ライフサイエンスコーパス: impression

1 persons have very little time to make a good impression.

2 amous neoplasia (OSSN) based on the clinical impression.

3 acetowhite lesions and ranked by colposcopic impression.

4 felt by many in the field to be a misleading impression.

5 is the extraction of "gist," a global first impression.

6 , vanilla-like/sweet and/or clove-like smell impressions.

7 ning the evidence for automaticity of facial impressions.

8 uggesting that they avoided leaving negative impressions.

9 ed fashion, including two possible equivocal impressions.

10 elevant for generating phenomenological size impressions.

11 people corrected their implicit and explicit impressions.

12 cted whether people corrected their implicit impressions.

13 ea reveal exquisitely preserved skin texture impressions.

14 s play a similar role in driving personality impressions.

15 true influences whether it impacts implicit impressions.

16 ) are very powerful cues when forming social impressions.

17 le individual differences in trustworthiness impressions.

18 After final impression, 20 patients were randomized into group A, re

19 We form very rapid personality impressions about speakers on hearing a single word.

20 ogic patients, speech-language pathologists' impressions about the patient's state when clinically as

21 liked each other more, formed more accurate impressions about their partners, and described their in

22 In surveillance, visual impression alone would have missed three cases of modera

23 We investigated whether such impressions also influence the communication of scientif

24 The psychiatrists' global impressions also rated patients as significantly less se

25 during adaptation induced a stronger initial impression and a slower decay of the MAE than did the in

26 Improvements in Clinical Global Impression and liver enzymes were larger in the nalmefen

27 PET/CT significantly correlate with clinical impression and overall survival.

28 the MRC beans had a higher score of general impression and pleasant coffee sensory descriptors as co

29 e that participants were keen to give a good impression and present themselves as knowledgeable pract

30 d 13 attributes for still water plus overall impression and they were sorted by: colour hues, transpa

31 small (<0.5 mm) polygons, preserved as both impressions and casts, the latter essentially foot repli

32 at each step in the process their diagnostic impressions and confidence levels.

33 adaptation patterns correspond with clinical impressions and provide a framework for identifying fami

34 ies simultaneously impact social perceivers' impressions and social targets' own experiences of ident

35 RICS, other PANSS subscales, Clinical Global Impression, and Global Assessment of Functioning were se

36 h prostate-specific antigen change, clinical impression, and overall survival.

37 regions of the micro-CT scan data of dental impression are equivalent to the real teeth and surround

38 However, these biases disappear when impressions are based on conversational content lacking

39 task-irrelevant, and that once formed, these impressions are difficult to inhibit.

40 Mandatory formation requires that impressions are formed about social traits even when thi

41 Impressions are formed where the head impacts the substr

42 percentage change from baseline and clinical impression at 6 mo (P = 0.0147) and 6-12 mo (P = 0.0053)

43 er of lesions on Na(18)F PET/CT and clinical impression at baseline (P < 0.0001), 6 mo (P = 0.0078),

44 nd only record cross-sectional, professional impressions at the point of care.

45 duction of a report that presents a coherent impression based on data contained in the report and tha

46 sed preferentially when participants updated impressions based on diagnostic behaviors, and further,

47 First impressions based on facial appearance predict many impo

48 roved cognition and improved global clinical impression but not function.

49 stantial proportion of the variance in first impressions can be accounted for through linear changes

50 icate most severe problems), Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scales (score range, 1-7; 7 indicates m

51 (PDQ) and physician-assessed clinical global impression (CGI) were analyzed in a prespecified hierarc

52 Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scales for severity of Illness and imp

53 Psychiatric Rating Scale, a Clinical Global Impressions (CGI)-severity rating <3, and a CGI-improvem

54 the videos and scored their clinical global impressions (CGI, with scores ranging from 1 to 7).

55 69, -8.09 to -1.28, p=0.007; clinical global impression [CGI] score -0.66, -1.11 to -0.21, p=0.005) t

56 he extremity of evaluation change, favorable impression change additionally draws on parametric modul

57 of lateral prefrontal cortex and unfavorable impression change additionally draws on parametric modul

58 I); CGI-severity (CGI-S); and Subject Global Impression-Cognition.

59 n this way, the factors driving social trait impressions could be visualized as a series of computer-

60 act can appear as two separate semi-circular impressions created by the upper and lower jaws, bearing

61 = 0.768) and between confocal microscopy and impression cytologic analysis (kappa = 0.629).

