ライフサイエンスコーパス: interpersonal

1 ng activities, cognitive, emotional control, interpersonal).

2 of mobility, self-care, pain, cognition, and interpersonal activities.

3 tors" and "facets" of psychopathy: Factor 1, interpersonal/affective traits; Factor 2, lifestyle/anti

4 Here, we analysed how interpersonal (Affiliation) and achievement-related (Age

5 Narcissism has been simultaneously linked to interpersonal aggression, achievement, and depression.

6 e, technical skills, problem-based learning, interpersonal and communication skills, professionalism,

7 associated with racial/ethnic disparity and interpersonal and environmental stressors, including a l

8 nce and severity of physical, psychological, interpersonal and existential problems.

9 ural and psychological mechanisms underlying interpersonal and group cooperation and coordination.

10 Negative affect, interpersonal and intergroup conflict, and possibly psyc

11 duce psychological distress, and may elevate interpersonal and intergroup conflict.

12 ntion significantly increases cooperation in interpersonal and intergroup conflicts; (ii) reducing th

13 h other cancers, as well as newly discovered interpersonal and intrapersonal phenotypic variations, r

14 gst nurses and nurse managers at individual, interpersonal and organisational levels.

15 ociated with specific regional structures of interpersonal and racial inequality that have "deep root

16 , and strongest for problematic drug use and interpersonal and self-directed violence (ORs of more th

17 nsive psychotherapy (family-focused therapy, interpersonal and social rhythm therapy, or cognitive-be

18 But it can also be an interpersonal and societal liability, partly remediable

19 e to outgroup pain, pinpointing adolescents' interpersonal and sociocognitive processes as potential

20 ed how they relate to several intrapersonal, interpersonal, and emotion regulation skills.

21 sing condition, often associated with legal, interpersonal, and employment problems.

22 sed eating performance due to intrapersonal, interpersonal, and environmental factors.

23 itive, emotional, motivational, personality, interpersonal, and group psychology.

24 en sex workers (TSW) face unique structural, interpersonal, and individual vulnerabilities that contr

25 Individual, interpersonal, and institutional efforts should be made

26 ences are apparent at structural, community, interpersonal, and intrapersonal levels.

27 dress a variety of interrelated individual-, interpersonal-, and organizational-level facilitators an

28 predictable for patients and increasing the interpersonal approach during handover.

29 ms to us he fails to accommodate many of the interpersonal aspects of representational exchange.

30 omatically tracked nonverbal cues to predict interpersonal attitudes.

31 These classifiers predicted high and low interpersonal attraction at an accuracy rate of 65%.

32 At the neural level, changes in interpersonal attraction were predicted by activity in t

33 nhanced attitude impact on the regulation of interpersonal attraction, energizing of emotional reacti

34 insic reward might be a source of changes in interpersonal attraction.

35 explore whether nonverbal cues could predict interpersonal attraction.

36 us (SES) face structural, health system, and interpersonal barriers to optimal health care, including

37 Despite their importance in interpersonal behavior, vitality forms have been, until

38 have important consequences for a variety of interpersonal behaviors.

39 ve as a model for the aberrant judgement and interpersonal behaviour observed in this disease and in

40 loyed as a robust, task-independent index of interpersonal behaviour.

41 have their pre-donation personal growth and interpersonal benefit expectations consistently met or e

42 Analyses revealed four (Interpersonal Benefit) and five (Personal Growth, Spirit

43 ssess their expectations of personal growth, interpersonal benefits, and spiritual benefits from the

44 oor-quality services-inadequate technical or interpersonal care-for 2 conditions.

45 This interpersonal cerebral coherence occurred only within pa

46 aspects of social interactions as ratings of interpersonal closeness between two walking stick-figure

47 ial context provided by music can strengthen interpersonal closeness by increasing temporal and affec

48 Here, we explored the role of perceived interpersonal closeness in joint action using the joint

49 on is sensitive to the social factor such as interpersonal closeness, and the underlying mechanisms a

50 reases feelings of empathy, sociability, and interpersonal closeness.

