戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ial was a randomized, controlled, crossover, intervention study.
2  Karzinom) is a population-based prospective intervention study.
3 ndent response to meat or fish intake in the intervention study.
4 9 quality control samples from a nutritional intervention study.
5                                  Prospective intervention study.
6  adolescent girls: findings from the HERMOSA Intervention Study.
7  an 8-week very low carbohydrate diet (VLCD) intervention study.
8 ded, randomized, 3-way-crossover, controlled intervention study.
9 etes participating in a behavioral nutrition intervention study.
10  were recruited to the Selenium in PRegnancy INTervention study.
11 subsequently validate this panel in an acute intervention study.
12 ical treatment, which should be tested in an intervention study.
13 aily dose of 2 g gluten was selected for the intervention study.
14 f Surgeons were invited to participate in an intervention study.
15 ic asthma were included in this double-blind intervention study.
16 oking to attend a recruitment clinic for the intervention study.
17 nisms have not been empirically tested in an intervention study.
18 omen were included in a randomized crossover intervention study.
19 smoked meat products (hot dog, bacon) in the intervention study.
20 comes to be used in all rheumatology nursing intervention studies.
21 ess as an outcome measure for future retinal intervention studies.
22 n genomic studies and biomarkers in clinical intervention studies.
23 ogate end points in early-stage procognitive intervention studies.
24  on meta-regressions of published cohort and intervention studies.
25  to interpret HAP levels measured during ICS intervention studies.
26 ere analyzed separately in three of the five intervention studies.
27 unfinished care prevalence, and a paucity of intervention studies.
28 transmission models to improve the design of intervention studies.
29 idered as a potentially useful AR outcome in intervention studies.
30 e considered for use in malaria in pregnancy intervention studies.
31 iotensin II and a low-sodium diet in 2 human intervention studies.
32            We measured adrenal hormones in 2 intervention studies.
33 ey might also serve as a baseline for future intervention studies.
34 ometabolic risk factors, comparing different intervention studies.
35 ion of CAT data, particularly in response to intervention studies.
36 ive, 18.9% were observational, and 8.7% were intervention studies.
37 ng sample size during the planning stages of intervention studies.
38 e been shown to improve vascular function in intervention studies.
39 ght articles were included, of which 20 were intervention studies.
40 e total diet should be taken into account in intervention studies.
41 ns of glucoraphanin for use in blinded human intervention studies.
42 nd may hold useful information for cognitive intervention studies.
43  to be evaluated with prospective randomized intervention studies.
44 ase death and suffering in epidemiologic and intervention studies.
45  microbiome sequence data from high-fat-diet intervention studies.
46 lactase status, corroborating the results of intervention studies.
47 ates and indirectness of the populations and interventions studied.
48  Skin biomarkers are needed for skin barrier interventions studies.
49 in the Hep-Net-International-Delta-Hepatitis-Intervention-Study 1 (HIDIT-1) trial.
50                        As part of a lighting intervention study, 18 hospital Labor and Delivery Depar
51                                        Of 21 intervention studies, 19 studies were in adults without
52 e reviewed 4759 publications and included 14 intervention studies (2497 participants), 3 prospective
53 er and Nutrition (EPIC) study.In the dietary intervention study, 4 groups of 10 subjects consumed inc
54                          In this nutritional intervention study 46 healthy and non-obese twin pairs c
55 (Studies 3 and 4b), 1 d later and 155 d post-intervention (Study 4b).
56 udinal, double-blind, randomized, food-based intervention study, 5- to 7-y-old children from northern
57                                   Twenty-two intervention studies (9 RCTs), including a total of 2082
58                       The Qidong Hepatitis B Intervention Study, a population-based, cluster randomiz
59  future transdisciplinary investigations and intervention studies across the fields of epidemiology,
60                                 Then, in the intervention study, adults with biopsy-proven celiac dis
61 of the prospective German Infant Nutritional Intervention study after 10 years of follow-up.
62 tment Study (CIGTS) or the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS).
63                   A recent prospective human intervention study aimed at reducing the n-6:n-3 LC-PUFA
64  activity on the risk of death in controlled intervention studies among individuals who have been hea
65 study designs and analyses and approaches to intervention studies and clinical care.
66 igorous statistical tests of significance in intervention studies and clinical trials, as well as qua
67  establishing a spontaneous model for future intervention studies and functional characterization.
