戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ined in at least three separate experiments (in duplicate).
2  and data from these articles were extracted in duplicate.
3 32, 64, 128, 256, and 512 mug/mL were tested in duplicate.
4  January 2008 was assessed independently and in duplicate.
5       All data were abstracted independently in duplicate.
6 itative standards, tested singly rather than in duplicate.
7  five quantitation standards that are tested in duplicate.
8 miRNA array consists of 4,104 probes printed in duplicate.
9 ality assessment were done independently and in duplicate.
10 een 100,000 and 1,000,000 were repeat tested in duplicate.
11 ata, and assessed risk of bias independently in duplicate.
12 y transmitted disease clinics were collected in duplicate.
13 easured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in duplicate.
14 y outcomes were abstracted independently and in duplicate.
15 taining 4608 follicle-derived probes printed in duplicate.
16 al 12,935 bp (84% of coding DNA) are arrayed in duplicate.
17 ith 0 misassignments in 500 assays performed in duplicate.
18  to 1,000,000 HCV RNA copies/ml were assayed in duplicate.
19  can carry out each of their major functions in duplicate.
20 E and Web of Science databases was performed in duplicate.
21 farction and ischemic stroke) were validated in duplicate.
22 act screening and full-text review were done in duplicate.
23  potentially eligible articles were screened in duplicate.
24 s and full texts were screened independently in duplicate.
25 usly established criteria, independently and in duplicate.
26 essment, and quality of evidence assessments in duplicate.
27 screening and data extraction were completed in duplicate.
28  2 reviewers each, working independently and in duplicate.
29  Data extraction was independently performed in duplicate.
30 ction was performed by 2 independent authors in duplicate.
31                Data extraction was performed in duplicate.
32  and risk of bias was assessed independently in duplicate.
33  were extracted independently by 3 reviewers in duplicate.
34 ntly extracted study data into a spreadsheet in duplicate.
35 and main publication indexed) were extracted in duplicate.
36 rds, screening for eligible studies was done in duplicate.
37 1 SARS-CoV-2 samples sequenced to high depth in duplicate.
38 d their positive product controls are tested in duplicate.
39                  Measurements were performed in duplicate.
40 d phosphorylated-tau-181 (p-tau-181) assayed in duplicate.
41 ined eligibility of trials independently and in duplicate.
42 sk of Bias version 1 tool) independently and in duplicate.
43 fter screening titles, abstracts, and papers in duplicate.
44 d, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias in duplicate.
45 d sifting and data extraction were performed in duplicate.
46 e, and risk prediction models were extracted in duplicate.
47 ble articles was performed independently and in duplicate.
48 cy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool independently and in duplicate.
49       Screening and data extraction occurred in duplicate.
50 d data extraction were performed blinded and in duplicate.
51 ts along with data extraction were performed in duplicate.
52 ty assessment were carried out independently in duplicate.
53 ction, and quality assessment were performed in duplicate.
54 ction, and risk of bias assessment were done in duplicate.
55  assessment were performed independently and in duplicate.
56 ction and quality assessment were undertaken in duplicate.
57                     Data extraction was done in duplicate.
58 racteristics and RR estimates were extracted in duplicate.
59 ction, and critical appraisal were conducted in duplicate.
60 stions were posed to each customized chatbot in duplicate.
61 t results when Dynamiker CrAg LFA was tested in duplicate.
62 text screening and extraction were performed in duplicate.
63 le/abstract and full-text screening was done in duplicate.
64 eened, and data extracted, independently and in duplicate.
65 ing and data extraction were independent and in duplicate.
66 r sources were reviewed, with data extracted in duplicate.
67 by one reviewer, with a 10% sample extracted in duplicate.
68 action, and quality appraisal were performed in duplicate.
69 re reviewed and data extracted independently in duplicate.
70 cles were identified and data were extracted in duplicate.
71 or studies were abstracted independently and in duplicate.
72 lity assessment were performed independently in duplicate.
73 on of salient study characteristics was made in duplicate.
74  June and 7 December 2014 and extracted data in duplicate.
75 ed 1301 potentially eligible PubMed articles in duplicate.
76  assessment were conducted independently and in duplicate.
77                      All samples were tested in duplicate.
78 racteristics and study quality were assessed in duplicate.
79 eviewers extracted studies independently and in duplicate.
80        Data were extracted independently and in duplicate.
81 n study outcomes and quality were abstracted in duplicate.
82 tcome data were abstracted independently and in duplicate.