51 ers, that is, of inflexible loyalty to their interpersonal commitments within the group.

52 Faso, the Alive & Thrive initiative combined interpersonal communication and community mobilisation a

53 acial emotion perception plays a key role in interpersonal communication and is a precursor for a var

54 Different patterns of interpersonal communication and social structures within

55 Interpersonal communication gap between immigrant women

56 atory members to engage in reason giving and interpersonal communication necessary for ethical practi

57 l and thus require robust oral, written, and interpersonal communication skills.

58 ast research on the psychological drivers of interpersonal communication with a study examining the s

59 nal state of an organization (as inferred by interpersonal communication).

60 on behaviours could inform broader models of interpersonal communication, and be applied to the devel

61 Faces and voices are of high importance in interpersonal communication, and there are notable paral

62 combined with a review of recent research on interpersonal communication, suggest how scientists can

63 ed reality, a key concomitant and product of interpersonal communication.

64 lence across the social ecology (individual, interpersonal, community, and societal); second, interve

65 ematically within a framework of individual, interpersonal, community, and structural categories.

66 cement and establishment of moral norms, the interpersonal comparison of welfare, and the structure o

67 ted (Agency) traits moderated the effects of interpersonal competition and interpersonal cooperation

68 ed on material concerns, but rather based on interpersonal concerns: they want equal respect.

69 roup condition), or their personal identity (interpersonal condition) made salient.

70 adaptive aggression and violence can lead to interpersonal conflict and criminal behavior.

71 tric conditions-is characterized by repeated interpersonal conflict and instable relationships, the n

72 cs, health outcomes, behavioral adaptations, interpersonal conflict, and a record of community resili

73 e addressing the contexts in which drug use, interpersonal conflict, and economic vulnerability conve

74 level of psychobiology, enhancing partners' interpersonal connection through neurochemical modulatio

75 ies embrace goals related to symptom relief, interpersonal connection, or spiritual fulfilment are ce

76 for all who consented to ascertain potential interpersonal connections.

77 diseases such as Ebola virus disease (EVD), interpersonal contact plays the most vital role in human

78 ies during the COVID-19 pandemic to decrease interpersonal contacts and the resultant risks of exposu

79 little is known about the impact of routine interpersonal contacts in shaping microbiome composition

80 higher pain in African Americans related to interpersonal context and extranociceptive central pain

81 the effects of interpersonal competition and interpersonal cooperation on the ERN.

82 Thus, empathic perspective taking promotes interpersonal coordination by enhancing accuracy in pred

83 elationship, we investigated whether and how interpersonal coordination is promoted by empathic persp

84 Nonverbal interpersonal coordination, or joint action, is a crucia

85 lso placed in its broader context: a form of interpersonal coordination.

86 breastfeeding practices through intensified interpersonal counseling (IPC), mass media (MM), and com

87 Likewise, the physical and interpersonal cues a trainee receives profoundly influen

88 s of multiple domains of racism (structural, interpersonal, cultural, anti-Black).

89 cognitive demand of lifetime occupation, and interpersonal demand of lifetime occupation), and the ri

90 cross different types of justice intuitions: interpersonal devaluation of offenders, judgements of mo

91 interpersonal variability in microbiomes to interpersonal differences in drug metabolism, which has

92 ations of different events, but not revealed interpersonal differences in event representations.

93 This work suggests that interpersonal differences in microbial metabolism should

94 merged as also influential in accounting for interpersonal differences in microbiomes.

95 This is the first study to demonstrate interpersonal difficulties associated with borderline pe

96 These results highlight the pervasiveness of interpersonal difficulties associated with BPD features

97 ive and emotional processes underpinning the interpersonal difficulties associated with BPD features,

98 cial adversities (eg, stressful life events, interpersonal difficulties) as important risk factors fo

99 remediation of clinical symptoms related to interpersonal difficulties.

100 encing criteria reflecting the affective and interpersonal dimensions.

