戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 d of osteoprotegerin (OPG) were evaluated by immunofluorescent staining.
2 e contrast agent (Eu-P947) with specific MMP immunofluorescent staining.
3 ong the z axis, as well as depth-independent immunofluorescent staining.
4 ity of CR-1 by fluorescent cell-labeling and immunofluorescent staining.
5 ectin (FN) was monitored by Western blot and immunofluorescent staining.
6 tic fibers in ONH tissue was investigated by immunofluorescent staining.
7 adhesion molecule (LECAM)-1 were detected by immunofluorescent staining.
8 hole-cell patch-clamp analysis, confirmed by immunofluorescent staining.
9 nsity were determined by immunohistochemical immunofluorescent staining.
10 d HLA class II (IA) antigen were assessed by immunofluorescent staining.
11 21(Cip1), and p27(Kip1) was determined using immunofluorescent staining.
12  subjects and SS ATD-affected patients using immunofluorescent staining.
13 d slow MHC after 12 d in culture, as seen by immunofluorescent staining.
14 by subcellular fractionation experiments and immunofluorescent staining.
15 RSBP-1 to trypsin digestion, and by indirect immunofluorescent staining.
16 p47 and type I procollagen was determined by immunofluorescent staining.
17 uated aggregates of tubulin were found by an immunofluorescent staining.
18          The number of LCs was enumerated by immunofluorescent staining.
19 d by ELISA, zymography, Western blotting and immunofluorescent staining.
20 bly transfected with the prothrombin cDNA by immunofluorescent staining.
21 tools followed by acid-fast staining (AF) or immunofluorescent staining.
22 s of cytoplasmic microtubules as revealed by immunofluorescent staining.
23 rences were supported by lineage tracing and immunofluorescent staining.
24 e the expression of senescence biomarkers by immunofluorescent staining.
25  stained for CB1 and uncoupling protein-1 by immunofluorescent staining.
26 eration in mutant epithelium, as revealed by immunofluorescent staining.
27  IL-15, as indicated by Western blotting and immunofluorescent staining.
28 ugated dextran, and (ii) AJC structure using immunofluorescent staining.
29 valuated using qRT-PCR, western blotting and immunofluorescent staining.
30 by quantitative PCR (qPCR), immunoblots, and immunofluorescent staining.
31 rn blot and of protein expression by IHC and immunofluorescent staining.
32 e, HBx-mSin3A colocalization was detected by immunofluorescent staining.
33  transplantation model by flow cytometry and immunofluorescent staining.
34 lular localization of FKBP10 was assessed by immunofluorescent stainings.
35 dispersed rat islet cells analyzed by double immunofluorescent staining, 90% of the insulin, 76% of t
36 nterferon-gamma (IFNgamma) were confirmed by immunofluorescent staining and affinity precipitation as
37 termined with protein gene product (PGP) 9.5 immunofluorescent staining and blinded and automated ima
38 ISC1, PCM1, and BBS proteins was assessed by immunofluorescent staining and coimmunoprecipitation.
39 iatric control subjects were used for double immunofluorescent staining and confocal image analysis.
40    PML/Nur77 colocalized in vivo in a double immunofluorescent staining and confocal microscopic anal
41 y epithelium of guinea pigs were examined by immunofluorescent staining and confocal microscopy in wh
42                                 We have used immunofluorescent staining and confocal microscopy to ex
43 s it in rat NTS by using multiple labels for immunofluorescent staining and confocal microscopy.
44 nd guinea pig OHCs was re-examined by use of immunofluorescent staining and confocal microscopy.
45 embrane protein Na/K-ATPase as determined by immunofluorescent staining and confocal microscopy.
46  identified by the fluorescence "halo" after immunofluorescent staining and could be retrieved by sit
47 r localization of proteins was determined by immunofluorescent staining and expression of cyclin-depe
48                                              Immunofluorescent staining and FACS analysis show that A
49                                              Immunofluorescent staining and flow cytometric analyses
50 CR-5 on their cell membranes, as analyzed by immunofluorescent staining and flow cytometric analyses.
51                                              Immunofluorescent staining and flow cytometric analysis
52 yzed these cells utilizing quantitative-PCR, immunofluorescent staining and flow cytometry analysis.
