ライフサイエンスコーパス: immunoprecipitation experiment

1 se PTMs were also confirmed using orthogonal immunoprecipitation experiments.

2 say, surface plasmon resonance analysis, and immunoprecipitation experiments.

3 et of class II TGAs as revealed by chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments.

4 e shown by immunofluorescence microscopy and immunoprecipitation experiments.

5 dogenous rRNA genes as revealed by chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments.

6 q, as assessed by ELISA, flow cytometry, and immunoprecipitation experiments.

7 ZnT-2 due to homodimerization observed upon immunoprecipitation experiments.

8 teract with UL52 primase as determined by co-immunoprecipitation experiments.

9 inding motifs from high-throughput chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments.

10 ncreased after wounding, as determined by co-immunoprecipitation experiments.

11 ng FcgammaR-mediated phagocytosis as seen by immunoprecipitation experiments.

12 antitative and nonquantitative pull-down and immunoprecipitation experiments.

13 validated and mapped this interaction by co-immunoprecipitation experiments.

14 by glutathione S-transferase pulldown and co-immunoprecipitation experiments.

15 on rate (58%) comparable with that of direct immunoprecipitation experiments.

16 confirmed using Western blot analysis and co-immunoprecipitation experiments.

17 9cre1 interactions are verified in chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments.

18 nteraction between Pes1 and Mtap1b-LC1 by co-immunoprecipitation experiments.

19 rformed co-immunoprecipitation and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments.

20 cytoskeleton organization and binds actin in immunoprecipitation experiments.

21 immunoblots, subcellular fractionation, and immunoprecipitation experiments.

22 luciferase assays and Chromatin crosslinking ImmunoPrecipitation experiments.

23 targets of P1, as demonstrated by chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments.

24 ed in the nucleus and were found together in immunoprecipitation experiments.

25 brain tissues was disrupted, as confirmed by immunoprecipitation experiments.

26 associates with both CaV3.1 and CaV3.2 in co-immunoprecipitation experiments.

27 re sophisticated version for ChIP (Chromatin immunoprecipitation) experiments.

28 Further, by co-immunoprecipitation experiments, a heterocomplex between

29 Immunoprecipitation experiments also showed that the SIM

30 In co-immunoprecipitation experiments, an anti-apoE antibody p

31 Using co-immunoprecipitation experiments and an in situ proximity

32 Performing co-immunoprecipitation experiments and assessing physical i

33 ith CRM1 is RanGTP-dependent, as shown in co-immunoprecipitation experiments and binding assays.

34 several Frizzled receptors was confirmed by immunoprecipitation experiments and by binding of myocil

35 We performed co-immunoprecipitation experiments and found a lower amount

36 ughput genomic analyses, including chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments and genome-wide associat

37 Immunoprecipitation experiments and glutathione S-transf

38 Electromobility shift assays, chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments and mutational studies c

39 oltage-gated sodium channels was shown by co-immunoprecipitation experiments and Na(+) current record

40 Immunoprecipitation experiments and overexpression of WT

41 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments and real-time monitoring

42 Immunoprecipitation experiments and reciprocal Western b

43 hione S-transferase-LAR pull-down and IGF-1R immunoprecipitation experiments and recombinant LAR deph

44 T-type channels associate with CaM using co-immunoprecipitation experiments and single particle cryo

45 Here we show, by co-immunoprecipitation experiments and yeast two-hybrid ana

46 DAPK-1 and PTRN-1 physically interact in co-immunoprecipitation experiments, and DAPK-1 itself under

47 Genome-wide expression analysis, chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments, and DNA methylation ana

48 ophoretic mobility shift analysis, chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments, and RNA interference ex

49 In protein pulldown and immunoprecipitation experiments, binding of RhoA and PKG

50 and, as revealed by mass spectrometry and co-immunoprecipitation experiments, binds to Cheerio, and t

51 at arrested replication forks, we performed immunoprecipitation experiments combined with mass spect

52 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments combined with transcript

53 Results from co-immunoprecipitation experiments confirm a physical assoc

54 Furthermore, chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed in vivo occupa

55 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed PARP-1 recruit

56 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed physical inter

57 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed that Homer1 as

58 Pull-down and co-immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed that MMRN2 bin

59 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed the binding of

60 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed the co-localiz

61 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed the interactio

62 Immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed the physical a

63 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed the presence o

64 A co-immunoprecipitation experiment confirms this finding and

65 Using chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments coupled with massively p

66 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrate a reduction

67 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrate that arresti

68 Immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrate that BRG1 bi

69 Immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrate that H1 is t

70 lyses, analytical ultracentrifugation and co-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrate that Mga for

