ライフサイエンスコーパス: induction time

1 dration, resulting in a dramatic decrease in induction time.

2 The induction time (6.8h) and antioxidant activity indices (

3 Sedation induction times, adverse events, doses, and sedation and

4 of 10(6)-10(8)cm(-3)s(-1); (iv). nucleation induction times agree with an a priori prediction based

5 Kinetic measurements show that the induction time and growth rate increase with increasing

6 mented amyloplasts, gravitropic sensitivity (induction time and intermittent stimulation) and plastid

7 Using the nucleation induction time and nucleation rates, determined with ima

8 odels correlated with the prolongation of MT induction time and that knockdown of MT with RNA interfe

9 prevail at higher temperatures, influencing induction times and oxidation rates.

10 oved linseed oil stability, showing the same induction time at 110 degrees C (by Rancimat) of control

11 studies revealed a 29.53-46.44 % increase in induction time at 140 degrees C, demonstrating improved

12 plosives can have vastly different adiabatic induction times at the same temperature.

13 etradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) with an induction time course following the c-Jun induction in b

14 re stimulated at various times to provide an induction time course for c-fos mRNA which peaked at 30

15 ymerase chain reaction data from a low-CO(2) induction time-course experiment demonstrated that the u

16 ce on the nucleation, i.e. shorter or longer induction time, dependent on the concentrations of the l

17 equently used to explain the existence of an induction time during the reduction process can be impor

18 he formation of stable crystals within short induction times, followed by rapid spreading as corner f

19 is of tailor-made polymers that decrease the induction time for crystal appearance and may find appli

20 It was found that the induction time for hydroxyapatite precipitation was stro

21 lloid formation, allowing measurement of the induction time for nucleation.

22 Induction time for the CB was significantly shorter in p

23 The induction time for the formation of rodlike assemblies i

24 incorporated into an insoluble polymer, the induction time for the onset of crystal formation for bo

25 second-scale molecular dynamics simulations, induction times for nucleation of LiF solids from their

26 Based on induction time, gas uptake, separation factor, hydrate p

27 corporation of Anx-A5 markedly shortened the induction time, greatly increasing the rate and overall

28 he reaction products, determined in terms of induction time (I(t)).

29 Furthermore, the variability of induction times in individual cells depends non-monotoni

30 r than those of EV oils and blends, in which induction time increased proportionally with the percent

31 as exciting classroom experiments, where an induction time is followed by rapidly changing colours t

32 The induction time is linearly proportional to the surface a

33 ion theory, for both mechanisms, the typical induction time is shown to scale with the pore volume to

34 A-EDA (OLD), unsaturated/saturated ratio and induction time (IT) allowed the correct classification o

35 s NEgen1, establishes correlations among the induction time, nucleation rate, growth rate, bond-formi

36 ) promoted protection against oil oxidation (induction time of 54.96h).

37 However, induction time of 80% PO blend was similar to that of pu

38 Rancimat induction time of palm oil (PO), several extra virgin ol

39 Induction time of pure PO was always higher than those o

40 hnique for direct determination of rates and induction times of primary nucleation of HbS fibers, bas

41 model revealed the stochastic nature of the induction timing of the key cell fate determinants and i

42 The rapid induction timing of the mRNA by SA indicates that it bel

43 Oxidation induction time (OIT) using differential scanning calorim

44 t; p < 0.001), as well as "artificial caries induction time" (p < 0.001).

45 covery in 20 consecutive patients undergoing induction timed sequential chemotherapy for newly diagno

46 d by patients with newly diagnosed AML after induction timed sequential chemotherapy.

47 y was accompanied by an increase in reaction induction times, suggesting that increasing surface pres

48 over time exhibited two regimes: an initial induction time, t(s), with little decay was followed by

49 rations of trans-ferulic acid resulted in an induction time (tau) proportional to the antioxidant con

50 termining key kinetic parameters such as the induction time (tau), rates of inhibited (R(inh)) and un

51 ted from its natural antioxidants, showed no induction time (tau).

52 Apo-TLs show a longer diffusion-dependent induction time than holo-TLs due to more extensive oligo

53 This process is also subject to an induction time that depends upon the partial pressure of

54 first-derivative analysis, which defines the induction time, the rate and the amount of initial miner

55 The induction time was measured for air bubbles approaching

56 No effect on toluene degradation rate or induction time was observed when active cells of Rhodoco

57 In the study group, the induction time was shorter (p = 0.03) and subjects with

58 The induction time was three to four times longer when both

59 nearly identical, the turnover time and the induction time were significantly shorter for the experi

60 Induction times were 1.46 h (borage oil), 1.44 h (Rosamo

61 In addition the induction times were very low (<3.67 min at 6.0 MPa).

62 rmation could be a determinant of beta-sheet induction time, with implications for the onset of amylo