ライフサイエンスコーパス: in favor of

1 Our study provides evidence in favor of a causal link between high-beta oscillatory

2 omputational modeling, to establish evidence in favor of a class of drift-diffusion models of rhythmi

3 in Switch-II (SII) and alpha3-helix regions, in favor of a conformation that is associated with a cat

4 e results provide direct structural evidence in favor of a conformational selection model for basal a

5 hat by abandoning the common polydonor model in favor of a D-A dyad structure, a sufficiently strong

6 a selective suppression of vestibular inputs in favor of a feed-forward balance regulation based on l

7 s are avoiding potatoes and sugary beverages in favor of a greater variety of carbohydrate foods, par

8 eward processing and active reward dismissal in favor of a long-term goal.

9 ing an opposable digit that grasped branches in favor of a longitudinal arch (LA) that stiffens the f

10 the development of basal CK5-positive areas in favor of a luminal gene program.

11 tion and the current lack of strong evidence in favor of a more aggressive antithrombotic strategy re

12 l results have challenged this view, arguing in favor of a more integrated view of visual processing.

13 his process, epithelial traits are repressed in favor of a motile mesenchymal phenotype.

14 inally, competing interests can lead to bias in favor of a particular intervention.

15 However, the evidence in favor of a particular value of K cannot usually be co

16 Leibovich et al. argue that the evidence in favor of a perceptual mechanism devoted to the extrac

17 nd abrogates the allosteric E*-E equilibrium in favor of a rigid conformation that binds ligand at th

18 resent study constitutes functional evidence in favor of a role for the HBs in memory processes, and

19 clearance that has previously been sidelined in favor of a role for VAMP8.

20 or the inhibition of this prepotent response in favor of a saccade toward a small, low-luminance stim

21 to supplant H(2)S as a deprotection reagent in favor of a safer and more convenient alternative.

22 uthern Sierra or low-elevation Owens Valley, in favor of a simple isolation model with no migration b

23 g of its transcript, leading to an imbalance in favor of AapA1 toxin expression.

24 the opportunity, groups overwhelmingly vote in favor of abolishing individual solutions to shared pr

25 versus 89.6% (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.8 to 2.5) in favor of ABVD + INRT.

26 versus 87.1% (HR, 15.8; 95% CI, 3.8 to 66.1) in favor of ABVD + INRT; the U group, 92.1% versus 89.6%

27 etitive inhibition of Hg uptake by Zn speaks in favor of active transport and suggests that essential

28 The available data are often biased in favor of acute data from laboratory-controlled condit

29 resses autoxidation by H-atom transfer (HAT) in favor of addition, such that the epoxides are the maj

30 ate that mineral formation can be diminished in favor of adsorption, regardless of reduction pathway.

31 e desired 1,1-heterodifunctionalized product in favor of alternative homodifunctionalized, 1,2-hetero

32 in broad-spectrum antibiotic prescriptions, in favor of amoxicillin.

33 Herein, we offer evidence in favor of an alternative reaction mechanism involving

34 inflammatory response in the diseased kidney in favor of an anti-inflammatory milieu with a reduction

35 Our results provide statistical evidence in favor of an association of polyomaviruses and their h

36 expansion of reconstituted gene sets argues in favor of an expanded omnigenic model view on the gene

37 as locking the SD3-SD4 interface flexibility in favor of an extended conformer increased activity.

38 + shifted the GP2 conformational equilibrium in favor of an intermediate state primed for NPC1 bindin

39 remains uncertain, with some studies finding in favor of an inverse association and some against.

40 This argued strongly in favor of an isolated molecular event and against a co

41 derived LPS is misdirected by polyphosphates in favor of an M2 resembling phenotype.

42 s the recommendation that PBC not be delayed in favor of an NPBC in patients with partially platinum-

43 tumors (P = 0.142), a significant difference in favor of anatomical resection was observed in patient

44 eceased patients, and examine arguments both in favor of and against allowing relatives to "veto" the

45 We discuss arguments in favor of and against contact precautions for ESBL-EC

46 ciated with the collapse of lipid metabolism in favor of antimicrobial responses.

47 c shifts in polarized macrophage populations in favor of antitumor immunity were not seen with checkp

48 ttle evidence of significant bias against or in favor of any phylogenetic group expected or known to

49 ity and cosmesis outcomes were significantly in favor of APBI.