62 Patients underwent clinical examination and impression cytologic examination of the central cornea b

63 A clinical assessment was carried out and impression cytologic specimens were processed for immuno

64 Impression cytology (IC) was taken from the bulbar conju

65 aser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM) and impression cytology (IC).

66 In vivo confocal microscopy and impression cytology (PAS, cytokeratin 12, and cytokerati

67 Confocal microscopy and impression cytology agreement in testing the diagnostic

68 A transcripts in conjunctival cells taken by impression cytology at each visit.

69 Impression cytology of the lower eyelid margin and tarsa

70 SB and TB impression cytology performed on control eyes, Sjogren s

71 Conjunctival impression cytology samples collected from participants

72 Tear washes and conjunctival impression cytology specimens were collected through sta

73 ency, with a high degree of concordance with impression cytology, and to detect limbal alterations as

74 vo corneal confocal microscopy, conjunctival impression cytology, tonometry and fundus exam.

75 and conjunctival epithelium was obtained by impression cytology.

76 evaluated by eyelid margin and conjunctival impression cytology.

77 ctional tear syndrome (DTS) via conjunctival impression cytology.

78 ed borders and overall observer suspicion or impression (defined by well-known suspicious for maligna

79 Parkinson Plus Score and the Clinical Global Impression Disease Severity Score but not sex (multivari

80 gions support the lasting effects of initial impressions (even after getting to know someone)?

81 3), and by 0.7 points on the Clinical Global Impression for Bipolar Disorder (SE=0.31, 95% CI=0.13-1.

82 Here, we aimed to explore how personality impressions for brief social utterances transfer across

83 Overall impressions for diagnosis of IH were recorded.

84 feasibility of using micro-CT scan of dental impressions for fabricating dental restorations and to c

85 e of positivity, reward, and salience during impression formation among men.

86 For 40 years, research on impression formation and attitudes has relied on dual-pr

87 nd implications for gender- and status-based impression formation are discussed.

88 dying how status and gender shape deliberate impression formation is difficult due to social desirabi

89 we address a further aspect, asking whether impression formation is mandatory.

90 hrough automatic modes of inference (such as impression formation) before more control-demanding mode

91 o recruited a network associated with social impression formation.

92 rain responses during deliberate but private impression formation.

93 rom anatomical permineralization and surface impression fossils that allow both direct and indirect m

94 ts show that the formation of attractiveness impressions from faces is mandatory, thus broadening the

95 here were no significant differences in odor impressions from the parent monoterpenes and their deriv

96 ts' perception of trial outcomes and overall impression gained from the experience.

97 revealed that: 1) In contrast to qualitative impressions gleaned from microscopic images, IRE1 cluste

98 to CM for all visits in the Clinical Global Impression global assessment of effectiveness.

99 of Negative Symptoms (SANS); Clinical Global Impression-Global Improvement (CGI-I); CGI-severity (CGI

100 Understanding the provenance of these impressions has clear scientific importance and societal

101 rved for women with a high-grade colposcopic impression, HSIL cytology, and human papillomavirus (HPV

102 They support the first impression hypothesis that suggests xenophilia can evolv

103 ponsiveness Scale (SRS), and Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale (CGI-I).

104 score or improvement on the Clinical Global Impression Improvement scale), relapse, and adverse effe

105 were the investigator-rated Clinical Global Impressions improvement scale (CGI-I) and the Conners' T

106 depression severity and the Clinical Global Impressions improvement score was more prominent in the

107 lsive Scale (Y-BOCS) and the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale.

108 ng Scale (HDRS(17)), and the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I).

109 S = 0.37, nominal P = .009), Clinical Global Impression-Improvement mean score, and Patient Global Im

110 n-Improvement mean score, and Patient Global Impression-Improvement mean score.

111 gnificant improvement on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale (score </=2).

112 or 2 (much improved) on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale at 14 weeks were 72% for FB

113 t least much improved on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale at week 12.

114 l Tic Severity Scale and the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale rated by a clinician masked

115 independent evaluator-rated Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale score of 1 (very much impro

116 ween FB-CBT and FB-RT on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale was 0.31 (95% CI, 0.17-0.45

117 h a positive response on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale were 68.5% for parent train

118 or very much improved on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale) was 50% (15 of 30) for gua

119 lobal Impression-Improvement, Patient Global Impression-Improvement, and Clinical Global Impression-S

120 Symptomatology-Self-Report, Clinical Global Impression-Improvement, Patient Global Impression-Improv

121 gative Symptoms [FSNS]) with Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) and -Severity (CGI-S) ra

122 rg Depression Scale (MADRS), Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I), and The Massachusetts G

123 ons-Severity Scale, d = .09; Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale, d = .25).

