戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 n sensitivity (n = 7) was measured using the insulin tolerance test.
2 uch more than the wild type (WT) mice in the insulin tolerance test.
3 ed sensitivity to insulin action measured by insulin tolerance test.
4 T4-null mice, as shown by the results of the insulin tolerance test.
5  respectively by intraperitoneal glucose and insulin tolerance tests.
6 sponse rather than insulin resistance during insulin tolerance tests.
7  intraperitoneal arginine or intraperitoneal insulin tolerance tests.
8       It also improves glucose tolerance and insulin tolerance tests.
9 sulin sensitivity as assessed by glucose and insulin tolerance tests.
10 /-) mice showed no improvement in glucose or insulin tolerance tests.
11  mice and wild-type controls, as measured by insulin tolerance tests.
12 ose disposal, as demonstrated by glucose and insulin tolerance tests.
13  glucose and insulin levels, and glucose and insulin tolerance tests.
14 ty index scores, gait speed, and glucose and insulin tolerance tests.
15  decrease in blood glucose in TG mice during insulin tolerance testing.
16  levels and prolonged hypoglycemia during an insulin tolerance test and increased glucose clearance i
17        Insulin sensitivity was examined with insulin tolerance testing and homeostasis model assessme
18                                       Yet in insulin tolerance tests and euglycemic clamp experiments
19             Results from in vivo glucose and insulin tolerance tests and ex vivo analyses revealed fa
20  control mice was compared using glucose and insulin tolerance tests and hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic
21 tween animals of a similar size, glucose and insulin tolerance tests and hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic
22                                   Glucose or insulin tolerance tests and insulin signaling were perfo
23       Insulin sensitivity was analyzed using insulin tolerance tests and insulin-stimulated phosphory
24 e to insulin resistance, as confirmed by the insulin tolerance test, and to threefold higher levels o
25 n resistance was assessed by intraperitoneal insulin tolerance tests, and epididymal (eAT) and inguin
26 nsulin and C-peptide levels, and glucose and insulin tolerance tests, and genetic deletion of hepatic
27 sulin resistance in glucose tolerance tests, insulin tolerance tests, and hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic
28 mproved the performance of db/db mice during insulin tolerance tests, and increased Akt phosphorylati
29 - mice and controls were fed as pairs, given insulin tolerance tests, and phenotypically characterize
30 rglycemia and whole-body insulin resistance (insulin tolerance test) as well as muscle oxidative stre
31                                              Insulin tolerance test demonstrated that the NQO1-/- mic
32 ulinemia during glucose tolerance tests, and insulin tolerance tests demonstrated an impaired glucose
33 er, this did not change glucose tolerance or insulin tolerance tests done with pharmacological levels
34  and hepatic lipids) and glucose metabolism (insulin tolerance test, euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clam
35                                           In insulin tolerance test, exogenous insulin-induced suppre
36 asis and insulin action based on glucose and insulin tolerance tests, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic cla
37 er, 36b significantly reduced glycemia in an insulin tolerance test in mice, suggesting that its mech
38  of sensitivity to GLP-1 in both glucose and insulin tolerance tests in a Ramp3 KO mouse model.
39                                  Glucose and insulin tolerance tests in fetuin KO mice indicate signi
40                                Results of an insulin tolerance test indicate that p50alpha/p55alpha k
41                                              Insulin tolerance test (ITT) also produces similar plasm
42 48 h after training using an intraperitoneal insulin tolerance test (ITT) and BP was assessed before
43 lerance test (IPGTT) for glucose metabolism, insulin tolerance test (ITT), and histology of cardiac s
44 h, rotarod, glucose tolerance test (GTT) and insulin tolerance test (ITT), body composition, and ener
45                Glucose tolerance test (GTT), insulin tolerance test (ITT), fasting blood glucose, and
46 uated using glucose tolerance test (GTT) and insulin tolerance test (ITT).
47 erences in glucose tolerance tests (GTTs) or insulin tolerance tests (ITTs) compared with wild-type m
48        Using glucose-tolerance tests (GTTs), insulin-tolerance tests (ITTs), and hyperinsulinemic eug
49 ntrols following intraperitoneal glucose, or insulin tolerance tests, or after mixed nutrient meals.
50                                  Glucose and insulin tolerance tests reveal that alcohol impairs the
51                         Finally, glucose and insulin tolerance testing revealed no alterations in glu
52                                              Insulin tolerance tests revealed reduced insulin sensiti
53                                  Glucose and insulin tolerance tests revealed that lung epithelial ce
54                                      An i.p. insulin tolerance test showed similar plasma glucose low
55                 A glucose tolerance test and insulin tolerance test showed that 25HC3S administration
56       Hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps and insulin tolerance testing showed similar insulin sensiti
57                                              Insulin tolerance tests showed an improvement in insulin
58                                              Insulin tolerance tests showed that male Znt7 KO mice we
59                             Oral glucose and insulin tolerance tests showed that the compound improve
60  Insulin sensitivity was assessed by a short insulin tolerance test the following morning.
61                                   In in vivo insulin tolerance tests, the dimer was equipotent to Act
62                                        In an insulin tolerance test, they showed smaller reduction in
63 rect calorimetry performed on day 11, and an insulin tolerance test to measure insulin sensitivity pe
64                  Intraperitoneal glucose and insulin tolerance tests were also similar in the two gro
65  and 12-month-old offspring, and glucose and insulin tolerance tests were performed in the female off
66            Body weights, plasma glucose, and insulin tolerance tests were performed prior to, immedia
67 mone measurements, and glucose tolerance and insulin tolerance tests were performed.
68 mposition was estimated by DEXA; Glucose and insulin tolerance tests were performed; after euthanasia
69 mice displayed similar glucose tolerance and insulin tolerance tests while on regular chow or three d
70 ulin sensitivity, as measured by glucose and insulin tolerance tests, with intermediate effects in Na