68 uroinflammatory and antimicroglial agents in intervention studies and in observational studies evalua
69                                   Results of intervention studies and registries increased the knowle
70 ional studies in adults, whereas large-scale intervention studies and studies of lutein during pregna
71                                     Ten were intervention studies and twelve were cross-sectional obs
72 markers of meat and fish intake in a dietary intervention study and in free-living subjects from the
73  red meat intake in both a highly controlled intervention study and in subjects of a cross-sectional
74 ated fatty acid data obtained from one human intervention study and one cellular model in both of whi
75 formed using data from the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study and the UCLA (University of Californi
76 behavioral intervention and feeding studies (intervention studies) and prospective observational stud
77 s, possible extensions of N-of-1 nutritional intervention studies, and areas of future research.
78 fy randomized clinical trials, nonrandomized intervention studies, and observational studies.
79 sed controlled trials, two were before-after intervention studies, and the remainder were observation
80 on-based study, 54% in a chlamydia screening intervention study, and 73% in a study among attendees o
81                 Prospective longitudinal and intervention studies are a critical next step in develop
82  part of this increase, but, as T1D is rare, intervention studies are challenging to perform.
83 e high-quality longitudinal observational or intervention studies are needed on the subject.
84              In addition, diet and lifestyle intervention studies are needed to confirm our findings.
85                                 Longitudinal intervention studies are needed to determine causality o
86 tive validation of biomarkers and randomized intervention studies are needed to determine optimal man
87                                              Intervention studies are needed to determine the most ef
88 behavior in the short term, but high-quality intervention studies are needed to determine whether eHe
89                                              Intervention studies are needed to examine whether sleep
90                                      Dietary intervention studies are needed to prove that consuming
91                                              Intervention studies are needed to underpin policy; for
92                                  Prospective intervention studies are required to determine whether s
93 ological mechanisms, human epidemiology, and intervention studies are summarized in this review.
94                                              Intervention studies are warranted to examine the effect
95 nal studies on calcification progression and intervention studies are warranted to investigate the po
96                                        Human intervention studies are warranted to investigate whethe
97                                  Periodontal intervention studies are warranted.
98     Based on these results, the design of an intervention study assessing the impact of cytomegalovir
99                      We performed a clinical intervention study at a regional hospital in Taiwan of 5
100 te suitable for potential future field-based intervention studies based on an improved understanding
101 dividual-level analyses (and through this to intervention studies carried out robustly at the level o
102 MD] slope, VF index slope, Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study, Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treat
103 , AND PARTICIPANTS: Nonrandomized controlled intervention study conducted at 9 French centers.
104            Baseline data from a school-based intervention study conducted in 2007 among 11-year-old a
105 r the Pacific Kids DASH for Health (PacDASH) intervention study, conducted in the Kaiser Permanente h
106  were included in a double-blinded crossover intervention study, consisting of a 20-d habituation per
107      With the use of a randomized, crossover intervention-study design, 49 adults (56% women) with el
108 ed clinical trials, nonrandomized controlled intervention studies, diagnostic accuracy studies with a
109                    Although meta-analyses of intervention studies differ in their findings, most asso
110 nd progress monitoring, novel prevention and intervention studies, elucidation of mechanisms of multi
111 rdiography (TEE) to guide structural cardiac interventions, studies evaluating safety in this context
112                  Prospective mechanistic and intervention studies examining circadian and sleep healt
113 systematic review and meta-analysis of human intervention studies examining the acute effect of LES i
114 idence from cross-sectional, prospective and intervention studies for the impact of periodontal disea
115 d a 3-arm parallel randomized double-blinded intervention study for 12 mo and underwent transperineal
116 data participating in a randomized lifestyle intervention study for weight loss, Action for Health in
117             A small but increasing number of intervention studies from LMICs provide initial evidence
118                    Alternatively, single-arm intervention studies (half the total sample size) could
119                       Approximately 70 human intervention studies have been carried out on cocoa and
120                                          Few intervention studies have been conducted to relieve hot
121 ve a reduced risk of obesity, few controlled intervention studies have been done in which maternal ob
122  rTFAs and iTFAs are inconsistent, and human intervention studies have been limited, underpowered, an
123  overweight and obesity; however, results of intervention studies have been mixed.