71 Consistently, immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrate that Mus81-M

72 Immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrate that Nuf and

73 Immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrate that the two

74 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrate that whereas

75 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated a physical

76 Immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated an interact

77 Immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated HGF-mediate

78 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated interaction

79 Oligo pull down and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that beta-c

80 Immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that both n

81 Silencing and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that cAMP r

82 Chromatin and methylated DNA immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that CSC-me

83 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that Cx43-b

84 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that damagi

85 Rather, co-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that dopami

86 In agreement, co-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that FOXM1

87 RNA-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that HGF st

88 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that HNF4al

89 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that Irr oc

90 Transcriptional analysis and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that PsmB6

91 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that the pr

92 recovery after photobleaching and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated the Nurr1-m

93 Sequential chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated the occurre

94 d p38 MAPK activation, which is in line with immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrating the intera

95 ynaptophysin, a synaptic vesicle marker, but immunoprecipitation experiments did not detect direct as

96 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments did not show that PR bin

97 Integration of omics data and RNA immunoprecipitation experiments established DGCR8 as a d

98 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments established that NHERF-1

99 Results from chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments find that rad52-R70A ass

100 RNA immunoprecipitation experiments followed by next-generat

101 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments followed by sequencing (

102 zed publicly available genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments for 27 TFs in Arabidopsi

103 reds of annotated conditions, from chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments for tens of different DN

104 inding of hsc70 to the SRY.CaM complex, with immunoprecipitation experiments from cell extracts showi

105 This is validated by co-immunoprecipitation experiments from cells expressing th

106 sothermal titration calorimetry in vitro and immunoprecipitation experiments from cells.

107 GE fluorography showed labeling of GLP-1R in immunoprecipitation experiments from GLP-1R-expressing c

108 The results obtained from our immunoprecipitation experiment further demonstrated that

109 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments further demonstrated tha

110 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments further reveal that, in

111 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments further revealed that bo

112 PLAs and immunoprecipitation experiments further revealed that sy

113 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments further showed that Nrf2

114 Cross-linking and immunoprecipitation experiments further suggested that R

115 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments further supported a role

116 However, whereas chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments have demonstrated p107 a

117 Separately, systematic chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments have enabled the assembl

118 Immunoprecipitation experiments have revealed that Loc1p

119 In sharp contrast with previous reports, immunoprecipitation experiments here demonstrate that co

120 RNA-sequencing and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments identified several tumor

121 Pulldown and co-immunoprecipitation experiments identified the ArfGAP wi

122 tion factor-DNA-binding arrays and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments identified the formation

123 Cross-linking immunoprecipitation experiments identified the locus as

124 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments in bone marrow macrophag

125 and frataxin and GRP75 were confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation experiments in both directions.

126 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments in conditionally immorta

127 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments in extracts from cells t

128 Transient transfection and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments in HCT116 cells were use

129 (4) Co-immunoprecipitation experiments in HEK-293 confirm that

130 KIIalpha-DAT interaction was supported by co-immunoprecipitation experiments in heterologous cells.

131 bcellular localization, fractionation and co-immunoprecipitation experiments in hiPSC-RPE and human p

132 performing size exclusion chromatography and immunoprecipitation experiments in human cell lines and

133 GST pulldown and, for native proteins, by co-immunoprecipitation experiments in prostate cancer cells

134 Cell adhesion assay and co-immunoprecipitation experiments in wild-type and TACE kn

135 Consistent with this, co-immunoprecipitation experiments indicate direct interact

136 Also, immunoprecipitation experiments indicate specific intera

137 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicate that AGL15 bind

138 r co-localization of L1-ORF1p and A3C and co-immunoprecipitation experiments indicate that an RNA-dep

139 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicate that FOXP3 comp

140 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicate that Nkx2.2 and

141 Biochemical analysis and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicate that Rph1 funct

142 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicate that these poly

143 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments indicate that these two

144 Immunoprecipitation experiments indicated an interaction

145 Immunoprecipitation experiments indicated protein-protei

146 r fluorescence complementation (BiFC) and co-immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that CERK1 phy

147 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that nerve gro

148 veratrol did not change KSRP expression, but immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that resveratr