53 ce of these observations was demonstrated by immunofluorescent staining and flow cytometry of lymphoc
54                                  Competitive immunofluorescent staining and flow cytometry reveal tha
55 was also examined in a subset of patients by immunofluorescent staining and flow cytometry.
56 rculating human EPCs were characterized with immunofluorescent staining and flow cytometry.
57                         In the present work, immunofluorescent staining and green fluorescent protein
58                                 We also used immunofluorescent staining and histology coupled with el
59                                              Immunofluorescent staining and immunoprecipitation exper
60 tive for (18)F-FMPEP-d2, consistent with the immunofluorescent staining and in vitro results.
61                                              Immunofluorescent staining and laser scanning confocal m
62                                        Using immunofluorescent staining and live cell imaging of fluo
63                                              Immunofluorescent staining and microarray analyses sugge
64 n B-CLL clones and approaches involving both immunofluorescent staining and pharmacologic inhibitors,
65                                              Immunofluorescent staining and quantitative image analys
66 was studied in knockout mice by using double immunofluorescent staining and real-time polymerase chai
67 MMP14 (MT1-MMP)-haploinsufficient mice using immunofluorescent staining and scanning electron microsc
68 ed with activated microglia were examined by immunofluorescent staining and semiquantitative real-tim
69  levels were evaluated in human PAH lungs by immunofluorescent staining and single cell RNA sequencin
70 r the presence of EETs and S aureus by using immunofluorescent staining and the PNA-Fish assay, respe
71 ssive, confluent clusters as demonstrated by immunofluorescent staining and TissueFAXS quantitative i
72                                         Both immunofluorescent staining and western blot analysis cor
73  HCE cells and corneal epithelium of rats by immunofluorescent staining and Western blot analysis.
74 ings were corroborated by electrophysiology, immunofluorescent staining, and biotinylation of surface
75  cycle-regulatory proteins was determined by immunofluorescent staining, and expression of the protei
76 ed by using RT-PCR, ELISA, Western blotting, immunofluorescent staining, and flow cytometry.
77 ive polymerase chain reaction, dual-labeling immunofluorescent staining, and immunoassays.
78 n be applied to immunoblotting, cell surface immunofluorescent staining, and immunohistochemistry at
79 e real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), immunofluorescent staining, and in situ hybridization we
80                         Immunoprecipitation, immunofluorescent staining, and RT-PCR of human VSMCs sh
81 f RIP1 was monitored by reporter gene assay, immunofluorescent staining, and Western blotting.
82 nt of jagged-1 in tip cells was confirmed by immunofluorescent staining as well as by laser capture m
83 series of postmortem immunohistochemical and immunofluorescent stainings, as well as Western blot ana
84    By using Northern blot, Western blot, and immunofluorescent staining assays, we showed that Nur77
85                                  VE-cadherin immunofluorescent staining at endothelial AJs and AJ wid
86 ts such as ciliary ultrastructural analysis, immunofluorescent staining, ciliary beat assessment, and
87                                              Immunofluorescent staining confirmed expression of the f
88                                     In vitro immunofluorescent staining confirmed that hDPSCs express
89                                              Immunofluorescent staining confirmed that SFRP2 and FMO1
90                                              Immunofluorescent staining confirmed that TNF-alpha was
91  experiments, proximity ligation assays, and immunofluorescent staining confirmed the interaction bet
92                                              Immunofluorescent staining confirmed the presence of the
93                                              Immunofluorescent staining confirmed this region-specifi
94 safety of this treatment were examined using immunofluorescent staining, confocal imaging, immunoelec
95                              Flow cytometry, immunofluorescent staining, confocal microscopy, and ana
96                                              Immunofluorescent staining demonstrated a ring-like fluo
97                                              Immunofluorescent staining demonstrated junctional gap f
98                                              Immunofluorescent staining demonstrated microglia activa
99                                              Immunofluorescent staining demonstrated that administrat
100                                       Double immunofluorescent staining demonstrated that Ca(v) 3.3-l
101                      Both immunoblotting and immunofluorescent staining demonstrated that PKCepsilon,
102                Gene expression profiling and immunofluorescent staining demonstrated that the express
103                                              Immunofluorescent stainings demonstrated localization to
