ライフサイエンスコーパス: injection rate

1 zed spherical morphologies regardless of the injection rate.

2 concentration of precursor solution and the injection rate.

3 sation time shows much less influence on the injection rate.

4 m collection efficiency, and the maximum PAC injection rate.

5 se studies do not explain what regulates IFT injection rate.

6 300 mg of iodine per milliliter at the same injection rate.

7 pared to the hydrophilic samples at the same injection rate.

8 distribution in the pore space for different injection rates.

9 the study had lower than expected anti-VEGF injection rates.

10 d media in comparison to the case with lower injection rates.

11 re pressure from earlier periods with higher injection rates.

12 earthquakes occurred near wells with similar injection rates.

13 agnitudes for varied boundary conditions and injection rates.

14 s were generated from the model at different injection rates (0.5-10.0 mL/sec).

15 four of 928 patients who received the median injection rate (2.5 mL/sec).

16 ter; dose, 2 mL per kilogram of body weight; injection rate, 2 mL/sec).

17 Use of injection rates above 2 mL/sec did not substantially inc

18 Injection rate, age, and presence of splenic disease inf

19 Relationship to variables (injection rate, age, splenomegaly) was assessed with the

20 Increasing the CO(2) injection rate and dewetting the injection well and form

21 hniques, but there is no correlation between injection rate and extravasation frequency.

22 No correlations exist between injection rate and extravasation rate or overall reactio

23 ics, and there was a concomitant increase in injection rate and mean lymphatic vessel diameter.

24 This allowed a faster bolus injection rate and potentially improved visualization of

25 features, including operational parameters (injection rate and pressure), geological information (de

26 ccess of the project, with direct impacts on injection rate and pressure.

27 the dissolution process with respect to acid injection rate and rock heterogeneity, including heterog

28 The effect of the contrast material injection rate and the influence of breath holding durin

29 ne how the relationship between the electron injection rate and the other kinetic processes relates t

30 ieved by controlling the supercritical CO(2) injection rate and the surface wettability at the reserv

31 High variation was observed in intravitreal injection rates and in Medicare drug payments per anti-V

32 mon and more frequently seen at CT when high injection rates and right arm injections are used.

33 Anti-VEGF injection rates and treatment switches were not importan

34 The energy injection rate, and properties of the environment are im

35 ith precise control over damage rate, helium injection rate, and temperature and utilize physical mod

36 al-temporal distribution of microseismicity, injection rate, and wellhead pressure.

37 The results reveal that even for the low injection rates associated with chemically impregnated c

38 -instantaneously responding to variations in injection rates at 95% confidence.

39 ical and new experiments with (a) a constant injection rate; (b) a constant source pressure; and (c)

40 viscous fingering through variations in the injection rate, based on linear stability theory, are le

41 itude of peak enhancement increased with the injection rate, but the increase was different in the ao

42 The injection rate can be controlled by the oscillation char

43 s to aquifer remediation, ionic strength and injection rate can be used as tuning parameters to contr

44 Increasing the CO(2) injection rate can suppress the capillary reflow and pre

45 The slower injection rate constant for each dye is exponentially di

46 0(18) and 10(13) cm(-3), respectively), hole injection rate constants (>/=10(12) s(-1)), and surface

47 nucleation sizes, suggesting that such fast injection rates constitute dynamic loading.

48 O(2) injection and trapping and incorporates injection-rate constraints.

49 Seismic activity increased even while injection rates declined, owing to diffusion of pore pre

50 Injection rate did not influence the rate of change in D

51 We find that for the fast injection rates, dynamic ruptures are triggered at lower

52 ties on the speed of the pinning rod and the injection rate employed during synthesis.

53 e earthquake groups reported maximum monthly injection rates exceeding 150,000 barrels of water per m

54 of water cut, the optimal average field gas injection rate (FGIR) decreases, while the average field

55 s inferred from laboratory studies and small-injection-rate field studies conducted under elevated al

56 ss was conducted to identify the optimal gas injection rate for each well, considering the limited ga

57 the aspiration rate must be higher than the injection rate for reagents to be confined.

58 the reaction temperature and decreasing the injection rate for the Rh precursor.

