コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 tified internal medicine physicians (general internists).
2 a transplant surgeon, a hepatologist, and an internist.
3 en the ophthalmologist and rheumatologist or internist.
4 a transplant surgeon, a hepatologist, and an internist.
5 western world and is frequently diagnosed by internists.
6 endous importance for both pediatricians and internists.
7 cs that should be achieved by board-eligible internists.
8 develop geriatrics-oriented academic general internists.
9 these initiatives and their implications for internists.
10 nder the care of nephrologists compared with internists.
11 red by nephrologists and services covered by internists.
12 e to improve the practice of medicine by all internists.
13 that includes both family practitioners and internists.
14 339 urologists, rheumatologists, and general internists.
15 ited States, nonobese patients and visits to internists.
16 y different challenges for pediatricians and internists.
17 fit than either family physicians or general internists.
18 (APP) and primary care physicians (PCPs) and internists.
19 nts, such as oncologists, allergologists and internists.
20 ld be managed in its early stages by general internists.
21 ed the number and type of procedures done by internists.
22 nymous survey was conducted of 217 attending internists, 132 medical house officers, and 219 staff nu
23 more likely to report aspirin use than were internists (20%), family physicians (18%), or general pr
25 18873 Medicare admissions treated by general internists, 38475 (2.1%) received care from a locum tene
28 icipants and the correct cause was 56.9% for internists, 56.0% for residents, and 55.7% for medical s
31 female PCPs (61.8% [170 of 275]) and general internists (73.1% [201 of 275]); overall, 28,7% (79 of 2
33 ician volume and mortality was strongest for internists (9.2% versus 10.6%; P<0.001) and weakest for
35 eam that consisted of a primary care general internist, a pharmacist, and a nurse or other certified
36 taff, ancillary services, and nursing staff, internists aboard the COMFORT were integral to supportin
37 s a discussion between a cardiologist and an internist about how each clinician would balance these f
38 The number and variety of procedures done by internists also increased with greater time spent in tot
39 oldemar Mobitz, an early 20th century German internist, analyzed arrhythmias by graphing the relation
41 his paper summarizes a discussion between an internist and a gynecologist on how they would balance t
43 aper summarizes a conference during which an internist and a radiologist discuss the application of t
46 , but all represent syndromes with which the internist and general cardiologist should be familiar.
47 nal Medicine (ABIM) show that 23% of general internists and 14% of subspecialists choose not to renew
51 onse rates were 79% (352 of 443) for general internists and 62% (255 of 409) for family physicians.
52 ce coverage for the vaccine (55% for general internists and 62% for family physicians) or inadequate
53 by 87% of cardiologists, but by only 77% of internists and 63% of FP/GPs (p < 0.001 between groups).
56 survey mailed to all Board-certified female internists and a matched group of male internists who ha
61 ho were mainly cared for by male physicians, internists and family medicine physicians had a signific
62 (49.8%) of all ambulatory visits to general internists and family physicians are made by patients fo
66 es of adult primary care physicians (general internists and family physicians) across Primary Care Se
68 rs among 59 primary care physicians (general internists and family practitioners) and 65 general and
69 nzyme inhibitors were used by cardiologists, internists and FP/GPs in 80%, 71% and 60% of patients wi
72 ly review available guidelines to help guide internists and other clinicians in making decisions abou
73 with heroin dependence frequently present to internists and other physicians for heroin-related medic
80 ed for the treatment of ARTIs, especially by internists and physicians in the Northeast and South.
86 cts on many of the ethical tensions faced by internists and their patients and attempts to shed light
88 1 family physicians, 77 (40%) of 194 general internists, and 66 (34%) of 194 cardiologists responded.
90 -certified, clinically active cardiologists, internists, and endocrinologists to receive 1 of 3 infor
91 g with leading gynecologists, women's health internists, and endocrinologists, aims to provide guidan
93 pitalists has implications for patients, for internists, and for the specialty of internal medicine.
99 consultant, the family physician and general internist are becoming peers, and they increasingly have
101 ons and the general public must be shown why internists are better able than family physicians to mee
104 t also threatens the traditional role of the internist as the caregiver for adults in health and dise
107 tients with diabetes mellitus treated by 301 internists at primary care practices affiliated with 2 l
108 y cohort treated by the MOC-required general internists before (1999-2000) and after (2002-2005) they
109 edicare patients who were treated by general internists (both hospitalists and traditional, non-hospi
110 dermatologists and from 39.7% to 37.7% among internists but with an increase from 71.4% to 75.4% amon
111 clinical need and expands opportunities for internists, but it is important that it not overreach, f
112 less expensive than that provided by general internists, but it offers no significant savings as comp
115 ectronic health record in our independent, 4-internist, community-based practice of general internal
117 of screening compared to those cared for by internists, despite equal or higher levels of awareness;
119 re, 2 experts, a diabetologist and a general internist, discuss how to apply the divergent guideline
120 anagement, a bariatric surgeon and a general internist, discuss the role of weight loss surgery versu
123 All family physicians work closely with internists during residency, but many general internists
124 the dining room table." The case of Dr B, an internist dying of myelofibrosis and congestive heart fa
125 treating pHPT, including general physicians, internists, endocrinologists, otolaryngologists, and sur
134 patients and health plans to distinguish the internist from family physicians and nurse practitioners
135 ospitalist could become the means to exclude internists from hospital care and deprive them of an imp
138 how general and subspecialty cardiologists, internists, gastroenterologists, and orthopedic surgeons
139 tings with a broad representation of general internists, geriatricians, funding agencies, and policym
141 her income beneficiaries receiving care from internists had the highest screening rate (68%), while d
145 nternists during residency, but many general internists have had little or no experience working with
147 care provided by family practitioners (FPs), internists (IMs), and gastroenterologists (GIs) for acut
148 ered by the physiatrist, rheumatologist, and internist in clinical practice, including osteoarthritis
150 iaries who received medical care from FPs or internists in 2006 (using Medicare Current Beneficiary S
153 terminants may guide oncologists and general internists in providing recommendations for their patien
156 es, including primary care doctors, hospital internists, intensivists and gastroenterologists due to
157 s sent to all surgeons, gastroenterologists, internists, intensivists, and radiologists who are curre
158 2.62), or reported a favorable impression of internists' lifestyle (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.39-2.87).