50 shifted the balance of Bcl-2 family proteins in favor of apoptosis, and decreased migration and intra

51 job candidates in ways that bias the process in favor of applicants of higher social class.

52 n post hoc analyses, significant differences in favor of asenapine over placebo were seen in time to

53 it contributes to biasing choices (criteria) in favor of attended information.

54 Financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive adults have been documented in th

55 to be more consistent or stronger than those in favor of attractive men, and biases are more consiste

56 stent with evolutionary explanations, biases in favor of attractive women appear to be more consisten

57 ctasis-Respiratory Symptoms Score at Week 4) in favor of aztreonam (mean difference of 9.7 points; 95

58 for the manipulation of host cell signaling in favor of bacterial pathogens.

59 site at low ATP concentrations, which shifts in favor of "base-off" Co(II)Cbl in the presence of exce

60 rder (MDD) largely ignore biological factors in favor of behavioral symptoms.

61 mixed, with some showing significant changes in favor of benralizumab and others not showing signific

62 r modeling to repurpose nucleoside scaffolds in favor of binding at nonpurine receptors as novel 5HT2

63 Although some argue in favor of bistability, others argue against it.

64 hift in the pool of acetyl "reader" proteins in favor of BRD9-regulated target genes.

65 16 to -0.86; P = .003) and a Cohen d of 0.31 in favor of CBASP.

66 tion for most of human chromosomes is biased in favor of centromeres with high abundance of DNA-depen

67 This bias in favor of charge-separated states has important conseq

68 educed relapse rate (44% +/- 3 vs 35% +/- 3) in favor of clofarabine and an increased death probabili

69 T-cell proliferation was skewed in favor of CM and EM CD4Tcon and CD8 T cells, especiall

70 the inhibition of automatic motor responses in favor of cognitively controlled movements.

71 the inhibition of automatic motor responses in favor of cognitively controlled movements.SIGNIFICANC

72 on gradients of host-cell-produced cytokines in favor of complement-derived anaphylatoxins, which the

73 group A patients (P<0.001), for a difference in favor of complete PVI of 17.1% (95% confidence interv

74 ifferent modules displayed a clear asymmetry in favor of connections from faster to slower modules.

75 operative comparison between both groups was in favor of CPCS group vs. FLACS group regarding total a

76 cts by catalytically tipping the equilibrium in favor of crystal growth adding cholesterol from the m

77 re was a Treatment Group by Time Interaction in favor of DCS-augmented HRT (p < 0.01), controlling fo

78 Overall, 62.3% of cases were resolved in favor of defendants.

79 willingness to forgo immediate small rewards in favor of delayed larger rewards.

80 Theories in favor of deliberative democracy are based on the prem

81 In fact, substitution rates are biased in favor of dominant sex determining chromosomes, which

82 around passenger mutations provide a signal in favor of driver genes.

83 s and shifted the ratio of viral dsRNA/ssRNA in favor of dsRNA.

84 rapy with conventional antiepileptic therapy in favor of early limitation of care or novel neuroprote

85 uptions to host defense that tip the balance in favor of EBV can have catastrophic effects.

86 ates and correctly rejecting variable models in favor of effectively constant models.

87 bers of naive CD4 and especially CD8 T cells in favor of effector memory subpopulations.

88 -3, together with Ag, drives differentiation in favor of effector T cells via the activation of mTOR

89 n ERR-beta agonist shifts isoform expression in favor of ERR-beta2 and potentiates inhibition of grow

90 was not significantly different but trended in favor of everolimus (16.5 v 22.8 months; hazard ratio

91 The mean difference was in favor of everolimus by 11.8 mL/min in the intent-to-t

92 ween group difference of 13 mm Hg (P = 0.02) in favor of everolimus.

93 coexistence of cubic and rhombohedral phases in favor of exceptional figures-of-merit zT.

94 e was a statistically significant difference in favor of ExCR for HRQoL and exercise capacity.

95 Improvements in favor of executive training did not appear immediatel

96 In this Personal Viewpoint essay, we argue in favor of expanding one such pilot project-the Compreh

97 ansmission and a suppression of DMN activity in favor of externally-directed attentional processes.

