ライフサイエンスコーパス: in comparison (to|with)

1 with a reduced risk of myocardial infarction in comparison with 12-month DAPT (absolute risk differen

2 In acute coronary syndrome, extended-term in comparison with 12-month DAPT was associated with a r

3 In comparison with 12-month DAPT, no significant differe

4 present network meta-analysis suggests that, in comparison with 12-month DAPT, short-term DAPT follow

5 f infantile endophthalmitis were identified, in comparison with 140 cases in 2014.

6 le-body PET/CT amounted to 17.6 +/- 8.7 mSv, in comparison to 3.6 +/- 1.4 mSv for PET/MRI, resulting

7 IL2(+) CD4(+) T cell responses respectively, in comparison to 33% and 13% of HBs(hi) patients.

8 A) and 89 of European Ancestry (EA) with SVs in comparison with 408 AA and 262 controls, respectively

9 -SLN(4) significantly inhibited tumor growth in comparison to 5-FU while area-under plasma concentrat

10 ucibility in such a 'mini-experiment' design in comparison to a conventionally standardised design, a

11 In comparison to a single mouse bed, the cost and time a

12 with a characterization of added uncertainty in comparison to a traditional serial imaging protocol.

13 In comparison with a flow injection analysis without fra

14 ng cell free DNA from a PDAC cohort (n = 64) in comparison with a non-cancer cohort (n = 243).

15 In comparison with a similar hemicyanine probe, Hx-Gal,

16 gnetite crystals possess specific properties in comparison to abiotic, chemically synthesized magneti

17 magnitude and direction of treatment effect in comparison with adjudicated event data, but nonfatal

18 underwent temporal lobe resection (n = 19), in comparison with age- and region-matched samples from

19 of those with aortic aneurysm or dissection, in comparison with age- and sex-matched controls (1:10 f

20 a concordant trend of increase in AD plasma in comparison with age-matched control plasma.

21 higher frequency of growth plate thickening in comparison to Aip+/, Prkar1a+/- mice.

22 ently from severe neurological complications in comparison to all control patients.

23 Moreover, in comparison with allergens administered intradermally,

24 lowest tertile of 1.27 (95% CI, 1.04-1.53), in comparison with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.06 (95%

25 rations of polyamines or related metabolites in comparison with an energy-unrestricted MedDiet and no

26 icted MedDiet (er-MedDiet) and PA promotion, in comparison with an energy-unrestricted MedDiet and tr

27 e significantly underdeveloped, particularly in comparison to analogous strategies for C-N and C-C bo

28 ked improvement in the functional properties in comparison to APIc discerned as improved hydration, s

29 orable changes in extracellular composition, in comparison with Apoe (-/-) baseline mice.

30 annin, quebracho, grape-skin and grape-seed) in comparison with ascorbic acid (AA), sulfur dioxide (S

31 lied and computational results were analyzed in comparison with available experimental data.

32 500 suggest significant cellular selectivity in comparison to bacterial cells.

33 after treatment (had less negative impacts) in comparison to baseline OHIP scores (t = 3.782, df = 2

34 ed risk for earlier myopia onset by 10-years in comparison to baseline SER of those who became myopic

35 d more likely to be classified as pathogenic in comparison to benign classification (OR = 106.15, 95%

36 total flavonoids (14.40-49.44 mg RE.kg(-1)) in comparison with berries (0.55-4.11 mg RE.kg(-1)).

37 e bias, and more sensitive variant detection in comparison with bwa, especially for insertions and de

38 dema, and a decrease in microglia activation in comparison with C57Bl/6 mice treated with AOM.

39 Notably, in comparison to Caco-2, it displays improved CYP3A4 exp

40 -milk calves housed in mixed groups (MHigh), in comparison to calves housed with group mates all rece

41 In comparison to CAR T cells, p40-Td CAR T cells showed

42 APOE4 variant experienced improved survival in comparison to carriers of APOE2.

43 , and positive and negative predictive value in comparison with CECT findings.

44 ocal or diffuse infections within the kidney in comparison with CECT.

45 sed caspase 3/7 activity in MDA-MB-231 cells in comparison to cells treated with DTX-loaded un-crossl

46 ng cancer cells, through apoptosis induction in comparison with chemotherapeutic drugs.