101 tion for African American students, but only interpersonal discrimination predicted increased arousal

102 s more general for Latinx students, for whom interpersonal discrimination, vicarious racism exposure,

103 e, few studies have investigated the role of interpersonal discussion.

104 We infer that the extreme interpersonal diversity of human gut viruses derives fro

105 which these systems are most sensitive (eg, interpersonal dynamics and neurochemical change) and the

106 tions, such as joint finger tapping, complex interpersonal dynamics emerge.

107 rofiles and intrapersonal (e.g. depression), interpersonal (e.g. empathy), and emotion regulation ski

108 ndicate that FT's improvements to children's interpersonal (e.g., prosocial behavior, authority accep

109 tional, and behavioral adaption to physical, interpersonal, economic, and political environments.

110 eriencing social (eg, violence, poverty) and interpersonal (eg, discrimination, low transgender women

111 roductively integrated into the framework of interpersonal emotion regulation (IER).

112 ptive self (identity and self-direction) and interpersonal (empathy and intimacy) functioning.

113 al diversity, focusing on its effects during interpersonal encounters and for groups.

114 science scholarship on social perception and interpersonal expectancies was characterized by a tripar

115 ased and self-fulfilling processes - is that interpersonal expectations relate to social reality prim

116 ic factors, childhood environment, and later interpersonal experiences are important sources of how p

117 Here we investigate how the interpersonal expression of positive and negative moral

118 tor 2, lifestyle/antisocial traits; Facet 1, interpersonal; Facet 2, affective; Facet 3, lifestyle; F

119 Applicants rated educational and interpersonal factors as more important than geographic

120 tic factors influence risk, psychosocial and interpersonal factors can trigger onset, and changes in

121 well as cognitive-affective, behavioural and interpersonal factors.

122 of the gender gap included institutional and interpersonal factors.

123 Interpersonal firearm violence among youth is a substant

124 ents with borderline personality disorder in interpersonal functioning appear to be related to altera

125 tal health, abstaining from substance abuse, interpersonal functioning, and parenting responsibility.

126 mporal frontotemporal dementia overestimated interpersonal functioning, and patients with non-fluent

127 ic personality features associated with poor interpersonal functioning.

128 urring emotional or behavioral symptoms, and interpersonal functioning.

129 ins in insight and subsequent improvement in interpersonal functioning.

130 n-fluent aphasia overestimated emotional and interpersonal functioning.

131 hird-party evaluation of scenarios depicting interpersonal harm in 1,170 children aged between 5 and

132 Interpersonal hypersensitivity is associated with a (pre

133 ct dysregulation, behavioral dyscontrol, and interpersonal hypersensitivity.

134 ed developmental competence (eg, academic or interpersonal) in young adulthood.

135 Weighted averaging mechanisms of interpersonal influence reduce the heterogeneity of the

136 se findings with a mathematical model of the interpersonal influence system that alters some or all o

137 havior and covering ethical infrastructures, interpersonal influences, individual differences, and co

138 in four musicians, which reflected real-time interpersonal information sharing.

139 We demonstrated high rates of violent interpersonal injury (71.6% of intentional injury) and m

140 ition, past-year stressors in the domains of interpersonal instability and financial hardship were as

141 how defensive responses are affected by the interpersonal interaction within the DPPS of the face.

142 fessionals whose occupations involve intense interpersonal interactions (eg, firefighter, chaplain, s

143 g, as an emotion system, is activated during interpersonal interactions and close relationships.

144 ring in the space around the body, including interpersonal interactions and maintenance of a particul

145 In neonates, touch is a cornerstone of interpersonal interactions and sensory-cognitive develop

146 al participation and subjectively meaningful interpersonal interactions are related to physical perfo

147 These results indicate that interpersonal interactions shape perception of threat an

148 Social cues and interpersonal interactions strongly contribute to evoke

149 tamine (MDMA) on cooperative behavior during interpersonal interactions, as well as the neural correl

150 other by evaluating the outcomes of repeated interpersonal interactions.