98 criteria were also statistically significant in favor of F17464 (p values < 0.05) using the LOCF meth

99 MI) method, the between-group difference was in favor of F17464 but did not reach statistical signifi

100 abolic reprogramming that preserves glycogen in favor of fatty acid oxidation and mitochondrial respi

101 spermatids and either a distorted sex ratio in favor of females (smaller deletions) or sterility (la

102 ould have substantial practical implications in favor of forage-related biodiversity conservation and

103 II(lo) DCs, and skewed the Treg-Th17 balance in favor of Foxp3(+) Tregs while decreasing Th17 cells.

104 expression in healthy skin is down-regulated in favor of FSTL1 upon wounding, which enhances keratino

105 mparable behavior in prostate cancer models, in favor of future theranostic use in GRPR-positive canc

106 the change of indexed LV end-systolic volume in favor of G-CSF group (P=0.02).

107 the agonist activity of ropinirole is biased in favor of Galpha(i1) recruitment, and that the agonist

108 There was a trend toward long-term survival in favor of GemErlo (estimated survival after 1, 2, and

109 nzyme that suppresses mitochondrial activity in favor of glycolysis.

110 other and regulate conformational equilibria in favor of headpiece opening.

111 her against partially recessive mutations or in favor of heterozygotes, may result in an apparent sel

112 This latter effect biases binding in favor of higher methylated states.

113 A difference in CD4 gain was observed in favor of HIV-1/M at W48 and W96, but this was not sig

114 mune cells, TAM RTKs can dampen inflammation in favor of homeostatic wound-healing responses, thus po

115 We provide theoretical arguments in favor of IBS and an empirical assessment of the metho

116 ference in CBL changes of 0.179 +/- 0.174 mm in favor of IIP without GBR when compared with implant w

117 ne checkpoint inhibitors may tip the balance in favor of immune surveillance in these cancers.

118 nce between mitochondrial fusion and fission in favor of increased fission, reducing the metabolic ca

119 ol clearance, altered hepatic lipid profiles in favor of increased levels of polyunsaturated fatty ac

120 CI, to detect a clinically important benefit in favor of initial vitrectomy with panretinal photocoag

121 ded host protein provides compelling support in favor of inteins acting as pause buttons to arrest pr

122 step, for ipi10 versus HDI (n = 989), trends in favor of ipi10 did not achieve statistical significan

123 1,051) and showed significant OS difference in favor of ipi3 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95.6% repeate

124 Humans also bias cooperation in favor of kin and reciprocating partners, but the scop

125 al of beta-elimination substrate specificity in favor of l-serine over the normally preferred l-serin

126 demonstrated an unexpected survival benefit in favor of laparoscopic over open resection for CLM in

127 revascularization rates (P=0.007) were found in favor of larger vessel size and oversized stents.

128 permanent stoma rates and anastomotic leaks in favor of LC but with an increased perineal wound brea

129 in the N-terminal region of Abeta aggregates in favor of less compact conformations.

130 ssion of prepotent stimulus-driven responses in favor of less potent alternatives.

131 as 1.79 (95% confidence interval, 1.20-2.67) in favor of licensed drugs.

132 Our results therefore strongly argue in favor of local immune remodeling at the onset of part

133 actor to forgo potential immediate benefits in favor of long-term social interests.

134 lying less on high-level explicit strategies in favor of low-level implicit motor learning.

135 iter (95% confidence interval, -517 to -179) in favor of luspatercept.

136 ed and statistically significant gender bias in favor of males (p = 0.0016), but none of the clinical

137 tal studies provide more compelling evidence in favor of mating motives and suggest the direction of

138 showed statistically significant differences in favor of metabolic surgery, including mortality.

139 The clinical and para-clinical findings were in favor of mitochondrial neurogastrointestinal encephal

140 If we abandon the coding metaphor in favor of models of the full behavioral loop, we need

141 t to improve long-term outcomes may diminish in favor of more repetitive or exploitatory choices.

142 cant difference in the DRI score at 3 months in favor of nail fixation (mean score, 44.2 in the nail

143 nt difference in mean OMAS at 3 and 6 months in favor of nail fixation.

144 brain barrier in a discriminating way biased in favor of non-pathogenic CD8(+) T cells relative to ot

145 vailable in the drug environment but forgone in favor of nondrug alternative reinforcers.