47 In comparison with Class 2, Class 1 consistently showed

48 Clinical case review in comparison with classic LFS cohorts demonstrated simi

49 r the algorithm could improve patients' care in comparison to clinicians' assessment.

50 In comparison with clopidogrel, prasugrel reduced myocar

51 In comparison with clopidogrel, ticagrelor significantly

52 duced ischemic events and increased bleeding in comparison with clopidogrel.

53 sory attributes of DP and DJ fruit infusions in comparison with commercial forest fruits (FF) infusio

54 ich allows for much lower energy consumption in comparison to commonly used depletion mode devices.

55 In comparison to concentrations measured in healthy volu

56 lidity of DW magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in comparison with contrast-enhanced computed tomography

57 ment outcomes among PWID and patients on OST in comparison to control cohorts.

58 In comparison to control, at dose of 1,200 mJ/cm(2) UV-A

59 reases tumor growth rates in mice recipients in comparison with control mice receiving CTLs pre-cultu

60 ad an improved capacity to stimulate T cells in comparison with control-treated tumors.

61 In comparison to controls, DPSC-CM significantly upregul

62 and functional brain imaging, we found that in comparison to controls, most women with uRPL had smal

63 ted underdeveloped CC in both patient groups in comparison to controls.

64 reover, patients with bvFTD performed poorly in comparison with controls in executive and social cogn

65 uch that there was no significant difference in comparison with controls.

66 ated with CD200-modified micro/nanoparticles in comparison with controls.

67 gulated in the stems of the transgenic trees in comparison with controls.

68 n 1alpha], IL-17A [interleukin 17A], P<0.05) in comparison with controls.

69 ive capacity of two experimental TB vaccines in comparison to conventional BCG.

70 In comparison to conventional ELISA-based sandwich immun

71 In comparison with conventional anticoagulation (parente

72 hich cause a lower volumetric energy density in comparison with conventional graphite anodes.

73 bacter actinomycetemcomitans elevated in AgP in comparison with CP, while Fusobacterium nucleatum, Pa

74 y and specificity of the assay were assessed in comparison to culture using 690 previously characteri

75 which it could provide valuable advancements in comparison to current pharmacotherapy such as small m

76 In comparison with current tools, we demonstrate that pu

77 In comparison to de novo synthesis, this metal-induced t

78 aimed to evaluate the effects of Ketoprofen in comparison with Diclofenac in immortalized human card

79 to quantify the diagnostic ability of 3D OCT in comparison with digital radiography.

80 have a higher capacity to demethylate DMHg, in comparison with dissolved sulfide.

81 fetime and absorption edge (580 nm, 2.13 eV) in comparison to DJP(n=1) (523 nm, 2.37 eV); thus, DJP(n

82 phosphatase oxidase (NADPH oxidase) levels, in comparison to DM+INS and DM+RSV+INS (P < 0.05).

83 among groups, lipid accumulation was reduced in comparison with DM recipients not receiving the drug

84 In comparison with each other, there were no significant

85 e relatively high incidence of comorbidities in comparison with earlier S-ICD trials.

86 ions among patients who developed post-MI HF in comparison with event-free controls (data set 1).

87 and these apparent iCO(2) responses are high in comparison to experiments and predictions from theory

88 because of an increased tumor retention time in comparison with FAPI-04.

89 , disparities in mortality persist for males in comparison with females and for non-Hispanic Blacks i

90 F toxicity was assessed in zebrafish embryos in comparison with four major constituents: perfluorooct

91 TDF) was higher in DFC-BE (81.82 g/100 g DW) in comparison to FRP-BE (49.04 g/100 g DW).

92 However, in comparison to fructose and sucrose, Rebaudioside A si

93 HSV-1 had reduced reactivity with antibodies in comparison to gB from the gC-null virus, suggesting t

94 urea)urethane with the trade name "Hastalex" in comparison with GORE-TEX, a commercial polymer routin

95 gulation of proinflammatory genes in Group 1 in comparison to Group 2 (P = .001).

96 ce changes are recorded in less than 30 min, in comparison with >8 h in the best alternative reported

97 ession, and Ag clearance, so low parasitemia in comparison with haplotypes other than GTAT (GTAC, GGG

98 In comparison with HCS, we found that schizophrenia, bip

99 e gastrointestinal disorders UC, CD and CRC, in comparison to healthy controls.