104                                              Immunofluorescent staining demonstrates failure of nucle
105 neighboring inducing cells, as determined by immunofluorescent staining, demonstrating that de novo v
106                                              Immunofluorescent staining detects overlapping expressio
107                                              Immunofluorescent staining determined that the distance
108                                 By combining immunofluorescent staining, fluorescence in situ hybridi
109 in, Tmod, and tropomyosin were determined by immunofluorescent staining followed by confocal microsco
110 ed expression of PAM-1 also caused decreased immunofluorescent staining for ACTH, a product of proopi
111                               The pattern of immunofluorescent staining for alpha-SMA and TNC at the
112 With affinity-purified reagents, we observed immunofluorescent staining for both AML1 and ETO in the
113 Infiltrates were confirmed histologically by immunofluorescent staining for CD3+ and CD11b+ cells.
114 ht microscopy, including immunohistochemical/immunofluorescent staining for CD31, CD105, and HMB45, a
115           Combined in situ hybridization and immunofluorescent staining for CUGBP1 and CUGBP2, the 2
116  confocal laser microscopic analyses of dual immunofluorescent staining for CYP1A1/1A2 and cytokerati
117                         Immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescent staining for CYP1A1/1A2 was detected w
118                                      Minimal immunofluorescent staining for D1B DA receptor proteins
119 this finding explains the unusual pattern of immunofluorescent staining for F.IX shown in these exper
120                                              Immunofluorescent staining for hexokinase I showed no di
121                                     Positive immunofluorescent staining for IL-1 alpha, mature IL-1 b
122                   This was done by combining immunofluorescent staining for MOR1 or DOR1 with that fo
123      The number of pericytes was measured by immunofluorescent staining for NG2 proteoglycan.
124 oupled recombinant gelonin (rGel), there was immunofluorescent staining for rGel within choroidal neo
125  and myofibroblasts, as determined by double-immunofluorescent staining for TF and cell type-specific
126                                       Double-immunofluorescent staining for TF and transforming growt
127 ivity was assessed in ATC patient tissues by immunofluorescent staining for the autophagy marker micr
128                                              Immunofluorescent staining for the corresponding vascula
129                                    Moreover, immunofluorescent staining for the lysosomal protease ca
130 ated by confocal microscopy of three-channel immunofluorescent staining for the proliferation marker
131                                      Ex vivo immunofluorescent staining for TSPO and CD68 (macrophage
132                        We therefore combined immunofluorescent staining for VR1 and NK1 to show that
133                Western blotting analysis and immunofluorescent staining further showed that only calc
134                      Sequential bindings and immunofluorescent staining further suggest that 1) TM5 b
135 e location, intensity, and rate of change of immunofluorescent staining, Hailey-Hailey and normal ker
136                                  By indirect immunofluorescent staining, hGH was detected on the surf
137                                              Immunofluorescent staining identified focal concentratio
138  processes that were prominent in subsequent immunofluorescent staining images but not with classical
139                                              Immunofluorescent staining, immunoblot, and Western blot
140 us and distinct from ND-10 as defined by PML immunofluorescent staining in CIN lesions, condylomata,
141 lization of IAIPs and HMGB1 were detected by immunofluorescent staining in control and rats immediate
142 T and B cells in the blood was determined by immunofluorescent staining in hosts bearing long-term (>
143 y Western blot and flow cytometry as well as immunofluorescent staining in primary sinus epithelial c
144                           Using double-label immunofluorescent staining in situ, we showed that infil
145           In this study, Xin was analyzed by immunofluorescent staining in skeletal muscle samples fr
146 polymerase chain reaction in total liver and immunofluorescent staining in tissues for synaptophysin
147                                              Immunofluorescent staining indicated that C6ORF32 locali
148                                     However, immunofluorescent staining indicated that FIP200 was pre
149                                              Immunofluorescent staining indicated that insulin pretre
150                                       Double-immunofluorescent staining indicated that the majority o
151 ns could be simultaneously isolated and, via immunofluorescent staining, individually identified and
152                                              Immunofluorescent staining is an informative tool that i
153 ent of the transporter protein occurs; (iii) immunofluorescent staining of 24-h fed and starved cells
