戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ers, supports immune maturation, and fosters infant development.
2 ring the first year of life are critical for infant development.
3 implications for both maternal wellbeing and infant development.
4 ors implicated in and potentially benefiting infant development.
5 uture work using multiscale entropy to study infant development.
6 e essential role of gut microbiota in normal infant development.
7 ical link between maternal mental health and infant development.
8 s motor and personal-social (ASQ) aspects of infant development.
9 obiome in early life is critical for healthy infant development.
10  at 18 months using the Bayley-III scores of infant development.
11 ant attachment, parenting self-efficacy, and infant development.
12 ant implications for future interventions in infant development.
13 tion, or both may be modulators of full-term infant development.
14 rectly regulate the microbial ecology during infant development.
15 re- and postnatal dietary supplementation on infant development.
16 ry-specific versions of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development.
17 and virome play an important role in healthy infant development.
18 ment was assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development.
19  about the short-term effects of H and CF on infant development.
20 d in maternal health and delivery, birth, or infant development.
21 riod has long-term negative consequences for infant development.
22 ain interactions typical of early periods of infant development.
23  (27.3 and 24mug/ml), possibly important for infant development.
24 r birth weight infants with consequences for infant development.
25 around age 14 months by the Bayley Scales of Infant Development.
26 nce and association with disability and poor infant development.
27 ed adverse consequences of this condition on infant development.
28  positive emotional stimuli at this stage of infant development.
29 ict patterned barrier formation during human infant development.
30 ebo were evaluated with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development.
31 s, immunological factors, and cells that aid infant development.
32 sure proper gut microbiome establishment and infant development.
33 med to compare effects of NRT and placebo on infant development 2 years after delivery.
34 nd cognitive (CO) outcomes (Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 24 months corrected age) in a tertia
35 ere was follow-up using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development 2nd edition; and (4) results were pub
36 ment was assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 2nd Edition, yielding the Mental Dev
37 evelopment was gauged via Bayley's Scales of Infant Development: 2nd edition for ELEMENT and 3rd edit
38 s, many associated with conditions including infant development (94,000) or Westernization (106,000).
39 ir health across gestation and characterized infant development across the first month of life.
40 her to provide adequate nutrients to support infant development, affecting birth weight (BW) and pote
41 dicate that sex may influence the effects on infant development after DCC in different directions.
42 ssessed at age 2 y with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development and at age 6.5 y with a hippocampus-d
43 (MM) of 16 vitamins and minerals would alter infant development and behavior.
44  to moments of social synchrony that support infant development and brain maturation.
45 s in a cohort of 758 pregnant women from The Infant Development and Environment Study (TIDES).
46          Human milk plays a critical role in infant development and health, particularly in cognitive
47 is much work on the role of breastfeeding in infant development and on the role of oxytocin in socio-
48 ese findings in light of the roles that both infant development and the caregiver play in emerging em
49                             Bayley Scales of Infant Development and the Wechsler Preschool and Primar
50 testinal microbiome plays a critical role in infant development, and delivery mode and feeding method
51  and 30 months of age using Bayley Scales of Infant Development, and then in mid-childhood (7-9 years
52 omes included scores on the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, anthropometric measurements, and the
53 overning parental behavior and its effect on infant development are conserved from rodent to humans.
54            Links between human milk (HM) and infant development are poorly understood and often focus
55 aternal or offspring HPA axis function or in infant development at 12 months.
56 ment was assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development at 2.5 years and the Wechsler Intelli
57 ephaly, and a low score on a Bayley Scale of Infant Development at 24 months.
58 rologic examination and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development) at 18 months, 36 months, or both.
59 ely 2 years of age with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID).
60          Depression and pain may also affect infant development, but future work is required to repli
61 method to prevent undernutrition and improve infant development, but the effects on mortality are unk
62 ents were performed at 2 y [Bayley Scales of Infant Development/Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)] and
63 ast-feeding) or biologic processes impacting infant development (e.g., immune response, susceptibilit
64 low-up assessments included Bayley Scales of Infant Development examinations at 18-22 months of corre
65 neurobehavioral assessment, Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Fagan Test of Infant Intelligence sc
66 city-social visual engagement-shapes typical infant development from birth and is pathognomonically i
67 uld be a promising candidate for influencing infant development, given its metabolic functions.
