戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 acteristics (eg, rate dependence, stability, imprecision).
2 n therapy, however, certainty was limited by imprecision.
3 g and is not simply the result of biological imprecision.
4 stimate of the level of relevant irreducible imprecision.
5 (SIL) internal standard was used to minimize imprecision.
6 n this generic sense while acknowledging our imprecision.
7 estimates for attenuation due to measurement imprecision.
8 ficient adjusted for attenuation due to test imprecision.
9 , bearing in mind the calculation's inherent imprecision.
10  were heterogeneous response definitions and imprecision.
11 s regarding risk of bias, heterogeneity, and imprecision.
12 isk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, or imprecision.
13 h as diagnostic codes risks under-coding and imprecision.
14 , although this result had a large degree of imprecision.
15 ved absolute resting perfusion but with wide imprecision.
16 inally indicating a serious risk of bias and imprecision.
17  evidence in these comparisons is limited by imprecision.
18 dary outcomes, with downgrades due mainly to imprecision.
19 xible estimator, as indicated by the greater imprecision.
20 very low quality because of risk of bias and imprecision.
21 eneity, publication bias, inconsistency, and imprecision.
22 ere was low certainty of the evidence due to imprecision.
23 0.84, 95% CI: 0.50-1.39), limited by serious imprecision.
24 out rating down certainty of evidence due to imprecision.
25 ial autocorrelation accelerating the rise in imprecision.
26  is very low due to serious risk of bias and imprecision.
27 arch is needed to clarify the source of this imprecision.
28 plained by task heterogeneity and conceptual imprecision.
29 k meta-analyses have a substantial degree of imprecision.
30 hod related to increases in relative bias or imprecision.
31 ovascular hemodynamics in TM and measurement imprecision.
32 rm 'allergy' has significantly increased its imprecision.
33 rding to its risk of bias, inconsistency and imprecision.
34 re-treatment can enhance recovery and reduce imprecision.
35 t-hoc data sampling may be a factor reducing imprecision.
36       But what determines the degree of such imprecision?
37 er-assay accuracy (97.3-103.4%) and very low imprecision [0.5-3.6% (RSD)].
38 OVID-19 and sparsity of data; some is due to imprecision about what it means for HIV to be a "risk fa
39                                          The imprecision also was significantly higher for RTVue meas
40 MS data, data set inflation and quantitative imprecision among related features is problematic for st
41 ed retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) bias and imprecision among three spectral-domain optical coherenc
42 although evidence was limited by substantial imprecision and a duration of follow-up likely insuffici
43 d internal standard mass fractions mitigates imprecision and bias that can be caused by even subtle n
44 ument experimentally even in the presence of imprecision and errors.
45                                 The relative imprecision and inaccuracy of available tests limit the
46 humidity control (THC) systems, resulting in imprecision and inconvenience.
47 The certainty of evidence was downgraded for imprecision and indirectness, reflecting rare events and
48 pensity is not directly secondary to sensory imprecision and is instead more consistent with a primar
49 ver, a difference cannot be ruled out due to imprecision and lack of available data.
50  of cerebellar ataxia, contributing to motor imprecision and motor rhythm loss, two defining features
51 etic heterogeneity, combined with phenotypic imprecision and poor marker coverage, has contributed to
52 ied from very low to high and was limited by imprecision and study limitations.
53 ing existing approaches due to inefficiency, imprecision and subcellular compartmentalization.
54  control modulations that addressed stimulus imprecision and the possibility of stimulation of cones
55                           The source of this imprecision and their implications for the use of Raman
56                                     Temporal imprecision and unaddressed confounding limit inferences
57 , which was generally low to moderate due to imprecision and within-study bias, and statistical incon
58 he arguments from congruency, confounds, and imprecision - and show that none succeed.
59 s (14-20 percentage points with 5% benchmark imprecision) and Census Household Pulse by 14 (11-17 per
60 ions were compared according to median bias, imprecision, and accuracy within 30% (P30) and 20% (P20)
61 idence is very low due to high risk of bias, imprecision, and inconsistency.
62                             However, because imprecision around the findings in the modified intentio
63 the average mass are potentially affected by imprecisions associated with the average mass.
64                Misclassification from method imprecision attenuated associations with creatinine clea
65 e we show a displacement measurement with an imprecision below the standard quantum limit scale.
66                              We achieve this imprecision by measuring the motion of a nanomechanical
67       Working memory is imprecise, and these imprecisions can be explained by the combined influences
68  for the optimal and noise cases, 12 for the imprecision case, and 60 for the imprecision with noise
69                                   Still, the imprecision caused by unavoidable measurement errors is
70 4 (11-17 percentage points with 5% benchmark imprecision), compared to a retroactively updated benchm
71 eptibility to severe malaria, but phenotypic imprecision compromises discovered associations.