154                                              Immunofluorescent staining of A549 cells showed a fibril
155                                              Immunofluorescent staining of adherens junctions confirm
156                                              Immunofluorescent staining of alpha-actin revealed that
157     Endothelial cell culture and preliminary immunofluorescent staining of Anaplasma-infected tissues
158        Furthermore, confocal microscopy with immunofluorescent staining of articular chondrocytes con
159                                              Immunofluorescent staining of bacterium-infected calvari
160                                              Immunofluorescent staining of BCCV-infected cells reveal
161                                              Immunofluorescent staining of both whole bladder tissue
162                                              Immunofluorescent staining of BRCA1 and gamma-H2AX indic
163                                              Immunofluorescent staining of C/EBPbeta revealed that A-
164                          TER measurement and immunofluorescent staining of cadherins after a calcium
165                                              Immunofluorescent staining of cells with PINCH-2-specifi
166  fractions of chicken embryo heart cells and immunofluorescent staining of chicken embryo cardiocytes
167                                              Immunofluorescent staining of chicken osteoclasts confir
168                                              Immunofluorescent staining of collagen IV and laminin an
169                                              Immunofluorescent staining of corneal tissue in vivo dem
170  cell and TM cell markers were identified by immunofluorescent staining of cryosections or tissue who
171                                              Immunofluorescent staining of cultured hippocampal neuro
172 a possible defect in the centromeric region, immunofluorescent staining of cyclin A1 protein shows lo
173 smission electron microscopy of sections and immunofluorescent staining of cytoskeletal proteins in w
174 he affinity-purified antibodies were used in immunofluorescent staining of developing limbs and matri
175                                              Immunofluorescent staining of E-cadherin and EdU reveale
176 rmed on tissue sections with the use of dual immunofluorescent staining of endothelium and the fluore
177 re authenticated by CD31 immunoblotting, and immunofluorescent staining of established EC markers VE-
178              Consistent with these findings, immunofluorescent staining of fast but not slow muscle m
179                                       Triple immunofluorescent staining of fetal and adult pancreases
180                                              Immunofluorescent staining of G-kinase was predominantly
181        However, in the Ts65Dn mouse a strong immunofluorescent staining of GIRK2 was detected in the
182 mission electron microscopy of glomeruli and immunofluorescent staining of glomerular epithelial cell
183                                              Immunofluorescent staining of HeLa and L929 cells using
184  located in mitochondria as evidenced by the immunofluorescent staining of HepG2 cells with specific
185                                              Immunofluorescent staining of HUVEC colocalized ICE expr
186                                              Immunofluorescent staining of in vitro-cultivated or hos
187                                              Immunofluorescent staining of islet isografts infected w
188 nd characteristic birefringent "needles." By immunofluorescent staining of known myofibril components
189                                    Live cell immunofluorescent staining of L1 demonstrated that most
190  by replacing ClO(-) with SP in vivo, and by immunofluorescent staining of large airways of exposed m
191                                              Immunofluorescent staining of lumbar DRG demonstrated th
192                                              Immunofluorescent staining of markers for activated endo
193        Biochemical fractionation studies and immunofluorescent staining of murine brain slices reveal
194  presence of RuV in skin specimens using RuV immunofluorescent staining of paraffin-embedded tissue s
195                                Histology and immunofluorescent staining of PKC and epidermal growth f
196                                     Indirect immunofluorescent staining of purified P. carinii organi
197                                              Immunofluorescent staining of rat sciatic nerve showed t
198                                     Indirect immunofluorescent staining of SCC cryosections and Weste
199                                              Immunofluorescent staining of T84 cells demonstrated the
200                                              Immunofluorescent staining of TCR-transduced cells with
201                                     By using immunofluorescent staining of the c-Fos-positive neurons
202                                              Immunofluorescent staining of the cells with beta-tubuli
203 ocal microscopy provided cross validation by immunofluorescent staining of the compartments.