100 are for long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) - in comparison to healthy infants - using MRI.

101 igher suPAR levels in both plasma and saliva in comparison with healthy controls and CHD.

102 excessive platelet and neutrophil activation in comparison with healthy controls and non-COVID-19 pne

103 d left ventricular (LV) myocardial stiffness in comparison with healthy controls as a key marker for

104 19 patients with different clinical severity in comparison with healthy individuals.

105 ale mice presented a robust lung remodelling in comparison with HFD males, evidenced by higher deposi

106 In comparison to HFE, RDE showed highly irregular cone p

107 l CVD events (HR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.18, 2.37) in comparison with high PA (>75th percentile).

108 In comparison with HIV- men, HIV+ men had higher QTVI (a

109 d detectable, but not with undetectable, VL, in comparison with HIV- men.

110 EA and CA rates and high error rates for AD in comparison to ID-BMD.

111 17 was performed on human ALS brain sections in comparison to immunofluorescence with Iba1 and GFAP.

112 In comparison to in-solution-based TrEnDi, iTrEnDi demon

113 In comparison with individuals in the lowest third of th

114 low-dose azacitidine shows greater efficacy in comparison to intermittent higher-dose azacitidine, l

115 toxic potential of a norisoprenoid glucoside in comparison to its aglycone.

116 d to be higher following ketone substitution in comparison to its removal, indicating that surface sp

117 hepatic and biliary injury were exacerbated in comparison to KO given placebo, as shown by serum bio

118 In comparison to linear PFECAs, branched PFECAs have a h

119 ifferent pattern of immune response proteins in comparison to lipopolysaccharide (LPS), underlying th

120 In comparison to liquid chromatography prefractionation,

121 el high-drug-loading (50 wt %) nanoparticles in comparison with low-drug-loading (0.5 wt %) nanoparti

122 of 9.24 (95% CI, 5.53-15.44) for dissection in comparison with matched controls.

123 ved in women and lower strength participants in comparison to men and moderate strength and higher st

124 n all three domains was found in men with GD in comparison to men without GD.

125 lly been considered less hazardous to health in comparison with men's work.

126 ancer activity and impact on drug resistance in comparison to metal-free thiosemicarbazones.

127 r validation of our susceptibility threshold in comparison to MIC across 64 more isolates confirmed t

128 increased proliferation of epithelial cells, in comparison to mice given control vector.

129 ma can be lowered by more than a factor of 2 in comparison to microsecond pulses.

130 ically unprotected axial bicarbazole radical in comparison with monocarbazole and helical bicarbazole

131 ommunities have shown increased productivity in comparison with monocultures and allow for the reduct

132 vity towards alpha-syn fibrils and oligomers in comparison to monomers and recognized intracellular i

133 ges of neuromorphic nanoelectronic materials in comparison with more mature technologies based on tra

134 igher levels in mouse pluripotent stem cells in comparison with mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs).

135 molecules was used to validate the approach in comparison to MS/MS spectra produced via data depende

136 eatly diminished cooperative GTPase activity in comparison to native Drp1.

137 tudies to characterize the action of MVT-602 in comparison with native kisspeptin-54 (KP54).

138 nts have an increased odds of developing SSI in comparison to NBL allergic patients.

139 In comparison with neutrophils from healthy subjects, th

140 ssociated with reduced in-hospital mortality in comparison with no admission of IFN-alpha2b, whereas

141 all synthesized iodine-containing polymers, in comparison to non-iodinated poly(lactic acid) (PLA),

142 tar larvae was reduced on medicinal milkweed in comparison to non-medicinal milkweed.

143 iants were associated with earlier mortality in comparison with non-carriers, independent of the deve

144 son with females and for non-Hispanic Blacks in comparison with non-Hispanic Whites.

145 0-fold increases in outdoor PM(2.5) exposure in comparison with non-migrants.

146 r solvents show significantly weaker binding in comparison to nonpolar solvents, and the bulk solvent

147 In comparison to normal-weight and obese pregnant women,

148 ponse, without further contribution from RAP in comparison with normocapnia.