124 obal Impressions-Severity or Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement, remission status, Children's De

125 scale improvement corresponds to a clinical impression in patients with negative symptoms of schizop

126 f the crevice, Philae made a 0.25-metre-deep impression in the boulder ice, providing in situ measure

127 dred million years ago, yet they left little impression in the fossil record.

128 Large identified plant impressions in the graves include stems of sage and othe

129 ross languages form very similar personality impressions irrespective of whether the voices belong to

130 Here, we show that this impression is surprisingly inaccurate.

131 Clinical impression is that rates of eating disorders vary betwee

132 The mandatory formation of impressions is likely to have an important impact in rea

133 reports a method for collecting fingerprint impressions left on ancient material culture and using t

134 These fossils were preserved as ferruginous impressions, like plant fossils, and biological soil cru

135 sults show that data acquired from different impression media are not comparable, supporting calls fo

136 In many studies silicon based impression media are used to replicate surfaces, and the

137 precision with which different silicon based impression media of varying composition and viscosity re

138 different investigators have used different impression media, the fidelity of surface replication ha

139 east moderate improvement in global clinical impression (median absolute risk difference, 4% [range,

140 ODE to define mucin defects was studied with impression membranes under conditions that selectively d

141 However, facial impression models do not consider variation between obse

142 scientist's work, and those that create the impression of a "good scientist" who does high-quality r

143 lay in more subtle patterns, only giving the impression of a clear-cut dichotomy.

144 er opens their eyes, they have the immediate impression of a rich, colorful experience that encompass

145 ses of signal diminution (i.e., reducing the impression of body size that they advertise through thei

146 hange in total NPI score and clinical global impression of change (CGIC) score after 26 weeks and wer

147 of Change (PGIC) and on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC), the change in 36-Item Short

148 ants reporting improvement on Patient Global Impression of Change (key secondary endpoint; P < 0.05).

149 er Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change (mADCS-CGIC).

150 Improvement on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) was the key secondary endpo

151 eved treatment success on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) and on the Clinical Global I

152 The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale was used to assess cli

153 m (PROMIS) Fatigue Scale, and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC).

154 sia, evaluated using the Radiographic Global Impression of Change (RGI-C) scale (-3 indicating severe

155 und in pain as ascertained by Patient Global Impression of Change at week 4.

156 y greater improvement in Radiographic Global Impression of Change global score than did patients in t

157 week 40, assessed by the Radiographic Global Impression of Change global score.

158 g an anchor-based approach based on a global impression of change question and supported using 3 dist

159 egory on the seven-category Caregiver Global Impression of Change scale in 62% of the cannabidiol gro

160 The Radiographic Global Impression of Change score also indicated significant im

161 and an adaptation of the Radiographic Global Impression of Change), and recumbent length or standing

162 ies of daily living, quality of life, global impression of change, and AEs.

163 istribution of the Clinician Interview-Based Impression of Change, plus carer interview did not diffe

164 as measured by the Clinician Interview-Based Impression of Change, plus carer interview, which ranges

165 'Very Much Improved' on the Clinical Global Impression of Change.

166 g temperature data perpetuates an inaccurate impression of cooler Pacific warm-pool SSTs and low equa

167 formation collected 20 years earlier and the impression of dementia as determined during telephone re

168 The impression of every MRI was coded 1 to 5, each value rep

169 at crystal" and summarized the best possible impression of graphene with (i) it is the first example

170 at crystal" and summarized the best possible impression of graphene with (i) it is the first example

171 the score at month 18 on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale, which is a pati

172 ent, measured by means of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement at 12 months.

173 g more severe symptoms), the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement scale (which was used to asses

174 D score of 7 or lower, and a Clinical Global Impression of Improvement score of 1 (very much improved

175 When we see a face, we rapidly form an impression of its attractiveness.

176 ization of temperature anomalies creates the impression of larger relative overall increases, but our

177 observationally constrained model gives the impression of low aerosol model uncertainty.

178 requencies, probably increasing the acoustic impression of male body size and playing a role analogou

179 nformation was discordant with the surgeon's impression of membrane peel completeness in 19% of cases

180 bservation agreement could give a misleading impression of model robustness.