83 rol and test bottle combinations were tested in duplicate.
84 re extracted, and their quality was assessed in duplicate.
85 assessment were undertaken independently and in duplicate.
86  Skin testing with penicillins was performed in duplicate.
87 decisions and data extraction were performed in duplicate.
88  and risk of bias assessments were performed in duplicate.
89 ere assessed for relevance independently and in duplicate.
90 AM (protospacer adjacent motif) combinations in duplicates.
91 lso be responsible for decelerated evolution in duplicates.
92                          Data were extracted in duplicate according to Data Extraction for Systematic
93                         Data were abstracted in duplicate according to the Preferred Reporting Items
94            Documents retrieved were screened in duplicate against our inclusion criteria.
95 ASMS format, 263,382 compounds were screened in duplicate and 29 binders with affinities below 100 mi
96 ning format, 370,400 compounds were screened in duplicate and 425 inhibitors with an IC(50) below 100
97                           We abstracted data in duplicate and assessed the methodological quality of
98 To minimize mapping errors, ESTs were mapped in duplicate and consensus RH vectors produced for use i
99  true positive or true negative by retesting in duplicate and defining a PCR-positive result as two o
100  achieved using four synthesized DNA targets in duplicate and five probes in sequence, indicating the
101             Outcome variables were extracted in duplicate and included the rate of myocardial infarct
102                     Reviewers extracted data in duplicate and independently and assessed the certaint
103  characteristics and results were abstracted in duplicate and independently, and the Cochrane risk of
104 d quality assessments of RCTs were conducted in duplicate and independently.
105 were rated by a team of oncology specialists in duplicate and marked as correct based on consensus or
106 ta were extracted by 3 independent reviewers in duplicate and pooled.
107                          Data were extracted in duplicate and primary outcome data were synthesised f
108                         Data were abstracted in duplicate and random-effects bayesian network meta-an
109 roximately 80% of yeast genes) were screened in duplicate and selected strains analyzed further.
110                    Trained staff measured RR in duplicate and SpO(2) in triplicate in children who ha
111 xtraction and Synthesis: Data were extracted in duplicate and synthesized for meta-analysis using gen
112                          Data were extracted in duplicate and synthesized using a random-effects mode
113 ing control parameters, HAPLN1 was imprinted in duplicate and the detection of spiked HAPLN1 was succ
114 n complexes show a higher retention of genes in duplicated and triplicated copies.
115  the LC-MS runs based on mandatory detection in duplicates and additional noise filtering according t
116                     The fundamental problems in duplicating and transmitting genetic information pose
117 nderwent testing by the broth microdilution (in duplicate) and agar dilution (in duplicate) methods,
118  assessed using carbon-monoxide rebreathing (in duplicate) and four-dimensional (4D) speckle-tracking
119                      Abstracts were reviewed in duplicate, and data were extracted using a standardiz
120 sia (VIN), and carcinoma were microdissected in duplicate, and each extracted DNA was analyzed in dup
121                           All tests were run in duplicate, and end points were determined both spectr
122            Data were extracted independently in duplicate, and findings pooled using inverse variance
123                         Data were abstracted in duplicate, and quality was scored using Scottish Inte
124                          Extraction was done in duplicate, and risk of bias was assessed.
125                                              In duplicate, articles were selected if they were random
126 rom 1980 until March 2012, independently and in duplicate, as well as personal files and reference li
127 aled 122 mRNAs that were increased >/=2-fold in duplicate assays of 16-week-old CR2-TAg versus normal
128 -mediated amplification (TMA) test performed in duplicate assays.
129 igher than threshold fluences were delivered in duplicates at hourly intervals, with 40% increments,
130 a extraction was performed independently and in duplicate by 2 of the authors, using the search term
131 All articles were assessed independently and in duplicate by 2 reviewers.
132        Data were extracted independently and in duplicate by 2 reviewers.
133                Study selection was performed in duplicate by 4 blinded independent coauthors.
134                Data extraction was performed in duplicate by 4 independent authors following the Pref
135 3 radiograph interpretations were each rated in duplicate by 6 emergency department physicians using
136 d isolates, with phenotypic results obtained in duplicate by automated broth dilution (BD Phoenix) an
137 rs or very major errors (VMEs) were retested in duplicate by both methods.
138               Data abstraction was conducted in duplicate by independent investigators.
139 creening and data extractions were completed in duplicate by independent reviewers.
140 antitatively from 259 children were analyzed in duplicate by RTrtPCR.