159 internists, the IM practice environment, and internists' lifestyle were more likely to pursue a caree
160 Prompt diagnosis and management, aided by an internist, may lead to resolution of the infection witho
162 ested: a pilot project of volunteer salaried internists (more trusted, less audited) commissioned to
165 ists and pediatricians, adult cardiologists, internists, obstetricians, nurses, and thoracic surgeons
169 providers in the practice, and, for general internists only, having more patients with Medicare Part
170 y rate than matched patients who saw only an internist or a family practitioner (14.6 percent vs. 18.
171 Patients who saw both a cardiologist and an internist or a family practitioner had a lower mortality
172 As compared with patients who saw only an internist or a family practitioner in the three months a
174 arget audience for this guideline is general internists or other clinicians involved in perioperative
176 are physician (OR, 3.29; 95% CI, 3.17-3.41), internist (OR, 2.79; 95% CI, 2.69-2.90), pediatrician (O
177 5% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.1-5.7) and internists (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.5-3.6) were significantly m
178 differentials exist between male and female internists overall and in various medical practice setti
181 Here, 2 experts-a nephrologist and a general internist-palliative care physician-reflect on the care
182 compared with patients cared for by general internists, patients cared for by hospitalists had a mod
183 lergists, gastroenterologists, pathologists, internists, pediatricians, and otolaryngologists must no
184 Of a random sample of Massachusetts general internists, pediatricians, cardiologists, orthopedic sur
185 diseases specialists, emergency physicians, internists, pediatricians, family physicians, neurologis
186 ialists, emergency physicians, intensivists, internists, pediatricians, hematologists, and transfusio
188 ore aggressive oral steroid regimens used by internists preclude strict comparisons between pediatric
194 ogy rotations and are more likely to rely on internist rheumatologists and nonrheumatologists to addr
196 Research is needed to understand the role of internist rheumatologists in caring for children with rh
199 ty characteristics that were associated with internist rheumatologists' willingness to treat children
200 ut on-site pediatric rheumatologists rely on internist rheumatologists, general pediatricians, or oth
201 mortality than patients cared for by either internists (risk ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.1
202 mandatory hand-off because it threatens the internist's identity as the physician who can care for t
203 renal cell carcinoma (RCC)] is known as "the internist's tumor" because it has protean systemic manif
206 s why rates of MOC participation for general internists seem lower than those for subspecialists (77%
215 valuation-and-management services by general internists that were attributed to hospitalists increase
217 ble impressions of the patients cared for by internists, the IM practice environment, and internists'
218 isit characteristics and compared to general internists, the likelihood of providing services was hig
220 Medicare beneficiaries treated by a general internist, there were no significant differences in over
221 actitioners (i.e., pediatricians and general internists), those who were in one- or two-physician pra
222 portant for both the ophthalmologist and the internist to recognize because they may precede the diag
223 r 10 years, ranging from $16 725 for general internists to $40 495 for hematologists-oncologists.
224 lear whether residency programs are training internists to provide effective care for patients who re
226 es of conditions seen in practice by general internists were estimated from the primary diagnosis for
227 nens physician; 9.3% (4123/44520) of general internists were temporarily covered by a locum tenens ph
229 significant difference in the proportion of internists who always monitored potassium from 2008 to 2
233 emale internists and a matched group of male internists who had graduated from medical school 10 to 3
234 The relatively large percentage of general internists who left internal medicine mostly to work in
235 le provides the perspective of the U.S. Navy internists who participated in the initial response to t
238 cially for smaller practices and for general internists who see more patients with Medicare Part D.
240 hysicians, subspecialists, and hospitalists, internists will continue to play a central role in provi
243 based (sub)specialists or paediatricians and internists with an expertise in allergology may deliver
245 valuating differences in performance between internists with time-limited or time-unlimited board cer
246 rences in outcomes for patients cared for by internists with time-limited or time-unlimited certifica
247 ternal Medicine (ABIM) initiatives encourage internists with time-unlimited certificates to recertify