ライフサイエンスコーパス: in situ hybridization

1 h have been further confirmed by fluorescent in situ hybridization.

2 identified from this assay with whole mount in situ hybridization.

3 investigated using immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization.

4 expressed in the hippocampus using RNAscope in situ hybridization.

5 te, and adult heart confirmed by qRT-PCR and in situ hybridization.

6 d over time by PCR, immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization.

7 which we confirmed through high-sensitivity in situ hybridization.

8 system (CNS) of Scyliorhinus canicula using in situ hybridization.

9 euroinformatics and validated by fluorescent in situ hybridization.

10 ns and validated the results using multiplex in situ hybridization.

11 d choroid plexus of both rats and humans via in situ hybridization.

12 validated using single molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization.

13 vents, using flow cytometry and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

14 ngthening of telomeres (ALT) by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization.

15 RNA is subsequently detected by fluorescent in situ hybridization.

16 e of the anastomosis and within tumors using in situ hybridization.

17 using double-label immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization.

18 e-seq identified maxRNAs by RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization.

19 st their expression with double fluorescence in situ hybridization.

20 in human beta-cells and little PCSK2 mRNA by in situ hybridization.

21 n cells, DNA-origami folding and fluorescent in-situ hybridization.

22 l(4,6,8) or single-molecule RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization(3,5,8,9) recordings of selected lo

23 block-face scanning electron microscopy with in situ hybridization (3D-EMISH) to visualize 3D chromat

24 -cell analysis, single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization, advanced immunohistochemistry and

25 fections were verified by histopathology and in situ hybridization analyses of both male and recipien

26 In situ hybridization analyses of mouse embryos show tha

27 cell RNA sequencing, flow cytometry, and RNA in situ hybridization analyses to validate key findings.

28 Through in situ hybridization analyses, we demonstrate that expr

29 video microscopy-, immunofluorescence-, and in situ hybridization analyses, we investigated the init

30 polymerase chain reaction, and fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses.

31 Applying single-cell RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis and quantitative PCR, we

32 Here we used single-cell RNA sequencing, in situ hybridization, anatomical tracing, and spatial c

33 By anatomic tracing, in situ hybridization and channelrhodopsin (ChR2)-assist

34 Recent advances in automated RNAscope in situ hybridization and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) te

35 We then use a combination of in situ hybridization and ex vivo two-photon Ca(2+) imag

36 ogenitors progress through the cell cycle by in situ hybridization and fluorescent miRNA sensor analy

37 ranscriptomics, single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization and high-resolution imaging, can e

38 ic hedgehog (SHH) signaling was confirmed by in situ hybridization and immunofluorescence suggesting

39 Using in situ hybridization and immunofluorescence techniques,

40 By in situ hybridization and immunofluorescence, we showed

41 In situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry confirm t

42 We now use in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry to charac

43 Through the integration of transcriptomics, in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry we find e

44 eriments since conventional methods, such as in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry, cannot i

45 In situ hybridization and immunohistological assays dete

46 Murine and human in situ hybridization and immunostaining revealed PPP1R1

47 ng a combination of computational analytics, in situ hybridization and in vitro characterization of p

48 LTF mRNA in situ hybridization and LTF protein immunohistochemist

49 molecular technologies, such as fluorescence in situ hybridization and next-generation sequencing has

50 he widespread implementation of fluorescence in situ hybridization and next-generation sequencing met

51 by indirect immunofluorescence, fluorescent in situ hybridization and PCR-based investigations.

52 ical function in the upper airways, RNAscope in situ hybridization and quantitative PCR to assess CFT

53 as measured using flow cytometry, ELISA, RNA in situ hybridization and quantitative real time PCR.

54 Fluorescence in situ hybridization and quantitative real-time polymer

55 Immunocytochemistry, in situ hybridization and RT-qPCR were utilized, when ap

56 and E- embryos, which were subjected to RNA in situ hybridization and RT-qPCR.

57 We use fluorescent in situ hybridization and transmission electron microsco

58 y number gains identified using fluorescence in situ hybridization and, in particular, next-generatio

59 Using a combination of immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, and a transgenic reporter assay,

60 reaction, further confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization, and amplified by the MALBAC metho

61 e, in combination with immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, and chemogenetic manipulations to

62 Immunofluorescence, in situ hybridization, and confocal imaging demonstrated

63 We also used immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, and electron microscopy to examin

64 -PCR), localization of infection by RNAscope in situ hybridization, and histopathological abnormities

65 els in rodent and primate brains using qPCR, in situ hybridization, and immunocytochemical single and

66 analyzed using RT-qPCR, mRNA array analysis, in situ hybridization, and immunofluorescence.

