コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 after treatment started (assessed by blinded interviewers).
2 further probing did differ significantly by interviewer.
3 ctions and observing their behavior with the interviewer.
4 d interviews conducted by a bilingual Latine interviewer.
5 similar to how they interacted with a human interviewer.
6 out in participants' own homes by a trained interviewer.
7 outcomes were evaluated by blinded telephone interviewers.
8 or at least 2 weeks as diagnosed by clinical interviewers.
9 wered questionnaires administered by trained interviewers.
10 tency amongst doctors and other nonclinician interviewers.
11 w designed to be administered by trained lay interviewers.
12 rates from community samples assessed by lay interviewers.
13 ent a comprehensive examination by bilingual interviewers.
14 erized dietary history, conducted by trained interviewers.
15 stionnaires were administered by experienced interviewers.
16 d at baseline and follow-up by trained field interviewers.
17 t interviewers, and the response time of the interviewers.
18 were randomly selected and then assigned to interviewers.
19 f techniques available to forensic and other interviewers.
20 d with a structured questionnaire by trained interviewers about their experiences after the departure
33 Independent master's-level clinical research interviewers administered the National Crime Victimizati
38 tary protein intake was assessed by using an interviewer-administered 108-item food-frequency questio
39 m and potassium intakes were averaged from 2 interviewer-administered 24-h diet recalls collected at
43 )) were randomly assigned to either ACASI or interviewer-administered assessment at their second foll
44 randomly assigned to complete an ASA24 or an interviewer-administered Automated Multiple-Pass Method
46 a were collected in 1995 during two separate interviewer-administered computer-assisted interviews co
49 the following: energy intake with the use of interviewer-administered dietary recalls and calculated
51 ake, the authors assessed the validity of an interviewer-administered food frequency questionnaire (F
52 tary habits were assessed with an in-person, interviewer-administered food frequency questionnaire de
53 tment for these differences, patients in the interviewer-administered group had higher scores on scal
55 ifferences between the self-administered and interviewer-administered groups were obtained from multi
56 t covariates was obtained through structured interviewer-administered in-person questionnaires, and u
59 ormance of the Oxford WebQ and a traditional interviewer-administered multiple-pass 24-hour dietary r
62 self-identified adult Latinos, underwent an interviewer-administered questionnaire and a complete oc
63 demographic information were collected using interviewer-administered questionnaire and structure obs
65 t women with unknown HIV status completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire assessing their p
67 community-level health workers, completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire detailing the ind
68 iratory conditions were collected through an interviewer-administered questionnaire from 1,226 women.
70 n New York county hospitals and completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire regarding lifesty
71 zed clinical examination and responded to an interviewer-administered questionnaire that collected cl
73 ased study was conducted using a structured, interviewer-administered questionnaire to assess the adv
79 From parentally reported history of wheeze (interviewer-administered questionnaire, age 3 and 5 year
80 sure information was derived from a detailed interviewer-administered questionnaire, and XRCC1 genoty
94 within the first 28 days post-symptom onset; interviewer-administered questionnaires and blood sample
95 tion and allergic outcomes collected through interviewer-administered questionnaires at multiple time
96 ardized systemic and ocular examinations and interviewer-administered questionnaires for collection o
97 ardized systemic and ocular examinations and interviewer-administered questionnaires for risk factor
99 andardized systemic and ocular examinations, interviewer-administered questionnaires, and blood inves
100 hey reported sociodemographic information in interviewer-administered questionnaires, and their clini
105 y, HIV status, and stigma were collected via interviewer-administered sociobehavioural questionnaires
106 was conducted in 1996-1997 in two stages: an interviewer-administered survey followed by a clinical e
107 ted during 2020-2022, undergoing semi-annual interviewer-administered surveys and HIV and HCV serolog
109 o self-administered surveys to assess HRQOL, interviewer-administered surveys were made available to
111 4) performs similarly enough to the standard interviewer-administered, Automated Multiple-Pass Method
112 ces using HRQOL as an outcome should include interviewer administration or risk a selection bias agai
114 collection method, although yields varied by interviewer among self-collected samples (p = 0.02).