141  Three stool samples were collected and read in duplicate by the Kato-Katz method in a cross-sectiona
142               FFA concentration was measured in duplicate by the Wako enzymatic method.
143 tracts, and full-text articles were screened in duplicate by two investigators.
144        Data were extracted independently and in duplicate by two reviewers using predefined and pilot
145        Data were extracted independently and in duplicate by two reviewers using predefined extractio
146 d full texts were assessed independently and in duplicate by two reviewers.
147 d full-texts were assessed independently and in duplicate by two reviewers.
148 Evaluation (GRADE) assessment were conducted in duplicate by two reviewers.
149 +/- 7.0 kg; 9.9-32.8% body fat) were scanned in duplicate by using DXA with a Lunar DPX-L densitomete
150 neas (n = 300) of all subjects were examined in duplicate by white light IVCM (Confoscan 4, NIDEK Tec
151 l electrophoresis (SDS PAGE)-LA ICP MS, and, in duplicate, by 2D IEF-PAGE.
152  hollow fiber cartridges (HFCs) were studied in duplicate: cellulose fibers with 70 kD nominal molecu
153                                              In duplicate chamber studies, the gas-phase concentratio
154 ve different 45-minute hypoxia interventions in duplicate: continuous hypoxia at FiO(2) 0.163 and 0.1
155                                    The ERSE, in duplicate copies, can confer full stress inducibility
156 convergent amino acid changing substitutions in duplicated copies of the Resistance to dieldrin (Rdl)
157                    Human SMN gene is present in duplicated copies: SMN1 and SMN2.
158                                 Skin testing in duplicate, correlation between case history of immedi
159 200 subvariants from multiple plasma samples in duplicate, covering 72 hours of a severe mast cell ac
160                              Independent and in duplicate data extraction and quality assessment were
161          Subsequent amino acid substitutions in duplicated daughter genes selectively restricted prot
162 s were manually segmented, independently and in duplicate; degree of segmentation agreement was confi
163 10)Po, (226)Ra, (228)Ra, (228)Th and (238)U) in duplicate diet samples collected from eight volunteer
164 in factor H-related (FHR) proteins resulting in duplicated dimerization domains are prototypical of C
165 ymerase chain reaction amplification results in duplicate DNA fragments coming from the same location
166 spective telomere and whether they originate in duplicated DNA or single-copy DNA.
167 lopment, Neurospora crassa inactivates genes in duplicated DNA segments by a hypermutation process, r
168                     When the DSB was located in duplicated DNA, 77% of the recombinants were similar
169                            Reviewers working in duplicate evaluated quality and abstracted informatio
170 % sensitivity and an 88% and 74% specificity in duplicate experiment sets.
171 3% sensitivity and a 90% and 94% specificity in duplicate experiment sets.
172                                     METHODs: In duplicate experiments for each serotype, a total of 2
173 A EXTRACTION: Two authors independently, and in duplicate, extracted study characteristics, outcomes,
174      All studies were independently screened in duplicate following PRISMA guidelines.
175 at cores were segmented, dried, and analyzed in duplicate for 25 PFASs (5 perfluororalkyl sulfonates
176             Each included study was assessed in duplicate for adherence to the 18-item SQUIRE 2.0 cri
177 lity assessment were performed independently in duplicate for all included studies using Preferred Re
178 rospective CrAg-screening cohort were tested in duplicate for CrAg by the CrAgSQ (IMMY) and CryptoPS
179                       The data were acquired in duplicate for each sample in positive ionization mode
180          Fasting blood samples were measured in duplicate for glucose, triglyceride, and high-density
181 plicate, and each extracted DNA was analyzed in duplicate for LOH at 10 chromosomal loci by PCR and p
182 ntains gene families that are often retained in duplicate for periods extending to tens of millions o
183                          Data were extracted in duplicate for the meta-analysis, and the risk of bias
184 ubMed electronic database, independently and in duplicate, for abstracts of RCTs published in seven l
185              In a pilot study, 29,570 clones in duplicate from both original and normalized, directio
186                          Data were extracted in duplicate from protocols, publications, websites, and
187 on of 21 pathogens and three control targets in duplicate from respiratory specimens.
188 viewers (NM, AJ, AM, and TNK) extracted data in duplicate from the full-text articles using a data ex
189 ian gene set uncovered a subgenome dominance in duplicate gene loss of one ancestral chromosome set.
190 tios, indicating that significant alteration in duplicated gene expression is fairly frequent even at
191 ll miss a fraction of them, especially genes in duplicated gene families.