151 ridge search to September 2019) of effective interpersonal interventions; observations of primary car

152 The experiment is based on an interpersonal investment game, in which we vary the char

153 SD gene expression signatures distinguishing interpersonal (IP)-related traumas from combat-related t

154 matic differences in permissible consumption-interpersonal judgments about what is acceptable (or not

155 ry and development process, and personal and interpersonal keys to success.

156 by resistance to change and by emotional and interpersonal lability.

157 At an interpersonal level, disclosure to a spouse and spousal

158 en (deficiencies in caring relationships and interpersonal loss) and men (failures to achieve expecte

159 Interpersonal motor coordination between dyads of patien

160 CU were associated with prenatal risks of an interpersonal nature (that is, intimate partner violence

161 on models based on known spatial features of interpersonal networks, most particularly the presence o

162 We review studies that measured interpersonal neural entrainment during early social int

163 We discuss possible causes of interpersonal neural entrainment, and consider whether i

164 ve pressure from 'we'"; and (4) the sense of interpersonal obligation.

165 to move beyond explicit category labels and interpersonal, or dyadic, similarity as the sole inputs

166 ce of facial cues compared to bodily cues on interpersonal outcomes in virtual environments and lend

167 facial expressions had a positive effect on interpersonal outcomes.

168 entions on health, cognitive, affective, and interpersonal outcomes; (b) evidence-based applications

169 imprint that is directly informative for the interpersonal perception of another's dynamic physical s

170 Social reality of a group emerges from interpersonal perceptions and beliefs put to action unde

171 We computed an "interpersonal prediction error", the difference between

172 selection, were highly correlated with this interpersonal prediction error.

173 Given that realizing such interpersonal preferences positively predicts relationsh

174 to which this pattern is generated by actual interpersonal prejudice as opposed to structural constra

175 d existential problems (OR = 1.54) but fewer interpersonal problems (OR = 0.50).

176 ly related to Delta"positive affect", while "interpersonal problems" were cross-sectionally associate

177 s (depressed affect, somatic complaints, and interpersonal problems).

178 vor of CBT for measures of social phobia and interpersonal problems, but not for depression.

179 nterventions for emotional dysregulation and interpersonal problems.

180 aints, depressed affect, positive affect and interpersonal problems] were examined among African-Amer

181 We propose that abstraction is an interpersonal process and serves a social function.

182 ness to or isolation from others, as well as interpersonal processes such as reciprocation of support

183 y can have profound influences on a range of interpersonal processes, from marriage and divorce rates

184 ity improvement focus on using and enhancing interpersonal professional relationships to achieve and

185 The competencies of Professionalism and Interpersonal/Professional Communication Skills had neve

186 ilt was modulated in the anterior insula and interpersonal psychopathic traits: anterior insula modul

187 Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) has been developed for

188 The authors tested interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT), which has demonstrate

189 Interpersonal psychotherapy for the prevention of excess

190 Interpersonal psychotherapy further reduced objective bi

191 ndomly assigned to participate in an adapted interpersonal psychotherapy or a health-education group

192 We determined whether an adapted interpersonal psychotherapy prevention program is more e

193 Cognitive behavioral therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy remain the most established

194 In follow-up analyses, interpersonal psychotherapy was more efficacious than he

195 rapy (SMD -0.56, 95% CrI -1.03 to -0.11) and interpersonal psychotherapy, mindfulness, and supportive

196 he players' inference predicted the players' interpersonal reactivity index (IRI) scores, explicit ra

197 with MCI, and 64 patients with AD) with the Interpersonal Reactivity Index Personal Distress subscal

198 While imagining both interpersonal rejection and acting out aggressively, a s

199 magery task consisting of narratives of both interpersonal rejection and directing physical aggressio

200 management issues (including leadership and interpersonal relations among staff), and barriers to re

201 ear to be much more effective with regard to interpersonal relations and other measures of personalit

202 his communication is useful for establishing interpersonal relations and supporting joint activities,

203 ut power's effects on affect, cognition, and interpersonal relations, but qualified others, particula

204 ects on participants' affect, cognition, and interpersonal relations.