115 ted), except that DNA yields did not vary by interviewer and a larger fraction (10.2%) of samples con
116 Interviews were conducted anonymously with interviewer and participant in separate locations and re
117 were induced or spontaneous, accounting for interviewer and respondent socio-demographic characteris
118 ed for all generations by clinically trained interviewers and best-estimate diagnosis made blind to d
120 ipants were recruited by trained independent interviewers and eligible if they had a history of injec
121 In a second, independent sample, research interviewers and patients' treating clinicians were able
122 re efforts are needed to monitor error-prone interviewers and respondents and reduce survey burdens i
123 ion, from other teens in the study, from the interviewer, and from prior reports in the literature.
125 the eye gaze directed towards the different interviewers, and the response time of the interviewers.
128 y be associated with factors relating to the interviewer as well as the consulted family member.
131 Interview Schedule for Children version 2.3, interviewers assessed a randomly selected, stratified sa
132 e Diagnostic Interview Schedule, independent interviewers assessed a randomly selected, stratified sa
137 intained through the 12-month follow-up: for interviewer-assessed PTSD (difference, 6.0; 95% CI, 1.6-
142 ed from computer-assisted questionnaires and interviewer-assisted questionnaires among participants o
143 naires were more likely than those receiving interviewer-assisted questionnaires to report smoking ma
144 first 190 participants underwent traditional interviewer-assisted questionnaires, whereas the remaini
146 sessments were performed by blinded clinical interviewer at baseline, week 8 end point, and follow-up
147 d a seven station four-minute model with one interviewer at each station and in Stream B a six statio
148 were administered by clinically experienced interviewers at 5 assessment points during a 15-year per
150 n in-person interview conducted by 2 trained interviewers at 9 sites in 7 counties in North Carolina.
151 sign was administered to patients by trained interviewers at four outpatient sites and two institutio
153 complete assessments, administered by blind interviewers, at baseline, at the end of the interventio
157 d at five distinct 2-year follow-up waves by interviewers blind to all previously collected informati
158 ects were reassessed at 2, 4, and 6 years by interviewers blind to previously collected information.
159 Family psychiatric history was determined by interviewers blind to probands' diagnosis, with mothers
164 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This interviewer-blinded randomized clinical trial enrolled p
169 patient characteristics were described, the interviewers collected clinical history independently, a
172 technique not only allowed us to bridge teen-interviewer communication barriers and develop shared te
173 identify the effect of specifically tailored interviewer communications training among other factors
176 provided identification codes for telephone interviewers completing BRFSS interviews in its public-u
177 a double-blind interview with a non-treated interviewer conducted 2.5 h after intravenous injection
183 the location of their knee pain, and trained interviewers could reliably record those locations.
184 n center, intervention group, age, race, and interviewer; covariates included study entry diastolic b
185 novel imputation methods, combined with more interviewer diagnosed cases, can identify loci that cont
186 ialing confirms prior observations, although interviewer differences or changes in respondents or hou
189 ere a robot may have advantages over a human interviewer, e.g. in police, social services, or healthc
192 estimation, and find evidence of substantial interviewer effects for 5 key estimates across states.