192 mpare binding sites and network connectivity in duplicated gene pairs in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis tha
193 d from the sub-neo-functionalization process in duplicate-gene evolution [11].
194 des an efficient method for making mutations in duplicate genes that are otherwise difficult to study
195 ene expression patterns and protein function in duplicate genes.
196 of studies report that functional divergence in duplicated genes is accompanied by gene expression ch
197 mmon in closely spaced repeats, often result in duplicated genes or pseudogenes, and affect highly st
198 , we detected accelerated sequence evolution in duplicated genes that transposed when compared to the
199  which results in a higher rate of evolution in duplicated genes.
200 ritization of pathogenic copy number changes in duplicated genes.
201 ory element evolution and network divergence in duplicated genes.
202                                              In duplicated genomes like maize, loss of an epigenetic
203 , hscB, hscA, fdx, and iscX genes, resulting in duplicate genomic copies of these genes: one whose ex
204 me rearrangements and asymmetrical gene loss in duplicated genomic blocks, asymmetrical amplification
205 network connections, 28 (44.4%) were located in duplicated genomic segments believed to have originat
206 es were selected blindly, independently, and in duplicate if accuracy of hysteroscopy was estimated i
207 nal loop library (81,920 interactions probed in duplicate in a single experiment).
208  in males, whereas the autosomes are present in duplicate in both sexes.
209  and distal coronary pressures were measured in duplicate in patients under resting conditions and du
210                   Experiments were performed in duplicate in two independent centers using standard o
211               The 16 genomes were introduced in duplicate into 5 different cellular backgrounds for a
212                Relevant data were abstracted in duplicate into a standardized template.
213 ay allow us to better understand both biases in duplicate losses and hybrid vigor.
214 er allopolyploidy events tend to show biases in duplicate losses, with one of the two subgenomes reta
215 S. cerevisiae lines and found more mutations in duplicates--mainly small-scale duplicates--than in si
216 rodilution (in duplicate) and agar dilution (in duplicate) methods, and select isolates were examined
217 aphite-rod anodes poised at -0.06 V (vs) SHE in duplicate microbial electrolysis cells (MECs).
218                  Methanogenesis was observed in duplicate microcosms that were unamended, amended wit
219 ve proteomics identified over 6,000 proteins in duplicate multiplexed labelling experiments across tw
220 versely, ectopic prospero expression results in duplicate neurons and sheath cells and a complete abs
221          Three hundred specimens were plated in duplicate on both instruments with 1-microl loops, an
222 -microl loops, and 293 specimens were plated in duplicate on both instruments with 10-microl loops.
223                        Cooking was performed in duplicate on different days, under standardised condi
224 o human tissues (blood and placenta), tested in duplicate on each platform.
225 ses, 8 reviewers screened and extracted data in duplicate on effects of respiratory isolation compare
226   The resulting 1,824 fractions were spotted in duplicate on nitrocellulose-coated slides.
227 y site, arterial blood samples were analyzed in duplicate on two separate blood gas analyzers and CO-
228  WB specimens were fresh; 84/218 were tested in duplicate on Xpert to compare WB sampling methods (pi
229 i are purified in 96-well format and spotted in duplicate onto amino-silane-coated slides in a spatia
230 idguts were excised, homogenized, and plated in duplicate onto selective horse blood agar plates.
231                                         NPA, in duplicate or in combination with stool or urine speci
232  different types of NOM samples are analyzed in duplicate or triplicate instrumental injections or ex
233         However, measurements of these gases in duplicate oral samplings often show poor reproducibil
234 splice form subfunctionalization will result in duplicate pairs with divergent exon structure when di
235 litate the evolution of novel gene functions in duplicate paralogs maintained over evolutionary time.
236 bed here, about 200 molecules can be tested, in duplicate, per hour for detergent-dependent sensitivi
237 s that the probability of parallel evolution in duplicate populations is inversely proportional to th
238     We reveal the key molecular substitution in duplicated pyruvate dehydrogenase genes that underpin
239 d heterocyclic carbene ligands was evaluated in duplicate reactions of two combinations.
240 ergone numerous independent events resulting in duplicate recD2 genes.
241 lling methods, and enables variant detection in duplicated regions of the genome that cannot be mappe
242 ased cloning identified two homologous genes in duplicated regions of the genome.
243 e accounted for by a low density of SNP data in duplicated regions, challenges in mapping and typing
244                           We extracted data, in duplicate, related to items of selection bias (sequen
245  a more important role of positive selection in duplicate retention than duplication-degeneration-com
246 and suggested a role of epigenetic mechanism in duplicate retention.