67 hromosome-based chromosome painting, genomic in situ hybridization, and multi-gene phylogenetics, we

68 etry, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, RNA in situ hybridization, and quantitative real-time PCR.

69 istology, immunohistochemistry, immunoblots, in situ hybridization, and quantitative real-time polyme

70 Immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, and real-time polymerase chain re

71 interactions by phase contrast, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and scanning electron microscopy.

72 ng, immunofluorescence staining, fluorescent in situ hybridization, and single-cell sequencing.

73 east cancer genes by multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization, and targeted sequence analysis of

74 smooth muscle cells by immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, and transmission electron microsc

75 gic analysis, immunohistochemistry, RNAscope in situ hybridization, and transmission electron microsc

76 demonstrate the feasibility of fluorescence in situ hybridization- and sequencing-based methods to i

77 h cSCC in situ, and actinic keratosis by RNA in situ hybridization; and the expression in seborrheic

78 Here, an in situ hybridization approach to generate a single-cell

79 sophila using an allele-specific fluorescent in situ-hybridization approach to distinguish wild-type

80 s of variants) and cytogenetic (fluorescence in situ hybridization) approaches to study the structure

81 nofluorescence, 15-PGDH activity assays, and in situ hybridization as well as ex vivo IPF tissue cult

82 et of which were validated using fluorescent in situ hybridization as well as whole-mount immunolabel

83 In situ hybridization assay of the validated miR was use

84 In situ hybridization assays detected positive signals o

85 Real-Time PCR and whole mount in situ hybridization assays indicate that prokr1b spati

86 n this study, our transcriptome analysis and in situ hybridization assays of maize embryonic leaves s

87 Real-time quantitative RT-PCR and RNAscope in situ hybridization assays were used for assessing the

88 ng nuclear/cytoplasmic fractionation and RNA in-situ hybridization assays, we demonstrated predominan

89 a quantitative single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization-based method to quantify splicing

90 nal strength in single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization, but probes tagged with an HCR ini

91 d catalysed reporter deposition fluorescence in situ hybridization (CARD-FISH) on >14 500 archaeal an

92 plications with confirmation by fluorescence in situ hybridization, chromosomal microarray analysis,

93 used different approaches including RNAscope in situ hybridization combined with light-sheet microsco

94 In situ hybridization confirmed an increase in BDNF expr

95 mmunohistochemical analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization confirmed the presence of allogene

96 In situ hybridization confirmed these findings.

97 ctions by using a combination of fluorescent in situ hybridization, confocal laser scanning microscop

98 In situ hybridization data localized DCN expression to a

99 ng quantitative single molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization data.

100 al patterns of expression using fluorescence in-situ hybridization data and to establish associations

101 ens paired with single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization directly implicate Y-specific gene

102 By in situ hybridization, each gene responded in different

103 In a comprehensive in situ hybridization effort, we show that the zebra fin

104 cells comprising hundreds of myonuclei, and in situ hybridization experiments have reported a range

105 scriptional profiling and highly multiplexed in situ hybridization experiments of the mouse habenula

106 roughput RNA sequencing and RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization experiments.

107 resolution, and with the data of fluorescent in situ hybridization experiments.

108 We used previously published in vivo in situ hybridization expression data to ground truth ge

109 -orcein chromosome staining and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses confirmed that L.

110 h combined results from IHC and Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses when analyzed with

111 Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis revealed two massi

112 Here we used fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and immuno-FISH on metaphas

113 lines using single-molecule RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and made several unexpected

114 tion, integrated with metaphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and PacBio sequencing on th

115 nfirmed this model by interphase fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and sequencing of purified

116 Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) approaches allow 3D archite

117 aracterized via histological and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) approaches respectively, an

118 sociated cells are labeled using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for RNA, and then isolated

119 Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) has been used extensively i

120 Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a powerful method to vis

121 Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a powerful single-cell t

122 Background Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a standard method for 1p

123 al DNA (rDNA) and an established fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) microscopy method.

124 e lineage-specific rRNA-targeted fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) microscopy, we demonstrate

125 and locus- and region-specific fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes designed in our lab

126 observed > 70% concordance with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results.

127 Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) reveals the abundance and p

128 We develop a haplotype-specific fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique that allows visua

129 a confirmed by ribosomal (r)RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to be associated with S. st

130 We use fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to characterize the endogen

131 ing with chromosome 3 status by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), comparative genomic hybrid

132 P, telomere immunofluorescence, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), micronuclei imaging, and t

133 Multiplexed with oligopaint DNA-fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-FISH and protein fluor

134 56 cyclin D1(-)/SOX11(+) MCL by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), whole-genome/exome sequenc

135 ed neuronal populations through fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

136 o 1p/19q codeletion status with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

137 ssessed the effect on CIN using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

138 iable using standard breakapart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

139 in normal somatic tissues using Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH).