72 a-assay imprecision was < 5% and inter-assay imprecision CV was < 10% for high (942 pg/mL) and low (3
73                                    The total imprecision (% CV) was below 13% for both QCs and native
74                   Accuracy (%bias) and total imprecision (%CV) were within preset acceptance criteria
75       However, a major impediment to gNBS is imprecision due to variants classified as pathogenic (P)
76 stment at the plate level was used to reduce imprecision estimates and increase the number of usable
77  What is the biological explanation for the "imprecision?" First, Precision Oncology relies on indisc
78 ere was low certainty of the evidence due to imprecision for both outcomes.
79  Development, and Evaluations assessments of imprecision for both outcomes.
80 vices offer, these findings suggest that the imprecision for measurement of neonatal bilirubin needs
81 fidence in estimates were decreased owing to imprecision for most outcomes (particularly myocardial i
82 graded by 2 levels for high risk of bias and imprecision for physical function and very serious impre
83 ision for physical function and very serious imprecision for self-reported physical function.
84 rbed by its environment and when measurement imprecision from photon shot noise is balanced against d
85 id may confer some benefit in acute EKC, but imprecision from small sample sizes, the potential risk
86                                        RTVue imprecision (healthy eyes 7.83, 95% CI 6.43-9.58; glauco
87                                In evaluating imprecision, heterogeneity, and incoherence, we consider
88 eled clinical conditions by adding noise and imprecision, i.e. phenotypic terms unrelated to the dise
89                     Users then rate down for imprecision if the 95% confidence interval crosses the M
90 r each band are identical within measurement imprecision in all three SRMs; only minor differences ar
91                                              Imprecision in both the m/z and charge measurements cont
92                               The widespread imprecision in BS recognition induced by K700E with limi
93 ys are challenging because of inaccuracy and imprecision in common field-friendly assessment methods.
94                         Delays and potential imprecision in cross-brain conduction times are especial
95 from the sequential paradigm determined that imprecision in decoding information and swap error (mist
96 ck of information about gaps in care and the imprecision in epilepsy diagnosis coding.
97                They could also be limited by imprecision in estimating the direction of individual el
98 iority margin is used and may be affected by imprecision in event rate estimation.
99 roduce false positives (erroneous calls) and imprecision in mapping.
100 ly incomplete coverage in HELP, and location imprecision in McrBC.
101 idemiologic descriptors are first, to lessen imprecision in measuring exposures, and second, to adjus
102 hat the prototype effect is compensatory for imprecision in memory.
103 t perform when summation is difficult due to imprecision in neural circuits or is suboptimal due to u
104 and CD4+ T cell count may indicate continued imprecision in neurosyphilis diagnostic criteria due to
105 nd CD4+ T cell counts may indicate continued imprecision in neurosyphilis diagnostic criteria, due to
106                Finally, we found evidence of imprecision in ORN-->PN connections that can diminish ne
107  low number of events, which may have caused imprecision in our estimates.
108                                         Mean imprecision in predicting the end of the operative day w
109                 The primary endpoint was the imprecision in prediction of the end of the operative da
110 been quantified for many northern peatlands, imprecision in process-based approaches to predicting CH
111 re, we should expect a degree of irreducible imprecision in quantitative correspondences with nature,
112 ysfunction as an origin for auditory sensory imprecision in schizophrenia.
113 or estimators suffer to differing degrees of imprecision in small-sample settings, it is important to
114                                      Despite imprecision in some of the site-specific estimates, clea
115 edforward and feedback neuronal filters, the imprecision in spike generation under constant stimulati
116                                     However, imprecision in study results precludes a definitive conc
117   Here we evaluate sources of inaccuracy and imprecision in study-level and cross-study estimates of
118 has been suggested that there is irreducible imprecision in such climate models that manifests itself
119 nt scoring threshold, and discuss sources of imprecision in the computation of alignment scores and m
120 interpretation of the findings is limited by imprecision in the effect estimate, which does not exclu
121  tumor specimen histopathology status due to imprecision in the effect size estimates.
122                                          The imprecision in the estimate prevents making a definitive
123 usted for regression dilution to account for imprecision in the estimation of albuminuria at the part
124 ias stemming from unmeasured confounding and imprecision in the estimation of diagnosis.
