コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 mpared findings in those with a diagnosis of influenza like illness.
2 primary or ambulatory care with influenza or influenza-like illness.
3 tory illnesses (ARIs), which may manifest as influenza-like illness.
4 Disease Control and Prevention criteria for influenza-like illness.
5 ted to 8 healthcare facilities in Kenya with influenza-like illness.
6 during the study period who did not have an influenza-like illness.
7 to sentinel sites within 7 days of onset of influenza-like illness.
8 in respiratory secretions from a child with influenza-like illness.
9 ied to historical data sets of patients with influenza-like illness.
10 and 95.6% specific (90.0-98.5) compared with influenza-like illness.
11 ontrols with community-acquired pneumonia or influenza-like illness.
12 lized adults older than 65 years of age with influenza-like illness.
13 and capacity preparedness for influenza and influenza-like illness.
14 duce the duration of hospital stay in severe influenza-like illness.
15 903) against acute respiratory infections or influenza-like illness.
16 tained from participants with symptoms of an influenza-like illness.
17 e and visited weekly to detect pneumonia and influenza-like illness.
18 test-negative design among outpatients with influenza-like illness.
19 n multiple occasions and 1 employee reported influenza-like illness.
20 as a proxy for complications of influenza or influenza-like illness.
21 rical baseline when forecasting incidence of influenza-like illness 1 wk, 2 wk, and 3 wk ahead of ava
23 nts assigned any dose of opicinumab included influenza-like illness (140 [43%] with any dose of opici
26 March 2020, cough, shortness of breath, and influenza-like illness accounted for twice as many ED vi
27 -analyses showed significantly lower odds of influenza-like illness after vaccination in patients wit
28 d one anaphylaxis) and one possibly related (influenza-like illness); all three recovered without seq
29 lude designating areas for waiting rooms for influenza-like illnesses, altering staff scheduling in a
32 gs were related to the clinical incidence of influenza-like illness and acute bronchitis at that time
33 ing pathogen that causes rapidly progressing influenza-like illness and acute encephalitis often lead
36 ive in preventing total respiratory illness (influenza-like illness and clinically diagnosed pneumoni
37 2,595-428,286) attended 35,663 patients with influenza-like illness and collected 13,925 respiratory
38 inactivated influenza vaccine in preventing influenza-like illness and influenza-associated pneumoni
39 ocompromised patients in terms of preventing influenza-like illness and laboratory confirmed influenz
40 ated significant protective associations for influenza-like illness and laboratory-confirmed influenz
41 e probably associated with similar risks for influenza-like illness and laboratory-confirmed viral in
42 ngeal swabs were collected from persons with influenza-like illness and tested for influenza virus by
43 were hospitalized for at least 24 hours for influenza-like illness and who tested positive for the 2
46 fing and capacity responses to influenza and influenza-like illness, and (4) future staffing and capa
47 teen percent of household contacts developed influenza-like illness, and 10% of household contacts ha
48 rted in 3289 (28.7%) of 11,459 patients with influenza-like illness, and antivirals were prescribed t
49 ospitalized with pneumonia, outpatients with influenza-like illness, and asymptomatic control patient
51 percentage of outpatient doctors visits for influenza-like illness, and the season onset, duration,
52 We find that seasonal variations in climate, influenza-like illnesses, and interindividual contacts j
53 As many as 40% of patients hospitalized with influenza-like illness are reported to be infected with
54 to participating general practitioners with influenza-like illness are swabbed for laboratory testin
56 bout preparedness for seasonal influenza and influenza-like illness as well as concerns about staffin
57 influenza illness, defined as development of influenza-like illness associated with influenza virus o
58 events were headache, fatigue, pyrexia, and influenza-like illness at 12 weeks (95 [37%) vs 45 [34%]
59 y specimens from outpatients presenting with influenza-like illness at 13 facilities in order to inve
