コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ial was a randomized, controlled, crossover, intervention study.
2 Karzinom) is a population-based prospective intervention study.
3 ndent response to meat or fish intake in the intervention study.
4 9 quality control samples from a nutritional intervention study.
5 Prospective intervention study.
6 adolescent girls: findings from the HERMOSA Intervention Study.
7 an 8-week very low carbohydrate diet (VLCD) intervention study.
8 ded, randomized, 3-way-crossover, controlled intervention study.
9 etes participating in a behavioral nutrition intervention study.
10 were recruited to the Selenium in PRegnancy INTervention study.
11 subsequently validate this panel in an acute intervention study.
12 ical treatment, which should be tested in an intervention study.
13 aily dose of 2 g gluten was selected for the intervention study.
14 f Surgeons were invited to participate in an intervention study.
15 ic asthma were included in this double-blind intervention study.
16 oking to attend a recruitment clinic for the intervention study.
17 nisms have not been empirically tested in an intervention study.
18 omen were included in a randomized crossover intervention study.
19 smoked meat products (hot dog, bacon) in the intervention study.
20 comes to be used in all rheumatology nursing intervention studies.
21 ess as an outcome measure for future retinal intervention studies.
22 n genomic studies and biomarkers in clinical intervention studies.
23 ogate end points in early-stage procognitive intervention studies.
24 on meta-regressions of published cohort and intervention studies.
25 to interpret HAP levels measured during ICS intervention studies.
26 ere analyzed separately in three of the five intervention studies.
27 unfinished care prevalence, and a paucity of intervention studies.
28 transmission models to improve the design of intervention studies.
29 idered as a potentially useful AR outcome in intervention studies.
30 e considered for use in malaria in pregnancy intervention studies.
31 iotensin II and a low-sodium diet in 2 human intervention studies.
32 We measured adrenal hormones in 2 intervention studies.
33 ey might also serve as a baseline for future intervention studies.
34 ometabolic risk factors, comparing different intervention studies.
35 ion of CAT data, particularly in response to intervention studies.
36 ive, 18.9% were observational, and 8.7% were intervention studies.
37 ng sample size during the planning stages of intervention studies.
38 e been shown to improve vascular function in intervention studies.
39 ght articles were included, of which 20 were intervention studies.
40 e total diet should be taken into account in intervention studies.
41 ns of glucoraphanin for use in blinded human intervention studies.
42 nd may hold useful information for cognitive intervention studies.
43 to be evaluated with prospective randomized intervention studies.
44 ase death and suffering in epidemiologic and intervention studies.
45 microbiome sequence data from high-fat-diet intervention studies.
46 lactase status, corroborating the results of intervention studies.
47 ates and indirectness of the populations and interventions studied.
48 Skin biomarkers are needed for skin barrier interventions studies.
52 e reviewed 4759 publications and included 14 intervention studies (2497 participants), 3 prospective
53 er and Nutrition (EPIC) study.In the dietary intervention study, 4 groups of 10 subjects consumed inc
56 udinal, double-blind, randomized, food-based intervention study, 5- to 7-y-old children from northern
59 future transdisciplinary investigations and intervention studies across the fields of epidemiology,
64 activity on the risk of death in controlled intervention studies among individuals who have been hea
66 igorous statistical tests of significance in intervention studies and clinical trials, as well as qua
67 establishing a spontaneous model for future intervention studies and functional characterization.