247 sign type bias, reducing technical variation in duplicate samples, improving accuracy of measurements
248 found to be nearly 1.5-2.0-fold up-regulated in duplicated samples at both the RNA and protein levels
249                                    Mutations in duplicate SBP-box transcription factor genes unbranch
250                                              In duplicate scans, the reliability of DXA measures of l
251                Two authors independently and in duplicate screened citations and reviewed text of stu
252                        Half of the mutations in duplicated segments were at previously unknown loci.
253 hat leverages substantially more information in duplicate sequences than used by previous methods and
254  improvements in array designs, particularly in duplicated sequences, are necessary to facilitate mor
255            Genomic sequences were determined in duplicate sequencing runs, and the consensus sequence
256   Patients and Methods Ten genes were tested in duplicate serum samples from 141 women at baseline, a
257         Lectins were printed on epoxy slides in duplicate sets to generate lectin super-microarrays w
258  antigenemia (more than three positive cells in duplicate staining); none of these patients subsequen
259 vels of HIV-1 RNA were consistently detected in duplicate swabs taken from the same woman on the same
260 When applied to extract DNA from 11 samples, in duplicate, the entire protocol can be completed in 6
261                                  We screened in duplicate, then extracted data and appraised risk of
262 ( approximately 70% of the E. coli proteome) in duplicate to generate a map of 2,234 interactions, wh
263 timulation of differentiation and hybridized in duplicate to high density Affymetrix microarray gene
264 copies (hypofunctionalization) that are held in duplicate to maintain sufficient quantity of function
265           Twenty experiments were performed, in duplicate, to sample the quadratic surface relating t
266  with each titration covering 12 data points in duplicate, took approximately 4h by the Gyrolab metho
267            A total of 120 chickens were used in duplicate trials to investigate the effectiveness of
268                                              In duplicate, two authors independently selected eligibl
269                    Risk of bias was assessed in duplicate using a risk of bias tool designed for the
270                            We extracted data in duplicate using a standardised approach.
271                         Data were abstracted in duplicate using a standardized data abstraction form.
272 Data from the included trials were extracted in duplicate using a structured proforma.
273        The strength of evidence was assessed in duplicate using Grading of Recommendations Assessment
274  peptides from each spot group were analyzed in duplicate using matrix-assisted laser desorption ioni
275    All microarray experiments were performed in duplicate using RNA obtained from independent experim
276 was completed by two reviewers independently in duplicate using standardized algorithms and checklist
277   Review selection and quality were assessed in duplicate using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic
278 The internal validity of trials was assessed in duplicate using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of
279  and certainty of the evidence were assessed in duplicate using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, versi
280                    Risk of bias was assessed in duplicate using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.
281               Internal validity was assessed in duplicate using the Risk of Bias tool.
282  sequenced in 48 individuals (five sequenced in duplicate) using the Illumina GA platform.
283                      Each sample was studied in duplicate, using a reference sample experimental desi
284                       When analyzed on-site, in duplicate, using hand-portable instrumentation, reaso
285                                              In duplicate, variables were extracted and coded with re
286                                              In duplicate, we abstracted trial characteristics and qu
287 urers' instructions, and tests were repeated in duplicate when errors occurred.
288                             Samples were run in duplicate where tissue volume permitted to compensate
289 ts (E1, E3, E5, E7, and E9) are each present in duplicate, whereas the remaining five unpaired elemen
290 en extracted data and appraised risk of bias in duplicate with a pre-tested form.
291 (CSF) specimens were tested in a blind study in duplicate with and without Pellet Paint coprecipitant
292         We have used nylon membranes spotted in duplicate with full-length polymerase chain reaction-
293                  Data analysis was performed in duplicate with further review by a third author in ca
294 er with primers to the chlamydia plasmid and in duplicate with primers to the major outer membrane pr
295 on until they are sampled, running all tests in duplicate with six dilutions instead of nine, reincub
296      For 249 specimens, the AA was performed in duplicate with two different commercially available m
297 w was performed followed by full-text review in duplicate, with conflicts settled through consensus,
298 ocol-were extracted and critically appraised in duplicate, with risk of bias evaluated using a modifi
299  mutagenesis of one residue can be completed in duplicate within a week by a single investigator.
300 ly described molecular evolutionary patterns in duplicate ZF genes throughout vertebrates.

 
Page Top