149 with CA or idiopathic acquired anosmia (IA) in comparison to normosmia controls (NC) during expectan

150 ted with the risk of being obese as an adult in comparison with not playing football in high school.

151 pulmonary embolism (5.4% vs 0.9%, P = 0.007) in comparison to NSQIP cohort.

152 owever, is that risk factors are not studied in comparison with one another or from across different

153 ciency of various promiscuous biotin ligases in comparison with one-step affinity purification approa

154 which CQFC1 showed the highest efficacy even in comparison to other drugs, in use or used, both in or

155 s during the 1991-2001 Balkan wars to Sweden in comparison to other European migrants to Sweden durin

156 ppocampal formation between the species, and in comparison to other mammalian species.

157 ing shapes (21%) and disease asymmetry (23%) in comparison to other modes of inheritance.

158 lly, and the overall rate of decline is slow in comparison to other pollutants.

159 hibit a similar clinical and genetic profile in comparison to other populations.

160 COFs is their potentially superior stability in comparison to other porous materials.

161 vels in CP+S group were significantly raised in comparison to other three groups.

162 In comparison to other widely used risk scores, CAC appe

163 mmunosensor for Campylobacter jejuni sensing in comparison with other bacterial cells was significant

164 UCC1 forms a central CS nanodomain in comparison with other CS-located proteins that are fo

165 t on structural free vibration of spider web in comparison with other imperfections.

166 RNA structure around the frameshift region) in comparison with other members of the coronaviridae fa

167 its concentration in tobacco smoke is higher in comparison with other metals.

168 que to detect entanglement in lasso proteins in comparison with other methods.

169 ted based on their high transcript abundance in comparison with other UGTs in vegetative tissues of N

170 ormance of CSF p-tau217 as a biomarker of AD in comparison to p-tau181.

171 ged a higher mean total BBPS (7.4, SD 1.62), in comparison to patients who received high-volume (7.0,

172 mpal NLGN1 was decreased in patients with AD in comparison to patients with mild cognitive impairment

173 In comparison with patients with T1MI, patients with T2M

174 In comparison with patients with tricuspid valves, patie

175 nregulated in patients with peri-implantitis in comparison with peri-implant mucositis sites (P = 0.0

176 nistration route for amiodarone or lidocaine in comparison with placebo during out-of-hospital cardia

177 In comparison with placebo, discharge survival was signi

178 rincipal provoking mechanism was arrhythmia, in comparison with postoperative status, hypotension, an

179 e experimentally measured local correlations in comparison to predictions based on the stimulus or ru

180 In comparison to previous catalysts, the GPhos-supported

181 estimated transcript and protein abundances, in comparison to previous models, when individual and fa

182 st = constant) was probed for the first time in comparison with previously explored concepts (MOF = c

183 rofile the kinetics of their differentiation in comparison to primary fetal and adult AEC2 benchmarks

184 ility under 800 degrees C hydrothermal aging in comparison with Pt, and may represent a paradigm shif

185 ccelerated liver growth and HC proliferation in comparison to PVL.

186 scanning speed (12 Hz) and perform very well in comparison to recent studies using more advanced MS i

187 pening signs of DSS-induced colitis on mice, in comparison with reference antagonist GSK1370319A.

188 d improved chemical stability of 23a and 24a in comparison with retigabine.

189 ystem bears the risk of underdiagnosing NASH in comparison to SAF score.

190 In comparison with saline rats, many apoptotic cells wer

191 ng on the polymeric device has been obtained in comparison with SAWs traveling on AlN on silicon subs

192 In comparison to SBP, Doppler-derived arterial load indi

193 of the HAs were performed for LPAIV strains in comparison to seasonal H3N2 and avian H3N8.

194 sion analyses of the rattlesnake venom gland in comparison with several non-venom tissues to characte

195 2 patients with VIA and analyzed their cases in comparison with sex- and age-matched anaphylaxis case

196 Virtual reality groups performed favourably in comparison to simulation groups in posttest knowledge

197 essible and a comparison of their reactivity in comparison to sodium diazeniumdiolate.

198 In comparison to spCas9, miCas9 enhances double-stranded

199 le of (18)F-flubrobenguane PET, particularly in comparison to standard diagnostic procedures such as

200 utcomes was observed with hydroxychloroquine in comparison to standard of care.