140 next-generation sequencing, or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

141 es were investigated by means of fluorescent in situ hybridization for 10 different bacterial taxa.

142 Based on in situ hybridization for arcopallial-expressed transcri

143 oni, including immunohistochemistry for AVT, in situ hybridization for avt-mRNA, and quantitative PCR

144 he following: immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization for HER2/MET amplification, IHC wi

145 In situ hybridization for miR-517a/c, a C19MC cistron mi

146 use of immunohistochemistry or fluorescence in situ hybridization for patients with tumors likely to

147 DX) is a novel technology using fluorescence in situ hybridization for rapid species identification (

148 ulation increased HSPC number as assessed by in situ hybridization for runx1/cmyb and flow cytometry.

149 ron microscopy were largely unrevealing, and in situ hybridization for SARS-CoV-2 showed no definitiv

150 In situ hybridization for tac3a mRNA identified cell pop

151 Fluorescence in situ hybridization for the MYC, BCL2, BCL6, and IG he

152 th EGFP(Vgat) neurons, which we validated by in situ hybridization for Vgat mRNA.

153 Histopathological examinations and in situ hybridizations for EBV in tumors, spleen, liver,

154 Recently, methods for serial fluorescent in situ hybridization have made it possible to measure t

155 esolution microbiome mapping by fluorescence in situ hybridization (HiPR-FISH), a versatile technolog

156 Indeed, immunofluorescence/fluorescence in situ hybridization (immuno-FISH) assays demonstrate f

157 lopmental stages, GXD includes data from RNA in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, RT-PCR, nor

158 s, GXD collects and integrates data from RNA in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, RT-PCR, nor

159 the maternofetal interface, as evidenced by in situ hybridization/immunohistochemistry.

160 ineage tracing, clonal analysis, multiplexed in situ hybridization, immunostaining, deep confocal ima

161 Using high-content digital imaging of RNA in situ hybridization in 195 PDAC tumors, we quantified

162 iplexed fluorescent immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization in combination with whole slide im

163 ssessed by TaqMan assay, RNA-sequencing, and in situ hybridization in four independent cohorts of hum

164 for visualization of 18S rRNA by fluorescent in situ hybridization in HEK-293T cells.

165 ntraparenchymal HHV-6 gene expression by RNA in situ hybridization in lung tissue in all three tested

166 during nitrofen-induced PH using RT-qPCR and in situ hybridization in the nitrofen rat model of PH an

167 - and pangenomic techniques and fluorescence in-situ hybridization in 2 age groups (cutoff age, 18 mo

168 assessed by TaqMan-assay, RNA-sequencing and in-situ-hybridization in 4 indepedent cohorts of human B

169 ngle-nucleus findings using RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization, in situ sequencing, and computati

170 Here, we show, by in situ hybridization (ISH) and by the analysis of trans

171 Using in situ hybridization (ISH) and quantitative real-time P

172 Notably, real-time PCR and in situ hybridization (ISH) assays confirmed that the to

173 phy (micro-CT), histology, histomorphometry, in situ hybridization (ISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC),

174 ls or through more targeted approaches using in situ hybridization (ISH).

175 elevant miRNAs were validated by qRT-PCR and in situ hybridization (ISH).

176 sequencing (scRNA-seq) and quantitative RNA in situ hybridization (ISH).

177 Using RNA in situ hybridization, lipoprotein lipase (LPL) was foun

178 approach called CRISPR live-cell fluorescent in situ hybridization (LiveFISH) using fluorescent oligo

179 ation and relationship with VEGF pathway via in situ hybridization maps and RNA sequencing data.

180 ions that match single molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization measurements.

181 Multiplexed error-robust fluorescence in situ hybridization (MERFISH) allows simultaneous imag

182 aches, multiplexed error-robust fluorescence in situ hybridization (MERFISH) has achieved spatially r

183 Multiplexed error-robust fluorescence in situ hybridization (MERFISH) is used to read out the

184 port a multiplexed error-robust fluorescence in situ hybridization (MERFISH)-based method for genome-

185 Multiplexed error-robust fluorescence in-situ hybridization (MERFISH) is a recent technology t

186 ession in cancer cells using the fluorescent in situ hybridization method (FISH) and immunohistochemi

187 esent split-FISH, a multiplexed fluorescence in situ hybridization method that leverages a split-prob

188 f SmedTV in discrete cells was shown through in situ hybridization methods for detecting the viral RN

189 Improved in situ hybridization methods for mRNA detection in tiss

190 niques, such as single-molecule fluorescence in-situ hybridization, microfluidics, and optogenetics,

191 ctric fish, Apteronotus leptorhynchus, using in situ hybridization of choline acetyltransferase mRNA.