61 boratory-confirmed influenza associated with influenza-like illness at least 14 days after vaccinatio
62 oint was RT-PCR-confirmed, protocol defined, influenza-like illness between 14 days or more after vac
63 y collected NPS specimens from patients with influenza-like illness between February 2008 and 28 May
64 hospital admissions related to pulmonary and influenza-like illness between Nov 1, 2013, and May 31,
68 action (RT-PCR)-confirmed, protocol-defined, influenza-like illness caused by any influenza strain st
71 a A/H3N2, A/H1N1, and B that combine data on influenza-like illness consultations and respiratory spe
72 fficacy attributes, and general practitioner influenza-like-illness consultations as reported by the
75 dentify influenza and SARS-CoV-2 infections: influenza-like illness, coronavirus disease 2019-like il
78 respect to efficacy was laboratory-confirmed influenza-like illness (defined as a temperature of at l
80 ataset of cell-phone users and their date of influenza-like illness diagnosis during the 2009 H1N1v p
81 f influenza is recommended for patients with influenza-like illness during periods of community cocir
82 and measured when they were symptomatic with influenza-like illness during the 2009 A/H1N1pdm influen
83 iously evaluated for respiratory symptoms or influenza-like illness during the first 10 weeks of 2020
86 resented to general practices in the UK with influenza-like illnesses during three successive winters
93 of influenza activity and the risk of acute influenza-like illness episodes among 8,323 healthy preg
95 f association between influenza exposure and influenza-like illness episodes increased as the pregnan
99 capable of detecting the temporal trends of influenza-like illness even without relying on a specifi
101 group had constitutional signs and symptoms (influenza-like illness, fatigue, fever, and chills) than
102 jurisdictions in the USA reported counts of influenza-like illness (fever including cough or sore th
105 We analyzed 31 years (1985-2016) of data on influenza-like illness from the French Sentinelles syste
106 swabs collected from patients in Wuhan with influenza-like-illness from 6 October 2019 to 21 January
107 e 2012 provided patient-level data on severe influenza-like-illnesses from >100 participating clinica
111 ystem for influenza that includes virologic, influenza-like illness, hospitalization, and mortality d
112 analyze the spatio-temporal distribution of Influenza Like Illness (ILI) in the city of Jerusalem ov
113 95% confidence interval [CI]:0.46-0.77) and influenza-like illness (ILI) (RR = 0.34; 95% CI:0.14-0.8
115 sed this ITS dataset to estimate and predict influenza-like illness (ILI) activity in the United Stat
117 of 9 donors developed symptoms consistent an influenza-like illness (ILI) and 7 of 9 were proven to b
119 gher incidence, duration, and/or severity of influenza-like illness (ILI) and acute respiratory infec
120 ss (SRI) at 2 hospitals and outpatients with influenza-like illness (ILI) and asymptomatic individual
121 enza A infection and either protocol-defined influenza-like illness (ILI) and Centers for Disease Con
123 hospitals across the country, patients with influenza-like illness (ILI) and severe acute respirator
124 We conducted ISS by monitoring patients with influenza-like illness (ILI) and severe acute respirator
125 08, we established sentinel surveillance for influenza-like illness (ILI) and severe acute respirator
128 za surveillance for patients presenting with influenza-like illness (ILI) at 136 private and public c
129 (CDC) runs an annual competition to forecast influenza-like illness (ILI) at the regional and nationa
130 ests, confirmed cases) and weekly dengue and influenza-like illness (ILI) case counts, Delphi-RF deli
131 SV) surveillance is heavily dependent on the influenza-like illness (ILI) case definition from the Wo
133 ompile weekly reports based on the number of influenza-like illness (ILI) clinical cases observed amo
134 sing causal inference methods on 12 years of influenza-like illness (ILI) data and 2 decades of respi
135 National Laboratory Surveillance System, and influenza-like illness (ILI) data were collected from Da
137 imated whether in utero exposure to maternal influenza-like illness (ILI) during the 1918 pandemic wa
138 nd oropharyngeal swabs were collected during influenza-like illness (ILI) episodes and from controls.