181 Under the impression of NAION with branch retinal artery occlusion

182 Lesions with the impression of oral lichen planus were unlikely to be eit

183 idea of the proposed protocol is that dental impression of patients can be accurately digitized by mi

184 g from the cardiac surface, resulting in the impression of propagating wavefronts when a series of ba

185 g hospital pyjamas results in an exaggerated impression of severity).

186 eep Resistance test, safety, Clinical Global Impression of severity, patient's global opinion, EuroQo

187 ement on the clinician-rated Clinical Global Impression of Severity.

188 locations across our movements to create an impression of space constancy.

189 althcare improvement initiatives can give an impression of the benefits realised, but additional qual

190 Reported data provide a broad impression of the biological consequences of residing in

191 This review gives an impression of the state of the art of the field by showi

192 This Perspective gives a sophisticated impression of the versatility of capillary electrophores

193 We demonstrate that visual impressions of abstract dimensions can be achieved with

194 g that style, not substance, drives negative impressions of ASD.

195 Impressions of competence from faces predict important r

196 refused (35% and 38%), and among responders, impressions of dementia showed high positive predictive

197 Recruiters' impressions of dementia were similar in responders and n

198 SS-derived measures corresponded to clinical impressions of greater improvement, as measured by the C

199 activity in the VMPFC and NAcc when forming impressions of high-SES (vs.

200 as recovery, on the basis of Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement (CGI-I).

201 re, across three studies, we find that first impressions of individuals with ASD made from thin slice

202 pacity of dynamic changes in pitch to elicit impressions of motion along the vertical plane and of ch

203 Research has shown that implicit impressions of others are often insensitive to the truth

204 Our sensory impressions of pain are generally thought to represent t

205 o account for 58% of the variance in raters' impressions of previously unseen faces, and factor-attri

206 Parental impressions of recovery were assessed using the Paediatr

207 However, observers' impressions of sharers are insensitive to permanence (i.

208 First impressions of social traits, such as attractiveness, fr

209 First impressions of social traits, such as trustworthiness or

210 her a decrease due to the trustee's negative impressions of the investor or an increase because the i

211 cognitive schema lead to inaccurate sensory impressions of the pain stimulus.

212 daptive brain function requires that sensory impressions of the social and natural milieu are dynamic

213 2012, radiologists were surveyed as to their impressions of the structured reporting program.

214 about other people's mental states and form impressions of their character.

215 ory events alongside our internal subjective impressions of them--affect.

216 y, and detailed models explain how consensus impressions of trustworthiness are driven by facial attr

217 The results of this study gives a first impression on the distribution of the SCCPs, MCCPs, and

218 nteractions among fetuses can impart lasting impressions on phenotypic outcomes.

219 Distinct tooth row impressions on the amber match the hadrosaur's alveolar

220 The smell impressions, on the other hand, were quite consistent.

221 provide supportive evidence to a morphologic impression or suspicion of flat HGD.

222 cations, ill-defined borders and the overall impression or suspicion of malignancy are associated wit

223 as a dynamic process (rather than a one-time impression) paints a new picture of its neural basis and

224 uration, hospitalization, physician clinical impression, parental assessment, and adverse events.

225 was viscous enough to adopt the shapes of 3D impression patterns, while the gelated MC served as a re

226 With the advent of social media, the impressions people make on others are based increasingly

227 icted by the interaction between human first impression perception and animal behaviour.

228 the Improvement scale of the Clinical Global Impression (range, 1-7), a secondary outcome, with a pos

229 First impression ratings (n = 227) of Barbary macaques' social

230 The correspondence of coding and the impressions regarding sensibility were evaluated.

231 such as web tension, registration accuracy, impression roll pressure and printing speed to determine

232 ry outcome measures were the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Bipolar Disorder-Severity (CGI-BP-S

233 Complicated grief-anchored Clinical Global Impression scale measurments every 4 weeks.

234 d observer ratings using the Clinical Global Impression Scale, and self-ratings of depression.

235 ission rates, and changes in Clinical Global Impression scale, Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomo

236 Improvement subscale of the Clinical Global Impression Scale.

237 (primary endpoint measure), Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI) severity score (key secondary en

238 otal score and scores on the Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI), the Brief Negative Symptom Scal

239 t and severity scales of the Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI-I and CGI-S).

240 ), improvement and severity (Clinical Global Impressions Scale [CGI]), caregiver burden (Zarit Burden

241 , and the change item of the Clinical Global Impressions Scale anchored to functioning.