192 Despite these observations, in situ hybridization of GBM specimens and analysis of p

193 In situ hybridization of IPF lung biopsies revealed that

194 ntestine, heart, liver and spleen as well as in situ hybridization of kidneys.

195 Results of fluorescent in situ hybridization of microdissected GRC probes and t

196 In situ hybridization of sarcoidosis granulomatous lung

197 In situ hybridization of Sult2a1 in mice showed expressi

198 One week after intrasplenic PBMC injection, in situ hybridization of the spleen demonstrated extensi

199 pheral blood neutrophils and lymphocytes and in situ hybridization of the sputum were used to identif

200 helial miR-182 expression was quantified via in situ hybridization of two prostate tissue microarrays

201 ncreatic beta cells were also examined using in situ hybridization on the frozen pancreatic sections.

202 ptions during inner ear development, we used in situ hybridization or immunohistochemistry to map the

203 erse translational approach and by combining in situ hybridization, primary cell isolation, immunoblo

204 RNA and DNA in situ hybridization probes for 25 commensal beta-HPVs

205 e tool called 'Vetting & Analysis of RNA for in situ Hybridization probes' (VARNISH) for probe design

206 testinal tissues were analyzed by histology, in situ hybridization, proliferation assays, and immunob

207 were made by real-time quantitative PCR, RNA in situ hybridization, quantitative confocal microscopy,

208 virus in the brain by immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, quantitative polymerase chain rea

209 ation of viral genomes using RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization revealed a striking difference in

210 RNAscope in situ hybridization revealed dynamic and special chang

211 Fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed increased epithelial pene

212 In situ hybridization revealed that GLP1R mRNA is expres

213 ts, their presence confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization, revealed recovery of function of

214 We demonstrate using RNA-sequencing and RNA-in situ hybridization (RNA-ISH) that FOLFIRINOX combinat

215 omatid exchange (SCE) assay with fluorescent in situ hybridization (SCE-FISH).

216 rate an evolution of sequential fluorescence in situ hybridization (seqFISH+).

217 Immunostaining and in situ hybridization show that these cells are concentr

218 RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization showed a near complete loss of Fox

219 Multiplex in situ hybridization showed similar distributions of te

220 Additionally, in situ hybridization showed that DMD messenger RNA prim

221 including fibulin-2 and macrophage CSF1; RNA in situ hybridization showed that expression of these tw

222 In situ hybridization showed that miR-200b-3p is express

223 In situ hybridization showed two distinct pituitary cell

224 ive multiplexed single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization (smFISH) and measured the expressi

225 we have adapted single molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization (smFISH) for use in the Drosophila

226 Multiplex single-molecule fluorescent in situ hybridization (smFISH) is a powerful method for

227 Here we use single-molecule RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization (smFISH) on mouse stem cells deriv

228 ly relevant for single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization (smFISH) studies in Caenorhabditis

229 combination of single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization (smFISH), time-lapse microscopy, a

230 Here, we used single-molecule fluorescence in-situ hybridization (smFISH) to detect alpha-satellite

231 croscopy and single-molecule RNA Fluorescent in-situ Hybridization (smFISH).

232 In contrast to colorimetric in situ hybridization, sRNA-FISH signals can be imaged u

233 Additional genetic tests and fluorescent in situ hybridization studies are helpful for clonal ide

234 immunofluorescence, electron microscopy, and in situ hybridization studies for SARS-CoV-2 on a subset

235 Immunofluorescence and in situ hybridization studies indicate that Rpt1- and Rp

236 In situ hybridization studies on human and zebrafish emb

237 Deep sequencing and in situ hybridization suggest that HBeAg-negative shrew

238 al nucleus tractus solitarius by fluorescent in situ hybridization, suggesting that PPG neurons are l

239 trograde tracing with immunofluorescence and in situ hybridization techniques.

240 mmunohistochemistry and, for the first time, in situ hybridization techniques.