139 rveillance in children <11 years old who had influenza-like illness (ILI) from January 2008 to Decemb
142 estimating, in near-real time, the level of influenza-like illness (ILI) in the United States (US) b
143 rto Rico from 1990 to 2009 and to reports of influenza-like illness (ILI) in the United States betwee
144 We test NobBS on dengue in Puerto Rico and influenza-like illness (ILI) in the United States to exa
146 entral Hospital, Blantyre, and a prospective influenza-like illness (ILI) observational study between
148 lthcare-seeking behaviors among persons with influenza-like illness (ILI) or adherence to influenza a
149 patients seen in the outpatient clinic with influenza-like illness (ILI) or hospitalized with severe
150 mized controlled trials (RCTs) had to report influenza-like illness (ILI) or infection rates amongst
152 al (NP/OP) swab specimens from patients with influenza-like illness (ILI) or severe acute respiratory
153 We prospectively enrolled outpatients with influenza-like illness (ILI) presenting at 14 sentinel c
154 the state-of-the-art forecasting accuracy of influenza-like illness (ILI) rates in the United States.
155 ce for acute respiratory infection (ARI) and influenza-like illness (ILI) relies primarily on reports
156 n methods with Wikipedia access logs and CDC influenza-like illness (ILI) reports to create a weekly
158 of schools closed within a district to state influenza-like illness (ILI) surveillance data, we measu
164 atory symptoms not meeting ILI criteria) and influenza-like illness (ILI) to determine the incidence
165 tioners sent throat swabs from patients with influenza-like illness (ILI) to the National Institute f
168 nfluenza vaccines LAIV and TIV in preventing influenza-like illness (ILI) was compared among US milit
170 onths to <10 years at first vaccination with influenza-like illness (ILI) was evaluated in Australia,
172 f samples taken from patients diagnosed with influenza-like illness (ILI) within the sentinel scheme
173 .3% against a febrile episode, 53.5% against influenza-like illness (ILI), 41.8% against related heal
175 included GMTs to month 12, the incidence of influenza-like illness (ILI), and adverse reactions afte
176 s (GMTs), GMT ratios (GMRs), adverse events, influenza-like illness (ILI), and laboratory-confirmed i
177 icipatory surveillance data on self-reported influenza-like illness (ILI), defined here as self-repor
178 ation records, and healthcare encounters for influenza-like illness (ILI), influenza, and pneumonia a
179 percent of influenza-positive patients with influenza-like illness (ILI), or severe acute respirator
180 tified 89 HCWs and 18 inpatients as cases of influenza-like illness (ILI), using an amended definitio
190 use forecasts of key metrics associated with influenza-like illness (ILI); near-term weekly incidence
191 articipants received weekly surveys querying influenza-like illness (ILI); those reporting ILI comple
192 the difference in the rates of self-reported influenza-like illness (ILI, defined as presence of feve
193 uration of URTI and its composite syndromes, influenza-like illness (ILI; fever and >/=2 of sore thro
194 contribution consists of combining multiple influenza-like illnesses (ILI) activity estimates, gener
195 res (GMT), GMT ratios (GMR), adverse events, influenza-like-illness (ILI) and laboratory-confirmed in
200 maceutical sales and volume of patients with influenza-like-illnesses (ILI) at an urgent care center
201 gated the spatiotemporal association between influenza-like illnesses (ILIs) and licensed swine opera
202 se of acute histoplasmosis was defined as an influenza-like illness in a plant employee with the onse
204 tamivir for treatment of naturally occurring influenza-like illness in adults reporting at least one
205 ta were collected from walk-in patients with influenza-like illness in Egypt during routine influenza
208 from children in a pediatric cohort study of influenza-like illness in Managua, Nicaragua, between Ju
209 lymerase chain reaction (PCR) to undiagnosed influenza-like illness in New York State led to the disc
210 primary outcomes: the incidence of maternal influenza-like illness in pregnancy and 0-180 days postp
212 roportion of specimens from outpatients with influenza-like illness in the community that tested posi
213 m children aged 24-59 months presenting with influenza-like illness in The Gambia were collected duri
214 s well tolerated, but more patients reported influenza-like illness in the hydroxychloroquine group c
215 imately, 25 to 50 million people suffer from influenza-like illness in the United States annually, le
219 immunisation significantly reduced maternal influenza-like illness, influenza in infants, and low bi
221 visited weekly until age 6 months to detect influenza-like illness; laboratory-confirmed influenza d
222 ntly prescribed in European primary care for influenza-like illness, mostly because of perceived inef
223 f SARS-CoV-2 (n = 224) and of non-SARS-CoV-2 influenza-like illness (n = 184), and laboratory-confirm
224 the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, with an increase in influenza-like illnesses observed as early as August.