149 Pulse-chase immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that S227P mut

150 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that Sp1 physi

151 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that Ssa1p was

152 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that the lower

153 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that TMC6 and

154 Immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that UTP cause

155 aining receptors, a possibility supported by immunoprecipitation experiments indicating that most AMP

156 We present evidence from reciprocal immunoprecipitation experiments indicating that NCBP1 an

157 Immunoprecipitation experiments (IPs) carried out with w

158 In cell transfection and immunoprecipitation experiments, mouse alpha4(VI)N6-C2 c

159 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments not only demonstrated th

160 on between CAR and ERK1/2 was examined by co-immunoprecipitation experiments of ectopically expressed

161 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments of TcUBP1-containing rib

162 This was confirmed with chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments of the human c-Met promo

163 onents functionally co-operate and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments on mutant animals demons

164 The histone chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments on several other genes s

165 Immunoprecipitation experiments performed in transfected

166 In co-immunoprecipitation experiments performed on H2O2-treate

167 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments performed using cultured

168 In co-immunoprecipitation experiments, PGRN interacts predomin

169 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments provide evidence that PK

170 Immunoprecipitation experiments, proximity ligation assa

171 FLAG-immunoprecipitation experiments retrieve a ferrochelatas

172 o activate the Nodal response pathway and co-immunoprecipitation experiments reveal differential rela

173 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments reveal endogenous PITX2

174 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments reveal increased binding

175 Consistent with this observation, chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments reveal increased MDC1 pr

176 Finally, immunoprecipitation experiments reveal that 1G2 can bind

177 Fluorescence microscopy and immunoprecipitation experiments reveal that both PHD fin

178 Microarray analysis and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments reveal that DBC1 inhibit

179 Forster resonance energy transfer and co-immunoprecipitation experiments reveal that each of the

180 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments reveal that LNCaP cells

181 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments reveal that mutation of

182 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments reveal that SpoIIQ resid

183 UV cross-linking and immunoprecipitation experiments revealed 2 ARE-binding p

184 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed a physical inte

185 To map Coy1 protein interactions, co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed an association

186 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed an interaction

187 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed binding of Bag1

188 Furthermore, chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed higher binding

189 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that a wide reg

190 In vitro and in vivo immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that ATBF1 inte

191 Reciprocal immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that CerS1, Cer

192 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that endogenous

193 Additional co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that FGF13 pote

194 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that full-lengt

195 Surprisingly, immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that FX and PTX

196 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that Hetalpha1K

197 Moreover, co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that insulin st

198 DNA affinity precipitation and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that insulin, C

199 Transcriptional analysis and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that Mesp1 and

200 Immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that MUC1-CT an

201 Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing and immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that NANOG boun

202 nstructs, as well as gel-shift and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that NY-ESO-1 p

203 Two-way immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that ORF34 phys

204 Immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that PGANT3 gly

205 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that PHF1 resid

206 pidly reverses this silencing, and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that reactivati

207 urface plasmon resonance measurements and co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that recombinan

208 phoretic mobility shift assays and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that SND1 binds

209 Immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that Spry1 expr

210 Finally, chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that T-bet can

211 Two-way immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that the membra

212 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that the NuRD c

213 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that the Ssu72

214 oth phosphorylated by LAIR-1 activation, and immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that Tyr-251 in

215 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that XBP-1(S) b

216 Fluorescence complementation and immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that XIAP inter

217 Quantitative chromatin-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that yKu70 bind

218 Immunoprecipitation experiments revealed the formation o

219 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed the presence of

220 sions in gene-deletion mutants and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments, revealing a more comple

221 Finally, in co-immunoprecipitation experiments, SGK1 interacted selecti

222 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments show direct evidence of

223 Here, chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments show that activation is

224 Immunoprecipitation experiments show that condensin D in

225 Immunoprecipitation experiments show that eIF4A2 does no

226 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments show that eliminating Rp

227 lpha (Hif1a)-dependent manner, and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments show that Hif1a bound to

228 Finally, chromatin-immunoprecipitation experiments show that in an H3-L61W

229 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments show that MCM2 binds to

230 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments show that MISO and 20E i

231 Full-genome chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments show that Mit1 binds to

232 Immunoprecipitation experiments show that ORC disassembl

233 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments show that Runx3 and Ets1

234 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments show that wild-type meck

