaging examinations performed at a large urban quaterna
134 resonance (MR) imaging, assessed prostate MR imaging examinations performed at a single center by usi
135 database identified 247 screening breast MR imaging examinations performed between January 1999 and
136 st material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examinations performed during the post-guideline
137 terprise-wide PACS; the numbers and types of imaging examinations performed for fiscal years 1993 and
138 d measure as of 2009 of the proportion of MR imaging examinations performed for low back pain without
140 owing gadodiamide administration in 1,049 MR imaging examinations performed in these patients were co
141 rts from 650 consecutive screening breast MR imaging examinations performed in women between Septembe
142 fusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examinations performed with techniques adopted f
143 nts who underwent at least 20 consecutive MR imaging examinations (plus an additional MR imaging for
144 ere compared with the interpretations of the imaging examination results, and sensitivities and speci
145 rding to these recommendations, some routine imaging examinations, such as those for screening, shoul
146 ir technique in the performance of CT and MR imaging examinations, summarize their approach to the di
147 there is much excitement about a noninvasive imaging examination that can reliably depict clinically
148 Indeed, mammography now is the most common imaging examination that directly results in the reducti
150 rize completely or are detected initially in imaging examinations that are not designed for full eval
152 27 rapid MR imaging, and 38 conventional MR imaging examinations timed in calendar year 2000, all ra
153 between reconstructive surgery and first MR imaging examination was 49 months (range, 5-513 months).
158 os and Rchange and the number of enhanced MR imaging examinations was analyzed by using a generalized
159 d glomerular filtration rate, and date of MR imaging examination were evaluated for pancreatic cysts
164 ical records, biopsy results, and subsequent imaging examinations were evaluated for malignancy.
165 M 19 additional lesions not visible on other imaging examinations were found, and as many as 36 new l
169 tibility maps between baseline and follow-up imaging examinations were performed by using the paired
170 Combined MR imaging/3D MR spectroscopic imaging examinations were performed in 16 hormone-treate
172 and diffusion tensor magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examinations were performed in 26 patients with
179 lesion considered TSTC, reports of follow-up imaging examinations were reviewed for a change in lesio
184 valuation of embolic risks, and clinical and imaging examinations were supplemented with pharmacokine
185 f neurologic, psychologic, and structural MR imaging examinations were within the normal range for al
187 ores (>=60%) on the radiology and diagnostic imaging examination when testing both versions of ChatGP
189 ovide written informed consent before the MR imaging examination, which consists of dynamic breast MR
190 ndred seventy patients each underwent two MR imaging examinations with bolus injection of gadoxetate
192 ts who underwent at least six consecutive MR imaging examinations with the exclusive use of either a
193 cipant underwent four sequential 3-T knee MR imaging examinations with use of the same imager and wit
194 -86 years), who had undergone both CT and MR imaging examinations within 1 year (average, 60.5 days;
196 in alternation during a single functional MR imaging examination, without the typical rest period, to