225 elevated percentage of outpatient visits for influenza-like illness occurred an average of 14 days af
226 Seven cases of culture-confirmed CDC-defined influenza-like illness occurred in 153 placebo recipient
227 ract infection, urinary tract infection, and influenza-like illness occurred in only 26, 9, and 7 ret
228 es showed a significant effect of preventing influenza-like illness (odds ratio [OR]=0.23; 95% confid
232 tion of strain, (2) effects of influenza and influenza-like illness on staff and patient care, (3) im
233 ed, but the specific effect of influenza and influenza-like illnesses on triggering acute myocardial
234 nal pain (one [7%]), fatigue (one [7%]), and influenza-like illness (one [7%]) in three patients trea
236 ties in Addis Ababa met case definitions for influenza-like illness or severe acute respiratory illne
237 ng 2010 from inpatients and outpatients with influenza-like illness or severe acute respiratory illne
238 es without swine exposure were identified in influenza-like illness outbreaks, indicating that limite
240 he original model significantly mispredicted influenza-like illness rates in the US during the 2012-1
241 ment to usual primary care for patients with influenza-like illness reduces time to recovery overall
242 r subtype associated with a protocol-defined influenza-like illness (relative efficacy, 24.2%; 95% co
243 t of Columbia, using a combination of excess influenza-like illness reports, COVID-19 test statistics
246 7%] of 54 patients), headache (eight [15%]), influenza-like illness (seven [13%]), and an increase in
247 received ABI-H0731 were headache (11 [15%]), influenza-like illness (seven [9%]), and dizziness (six
249 prompt evaluation and antiviral treatment of influenza-like illness should be considered in such wome
250 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's influenza-like illness surveillance data with aggregated
251 ease Control and Prevention (CDC) Outpatient Influenza-like Illness Surveillance Network and Centers
252 s (ILI) activity, provided by the Outpatient Influenza-like Illness Surveillance Network of the Cente
254 n applied to redesigning the provider-based, influenza-like-illness surveillance network (ILINet) for
255 s of infected children (<19 years) displayed influenza-like illness symptoms than infected adults (re
257 first symptomatic person in a household with influenza-like illness, testing influenza positive on re
258 s had twice the risk of developing secondary influenza-like illness than contacts of HIV-negative ind
259 g winter 2004, there was a high incidence of influenza-like illness that tested negative both for inf
264 We calculated the incidence of visits for influenza-like illness using the size of the patient pop
266 as compared with the control vaccine against influenza-like illness was 34.5% (95% confidence interva
268 nasopharyngeal swabs from participants with influenza-like illness was confirmed by reverse-transcri
270 e and the use of aspirin during varicella or influenza-like illness was first reported, there has bee
272 os across trials for all-cause mortality and influenza-like illness were 0.71 (95% confidence interva
274 influenza was circulating and those coded as influenza-like illness were associated with consistently
276 Specimens from patients presenting with influenza-like illness were collected and shipped to the
277 he 2010-2011 influenza season, subjects with influenza-like illness were enrolled in an emergency dep
280 ute respiratory illness and outpatients with influenza-like illness were tested by real-time reverse
281 ospitals and primary healthcare centers with influenza-like illness were tested for influenza from th
283 Nose and throat samples obtained during influenza-like illnesses were tested for A/California/7/
284 cted specimens from patients presenting with influenza-like illness who visited sentinel surveillance
285 C) runs a challenge for forecasting weighted influenza-like illness (wILI) at the national and region