68 uroinflammatory and antimicroglial agents in intervention studies and in observational studies evalua
70 ional studies in adults, whereas large-scale intervention studies and studies of lutein during pregna
72 markers of meat and fish intake in a dietary intervention study and in free-living subjects from the
73 red meat intake in both a highly controlled intervention study and in subjects of a cross-sectional
74 ated fatty acid data obtained from one human intervention study and one cellular model in both of whi
75 formed using data from the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study and the UCLA (University of Californi
76 behavioral intervention and feeding studies (intervention studies) and prospective observational stud
79 sed controlled trials, two were before-after intervention studies, and the remainder were observation
80 on-based study, 54% in a chlamydia screening intervention study, and 73% in a study among attendees o
86 tive validation of biomarkers and randomized intervention studies are needed to determine optimal man
88 behavior in the short term, but high-quality intervention studies are needed to determine whether eHe
95 nal studies on calcification progression and intervention studies are warranted to investigate the po
98 Based on these results, the design of an intervention study assessing the impact of cytomegalovir
100 te suitable for potential future field-based intervention studies based on an improved understanding
101 dividual-level analyses (and through this to intervention studies carried out robustly at the level o
102 MD] slope, VF index slope, Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study, Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treat
105 r the Pacific Kids DASH for Health (PacDASH) intervention study, conducted in the Kaiser Permanente h
106 were included in a double-blinded crossover intervention study, consisting of a 20-d habituation per
107 With the use of a randomized, crossover intervention-study design, 49 adults (56% women) with el
108 ed clinical trials, nonrandomized controlled intervention studies, diagnostic accuracy studies with a
110 nd progress monitoring, novel prevention and intervention studies, elucidation of mechanisms of multi
111 rdiography (TEE) to guide structural cardiac interventions, studies evaluating safety in this context
113 systematic review and meta-analysis of human intervention studies examining the acute effect of LES i
114 idence from cross-sectional, prospective and intervention studies for the impact of periodontal disea
115 d a 3-arm parallel randomized double-blinded intervention study for 12 mo and underwent transperineal
116 data participating in a randomized lifestyle intervention study for weight loss, Action for Health in
121 ve a reduced risk of obesity, few controlled intervention studies have been done in which maternal ob
122 rTFAs and iTFAs are inconsistent, and human intervention studies have been limited, underpowered, an
125 ly common in people with type 2 diabetes, no intervention studies have compared the effects of aerobi
135 f women enrolled in the International Breast Intervention Study (IBIS-I) or the Royal Marsden study.
138 analysis of the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study II, a double-blind randomized clinica
139 tervention sampling were used by just 23% of intervention studies in biodiversity conservation, and 3
141 for detailed investigation: (1) longitudinal intervention studies in humans probing the dynamics of b
142 review and meta-analysis of controlled diet-intervention studies in nondiabetic subjects to determin
145 ls required in the planning and reporting of intervention studies in the prevention and management of
147 evention Program Outcome Study), a long-term intervention study in 3234 subjects with prediabetes (me
151 RUTF use.We conducted a nonrandomized pilot intervention study in which 115 children eligible for ou
152 mized, double-masked, 2-parallel-arm dietary intervention study in which healthy participants (aged 3
153 fy oxylipins in human plasma samples from an intervention study in which participants were randomly a
156 models for ZIKV pathogenesis and therapeutic intervention studies, including vaccines, with contempor
159 ospective, multicenter, open-label, phase IV intervention study involving 11 secondary/tertiary cente
160 ed, double-blind, placebo-controlled dietary-intervention study involving 944 children who were posit
162 loid binding over time--for example, in drug intervention studies--it is essential to use fully quant
166 single-blind, parallel, controlled, dietary intervention study, MetS subjects (n = 472) from 8 Europ
168 t be directly influenced by the prophylactic intervention, studies must be designed to insure that th
169 omized trials and 2 nonrandomized controlled intervention studies (N = 65 888; 13 good-quality, 26 fa
172 lity randomized and nonrandomized controlled intervention studies of behavioral counseling interventi
174 cadian arrhythmias, review observational and intervention studies of the effects of circadian-rhythm-
175 Multi-institutional nonrandomized controlled intervention study of 1068 children aged 7 through 17 ye
176 SIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective intervention study of 1255 patient admissions (642 befor
177 double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel intervention study of 44 overweight or obese (body mass
179 ive, multicentre, non-randomised, open-label intervention study of an implantable DBS device (the VAN