146 early reduced, and biotransformation shifted in favor of norfluoxetine, the primary fluoxetine metabo

147 bees that ignore previously familiar stimuli in favor of novel ones and low-LI bees that learn famili

148 olute Cohen's d ranged between 0.12 and 1.12 in favor of NSI-189, p values between 0.002 and 0.048 fo

149 ranscriptase inhibitors in the cART regimen, in favor of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

150 ents with fibrotic HP, suggestions were made in favor of obtaining BAL for lymphocyte cellular analys

151 th nonfibrotic HP, a recommendation was made in favor of obtaining bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid

152 or both retreatment strategies, with a trend in favor of OCT-guided vs BCVA loss guided retreatment.

153 unger females may prompt males to avoid them in favor of older but more fecund females.

154 a significant and moderate to strong effect in favor of omega-3.

155 ve studies failed to provide strong evidence in favor of one particular vascular approach and the spe

156 ase events because it had a recruitment bias in favor of opening more RyRs.

157 evidence to inform clinical recommendations in favor of or against various diagnostic tests in patie

158 number of Americans choose to curtail sleep in favor of other social, leisure, or work-related activ

159 to TB risk estimation among people with LTBI in favor of our evidence-based and patient-centered meth

160 The safety of discontinuing aspirin in favor of P2Y(12) inhibitor monotherapy remains disput

161 A nominally significant difference in OS in favor of patients randomized to eribulin compared wit

162 This study strengthens the case in favor of performing DALK over PK when possible.

163 Next, we describe and discuss the arguments in favor of permitting donation intentions to be overrul

164 respectively, were statistically significant in favor of PET/CT.

165 12% (95%CI: -17% to -8%, I2: 54%, p&0.00001) in favor of pNPWT.

166 ficant difference in complications was seen, in favor of polypropylene mesh repair (P = 0.044, 22.1%

167 Publication bias in favor of positive findings influences the distributio

168 We find that selection in favor of preferred codons ranges from weak (|N(e)s| ~

169 nsion, and patient satisfaction seemed to be in favor of preperitoneal wound catheters compared with

170 o exclude DCM compounds from screening decks in favor of previously untested or less tested compounds

171 at induces cell death by tipping the balance in favor of proapoptotic gene expression.

172 D4 module results in loss of enterocyte fate in favor of progenitor and secretory cell lineages.

173 tion of AED location was consistently skewed in favor of public locations.

174 This argues against recycling models and in favor of pulling models.

175 interneuron networks shifted their activity in favor of pyramidal neuron hyperactivity: somatostatin

176 BCVA between treatment arms was 1.8 letters in favor of ranibizumab after 6 months of follow-up; BCV

177 ere was significant difference in BCVA gains in favor of ranibizumab.

178 types that normally bias their connectivity in favor of red cones fail to precisely recapture this s

179 ine data are essential to determining policy in favor of reducing poverty.

180 The odds ratio in favor of resolution of severe asthma was 2.75 (95% CI

181 their sensitivity to global changes in light in favor of responses to spatial patterns.

182 und complications (38.3% vs 50.0%, P = 0.26) in favor of SC.

183 here most of the glycomic profile is ignored in favor of selecting a few features, or even a single f

184 Arbitrating in favor of self-gathered information activated the dors

185 ered a 2-fold discriminatory mechanism of FH in favor of self: relative to FHL-1, FH exhibits a regul

186 IL-2 can augment the gammadeltaT-17 response in favor of short-lived effectors with limited plasticit

187 cked, collective MEC phenotypes were reduced in favor of single MECs migrating away from spheroids.

188 This study provides encouraging evidence in favor of SMAPs as potential anticancer drugs.

189 cortex and the midbrain, whereas arbitrating in favor of social information engaged the ventromedial

190 eted as evidence for an intrinsic preference in favor of sooner rewards.

191 achieved a statistically significant result in favor of standard therapy or a null result with no st

192 a random walk) and uniform increasing trends in favor of stepwise shifts for explaining increasing co

193 tegies that target TAMs indiscriminately and in favor of strategies that specifically target immunosu

194 y rates 4-6 fold and shifting the microbiome in favor of stress-associated taxa.

195 e-free cycle and by high-affinity inhibitors in favor of structurally symmetric nucleotide binding si

196 he model to TRACERx evolutionary data argued in favor of substantial and sustained immune pressure ex

197 her, M120 confers a net discriminative force in favor of substrate by 100- to 858-folds.

198 ay from the reaction center, to discriminate in favor of substrate.

199 revious revascularization (adjusted HR: 0.82 in favor of such treatment; 95% CI: 0.75 to 0.91).