201 ity on visual acuity (BCVA) within 12 months in comparison to standard therapy, i.e. intravitreal inj

202 idone (Ce6-PVP)-based fluorescence endoscopy in comparison to standard white-light endoscopy.

203 In comparison with standard targeting methods, this appr

204 In comparison with STE derived strain, the RA reservoir

205 ity in the air and snow of Livingston Island in comparison with studies using traditional isolation m

206 R in T cells strongly ablated alloreactivity in comparison with TCR-expressing T cells.

207 were applied to evaluate chemical variations in comparison to tender water (control) that could expla

208 DDs and faster for dihydroxylated biphenyls in comparison to that for triclosan.

209 nked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Eurolyser) in comparison to that of a reference standard of Mycobac

210 r DNA immobilization efficiency was obtained in comparison with that in a conventional method using g

211 a (TNF-alpha) mRNA levels and protein levels in comparison to the 20-mer containing 223K during M. pn

212 revealed up to 4-fold increased tumor uptake in comparison to the all-amide reference compound [Nle(1

213 nificantly impacted the molecular properties in comparison to the analogous indolo[3,2,1-jk]carbazole

214 ated with non-encapsulated essential oil, or in comparison to the apples in positive control.

215 uracy for kinases with no known phosphosites in comparison to the baseline model and other methods av

216 er incorporation into FO Pickering emulsions in comparison to the bulk oil.

217 se in the number of high-energy phonon modes in comparison to the bulk Sn PDOS.

218 alf maximum of the elution band of up to 30% in comparison to the calculated value because of diffusi

219 A4@Exosome had a higher affinity toward lung in comparison to the CBSA/siS100A4@Liposome, and exhibit

220 proteomic characterization of these regions in comparison to the cerebral cortex, which is not condu

221 ISA performance of Gel-BSA-OHG was evaluated in comparison to the conventional substrate (BSA-OHG).

222 ed antioxidant activity and thermostability, in comparison to the cyanidin-3-glucoside, which is an a

223 the algorithm has shown superior performance in comparison to the existing algorithms and demonstrate

224 In comparison to the families of major histocompatibilit

225 k (CCN) during the focus on breath condition in comparison to the focus on emotion condition.

226 nd reduced hypertriglyceridemia side effects in comparison to the free drug and blank sHDL.

227 ped in SDNLs was protected against oxidation in comparison to the free omega-3 PUFAs concentrates.

228 In comparison to the general population, adult patients

229 ficant effect on carvacrol of Thymus species in comparison to the greenhouse condition.

230 e binding strength of over two hundred-fold, in comparison to the halogen bonding and hydrogen bondin

231 erate a robust neutralization antibody titer in comparison to the HSV-1 0DeltaNLS-vaccinated wild-typ

232 ioselectivity but higher conversion achieved in comparison to the isothiourea HyperBTM.

233 In comparison to the normal group, the ADC values in IUG

234 In comparison to the other groups, the PDRBD+ group also

235 aled greater bone loss in DM+PLAC and DM+INS in comparison to the other treatments (P < 0.05).

236 better BCG as reflected by lower PCI values in comparison to the other two MS severity groups (sever

237 In comparison to the parental m1 VacA protein, a chimeri

238 In comparison to the phenotype before anti-CD20 treatmen

239 etic mobility (mu(eff)) as the key parameter in comparison to the relative migration time (RMT) appro

240 ithin 4 min, reflecting its freshness status in comparison to the TVB-N and TVC method which takes ma

241 the standard manual method with Syngo Plaza in comparison with the 3D ProSoma software.

242 effects of the selective M(1) PAM VU0453595 in comparison with the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor do

243 In comparison with the administration of unmodified IL-1

244 EG-DVBE resins was reduced approximately 89% in comparison with the Bis-GMA/HEMA controls.

245 rmed the strong increase in elongation rate, in comparison with the condition of tip-growth.

246 the Ep group were detected slightly impaired in comparison with the control group (P >0.05); and the

247 (primary outcome) and lower levels of plaque in comparison with the control group after 24 months (P

248 ated equivalent shear bond strength and uTBS in comparison with the controls.