204                                              Immunofluorescent staining of the junctional proteins VE
205                                              Immunofluorescent staining of the microtubule network re
206                                              Immunofluorescent staining of the T-cell line with the p
207                                              Immunofluorescent staining of the tissue sections reveal
208                                              Immunofluorescent staining of the WT1 protein in 3T3 and
209                                              Immunofluorescent staining of thin sections of b/b and +
210                                              Immunofluorescent staining of tumour sections from human
211                                     Notably, immunofluorescent staining of viral proteins revealed an
212                                              Immunofluorescent staining on testis sections with the m
213 oma, we performed in situ hybridizations and immunofluorescent stainings on human immunodeficiency vi
214 aracterized by hyperphosphorylated tau (AT8; immunofluorescent staining) pathological inclusions, neu
215                                 Although the immunofluorescent staining pattern of several Golgi prot
216  cofractionates with yeast NPCs and gives an immunofluorescent staining pattern typical of nucleopori
217      Both antisera gave the same distinctive immunofluorescent staining pattern, with unstained heter
218                                          The immunofluorescent staining patterns produced by each ant
219                                              Immunofluorescent staining patterns were also consistent
220                     Mitogenic activation and immunofluorescent staining performed inside the microflu
221    This was addressed by immunohistochemical/immunofluorescent stainings performed on grafted tissue
222                                              Immunofluorescent staining produced by incubation with t
223 ated single chromatids, their morphology and immunofluorescent staining properties were strikingly si
224 elated well with the quantified results from immunofluorescent staining (r = 0.98).
225 g qRT-PCR, immunoprecipitation/Western blot, immunofluorescent staining, radio-thin-layer chromatogra
226                                 When used in immunofluorescent staining reactions using GVL peptide-l
227 oscopy and in intestinal epithelial cells by immunofluorescent staining, respectively.
228 tabase including the addition of subcellular immunofluorescent staining results from the Human Protei
229 of MALDI-IMS data with subsequently acquired immunofluorescent staining results.
230                                       Double immunofluorescent staining revealed a co-expression of W
231                                Surprisingly, immunofluorescent staining revealed a cytoplasmic misloc
232                                              Immunofluorescent staining revealed a dynamic ECM remode
233                                     However, immunofluorescent staining revealed an increased frequen
234                                              Immunofluorescent staining revealed constitutive and ind
235                                              Immunofluorescent staining revealed impairment of photor
236                                              Immunofluorescent staining revealed localization of the
237                                              Immunofluorescent staining revealed low levels of cortac
238                    Western blot analysis and immunofluorescent staining revealed mitochondrial p53 tr
239                                              Immunofluorescent staining revealed reduced surface expr
240                                              Immunofluorescent staining revealed that CGRP-Rs are abu
241                                              Immunofluorescent staining revealed that in the LA, type
242   In the bone marrow transplant mice, double immunofluorescent staining revealed that the combination
243                                              Immunofluorescent staining revealed that the cTaxREB107
244 alian cells with mNAT1 and mARD1 followed by immunofluorescent staining revealed that these proteins
245                                              Immunofluorescent staining revealed the presence of STAT
246               Additional localization, using immunofluorescent staining, revealed clustering in apica
247                                              Immunofluorescent staining reveals striking juxtanuclear
248                      Immunohistochemical and immunofluorescent staining show that ODN treatment drama
249 ampal degeneration in C57BL/6 mice, in which immunofluorescent staining showed a 28% loss of PSD95-po
250                                              Immunofluorescent staining showed a significant reductio
251                                       Double immunofluorescent staining showed aberrant co-localizati
252                          In addition, double immunofluorescent staining showed co-localization of end