125                                              Imprecision in the FC resulted in diagnostic discordance
126 ralized lowered junctional myosin and led to imprecision in the integration of emerging NSCs into the
127                       This has produced some imprecision in the literature on what is meant by the te
128             In addition, a certain degree of imprecision in the localization of postsynaptic GABA(A)
129                                     Although imprecision in the measurement of diet places limits on
130              There is currently considerable imprecision in the nosology of biomarkers used in the st
131 in various phases of the cell cycle, and the imprecision in the placement of the plane of cell divisi
132 pic contrast and was not easily explained by imprecision in the silencing of the cones.
133                                              Imprecision, inconsistency, and risk of bias also limite
134  for risk of bias, inconsistency of results, imprecision, indirectness of evidence, and publication b
135 itations in the study design, inconsistency, imprecision, indirectness, and publication bias can decr
136  of clinicians' cultural competence, and (5) imprecision inherent in the use of unstructured intervie
137 s with a significant new type of irreducible imprecision involving many fast, unstable modes.
138 his diagnosis will remain unknown until this imprecision is addressed.
139 matic approach to deal with this irreducible imprecision is advocated through algorithms based on the
140 ent phenotype characteristics, provided that imprecision is mitigated.
141 hown to be imprecise, yet the extent of this imprecision is unknown.
142             This prospective uncertainty (or imprecision) is referred to as volatility and has previo
143                                     Temporal imprecision leads to deficits in the comprehension of si
144                             In general, this imprecision leads to substantial attenuation of disease-
145 say was precise and accurate with interbatch imprecision &lt;16.5%, and interbatch inaccuracy <13.7% at
146 mean error=6%), precise (intra- and interday imprecision &lt;8%), and sensitive (limit of detection=0.06
147 ss a wide range of parameters with excellent imprecision (&lt;3.5%) and was linear throughout the positi
148  estimates were unbiased (<10%) and had good imprecision (&lt;30%).
149 as >or=85.7% with intra-assay and interassay imprecision&lt;or=13.9 and 12.4%, respectively.
150 ra-day bias, <10%), precise (inter/intra-day imprecision, &lt;10%), and fast (6 min run time).
151  mu the bias becomes more important than the imprecision, making accuracy dependent on knowledge of t
152             The target article is plagued by imprecision, making it largely impossible to evaluate th
153 ] to 91% [95% CI, 88%-93%]); variability and imprecision may be due to differences in study designs o
154                                         This imprecision may have masked the efficacy of the interven
155 count the clustering between eyes, to assess imprecision (measurement reproducibility).
156                                   Due to map imprecision, nearby stimulus locations produced intermin
157 xcept for one in which changes in FMI timing imprecision negatively correlated with changes in RAWM w
158 analytical recovery of 80.3-108.3% and total imprecision of 2.2-11.0% for all quantitative analytes.
159 mean inaccuracy of 9%, interday and intraday imprecision of 7.5% or lower, and a lower limit of quant
160                                       If the imprecision of a measurement of the displacement of an o
161 y 8.5 +/- 0.4 decibels (dB), and measurement imprecision of a single quadrature of motion 2.4 +/- 0.7
162                                          The imprecision of aspects of the joining reaction contribut
163 line of equivalence, taking into account the imprecision of both tests, was used to compare results.
164         It is increasingly accepted that the imprecision of categorical psychiatric diagnoses can be
165  generate Ab and TCR diversity is programmed imprecision of coding joint formation.
166 is artifactually enhanced by the measurement imprecision of current quantitative techniques.
167 excessive placebo/sham response rates to the imprecision of diagnostic and outcome assessments.
168 tainty of evidence was downgraded because of imprecision of effect estimates and indirectness of the
169 rom settlements, and missing data as well as imprecision of estimates add to quality problems that ca
170                                          The imprecision of estimates of aspirin consumption and the
171 must be interpreted in light of the profound imprecision of exposure assessment that characterizes nu
172 ted statistics of interest to illustrate the imprecision of FDR estimation.
173 he mixture, correlation between species, and imprecision of historical estimates.
174 velopment and testing include inadequacy and imprecision of inclusion/exclusion criteria and ratings,
175 ifferential biology of multiple mobile DNAs, imprecision of integrases and transposases, and differen
176  robust in real data applications due to the imprecision of LD obtained from reference panels.
177 thods to quantify attention, bias leading to imprecision of measurement.
178  It succeeds in predicting the precision and imprecision of motor behavior using a suboptimal decodin
179                               Yet, given the imprecision of natural language, deciding what informati
180                          Pathologically, the imprecision of NHEJ contributes to genome mutations that
181 ouble-strand break processes make use of the imprecision of NHEJ in generating antigen receptor diver
182                         Despite the relative imprecision of our estimates and possible residual bias,
183 sion of unpublished data can also reduce the imprecision of pooled effect estimates during meta-analy
184 of computational tools might help bypass the imprecision of psychiatric diagnosis and connect measure
185  procedure was fully validated; the bias and imprecision of quality controls (QCs) at three Hct level
186              The bias, intraday and interday imprecision of quality controls at three hematocrit leve
187 the outcomes, but no obvious indirectness or imprecision of results reporting.