59 Using possible injection rates for deep-saline sandstone aquifers, we e

60 When injection rates from two inlets are uneven, flow symmetr

61 ished with helical CT at the injection site (injection rate, from 1.0 to 5.0 mL/sec; mean, 2.9 mL/sec

62 seen between frequency of heterogeneity and injection rate (> or = 1 mL/sec, 82%; < 1 mL/sec, 50% [P

63 at the duration of perilymphatic leakage and injection rate have a significant effect on the post-sur

64 This air injection rate is <1% of flows for typical extraction-ba

65 The injection rate is constrained by the desire to minimize

66 While the initial charge injection rate is largely invariant for all foldamer len

67 ast to convection in air, the kinetic energy injection rate is particularly enhanced for liquid mercu

68 density of TiO2 sub-band acceptor levels and injection rate is well described using Marcus-Gerischer

69 ore pressure and poroelastic stress, and the injection rate itself, are less important than the stres

70 Increasing sorbent injection rates, larger collection efficiency differenti

71 Managing injection rates may be a useful tool to minimize the lik

72 The injected volume corresponded to the injection rate multiplied by the sum of the scanning del

73 o experienced pressure buildup with a target injection rate of 0.5 Mt/year, and a cutback on injectio

74 The 0.0074% (1 in 13 512) per-injection rate of endophthalmitis in this series compare

75 nd the rate of reaction is controlled by the injection rate of Ox2 .

76 In addition to changing the injection rate of precursor, we also systematically inve

77 n situ gas compositions, the highly variable injection rate of SF[Formula: see text] into the detonat

78 hell morphology was observed by changing the injection rate of the shell precursors while keeping all

79 s, and does not require any control over the injection rate of the SNCs, as is the case for shell gro

80 t project CO(2) storage deployment at annual injection rates of 0.3-1.7 Gt year(-1) by 2050 have been

81 Per-injection rates of endophthalmitis remained low over tim

82 Since the ribosome injection rates of the totally asymmetric exclusion proc

83 were CST, change in BCVA and CST, number of injections, rate of completed follow-up, and withdrawal

84 The effect of contrast medium injection rate on the time and magnitude of peak enhance

85 ificant difference in image quality based on injection rates or the performance of breath holding dur

86 onses to pazopanib and/or ranibizumab (BCVA, injection rate, or optical coherence tomography/fluoresc

87 P=.08), target error (P=.07), intraarticular injection rate (P>.99), and arthrography time (P=.22).

88 were significantly different between the two injection rates (P < or = .002), with faster, more inten

89 f hydrodynamic dispersion coefficient versus injection rate (Peclet number).

90 Key parameters such as proppant diameter, injection rate, perforation orientation, and number of p

91 red nonlinear relationships, confirming that injection rate, perforation orientation, and perforation

92 ection rate of 0.5 Mt/year, and a cutback on injection rate progressively until 2050 to not exceed th

93 The injection-rate reduction in 2016 mitigates the exceedanc

94 Following substantial injection rate reductions, the downward earthquake migra

95 Thus, our study implies that, following injection rate reductions, the frequency of high-magnitu

96 ection wells for 10+ years after substantial injection rate reductions.

97 In contrast, the relatively slow injection rates result in gradual nucleation processes,

98 It is also shown that, under high well-injection rate scenarios with relatively low cost, there

99 d patient age, contrast material volume, and injection rate to be independent predictors of nephrogra

100 scale will require increasing per-well CO(2) injection rates to a point where CO(2) forms a persisten

101 urce pressure; and (c) a linearly increasing injection rate, together with numerical simulations base

102 Injection rate used for the three experimental protocols

103 The injection rate was 1.9 mL/sec or less in group 1 (n = 2,

104 Intraarticular injection rate was 100% (45 of 45).

105 In most cases, the initial injection rate was 2 mL/sec.

106 The injection rate was 2.5 mL/sec for the first 32 scans and

107 because all boundaries were open, the target injection rate was achieved, and it was a viscous-domina

108 The higher injection rate was associated with higher pressure (777

109 The air injection rate was increased from 1 to 5 to 10 L/min, wi

110 Injection rate was not correlated with frequency or amou

111 relation of choroidal thinning and anti-VEGF injection rate was observed at year one (r = - 0.79; R(2

112 The same injection rate was used for the interactive protocol gro

113 ant drivers of emissions variation are steam injection rates, water handling requirements, and rates

114 geologic storage capacities and sustainable injection rates, which has contributed to the absence of

115 e-2,5-diyl) (P3HT), P3MEEMT has faster anion injection rates, which we attribute to the hydration of