205 ality interpretation could lead to: (a) poor interpersonal relationships among patients, providers, a

206 for (mainly female) patients with difficult interpersonal relationships and more severe personality

207 e with personality disorder have problems in interpersonal relationships but often attribute them wro

208 Aims were engagement, communication and interpersonal relationships focusing upon immediate area

209 ntal background, personality and failures in interpersonal relationships played a stronger etiologic

210 ucts and incur more debt, have lower-quality interpersonal relationships, act in more ecologically de

211 p, they felt less burned-out and strained in interpersonal relationships, they engaged less in misbeh

212 icant impact, both positive and negative, on interpersonal relationships.

213 emonstrate how caregiving patterns fostering interpersonal resonance, reactive temperament, and chron

214 erence for more predictable environments, 3) interpersonal responsibility for shared goals, 4) commit

215 The YSW is an interpersonal science communication and outreach experie

216 -0.7 to -0.2, p=0.001) and patient-rated QPR interpersonal scores (-1.6, -2.7 to -0.5, p=0.005) at fo

217 ular group members also demonstrated greater interpersonal sensitivity by more accurately predicting

218 w knowledge of one type of social relation - interpersonal similarity - shapes cognition and behavior

219 abundant evidence showing the importance of interpersonal similarity and homophily for human relatio

220 others using trait dimensions-in explaining interpersonal similarity.

221 nd the Guilty Feeling Scale, which comprises interpersonal situation (IPS; guilt from hurting friends

222 FT's improvements to interpersonal skills emerge as the strongest indirect pa

223 ce, communication, honesty, benevolence, and interpersonal skills.

224 alone, viewing a screen - but less about how interpersonal social influences are substantiated in the

225 and punitive, and who sanction violators of interpersonal social norms, foster and sustain the expan

226 Interpersonal space (e.g., IPS) refers to the physical d

227 ies, including face, voice, body, touch, and interpersonal space; different levels of analysis, inclu

228 , condomless receptive anal sex, depression, interpersonal stigma, law enforcement stigma, and violen

229 increased limbic responsiveness to emotional interpersonal stimuli.

230 he working environment (in terms of burnout, interpersonal strain and counterproductive work behaviou

231 sychopathy is characterized by a distinctive interpersonal style that combines callous-unemotional tr

232 k goals) is associated with professional and interpersonal success.

233 ing emotions related to cancer and receiving interpersonal support can promote psychological and phys

234 data: the Heart Failure Symptom Survey, the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List-12, the Graven and

235 e findings are consistent with the theory of interpersonal synchronization emerging through self-othe

236 Interpersonal synchronization has been a widely used fra

237 e current study supports the hypothesis that interpersonal synchronization in body movement could be

238 a from two separate experiments we show that interpersonal synchronization strategies rely on the rel

239 o predict leaders' behavior and thus improve interpersonal synchronization.

240 , we investigated the simultaneous impact of interpersonal synchrony (between persons) and intraperso

241 The social benefits of interpersonal synchrony are widely recognized.

242 system plays an important role in promoting interpersonal synchrony during dance, suggesting that OT

243 Our results showed greater stability during interpersonal synchrony in schizophrenia patients who re

244 Too much interpersonal synchrony is considered detrimental for a

245 Interpersonal synchrony predicted an increase in positiv

246 We hypothesized that interpersonal synchrony's known tendency to increase pos

247 used were family, cognitive behavioural, and interpersonal therapies.

248 ns, such as cognitive behavioral therapy and interpersonal therapy, are effective in preventing perin

249 The social brain appears to map our interpersonal ties, and alterations in this map may help

250 Information and behaviour can spread through interpersonal ties.

251 in-to-skin contact in humans, which promotes interpersonal touch and affiliative behavior.