124                                   Most human intervention studies have been performed on cocoa as an
125 ly common in people with type 2 diabetes, no intervention studies have compared the effects of aerobi
126                                         Some intervention studies have demonstrated that eicosapentae
127                                        Human intervention studies have documented protective effects
128                                       Recent intervention studies have explored the role of mixed mea
129                                           2) Intervention studies have indicated that the metabolic e
130                                    Lifestyle-intervention studies have not shown improved outcomes.
131                       Both observational and intervention studies have provided evidence in support o
132                                      Dietary intervention studies have shown that enteral therapy, wi
133                                         Some intervention studies have suggested that dairy products
134                                         Many intervention studies have tested the effect of dietary f
135 f women enrolled in the International Breast Intervention Study (IBIS-I) or the Royal Marsden study.
136 om sample of the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS-I).
137 itors (MAP.3 and International Breast Cancer Intervention Study II [IBIS-II]).
138  analysis of the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study II, a double-blind randomized clinica
139 tervention sampling were used by just 23% of intervention studies in biodiversity conservation, and 3
140 c risk markers, but double-blinded vitamin D intervention studies in children are scarce.
141 for detailed investigation: (1) longitudinal intervention studies in humans probing the dynamics of b
142  review and meta-analysis of controlled diet-intervention studies in nondiabetic subjects to determin
143       A critical goal of early detection and intervention studies in psychosis is therefore to unders
144 ies in biodiversity conservation, and 36% of intervention studies in social science.
145 ls required in the planning and reporting of intervention studies in the prevention and management of
146 ospective, multicenter, open-label, phase IV intervention study in 14 specialist UK clinics.
147 evention Program Outcome Study), a long-term intervention study in 3234 subjects with prediabetes (me
148                (Ad Hoc Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Study in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients:
149        We performed a randomized, controlled intervention study in apparently healthy, free-living ad
150                   We conducted a prospective intervention study in two rural communities in KwaZulu-N
151  RUTF use.We conducted a nonrandomized pilot intervention study in which 115 children eligible for ou
152 mized, double-masked, 2-parallel-arm dietary intervention study in which healthy participants (aged 3
153 fy oxylipins in human plasma samples from an intervention study in which participants were randomly a
154                                              Intervention study: in PCSK9 GOF mutation patients rando
155 nal studies, with only a few longitudinal or intervention studies included.
156 models for ZIKV pathogenesis and therapeutic intervention studies, including vaccines, with contempor
157         Genetic, observational, and clinical intervention studies indicate that circulating levels of
158                                  We included intervention studies involving a task-sharing strategy f
159 ospective, multicenter, open-label, phase IV intervention study involving 11 secondary/tertiary cente
160 ed, double-blind, placebo-controlled dietary-intervention study involving 944 children who were posit
161                                           An intervention study is required to test this hypothesis.
162 loid binding over time--for example, in drug intervention studies--it is essential to use fully quant
163 of school-based environmental assessment and intervention studies linked to health effects.
164             The relatively short duration of intervention studies (</=16 wk) may explain the lack of
165             Six observational studies and 21 intervention studies met the inclusion criteria.
166  single-blind, parallel, controlled, dietary intervention study, MetS subjects (n = 472) from 8 Europ
167 (BCRAT), and the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study model (IBIS).
168 t be directly influenced by the prophylactic intervention, studies must be designed to insure that th
169 omized trials and 2 nonrandomized controlled intervention studies (N = 65 888; 13 good-quality, 26 fa
170 er steatosis] were included in the follow-up intervention study (n = 13 by month 12).
171                                       Of the intervention studies none explicitly incorporated psycho
172 lity randomized and nonrandomized controlled intervention studies of behavioral counseling interventi
173  exposure in large-scale epidemiological and intervention studies of HAP.
174 cadian arrhythmias, review observational and intervention studies of the effects of circadian-rhythm-
175 Multi-institutional nonrandomized controlled intervention study of 1068 children aged 7 through 17 ye
176 SIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective intervention study of 1255 patient admissions (642 befor
177 double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel intervention study of 44 overweight or obese (body mass
178                   We conducted a prospective intervention study of a resident handoff-improvement pro
179 ive, multicentre, non-randomised, open-label intervention study of an implantable DBS device (the VAN
180                     We analyzed data from an intervention study of electronic inhaler monitoring devi
181 pants as part of a larger randomized dietary intervention study of participants consuming either a he
182 , systematic reviews, randomized trials, and intervention studies on hepatitis B vaccination, screeni
183                     There are no periodontal intervention studies on primary ACVD prevention and ther
184 ilable data from laboratory animal and human intervention studies on tea and cancer prevention.