200 uction of NAbs, but there are good arguments in favor of suppressing such "off-target" immune respons

201 This defect shuts off miR-198 expression in favor of sustained FSTL1 translation, driving metasta

202 Initially overlooked in favor of T cell-mediated rejection, the importance of

203 asing of competitive local neuronal dynamics in favor of task-relevant stimuli [6], this "inhibitory

204 nges in the percentage of the predicted FEV1 in favor of tezacaftor-ivacaftor over placebo were 4.0 p

205 PK pathways, shifting the iTreg polarization in favor of Th1 and Th17 subsets.

206 ific regulatory T cells; or immune deviation in favor of TH1 responses.

207 ulation, hence rejecting "simple regulation" in favor of the "coordinate regulation" model.

208 The reaction is diastereoselective, in favor of the 1S epimer, when large groups are attache

209 A notable selectivity in favor of the 2-hydroxybenzophenone derivatives was ob

210 nant for the control of the regioselectivity in favor of the 6-endo process.

211 ing, or allosteric, hypothesis was abandoned in favor of the associative hypothesis, which posited th

212 rs, the products obtained were redistributed in favor of the best anion binders.

213 follow-up between the CCEP and control group in favor of the CCEP.

214 eshold, which represented the total evidence in favor of the chosen target.

215 rates of any breastfeeding ranged from 14.1% in favor of the control group to 18.4% in favor of the i

216 dy provides the first experimental arguments in favor of the corticofugal hypothesis of amyotrophic l

217 19 points (two-sided 90% CI, -0.33 to -0.05) in favor of the CRP-guided group.

218 Rather than staking out positions in favor of the ctenophores-sister or the sponges-sister

219 ury award amounts, whether the case resolved in favor of the defendant, and the type of glaucomatous

220 ng in femoropopliteal interventions; a trend in favor of the DES was observed up to 36 months.

221 n C-1 of the acceptor displaced the reaction in favor of the desired galactofuranosyl containing disa

222 H vs. DLS, specifically shifting the balance in favor of the DH-based spatial memory system, although

223 tructure reduce or eliminate this preference in favor of the disordered phase.

224 return with, on average, a directional bias in favor of the dominant segregating sex chromosome.

225 ed for postprocedural extracorporeal support in favor of the DS group (odds ratio, 0.22; 95% confiden

226 duce the pool of soluble toxic Abeta species in favor of the formation of larger insoluble nontoxic a

227 between the immune system and cancer or HIV in favor of the former, allowing elimination of diseased

228 hange over time of -4.6 (95% CI=-8.7, -0.56) in favor of the group that continued methylphenidate tre

229 tics tools, we have obtained strong evidence in favor of the HN stalk-mediated activation of paramyxo

230 ion may shift this host-pathogen interaction in favor of the host.

231 th Bayesian statistics and found no evidence in favor of the hypothesis that language lateralization

232 In total, our study provides strong support in favor of the hypothesis that protein aggregation is n

233 g barrier can be detrimental unless balanced in favor of the immune system.

234 kpoint inhibitor therapy to tilt the balance in favor of the immune system.

235 Recent experiments provide sound arguments in favor of the in vivo expression of the AntiSense Prot

236 primary outcome scores shifted consistently in favor of the intensive strategy, with a common OR for

237 ing complications were significantly reduced in favor of the intervention (OR = 0.401; CI, 0.302-0.53

238 Both acORs are in favor of the intervention (P for interaction = 0.07).

239 ty, and biomarkers of cardiometabolic health in favor of the intervention group, but not in quality o

240 14.1% in favor of the control group to 18.4% in favor of the intervention group.

241 d to detect clinically important differences in favor of the intervention should be considered when i

242 overall acOR was 1.67 (95% CI, 1.21 to 2.30) in favor of the intervention.

243 8 steps/day (97.5% CI, 309-1.048; p < 0.001) in favor of the intervention.

244 tive time and direct institutional cost seem in favor of the laparoscopic approach.

245 hifted the MHC-II(lo)/MHC-II(hi) TAM balance in favor of the latter as observed by the preferential d

246 en spontaneous folding and chaperone binding in favor of the latter.

247 age 2: 2-formyl-6-methylpyridine was ejected in favor of the less sterically hindered 2-formylpyridin

248 and flow time were significantly (P < 0.05) in favor of the LL group at 1 and 9 months from surgery.