252 itate both neural and emotional responses to interpersonal touch in a context- (female vs male touch)

253 ionale was to manipulate the reward value of interpersonal touch independent of the intensity and typ

254 erceived hedonic value of human heterosexual interpersonal touch is facilitated by OXT in men, but th

255 the neural and emotional responses to human interpersonal touch.

256 al level, sharing-economy companies leverage interpersonal trust between their members on a scale uni

257 ral judgment groups subsequently showed more interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and generosity tha

258 which highlighted the role of structural and interpersonal types of work pressure on individual respo

259 tabolic activities of the microbiota connect interpersonal variability in microbiomes to interpersona

260 Its levels are highly heritable, and its interpersonal variability is modulated in part by 3 quan

261 jects and are not standardized, resulting in interpersonal variability of interpretation.

262 of many medical drugs, with consequences for interpersonal variation in drug efficacy and toxicity.

263 e that even with the considerable intra- and interpersonal variation in the human microbiome, this va

264 A large interpersonal variation in the skin microbiota compositi

265 partially explain community composition and interpersonal variation.

266 d eliminate confounding species-specific and interpersonal variations and ultimately pave the way for

267 ios of C=C isomers are much less affected by interpersonal variations than their individual abundance

268 Despite large interpersonal variations, adenoid microbiota shared a co

269 ffect on a broad array of domains, including interpersonal violations (Studies 1, 2), prosocial inten

270 tients whose firearm injury occurred through interpersonal violence (assault).

271 gnificant increases in firearm injuries from interpersonal violence (RR, 2.23 [CI, 1.01 to 4.89]) but

272 rend corresponded with rising YLL rates from interpersonal violence and chronic kidney disease.

273 s related to HIV self-testing were reported: interpersonal violence and mental distress.

274 ree female adolescent and adult survivors of interpersonal violence and non-trauma-exposed demographi

275 sease, diabetes, cirrhosis, and, since 2000, interpersonal violence drove deteriorating health outcom

276 ogress has been made in reducing US rates of interpersonal violence even though a significant burden

277 Children exposed to interpersonal violence exhibited poor memory of contexts

278 forts to understand, prevent, and respond to interpersonal violence have often neglected the degree t

279 cost of cranial injuries largely related to interpersonal violence in past populations.

280 g among individuals admitted to hospital for interpersonal violence injury during childhood (cumulati

281 ian estimates indicate that the frequency of interpersonal violence rises 4% and the frequency of int

282 Importance: Self-directed and interpersonal violence share some common risk factors su

283 us paper that four earlier traumas involving interpersonal violence significantly predicted PTSD afte

284 g a violent crime, or hospitalisation due to interpersonal violence was 32.0% (95% CI 31.6-32.5) in t

285 er, while mortality rates from self-harm and interpersonal violence were elevated in southwestern cou

286 ons, crowded or rural living conditions, and interpersonal violence) are both more intense and more c

287 Children (N = 60; 8-19 years, 24 exposed to interpersonal violence) completed a context encoding tas

288 s, neurological disorders, and self-harm and interpersonal violence), both increases and decreases in

289 individuals exposed to trauma (e.g., combat, interpersonal violence, and natural disasters).

290 for injuries or poisonings due to self-harm, interpersonal violence, or accidents before their 15th b

291 us, obstetric complications, obesity, recent interpersonal violence, pre- and early postpartum stress

292 Interpersonal violence, which includes child abuse and n

293 ionals regarding the causes of self-harm and interpersonal violence.

294 avioral interventions for women survivors of interpersonal violence.

295 s from all causes, particularly HIV/AIDS and interpersonal violence.

296 include a group at high risk of perpetrating interpersonal violence.

297 ity, and emerging social behaviors involving interpersonal violence.

298 nonical correlation analysis to identify an 'interpersonal vulnerability' dimension.

299 tivation (intrapersonal), and assertiveness (interpersonal)-while controlling for demographics (e.g.,

300 Stern, The Interpersonal World of the Infant (1985); D.