185                                          Two intervention studies on the influence of obesity on peri
186                              Mechanistic and intervention studies on the role of KCs in determining t
187   We performed a 30-month prospective cohort intervention study on 6 high-risk units in a 994-bed ter
188 ntation, and would be appropriate for use in intervention studies or clinical trials.
189 proach could potentially be used in exercise intervention studies or in studies of inflammatory myopa
190          (Prospective Aerobic Reconditioning Intervention Study [PARIS]; NCT01113840).
191                                              Interventions: Study participants were randomized to rec
192                                       Future intervention studies, perhaps with a chronic design, in
193                    In urine samples from the intervention study, pork intake was positively associate
194                                 This dietary intervention study provides evidence that regular CF con
195 Cochrane CENTRAL, and Clinicaltrials.gov for intervention studies published between Jan 1, 1990, and
196 systematic search for controlled weight-loss-intervention studies published up to 31 March 2016 was p
197  and Prevalence of Risk Factors and Holistic Intervention Study (PURSE-HIS) in Chennai, India.
198  associated with red meat intake in both the intervention study (q = 0.004, Student's t-test) and the
199 disorders," and "delirium." STUDY SELECTION: Intervention studies (randomized or nonrandomized) asses
200 ported that, when compared with control, the interventions studied resulted in significant reductions
201           87% of MBSR patients completed the intervention; study retention was >95% at each follow-up
202 ng of study populations, types and timing of interventions studied, risk of bias, outcomes reported,
203 iets, we propose that both observational and intervention studies should as far as possible be requir
204                                 Furthermore, intervention studies should at least address the anastom
205                                 Etiology and intervention studies should evaluate the suite of enviro
206                                              Intervention studies should investigate whether increasi
207                                       Future intervention studies should seek to examine whether impr
208              Dissemination studies and early intervention studies show mixed findings and further wor
209 ization, and data from preoperative clinical intervention studies show that interventions in the path
210                                              Intervention studies showed protective effects on interm
211                        Evidence from dietary intervention studies shows that the intake of flavanols
212                                         This intervention study shows that an HDD results in a reduct
213  such as cell cycle or cell death.This human intervention study shows that the quantity and source of
214                           In this randomized intervention study, subjects consumed a high- and a low-
215 N: Available evidence from observational and intervention studies suggest a beneficial effect of stat
216                          Recent organic diet intervention studies suggest that diet is a significant
217                            Data from dietary intervention studies suggest that intake of (-)-epicatec
218                              Small lifestyle-intervention studies suggest that modest weight loss inc
219                                   Short-term intervention studies suggest that NNS, when substituted
220 ry studies, there is a growing body of human intervention studies suggesting that tea can slow cancer
221                                       Future intervention studies targeting intestinal phosphate abso
222 rvention stakeholders including the original intervention study team, the proposed adaptation team, a
223 s incomplete recognition of requirements for intervention studies that aim to assess their benefits i
224  and elucidate complex mechanisms of action, intervention studies that assess markers related to thes
225 ry embolism in adults were included, as were intervention studies that assessed the effects of statin
226         There is a scarcity of well designed intervention studies that document stigma reduction in p
227                  We included all prospective intervention studies that evaluated the efficacy and saf
228 results of randomized controlled nutritional intervention studies that have assessed the impact of da
229         Future investigations should include intervention studies that optimize indoor air quality as
230                                  Prospective intervention studies that restrict antibiotic consumptio
231  a potential surrogate biomarker for midlife intervention studies that seek to measure dementia-preve
232 he need for further experimental and dietary intervention studies that target circulating trans-palmi
233 obtained from 10 of 11 identified comparison intervention studies that used either saline or midazola
234 resent study was an exploratory, prospective intervention study that aimed to explore brain response
235                              We performed an intervention study that analyzed anthocyanins and their
236 ealth Outcomes in diabEtes Mellitus patients Intervention Study (THEMIS) was a phase 3 randomised, do
237                                           In intervention studies, therapy with rosuvastatin signific
238 r findings, coupled with evidence from other intervention studies to date, suggest that policy makers
239     These data provide a framework for early intervention studies to facilitate safer application of
240  before development of AD or FA for targeted intervention studies to potentially alter the atopic mar
241                                        Early intervention studies to repair the epidermal barrier or
242 ive, single-arm, before-and-after, community intervention study to assess the efficacy of mass drug a
243 -led, community-based participatory research intervention study to determine whether using personal c
244                    We conducted a randomized intervention study to evaluate a Clean Development Mecha
245                              We conducted an intervention study to investigate the effects of these n
246       We performed a multicenter prospective intervention study to test an ultrarapid cooling technol
247 on physical performance is warranted, as are intervention studies, to support future recommendations.