188              Calibration equations, bias and imprecision of RNFL measurements were calculated using s
189 ogy, indirectness, and the heterogeneity and imprecision of some results temper inferences from this
190 lts reveal that cell sorting acts to correct imprecision of spatial patterning by noisy inductive sig
191                                          The imprecision of the effect size estimate for cancer-speci
192 dds ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.04-2.59), but the imprecision of the estimate prevents making a definitive
193             Limitations of the study include imprecision of the estimated population denominators, la
194 ult of within study bias, inconsistency, and imprecision of the findings reported.
195                                 The inherent imprecision of the IA and reference ELISAs was sigma(del
196                                          The imprecision of the LPT was low (coefficient of variation
197 ual measurements is related to the intrinsic imprecision of the measurement process only.
198 uracy of the measurement and the greater the imprecision of the measurement.
199 ity of evidence is limited by heterogeneity, imprecision of the result estimates, and risk of bias.
200                         Whereas the inherent imprecision of the SA and reference ELISAs was sigma(del
201 n to or deletion from the joining genes, and imprecision of the site of recombination.
202 iption of discrete 5' termini, suggesting an imprecision of the transcription and/or RNA processing m
203          We predict that, given the relative imprecision of vocal fold vibration in desiccated versus
204  estimate the probability and the ambiguity (imprecision) of twenty-three probabilistic phrases in a
205             Patients do not show the type of imprecision or delay-dependent amplification of impairme
206                      RTVue-100 showed higher imprecision (or higher measurement variability) than Cir
207 of moderate quality because of indirectness, imprecision, or inconsistency, and observational studies
208 lex arrays exhibit high levels of analytical imprecision, particularly at the batch level.
209 atients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), imprecision persists with such analyses.
210                                              Imprecision precludes definitive conclusions.
211 , risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, publication bias, treatment fidelity, and t
212                                   Analytical imprecision ranged from 3.5% to 5.3%, which is enough to
213                         Within-run and total imprecision ranged from 8 to 17% and 11 to 20%, respecti
214 wever, there was significant uncertainty and imprecision regarding the probability of experiencing ex
215 e that the accuracy is mainly limited by the imprecision related to device programming and temporal d
216 ronal basis of such poor learning and memory imprecision remains unknown.
217 r alcohol use, but the CIs are wide and some imprecision remains.
218 earch are presented, relating to: conceptual imprecision, research bias, limitations with binary desc
219  on moderate-certainty evidence, lowered for imprecision (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.87-1.02).
220 urement (310.38 mum) and the highest (worst) imprecision SD (3.13 mum; CV = 0.010), and the inferior
221  3.32 mum (CV = 0.011), and a device-related imprecision SD of 2.33 mum (CV = 0.008).
222          The quadrant with the lowest (best) imprecision SD was in the nasal one (2.06 mum; CV = 0.00
223 icates, but we observed significantly larger imprecision than expected under pure Poisson sampling er
224 mature olfactory system belies developmental imprecision that might facilitate the evolution of senso
225 the 4 equations exhibited a similar level of imprecision, the bias of the new CKD-EPI equation was +5
226                    Owing to risk of bias and imprecision, there was low certainty in evidence that hy
227                                Owing to high imprecision, there was low certainty in evidence that th
228                    Owing to risk of bias and imprecision, there was low certainty in evidence that yo
229 ation because it adds only a small amount of imprecision to the code for target speed in MT, which is
230 or M2, M4, M5 and M6 had poor bias and large imprecision under static and dynamic conditions.
231 ii) reporting bias, (iii) indirectness, (iv) imprecision, (v) heterogeneity, and (vi) incoherence.
232 oefficient of variation (CV) for intra-assay imprecision was < 5% and inter-assay imprecision CV was
233                                 The interday imprecision was < or = 12.2% over a dynamic range extend
234                        Interday and intraday imprecision was better than 8% for all metabolites, whil
235 ry, lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) and imprecision were determined for each analyte.
236 search areas exist, such as risk of bias and imprecision, which are, however, comparable to those of
237  12 for the imprecision case, and 60 for the imprecision with noise case.
238 derstanding that an important factor causing imprecision with RT PCR is a change in the initial ratio
239 ptive bias (mean departure from optimum) and imprecision (within-population variance) to the phenotyp

 
Page Top