249 as people give up use of a minority language in favor of the majority language in a process called la

250 -Meier curves showed significant differences in favor of the mesh group (long-rank = 4.21, P = 0.04).

251 eductive elimination is predicted to be more in favor of the methyl group than the methylene of the p

252 achieved a statistically significant result in favor of the new experimental treatment for the proto

253 task workload, and questionnaire assessment in favor of the novel viewer, as compared to all 3 modal

254 h a compositional asymmetry of 0.63 +/- 0.04 in favor of the outer leaflet.

255 rms, whereas overall survival showed a trend in favor of the panitumumab-containing arm (hazard ratio

256 s below critical maxima, tipping the balance in favor of the parasite.

257 at Pla plays a dual role to tilt the balance in favor of the pathogen.

258 The 17 cases that resulted in verdicts in favor of the pediatric plaintiff had a mean jury awar

259 tam antibiotics as potential inhibitors, and in favor of the peptidoglycan substrate.

260 nts [95% confidence interval, -11.4 to -1.4] in favor of the placebo group; P = 0.01).

261 dness were more likely to result in verdicts in favor of the plaintiff (difference, 60.5%; 95% CI, -1

262 tric patients was more likely to be resolved in favor of the plaintiff and was associated with higher

263 Of these 35 cases, verdicts in favor of the plaintiff were issued in 17 pediatric ca

264 ophthalmitis were more likely to be resolved in favor of the plaintiff.

265 4-month slow slip cycle in Cascadia, arguing in favor of the predictability of slow slip rupture.

266 hat exogenously administered CgA was cleaved in favor of the proangiogenic form and was associated wi

267 ants in Brazil and Haiti and report evidence in favor of the putative role of human mobility in facil

268 the reduction of goethite with fewer defects in favor of the reduction of minerals with more defects.

269 In these children, a systematic bias in favor of the response of another person emerged at ar

270 ant difference between them but with a trend in favor of the rituximab group at 12 months.

271 t difference between groups but with a trend in favor of the rituximab group.

272 Balaskas et al. (2019) provide new evidence in favor of the role of positional strategies in the org

273 contributions from solvation entropy, again in favor of the S-complex.

274 e adjustment, the difference was significant in favor of the screening group (hazard ratio, 0.17; 95%

275 Here, we bring evidence in favor of the supramodality hypothesis by showing that

276 The efficacy results trended modestly in favor of the treatment group, but no statistically si

277 These results are in favor of the use of UAEPC as potential additive in fo

278 provement in the ratio between these genomes in favor of the wild-type, known as heteroplasmy shiftin

279 ant, and the authors offer several arguments in favor of their strategy.

280 esses in the incongruent condition and speak in favor of theories that assume a longer duration of sp

281 l-5D quotient was of borderline significance in favor of therapy (-0.03; 95% CI, -0.07 to -0.002; P =

282 fectiveness, the pooled overall effects were in favor of these 10 nonpharmacological interventions.

283 ement learning task, we show strong evidence in favor of this hypothesis.

284 evidence assembled by Casagrande and others in favor of this hypothesis.

285 evious laser-heating experiments is resolved in favor of those experiments reporting the higher melti

286 d out before a strong recommendation is made in favor of TNT.

287 ciated with individuals expressing less bias in favor of traditional gender roles and categories, as

288 Abhay Sharma brings two arguments in favor of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance (TG

289 Alive and Ventilator Free less often found in favor of treatments that increased mortality and incr

290 hormones can shift the immunological balance in favor of Tregs via differential engagement of the GR

291 nisms may exist to modulate MEK/ERK activity in favor of tumor cell proliferation.

292 the ECT course (mean difference=1.08 points in favor of unilateral ECT [95% CI=-1.67 to 3.84]).

293 Here we argue in favor of using an objective approach to phylogeograph

294 rences between the two prosthetic techniques in favor of using DAs.

295 quilibrium from dimer formation dramatically in favor of viral capsid assembly.

296 by altering the host gene expression program in favor of viral persistence.

297 is causing a shift in biological communities in favor of warm-affinity species (i.e., thermophilizati

298 changes in CO2 and fire shifted the balance in favor of woody plants.

299 are group (baseline-adjusted mean difference in favor of Yoga-CaRe: 1.5; 95% CI: 0.5 to 2.5; p = 0.00

300 lity of K2 to bind the (pro)catalytic domain in favor of zymogen, thereby enforcing zymogen-like char