194 and model-based approaches to incorporating interviewer effects in variance estimation, and find evi
195 iven these findings, examination of data for interviewer effects is advisable despite incorporation o
196 RFSS analysts should consider accounting for interviewer effects, and we provide example code enablin
200 e-to-face surveys, but little is known about interviewer error within face-to-face food frequency que
201 3,855 (7.96%) questions were identified with interviewer error, which mainly came from falsification
202 y outlier detection and further examined the interviewer errors by reviewing these error-prone interv
203 vide another route for teachers, clinicians, interviewers, etc., to better understand their communica
207 iews, we observed complete agreement between interviewers for diagnosing major depressive, manic, and
208 future work towards developing KASPAR as an 'interviewer' for young children in application areas whe
209 d on recorded interviews with dietitians and interviewers from the National Health and Nutrition Exam
212 s to be used in epidemiologic studies by lay interviewers have, since the 1970s, attempted to operati
214 tained from a patient survey by professional interviewers in addition to a comprehensive review of me
217 i) quickly establish rapport; (ii) align the interviewer-interviewee roles and goals b; (iii) promote
218 ood Leukemia Study during 2001-2006, trained interviewers inventoried residential pesticide products
223 at offspring age 7 years was carried out by interviewers masked to treatment conditions from April 2
228 collection') or participants were seen by an interviewer or took part in the survey online to self-co
230 are responses to questions--asked by survey interviewers or medical personnel--such as, "How happy d
231 rrelated with the clinical experience of the interviewer (OR, 0.884; 95% CI, 0.831-0.938; P < 0.0001)
232 ne (1987-1989) and follow-up (1995-1997), an interviewer-phlebotomist visited each subject in his hom
233 ct personalized, in-depth interviews without interviewers; provide standardized data collection with
235 lues, which were obtained by having a second interviewer rate a recording of the original interview.
236 ior therapy resulted in more rapid relief in interviewer-rated (vs both treatments, P = .03) and self
241 age 24 (N=47, 1.2%), by both self-report and interviewer-rated measures of psychotic experiences at a
242 hough no differential effect was observed on interviewer-rated PTSD severity, there was a significant
246 ention reduced reports of thought intrusion, interviewer ratings of anxiety, and emotional distress a
248 ily living, in later birth cohorts, and when interviewers recorded issues potentially affecting test
250 but this was partly explained by changes in interviewer reporting of skin color in the same period.
255 nder the direction of a nonmedically trained interviewer ("self-collection"); the other group (94 con
256 mplementation, emphasising the importance of interviewer skills, training, and consistent implementat
260 uestions, 3) choosing a format acceptable to interviewers that maximizes accurate answering and recor
263 g a structured questionnaire completed by an interviewer to assess adverse events in 442 healthcare w
264 ned over two separate occasions by different interviewers to face-to-face and real-time interactive v
265 tion methods and carefully recruit and train interviewers to minimize biases and enhance reporting ac
266 geneity we found might reflect variations in interviewer training and survey implementation, emphasis
267 nomenclature's algorithms, 6) developing an interviewer training program that maximizes reliability,
268 olistic review for admissions and selection; interviewer trainings on implicit bias mitigation and on
269 s provided spot urine and blood samples, and interviewers transcribed nutrient information from their
270 hood-onset conduct disorder rated by trained interviewers using a standard diagnostic interview.
271 years old, were interviewed by trained study interviewers using a standardized, structured questionna
273 ted for current major depressive disorder by interviewers using the nonpatient edition of the Structu
275 eavily influenced by context and substantial interviewer variability, and TB symptoms may frequently
276 works on psychological symptoms, wherein the interviewer variable was strongly related to the outcome
277 ged women (1982-1987), the authors evaluated interviewer variation in responses to different types of
278 redictors of depression, despite significant interviewer variation in the outcome and predictor varia
279 pes of questions, and assessed the impact of interviewer variation on inferences derived from study d
286 reasons for overdiagnosis of OCD by the lay interviewers were inappropriate labeling of worries or c
292 Best judgment ratings were generated by an interviewer who administered the rating scales to patien
293 with personality disorders were assessed by interviewers who used a semistructured research intervie
294 s with personality disorders was assessed by interviewers who were blind to clinical diagnosis and wh
297 mpled households were interviewed by trained interviewers with a structured questionnaire that was de
298 nistered telephonically by clinical research interviewers with extensive experience in the diagnosis
300 with the assistance of trained psychologist interviewers within 3 months after a detailed ophthalmol