253                                      H&E and immunofluorescent staining showed fewer germ cells in se
254                                              Immunofluorescent staining showed higher numbers of CD31
255                                              Immunofluorescent staining showed nuclear localization i
256                                              Immunofluorescent staining showed redistribution of alph
257 l populations in lung tissue cryosections by immunofluorescent staining showed sparse bacteria within
258                                  Analysis by immunofluorescent staining showed that MAGP-2 overexpres
259                                              Immunofluorescent staining showed that Panx1 expression
260            Laser capture microdissection and immunofluorescent staining showed that pronounced IL-4 m
261                                              Immunofluorescent staining showed that purinergic recept
262                                              Immunofluorescent staining showed that the collapse of t
263                         Pull-down assays and immunofluorescent staining showed that the major alpha4(
264                                              Immunofluorescent staining showed that wild type TBX5 wa
265                                              Immunofluorescent staining showed that ~50% of endocytos
266                                              Immunofluorescent staining showed the presence of pneumo
267           Combined in situ hybridization and immunofluorescent staining shows that Cblns 1, 2, and 4
268                        We have now performed immunofluorescent-staining studies with four polyclonal
269 ental profiles using electron microscopy and immunofluorescent staining suggest that cell fusions are
270                                              Immunofluorescent staining suggested colocalization of M
271  protein in cells by immunohistochemical and immunofluorescent staining techniques and examined coloc
272 olocalization of endogenous Irgm1, using two immunofluorescent staining techniques, either in fibrobl
273 o only 24 (23.3%) by traditional culture and immunofluorescent-staining techniques.
274                                     Based on immunofluorescent staining, the co-localization of PRC1
275  B and the annexin II tetramer were shown by immunofluorescent staining to colocalize on the surface
276                        Additionally, we used immunofluorescent staining to demonstrate the presence o
277  methods may require the presence of 50,000 (immunofluorescent staining) to 500,000 (AF) oocysts per
278              This expression was verified by immunofluorescent staining using an Ab against axolotl C
279                                              Immunofluorescent staining using anti-EGFR and GFP-ACK1
280 terograde tracing combined with triple label immunofluorescent staining was conducted to examine the
281                                       Direct immunofluorescent staining was done in 200 muL whole-blo
282              Up to now, use of automation in immunofluorescent staining was mostly limited to one mar
283                                         ET-1 immunofluorescent staining was punctate and distinct fro
284                                              Immunofluorescent staining was used to examine junctiona
285                                              Immunofluorescent staining was used to investigate TNF r
286                 Using Western blot, IHC, and immunofluorescent staining, we show persistent factor IX
287 nfocal microscopy (LSCM) in combination with immunofluorescent staining, we simultaneously measured i
288 hanges in MMP protein expression detected by immunofluorescent staining were similar to changes in ge
289                 Real-time RT-PCR, ELISA, and immunofluorescent staining were used to assess the effec
290                              Immunoblots and immunofluorescent staining were used to determine the le
291                                              Immunofluorescent staining with a monoclonal antibody ag
292                                              Immunofluorescent staining with a polyclonal rabbit anti
293                                              Immunofluorescent staining with a specific antibody agai
294                                              Immunofluorescent staining with antibodies to E-cadherin
295 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or immunofluorescent staining with confocal laser scanning
296         Using functional assays and specific immunofluorescent staining with multivalent, labeled H-2
297 reen fluorescent protein-tagged proteins and immunofluorescent staining with specific anti-peptide an
298                                              Immunofluorescent staining with specific antibodies immu
299 e sympathetic ganglion neurons by RT-PCR and immunofluorescent staining, with expression occurring be
300 sectioning followed by standard histology or immunofluorescent staining without loss of fluorescence

 
Page Top