68 udies of parallel gut microbiome and preterm infant development have given key insight into the impac
69 s, the main advances in our understanding of infant development have involved the application of cogn
70 nfant undernutrition is associated with poor infant development; however, few studies have examined t
71 ritional and bioactive factors necessary for infant development, human breast milk contains bacteria
72 t 20 mo of age by using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II (BSID-II), the MacArthur Bates Com
73  Developmental Index of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II (P=0.03 for each) and the Gross Mo
74 ventricular hemorrhage, and Bayley Scales of Infant Development II and III at 2 years of age, analyze
75 d 12 mo of age by using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II and the Home Observation Measureme
76 ratios [ORs], 1.4-1.7), low Bayley Scales of Infant Development II scores on the mental development i
77                             Bayley Scales of Infant Development II were used to assess cognition.
78 core of less than 70 on the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II), as compared with 31 of 68 childr
79 DI) were measured using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II, and behavior problems were assess
80 d motor abilities using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II at ages 1, 2, and 3 years; intelli
81  neurodevelopment using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II.
82 elopment Index (MDI) of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II.
83 2 to 36 months of age using Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II.
84 essment at 2 years included Bayley Scales of Infant Development III and tests of executive and visual
85 d either died or had 2-year Bayley Scales of Infant Development III assessments completed were includ
86  disability included any of Bayley Scales of Infant Development III cognitive score less than 70, Gro
87 e score calculated from the Bayley Scales of Infant Development III in Bangladesh children.
88 were 18-month mortality and Bayley Scales of Infant Development-III assessment.
89 ies were assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-III at 18.7 months median corrected a
90 uid (CSF) diversion and (2) Bayley Scales of Infant Development-III testing around 2 years of age.
91 ment was assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development in 1,519 infants (median age, 16 mont
92 rtum, and to children aged 6-18 mo, improves infant development in Malawi.
93 es lamina propria macrophage function during infant development in mice and whether macrophage-intrin
94 des unprecedented opportunities for studying infant development in real-world settings.
95 al Development Index of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (in which scores range from 50 to 150
96 y which maternal stress is thought to impact infant development is by shaping the development of the
97 the influence of maternal iron deficiency on infant development is underexplored.
98  from December 1999 through June 2008 at the Infant Development Laboratory of the Emory Psychological
99 he authors administered the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (means, 87 (standard deviation, 15) a
100  the critical signals regulating BeAT during infant development need to be better defined.
101 e protein-1 (MSP-1) at birth correlates with infant development of anti-MSP-1 Abs acquired as a conse
102 al-development score on the Bayley Scales of Infant Development or the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Sc
103 etic peptide concentration, Bayley scores of infant development, or ventricular ejection fraction.
104                                   In typical infant development, parents and their children jointly c
105 hip between infection dynamics and fetal and infant development remain.
106      Child health outcomes (Bayley Scales of Infant Development scores [BSID-II], pneumonia, height a
107 deficit in Bayley Mental and Motor Scales of Infant Development scores at 2 years, with cocaine-expos
108  In 23 preterm infants with Bayley Scales of Infant Development scores, larger vCDR was associated wi
109 lestones in a US cohort.The Upstate New York Infant Development Screening Program (Upstate KIDS Study
110 on (at hospital discharge), Bayley Scales of Infant Development, second edition (at hospital discharg
111 ate better function) of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, second edition (BSID-II) at 2 years
112  Developmental Index of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Second Edition, for patients born be
113                             Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Second Edition-Mental and Psychomoto
114 recruited in 2015-2016 for the Pregnancy and Infant Development Study (Cincinnati, Ohio), we examined
115                                The Jerusalem Infant Development Study is a prospective investigation
116 hese neonates underwent the Bayley Scales of Infant Development test at 18 months of age.
117 lopment was measured by the Bayley Scales of Infant Development Third Edition (BSID-III).
118 e to severe cerebral palsy, Bayley Scales of Infant Development Third Edition [BSID-III] cognitive sc
119 e development (score on the Bayley Scales of Infant Development third edition), socioemotional develo
120 tive composite score on the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, third edition (Bayley-III) at 22 to
121 The primary outcome was the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Third Edition (BSID-3), cognitive sc
122  were assessed based on the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, third edition (BSID-III).
123 guage development (with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Third Edition) and socioemotional de
124 itive, and language skills (Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Third Edition; Preschool Language Sc
125 rs' corrected age using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Third Edition (BSID-III) and the Gros
126 ge were evaluated using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Third Edition (BSID-III) at corrected
127 res were assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Third Edition (BSID-III).
128 elopment assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Third Edition (developmental delay wa
129           At 12 months, the Bayley Scales of Infant Development was administered.
130                                              Infant development was assessed from birth to 12 months
131                     The Bayley-III Scales of Infant Development were administered at 24 postnatal mon

 
Page Top