241 this study, we adapted RNAscope fluorescent in situ hybridization technology for use on whole-mount

242 ate Pheno system uses automated fluorescence in situ hybridization technology with morphokinetic cell

243 Here, we demonstrate by fluorescent in situ hybridization that these inclusions are decorate

244 n and signaling after injury, and we show by in situ hybridization that Wnts are activated by acute c

245 We established, by in situ hybridization, that Neto2 was expressed in both

246 ve NSCLC harbor high MET CNG by fluorescence in situ hybridization, this did not significantly affect

247 Using RNAScope in situ hybridization to characterize activity of differ

248 genetic approaches, from simple fluorescence in situ hybridization to comparative chromosome barcodin

249 trophysiology, optogenetics, and fluorescent in situ hybridization to confirm these methods were robu

250 We used branched-chain RNA in situ hybridization to detect HHV-6 messenger RNA (U41

251 mRNA in situ hybridization to detect IFN-gamma was performed.

252 Here, we utilize multichannel fluorescent in situ hybridization to detect the expression of adrene

253 RNA sequencing coupled with high-resolution in situ hybridization to identify novel transcriptional

254 of the cholinergic gene locus, and then used in situ hybridization to localize mRNA encoding choline

255 We used immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization to measure the neuronal activity m

256 otocol for flow cytometry-based fluorescence in situ hybridization to mouse T cells.

257 dentity of MnPO(EP3R) neurons, we first used in situ hybridization to show coexpression of EP3R and t

258 Finally, we used in situ hybridization to show that sema1a.1 and sema1a.2

259 As) and transcriptional regulators, and used in situ hybridization to validate critical genes and pat

260 Moreover, we used fluorescence in situ hybridization to verify the structure of these 1

261 Using multi-color fluorescence in situ hybridization to visualize four vRNP segments wi

262 We used RNAscope in-situ hybridization to quantify the colabeling of the

263 By immunohistochemistry, RNAscope in situ hybridization, transmission electron microscopy,

264 nalysis and single molecule RNA-fluorescence in situ hybridization uncovered vessel bed-specific, het

265 cal and biochemical techniques, fluorescence in situ hybridization using peptide nucleic acid probes

266 Fluorescence in situ hybridization using probes based on oligonucleot

267 In situ hybridization validated computational prediction

268 In 3 patients, fluorescence in situ hybridization visualized T. whipplei in urine.

269 In situ hybridization was done on normal lung tissue to

270 MET fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed in 200 consecutive p

271 Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed on jejunal cryosecti

272 In situ hybridization was used to evaluate the expressio

273 Here, fluorescence in situ hybridization was used to identify DLBCLs harbor

274 r the characterization of transcriptomes and in situ hybridization was utilized to further characteri

275 Using chromogenic in situ hybridization we localized aromatase-expressing

276 Using sequential fluorescence in situ hybridization we were able to identify all popla

277 mmunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, and in situ hybridization, we characterized the pattern of p

278 With RNAscope in situ hybridization, we demonstrate that key enzymes t

279 ataset of geniculate ganglion neurons and by in situ hybridization, we demonstrate that R-spondin-2,

280 alysis of single-cell expression studies and in situ hybridization, we describe that alpha9, but not

281 By in situ hybridization, we detected several of these RNAs

282 nd flow cytometry, combined with fluorescent in situ hybridization, we determined that expression of

283 Using RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization, we found that in the follicle cel

284 scriptomic analyses, immunofluorescence, and in situ hybridization, we found that the expression of t

285 s, and on an innovative technique for duplex in situ hybridization, we identified parafacial neurons

286 label retention experiments and multiplexed in situ hybridization, we identify a population of cycli

287 Based on scRNA-seq, immunostaining, and in situ hybridization, we infer that 1) the dominant eff

288 A sequencing and single molecule fluorescent in situ hybridization, we localized expression of transc

289 enome sequencing data and fiber-fluorescence in situ hybridization, we mapped the rearranged alleles

290 Via in situ hybridization, we next mapped this discrete tran

291 Using single-cell RNA-Seq and multiplexed in situ hybridization, we show here that a single marker

292 Using whole mount in situ hybridization, we show that STAG2 and SMC1A are

293 Using fluorescent single-molecule in situ hybridization, we showed that distinct NOSs are

294 ng, and both chromogenic and single-molecule in situ hybridizations, we validated AKI signatures in m

295 asurements, and single molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization were performed together with analy

296 w by quantitative real-time-PCR, florescence in situ hybridization, Western blotting and GTPgS autora

297 Autoradiography with [H-3]-(+)-PHNO and in situ hybridization with a D3-specific S-35 riboprobe

298 In situ hybridization with a D3-specific S-35 riboprobe

299 g multiple rounds of sequential fluorescence in situ hybridization with the painting probes.

300 Additionally, we combined in situ hybridization with tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) imm