235 Moreover, co-immunoprecipitation experiments show that Yb forms a com

236 Furthermore, co-immunoprecipitation experiment showed that AICAR suppres

237 be highly dependent on c-Myc, and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments showed differential occu

238 Pull-down and co-immunoprecipitation experiments showed that Barr1 can di

239 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments showed that betaine regu

240 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments showed that CRMP2 associ

241 Moreover, co-immunoprecipitation experiments showed that Galectin-1 i

242 Finally, our chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments showed that GI binds to

243 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments showed that glucose incr

244 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments showed that Hap1 binds t

245 Chromatin-immunoprecipitation experiments showed that HES1 and NR3

246 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments showed that IE62 stimula

247 Furthermore, co-immunoprecipitation experiments showed that Ihh binds to

248 Cross-linking and immunoprecipitation experiments showed that Irr occupies

249 Whole-cell cross-linking and immunoprecipitation experiments showed that Irr occupies

250 Immunoprecipitation experiments showed that J20 and DXS

251 Immunoprecipitation experiments showed that NET forms st

252 on, gel mobility shift assays, and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments showed that PGE(2) induc

253 transcription levels of DWF4, and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments showed that TCP1 indeed

254 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments showed that the abundanc

255 ansiently expressed in HEK293T cells, and co-immunoprecipitation experiments showed that the delta-op

256 Proteomics studies and immunoprecipitation experiments showed that the ribonucl

257 Immunoprecipitation experiments showed that YY1 and PLZF

258 In all brain regions, co-immunoprecipitation experiments showed that ~90% of GluA

259 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments showed the association o

260 The immunoprecipitation experiments showed the direct intera

261 reducing- and nonreducing conditions and co-immunoprecipitation experiments showed the presence of R

262 Transient transfection and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments suggest that PARP-1 play

263 Data from immunoprecipitation experiments suggest that the ETEC fa

264 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments suggest that the regulat

265 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments suggest that these regul

266 Immunoprecipitation experiments suggested an interaction

267 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments suggested Notch-1 direct

268 Immunoprecipitation experiments suggested oligomerizatio

269 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments suggested physical inter

270 Furthermore, co-immunoprecipitation experiments suggested reduced alphaI

271 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments suggested that these ubi

272 luorescence complementation and pull-down/co-immunoprecipitation experiments supported a hypothesis o

273 tructs and truncated p75(NTR) variants by co-immunoprecipitation experiments, surface plasmon resonan

274 Here we show by chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments that in vivo BPCs also b

275 Moreover, we show by co-immunoprecipitation experiments that LFG interacts with

276 d with 2xhemagglutinin allowed us to perform immunoprecipitation experiments that showed that MceA fo

277 nalyses, genetic interventions and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments that Stat1 directly coup

278 g or mutating these domains and performed co-immunoprecipitation experiments to analyze the interacti

279 th silencing complexes as demonstrated by co-immunoprecipitation experiments using an AGO1-specific a

280 Immunoprecipitation experiments using anti-puromycin ant

281 Sedimentation and immunoprecipitation experiments using cell extracts reve

282 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments using cells transfected

283 Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments using latently infected

284 Based on chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments using validated antibodi

285 Co-immunoprecipitation experiments verified that PKCalpha a

286 By co-immunoprecipitation experiments we found that PC1 trunca

287 From GST-pull-downs and co-immunoprecipitation experiments we show that Wt1a, Foxc1

288 In chromatin immunoprecipitation and co-immunoprecipitation experiments, we further demonstrate

289 Using chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments, we show that in embryon

290 By immunoprecipitation experiments, we show that LMP1 inter

291 In addition, by chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments, we show that Nrf2 is a

292 oretic mobility shift analysis and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments, we show that the hetero

293 protein interaction assays in yeast, and co-immunoprecipitation experiments were used to establish t

294 This was supported by co-immunoprecipitation experiments, where membrane-bound di

295 e comparison of RISC proteins inhibition and immunoprecipitation experiments, will be available for t

296 or the autoinhibition model, we performed co-immunoprecipitation experiments with combinations of ART

297 Immunoprecipitation experiments with lysates of HSV-infe

298 IP-exo protocol called ChIP-nexus (chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments with nucleotide resoluti

299 We used immunoblotting and immunoprecipitation experiments with serum from CUS pati

300 content of deep-sequenced RNA extracted from immunoprecipitation experiments with the Ago1 and Ago2 p