戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 varied until a level was found that produced indifference.
2  society, such as social injustice and human indifference.
3 ined as <0.5 for synergy, >or=0.5 but <4 for indifference, and >or=4 for antagonism.
4  and heightened climate frustration, reduced indifference, and increased risk perceptions compared to
5       Two hypotheses, gaze aversion and gaze indifference, are commonly cited to explain a diagnostic
6 t then decreases after reaching the point of indifference between staying and switching.
7         Initially, humans and monkeys showed indifference between the two options of either staying w
8 onomic reward value requires tests at choice indifference between two options, which is difficult to
9 us had same utility, as inferred from choice indifference); bundles on higher ICs (higher utility) we
10                                 While choice indifference curves (ICs) of economic theory provide beh
11  concepts to estimate two-dimensional choice indifference curves (ICs) that represented revealed stoc
12 he option components separately but followed indifference curves as a population.
13 er of the Theory; it followed the behavioral indifference curves within their confidence limits, was
14 oices are modeled as curves of equal choice (indifference curves) and reflect an underlying process o
15 n such bundles, including convenient graphic indifference curves.
16 ear (I), convex (II) or concave (III) choice indifference curves.
17 s using homothetic polynomials validated the indifference curves.
18                            In contrast, near-indifference decisions correlated with fluctuations in t
19                           Surprisingly, near-indifference decisions did not reflect fluctuations in t
20 i-Mental State Examination score, and apathy/indifference, did not affect the rate of functional decl
21 l mechanisms of clonal exhaustion and immune indifference, governed by antigen migration and localiza
22 re, we show psychophysically titrated choice indifference in monkeys between bundles of differently s
23  not vary as a function of the distance from indifference in the acceptance decision.
24                     Androgen receptor- (AR-) indifference is a mechanism of resistance to hormonal th
25                         We suggest that such indifference is partly attributable to a belief in the f
26                                          The indifference maps consisted of nonoverlapping, linear, c
27     We showed previously that the behavioral indifference of cats toward sweet-tasting compounds can
28                                          The indifference of HSC to nutrient sensing through RagA con
29 tual gaze and empathic eye blinking, whereas indifference or malevolence was associated with lower or
30                This allowed us to establish "indifference pairs" individualized to each participant:
31 o win each of the rewards that comprised the indifference pairs.
32 easure was mean adjusted delay (MAD), or the indifference point (in sec) between choice of an immedia
33 s under adaptive behavior change may have an indifference point, may produce oscillatory dynamics wit
34           Using a logistic function to model indifference points data, we compared performance to tha
35 arge delayed reward, as reflected by shorter indifference points) compared to controls, but were no d
36 measurement sensitivity, with broad spectral indifference, regardless of imbalance due to dissimilari
37  of vaccine deliberation, dissent, distrust, indifference, skepticism, and policy and processes.
38    Using the test of equivalence or clinical indifference, the impact of an Acinetobacter baumannii i
39 nit of another good while maintaining choice indifference, thereby implementing the concept of margin
40 t the outcome results in damage, benefit, or indifference, thus resulting in the states of symbiosis,
41 ch lower pK(a) (5.7) than for previous YFPs, indifference to chloride, twice the photostability of pr
42 ing Na(V)1.7, cause channelopathy-associated indifference to pain (CIP), whereas gain-of-function mut
43  loss-of-function mutations cause congenital indifference to pain because of attenuation of action po
44 D) are often reported to exhibit an apparent indifference to pain or temperature.
45 of the Na(v)1.7 channel in patients leads to indifference to pain.
46 oss-of-function mutations lead to Congenital Indifference to Pain.
47 ction, and further suggest that the relative indifference to predator threat on the part of the invad
48           While many individual fires showed indifference to property lines, taken as a whole, we fou
49                               This selective indifference to sustained pain resembles the phenotype s
50 1.43; 95% CI, -1.67 to -1.18), with relative indifference to the closure of social and lifestyle venu
51                                         This indifference value is sensitive to reward devaluation wi
52  type within a session enables estimation of indifference values using logistic regression.