249 The CPE-CCT method was confirmed in comparison with the corresponding direct HPLC standar

250 rs (DALYs) averted per 1000 vaccinated girls in comparison with the counterfactual scenario of no vac

251 in pollutant emissions of more than a third in comparison with the counterfactual, leading to a glob

252 antigen 617 (PSMA) radioligand therapy (RLT) in comparison with the established tumor markers.

253 In comparison with the fast development of binary mixtur

254 d in the beer obtained by encapsulated yeast in comparison with the free cell.

255 hospital stay in days was shorter in the SC in comparison with the HCQ group (standard mean differen

256 In comparison with the latest published work, the new CH

257 receptor beta/delta (PPARbeta/delta) genes, in comparison with the once-daily exercise.

258 d virulence at the later stage of infection, in comparison with the parent strain.

259 gioselectivity to give 5-amino-1,3-oxazoles, in comparison with the previously reported syntheses of

260 crystallinity with reduced defect densities, in comparison with the pristine ones.

261 g the amplitude of the fundamental processes in comparison with the rectangle filter.

262 r antigen (PCNA)-reactive cells showed that, in comparison with the saline injected rats, the adminis

263 rease for the redox probe ferrocene-methanol in comparison with the same surface treated by dimethylf

264 In comparison with the SARS-CoV RBD, an ACE2-binding rid

265 d deletions exhibit increased ethanol levels in comparison with the wild-type strain.

266 perior resistance to macroscopic deformation in comparison to their analogs generated from statistica

267 tzite to rocksalt phase at elevated pressure in comparison to their bulk counterpart.

268 ion or overproduction on the circadian clock in comparison to their effects on cell cycle progression

269 onsiderably poorer performance and stability in comparison to their lead analogues, their performance

270 of the archipelago are virtually unexplored in comparison to their shallow-water counterparts.

271 AT/SAT) ratio after high-fat diet challenge, in comparison to their wild-type counterparts.

272 onsils but displayed unique genetic features in comparison with those of contemporaneous IAVs circula

273 In comparison with those who remained on dialysis, adjus

274 AF microscopy and spectroscopy, particularly in comparison with TIRF.

275 arget interactions (DTIs) are highly desired in comparison to traditional experimental assays.

276 In comparison to traditional full-carbon-chain perfluoro

277 In comparison to traditional scheduling, the perceived c

278 hour characteristics and perceived wellbeing in comparison to traditional scheduling.

279 ficity (91%) were obtained using this method in comparison with traditional mammography (88-93% and 8

280 uctural polysaccharides in leatherwood xylem in comparison with trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides)

281 latively lower levels of pro-tumor cytokines in comparison to tumors treated with CCL21 alone or buff

282 s generated from Cl66-Dox and Cl66-Pac cells in comparison with tumors generated from Cl66 cells.

283 mor vasculature and increased tumor necrosis in comparison with tumors treated with monotherapies.

284 he average relative precision by 80% and 36% in comparison with two state-of-the-art methods, PSICOV

285 on of PCL in the core of the triaxial fibers in comparison with uniaxial PLGA (50:50) and coaxial PLG

286 antibody avidity was increased in APTB cases in comparison to uninfected individuals and the ratio of

287 In comparison with using predominantly gas in the recent

288 timated to be similar but slightly decreased in comparison with vaccination of 9-year-old girls.

289 methyl esters (183 mg L(-1) to 456 mg L(-1)) in comparison with Vitis vinifera wines.

290 In comparison to warfarin, apixaban was associated with

291 thracnose disease-causing C. gloeosporioides in comparison to wild type and empty-vector control plan

292 t possesses greater overall solvent exposure in comparison to wild-type but with reduced water access

293 also had decreased WNT10A protein expression in comparison to wild-type cells.

294 in decreased levels of sulfated salicinoids in comparison to wild-type plants, indicating that SOT1

295 ever, the mutant had shorter epidermal cells in comparison with wild-type Hwayoung (HY).

296 n Tet2 KO mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) in comparison with wild-type mESCs.

297 tase activity in lesions in the Ahr knockout in comparison with wild-type mice.

298 pha(+), and TCRbeta(+)CD8alphaalpha(+) cells in comparison with wild-type mice.

299 signature and circulating free Il-18 levels, in comparison with WT->WT chimeras.

300 and impaired regenerative response to injury in comparison to young (2-3 months old) mice.