ライフサイエンスコーパス: intra-abdominal pressure

1 s occurred in transpulmonary pressure due to intra-abdominal pressure.

2 utes to continence during rapid increases in intra-abdominal pressure.

3 al reflux, which may be related to increased intra-abdominal pressure.

4 al organ dysfunction resulting from elevated intra-abdominal pressure.

5 trunk stabilization by indirectly increasing intra-abdominal pressure.

6 cing sphincteric closure during increases in intra-abdominal pressure.

7 al cavity, was filled with water to increase intra-abdominal pressure.

8 increase in pleural pressure with increasing intra-abdominal pressure.

9 re remeasured 30 mins after each increase in intra-abdominal pressure.

10 Above intra-abdominal pressure 5 mm Hg, plateau airway pressur

11 us muscle activity associated with increased intra-abdominal pressure and anal or vaginal EMG probes

12 drainage was inserted in order to reduce the intra-abdominal pressure and enable appropriate ventilat

13 dal ventilation in the presence of increased intra-abdominal pressure and in calculating true transpu

14 cs, and cardiac output 5 mins after each new intra-abdominal pressure and positive end-expiratory pre

15 niques are necessary to decompress increased intra-abdominal pressure and prevent or treat persistent

16 to minimize the risk of developing elevated intra-abdominal pressure and to aggressively treat intra

17 pressure is the gold standard for measuring intra-abdominal pressure, and several nonsurgical method

18 us, elevated intracranial pressure, elevated intra-abdominal pressure, and therapeutic hypothermia af

19 Increased intra-abdominal pressure appears to produce this effect

20 as well as minimization of intrathoracic and intra-abdominal pressure as clinically possible.

21 Indeed, increased intra-abdominal pressure, as an extreme marker of abdomi

22 The mean intra-abdominal pressure at admission day was an indepen

23 The intra-abdominal pressure at baseline was 4 +/- 3 mm Hg i

24 city was significantly reduced by increasing intra-abdominal pressure at both positive end-expiratory

25 Four levels of intra-abdominal pressure (baseline, 12, 18, and 22 mm Hg

26 arying degrees of matching the corresponding intra-abdominal pressure: baseline positive end-expirato

27 ra-abdominal pressure compared with baseline intra-abdominal pressure) but did not change cardiac out

28 Acutely increased intra-abdominal pressure causes a significant increase i

29 ry lung volume (+119% [p < .001] at 22 mm Hg intra-abdominal pressure compared with 5 cm H2O positive

30 ry lung volume (+233% [p < .001] at 22 mm Hg intra-abdominal pressure compared with 5 cm H2O positive

31 and -8% [p < .05], respectively, at 22 mm Hg intra-abdominal pressure compared with baseline intra-ab

32 Using an ex vivo model replicating the intra-abdominal pressure conditions of the bladder, the

33 High intra-abdominal pressure could enhance the penetration o

34 raneous muscle) activity that would increase intra-abdominal pressure during EAS contraction, and (4)

35 njury and acute renal failure with regard to intra-abdominal pressure dynamics, preload limitation, a

36 Subjects with a mean intra-abdominal pressure equal to or greater than 12 mm

37 ricardotomy negated all effects of increased intra-abdominal pressure except the decreased cardiac in

38 intra-abdominal hypertension, defined by an intra-abdominal pressure greater than or equal to 12 mm

39 < 0.001), and intra-abdominal hypertension (intra-abdominal pressure >/= 12 mm Hg) occurred in 19.9%

40 ission to the ICU was associated with higher intra-abdominal pressure, higher plasma C reactive prote

41 Elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is a frequent cause of mo

42 Elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is associated with ICP el

43 Currently, the gold standard for measuring intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is via the bladder.

44 is considered the gold standard for indirect intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurements.

45 study sought to determine whether changes in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) with aggressive diuretic

46 d can be present at relatively low levels of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP).

47 ate positive end-expiratory pressure (= half intra-abdominal pressure in cm H2O + 5 cm H2O), and high

48 and high positive end-expiratory pressure (= intra-abdominal pressure in cm H2O).

49 anges in positive end-expiratory pressure or intra-abdominal pressures in both conditions.

50 were studied: a) group 1 (n = 9) animals had intra-abdominal pressure increased to 25 mm Hg above bas

51 tched to intra-abdominal pressure to prevent intra-abdominal pressure-induced end-expiratory lung vol

52 When compared with normal intra-abdominal pressures, intra-abdominal hypertension

53 positive end-expiratory pressure matched to intra-abdominal pressure led to a preservation of end-ex

54 ivided into three subgroups according to the intra-abdominal pressure measurement policy in different

55 Intra-abdominal pressure measurements in predefined at-r

56 dent predictor of mortality in patients with intra-abdominal pressure measurements started within the

57 Whether limiting intra-abdominal pressure measurements to preselected at-

58 Serial intra-abdominal pressure measurements, nonoperative pres

59 At each level of intra-abdominal pressure, moderate positive end-expirato

60 We aimed to clarify whether expanded intra-abdominal pressure monitoring results in an increa

61 In patients with intra-abdominal pressure monitoring, the mean intra-abdo

62 tudied, and 1,241 patients (46.0%) underwent intra-abdominal pressure monitoring.

63 Moreover, larger thicknesses increase the intra-abdominal pressure necessary for childbirth.

64 Application of intra-abdominal pressures of 0 and 20 cm H2O at positive

65 hing positive end-expiratory pressure to the intra-abdominal pressure on cardio-respiratory parameter

66 ntra-abdominal pressure monitoring, the mean intra-abdominal pressure on the admission day is an inde

67 The detrimental impact of elevated intra-abdominal pressure, progressing to abdominal compa

68 ratios; (4) leak-point pressure, the minimum intra-abdominal pressure required to cause incontinence,

69 shock, and its resuscitation with increased intra-abdominal pressure results in many untoward hemody

70 cy of this condition, routine measurement of intra-abdominal pressure should be performed in high-ris

71 ay be why persons with chronically increased intra-abdominal pressure, such as the morbidly obese, su

72 t fluid, blood and protein losses, increased intra-abdominal pressure, systemic hyperthermia, and inc

73 At each level of intra-abdominal pressure, three levels of positive end-e

74 Increase of intra-abdominal pressure to 25 mm Hg above baseline caus

75 Expanding the measurement of intra-abdominal pressure to more than 50% of intensive c

76 positive end-expiratory pressure matched to intra-abdominal pressure to prevent intra-abdominal pres

77 cted by opening the abdomen, suggesting that intra-abdominal pressure transmission contributes little

78 e increased linearly by ~ 50% of the applied intra-abdominal pressure value, associated with commensu

79 Following baseline measurements, intra-abdominal pressure was increased by incrementally

80 Intra-abdominal pressure was measured a minimum of every

81 The intra-abdominal pressure was measured in 31.7%, 55.6%, a

82 The intra-abdominal pressure was significantly higher in ext

83 nism proposed is that central obesity raises intra-abdominal pressure, which increases pleural pressu

84 ring laparoscopic surgery produces increased intra-abdominal pressure, which potentially influences h

85 ethysmography (OEP), (ii) intra-thoracic and intra-abdominal pressures with a balloon catheter in eac