242 ative Syndrome Scale and the Clinical Global Impressions Scale at baseline and again after 4 weeks of

243 ession severity score on the Clinical Global Impressions scale for use in bipolar illness (CGI-BP), r

244 changes on the CY-BOCS, the Clinical Global Impressions Scale, and the Children's Global Assessment

245 ed global functioning on the Clinical Global Impression scales.

246 ing of ovarian cyst described in the body or impression section of the report.

247 aseline in the scores on the Clinical Global Impressions Severity (CGI-S) scale and the Brief Negativ

248 ting Scale (MADRS) score and Clinical Global Impressions severity (CGI-S) score, respectively.

249 a 50% improvement in MADRS, Clinical Global Impressions severity and improvement subscales, and pati

250 acy outcome was score on the Clinical Global Impressions severity scale (CGI-S).

251 ating Scale (MADRS), and the Clinical Global Impressions severity scale (CGI-S).

252 Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Clinical Global Impressions severity subscale (CGI-S), respectively, ana

253 primary outcome measure) and Clinical Global Impressions severity subscale score (CGI-S; key secondar

254 cacy end points included the Clinical Global Impression, Severity (CGI-S) scale, modified for ADHD sy

255 Depression Rating Scale, the Clinical Global Impression-Severity and -Improvement scales, and adverse

256 ent of severity of delirium, Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S), time to response (TTR

257 For the Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale, baseline scores were 3.5 and

258 or more than moderate on the Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale; and scored moderate or more t

259 kin-picking severity was the Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale; total scores range from 1 (no

260 Impression-Improvement, and Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scales and adverse events.

261 to -1.58, respectively) and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (estimate, -0.29, 95% CI, -0.35 to

262 before open-label baseline; Clinical Global Impressions-Severity [CGI-S] scores >/=4 [moderate sever

263 cally significant agitation (Clinical Global Impressions-Severity agitation score >/=4), and a Mini-M

264 sessive Compulsive Scale and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity indicated that the d-cycloserine pl

265 sion Rating Scale score with Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Depression score of >/= 4; hospi

266 ondary outcomes included the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity or Clinical Global Impressions-Impr

267 he clinician-rated measures (Clinical Global Impressions-Severity Scale, d = .09; Clinical Global Imp

268 ulsive Scale total score and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity.

269 from the study because they were studied by impression smears.

270 kg/day as determined by Giemsa-stained organ impression smears.

271 ns can be influenced substantially by "first-impression" social attributions based on physical appear

272 restrial ecosystems, we examined compression-impression specimens of the late Middle Devonian liverwo

273 Humans readily form social impressions, such as attractiveness and trustworthiness,

274 may, however, give clinicians the subjective impression that a tracheostomy tube is still necessary a

275 evalence data are lacking, there is a strong impression that food allergy has increased, and rates as

276 les to persist and thereby creates the false impression that Hsp90 confers greater robustness.

277 of this study was to counteract the growing impression that interventions outside of this period can

278 FMP with melamine or urea to give the false impression that it contains sufficient protein.

279 mans and other model species have led to the impression that sex determination mechanisms are old and

280 duction of a report that presents a coherent impression that specifically addresses the clinical ques

281 , controlled trial confirms the undocumented impression that statins increase muscle complaints.

282 have used "causal analysis," generating the impression that studies not explicitly labeled as such a

283 al footprint, however, confirms the clinical impression that the disorder extends beyond the visual s

284 ynchronize their states, giving the stunning impression that the group behaves as one.

285 he shorter sides pass just above, giving the impression that the sphere is walking across the water s

286 The reported impression that there is a pharmacologic drug synergy fr

287 PII and 26S proteasomes confirmed the visual impression that these two complexes spatially associate

288 However, this gives the impression that tumour permeability is static amid a cha

289 o cigarette smoking, and users are under the impression that vaping of e-cigarettes is harmless, but

290 Although we have the impression that visual information flows continuously fr

291 violence disrupts the ability to form moral impressions that dissociate between agents with distingu

292 However, in contrast to general impressions, the incidence of CTE is unknown, the clinic

293 king it challenging for people to manage the impressions they make.

294 y 3 lesion, the first lesion reported in the impression was used for data analysis.

295 tive and interesting in terms of the sensory impressions were (+)-isomenthone oxime (fresh, musty, gr

296 Digital impressions were taken prior to extractions (T0), 1 mont

297 ad leaves a series of alternating left-right impressions, where each impact can appear as two separat

298 The typology of the stamp impressions, which corresponds to changes in the politic

299 Overall reader impression yielded the highest accuracy for diagnosis of

300 Overall reader impression yielded the highest sensitivity and specifici