181 pants as part of a larger randomized dietary intervention study of participants consuming either a he
182 , systematic reviews, randomized trials, and intervention studies on hepatitis B vaccination, screeni
187 We performed a 30-month prospective cohort intervention study on 6 high-risk units in a 994-bed ter
189 proach could potentially be used in exercise intervention studies or in studies of inflammatory myopa
195 Cochrane CENTRAL, and Clinicaltrials.gov for intervention studies published between Jan 1, 1990, and
196 systematic search for controlled weight-loss-intervention studies published up to 31 March 2016 was p
198 associated with red meat intake in both the intervention study (q = 0.004, Student's t-test) and the
199 disorders," and "delirium." STUDY SELECTION: Intervention studies (randomized or nonrandomized) asses
200 ported that, when compared with control, the interventions studied resulted in significant reductions
202 ng of study populations, types and timing of interventions studied, risk of bias, outcomes reported,
203 iets, we propose that both observational and intervention studies should as far as possible be requir
209 ization, and data from preoperative clinical intervention studies show that interventions in the path
213 such as cell cycle or cell death.This human intervention study shows that the quantity and source of
215 N: Available evidence from observational and intervention studies suggest a beneficial effect of stat
220 ry studies, there is a growing body of human intervention studies suggesting that tea can slow cancer
222 rvention stakeholders including the original intervention study team, the proposed adaptation team, a
223 s incomplete recognition of requirements for intervention studies that aim to assess their benefits i
224 and elucidate complex mechanisms of action, intervention studies that assess markers related to thes
225 ry embolism in adults were included, as were intervention studies that assessed the effects of statin
228 results of randomized controlled nutritional intervention studies that have assessed the impact of da
231 a potential surrogate biomarker for midlife intervention studies that seek to measure dementia-preve
232 he need for further experimental and dietary intervention studies that target circulating trans-palmi
233 obtained from 10 of 11 identified comparison intervention studies that used either saline or midazola
234 resent study was an exploratory, prospective intervention study that aimed to explore brain response
236 ealth Outcomes in diabEtes Mellitus patients Intervention Study (THEMIS) was a phase 3 randomised, do
238 r findings, coupled with evidence from other intervention studies to date, suggest that policy makers
239 These data provide a framework for early intervention studies to facilitate safer application of
240 before development of AD or FA for targeted intervention studies to potentially alter the atopic mar
242 ive, single-arm, before-and-after, community intervention study to assess the efficacy of mass drug a
243 -led, community-based participatory research intervention study to determine whether using personal c
247 on physical performance is warranted, as are intervention studies, to support future recommendations.
248 on was confirmed in an independent lifestyle intervention study (Tuebingen Lifestyle Intervention Pro
250 the brain's functional properties, however, intervention studies typically perturb neurons in a nons
251 taine was 131 mg/d, well below those used in intervention studies using betaine to lower blood homocy
256 providers and organizations require complex intervention studies, using mixed methods designs with q
258 uble-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over NK intervention study was carried out in 12 healthy young m
261 ouble-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover intervention study was conducted in 13 healthy overweigh
262 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind intervention study was conducted in adults aged >/=50 y
269 his randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical intervention study was set in PD centers at Northwestern
271 anded (PrEPX) Study, a multisite, open-label intervention study, was nested within the Australian Col
272 hrough combinations of both animal and human intervention studies, we comprehensively investigated al
273 In a prospective randomised, cross-over intervention study, we analysed the plasma and urinary l
282 ted into the Food4Me pan-European PN dietary intervention study were randomly assigned to 4 treatment
284 clinical samples derived from an anthocyanin intervention study, where 36 of the 45 modeled metabolit
285 aseline videos selected from a communication intervention study, where videos were recorded to captur
286 in the evidence for high quality randomised intervention studies which combine hardware and software
288 wer questions on the safety of probiotics in intervention studies with confidence." Critics point out
290 er, only limited data from prospective human intervention studies with long-term follow-up are availa
291 ves and present supporting findings from two intervention studies with marginalized populations.
293 s of 309 patients from the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study with >/=6 years of follow-up and >/=1
295 inded, randomized 2 x 5-wk crossover dietary intervention study with a 14-d run-in period during whic
299 Suite of 5 identical controlled before-after intervention studies, with preplanned analysis of pooled