248 on was confirmed in an independent lifestyle intervention study (Tuebingen Lifestyle Intervention Pro
249       Eighteen papers - 12 unique, completed intervention studies (two quasi- and ten experimental tr
250  the brain's functional properties, however, intervention studies typically perturb neurons in a nons
251 taine was 131 mg/d, well below those used in intervention studies using betaine to lower blood homocy
252                                           In intervention studies using DBA2/J and Nos3 (eNos) KO mou
253                     Neoadjuvant and adjuvant intervention studies using standard-of-care chemotherape
254 rvivors, more evidence is needed from robust intervention studies using standardized outcomes.
255 intake on circulating metabolites in a human intervention study using untargeted metabolomics.
256  providers and organizations require complex intervention studies, using mixed methods designs with q
257                                          The intervention studied was surgical insertion of a ST-AMG
258 uble-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over NK intervention study was carried out in 12 healthy young m
259                        The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study was conducted from 1998 to 2006; the
260                A prospective, observational, intervention study was conducted from August 1, 2008, to
261 ouble-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover intervention study was conducted in 13 healthy overweigh
262 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind intervention study was conducted in adults aged >/=50 y
263            Here, a randomized double-blinded intervention study was conducted where exclusively formu
264 dent, parallel randomized controlled dietary intervention study was conducted.
265                            The effect of the intervention study was evaluated by 2-sample t tests.
266                                A prospective intervention study was performed in 2 acute care general
267 spective, randomized, and controlled dietary intervention study was performed over 6 mo.
268 995 Canadian Asthma Primary Prevention Study intervention study was performed.
269 his randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical intervention study was set in PD centers at Northwestern
270                               The aim of the intervention study was to evaluate the influence of inul
271 anded (PrEPX) Study, a multisite, open-label intervention study, was nested within the Australian Col
272 hrough combinations of both animal and human intervention studies, we comprehensively investigated al
273      In a prospective randomised, cross-over intervention study, we analysed the plasma and urinary l
274                         In a month-long diet intervention study, we show that diet standardization dr
275                                              Intervention studies were all of weak quality overall an
276 , 31 longitudinal, 33 cross-sectional, and 3 intervention studies were conducted in adults.
277                                  No included intervention studies were designed specifically to achie
278                            Effect sizes from intervention studies were extracted or calculated where
279                  Eight longitudinal and five intervention studies were included.
280                                           No intervention studies were included.
281                            Two human dietary intervention studies were used to translate the results.
282 ted into the Food4Me pan-European PN dietary intervention study were randomly assigned to 4 treatment
283                The main long-term management interventions studied were anaphylaxis management plans
284 clinical samples derived from an anthocyanin intervention study, where 36 of the 45 modeled metabolit
285 aseline videos selected from a communication intervention study, where videos were recorded to captur
286  in the evidence for high quality randomised intervention studies which combine hardware and software
287              Six observational studies and 2 intervention studies with 14,903 participants were inclu
288 wer questions on the safety of probiotics in intervention studies with confidence." Critics point out
289                                              Intervention studies with exogenous sulfur are warranted
290 er, only limited data from prospective human intervention studies with long-term follow-up are availa
291 ves and present supporting findings from two intervention studies with marginalized populations.
292               We included non-pharmaceutical intervention studies with primary or secondary outcomes
293 s of 309 patients from the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study with >/=6 years of follow-up and >/=1
294 he second part of the study was a controlled intervention study with 12 healthy volunteers.
295 inded, randomized 2 x 5-wk crossover dietary intervention study with a 14-d run-in period during whic
296                  A pre-intervention and post-intervention study with a contemporaneous control group
297             We designed a quasi-experimental intervention study with an interrupted time-series analy
298                                  To mimic an intervention study with confounding, a fictitious treatm
299 Suite of 5 identical controlled before-after intervention studies, with preplanned analysis of pooled
300                                              Intervention studies would also be helpful to identify w

 
Page Top