ライフサイエンスコーパス: intraclass

1 class 5 adhesins and their ability to induce intraclass antibody responses, we produced 28 antiadhesi

2 h between all methods and chronological age (intraclass coefficient > 0.93).

3 server agreement was assessed by calculating intraclass coefficient and Fleiss kappa.

4 The intraclass coefficient between 2 blinded operators was 0

5 strong agreement with RHC-measured mPAP, an intraclass coefficient of 0.78, and high diagnostic accu

6 in central than in peripheral VF locations (intraclass coefficient, 0.66-0.89; P < 0.001).

7 rs and volumes showed excellent correlation (intraclass coefficient, 0.95 and 0.94, respectively).

8 Intraclass coefficients for global and sectoral paramete

9 high intragrader and intergrader agreement (intraclass correlation >/=0.94).

10 -rater reliability were largely "excellent" (intraclass correlation >0.90).

11 Intraclass correlation (ICC) and coefficient of variatio

12 The intraclass correlation (ICC) of both intragrader and int

13 ty in cell trajectories within droplets, the intraclass correlation (ICC), the synchronization surfac

14 ent between the right and left eyes for FAZ (intraclass correlation [ICC], 0.97), SVC VLD (ICC, 1.00)

15 arson correlation, analysis of variance, and intraclass correlation analyses were performed to compar

16 ement in raw measurements was assessed using intraclass correlation and Bland-Altman indexes, and int

17 ination repeatability were assessed by using intraclass correlation and coefficient of variation anal

18 ility of scan assessment was generally good (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.7), and average t

19 essing combinations with high repeatability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient > 0.85), our results

20 l uptake measures at either uptake interval (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.97 and R(2) > 0.9

21 baseline and during therapy (R(2) >/= 0.94; intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.97).

22 baseline and during therapy (R(2) >/= 0.94; intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.97).

23 producibility of measurements was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.947).

24 ealed a good Pearson's r (+0.974) but a poor intraclass correlation coefficient (+0.528) as the resul

25 The intraclass correlation coefficient (95% confidence inter

26 ducibility was found between graders with an intraclass correlation coefficient (distance measurement

27 Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC(3,k)) of 0.783 (

28 LTL displayed tracking in both children [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.905, P < 0.

29 Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altma

30 grader repeatability were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient

31 Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient

32 Feature reliability was analysed using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and patient ran

33 The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Spearman ra

34 Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) assessed with m

35 prediction robustness was evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) at 31-50 extern

36 Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between graders

37 Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the fou

38 ) to provide an estimate of the value of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for dental cari

39 Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for these gradi

40 tersession) were assessed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) from linear mix

41 ividuals with or without T1D (n = 16) had an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.985 (95% C

42 The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of each scan se

43 The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ranged from 0.7

44 The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.55 (95% C

45 The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was estimated t

46 For all MRI parameters, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was higher than

47 Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to ass

48 The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to ass

49 The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to mea

50 ty-five percent confidence intervals and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated

51 analysis of variance, two-sample t test, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used.

52 determined by the Cohen kappa statistic and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with correspond

53 ariation but large temporal variation [assay intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), 79.3%-87.9%; t

54 percentage difference (PD), the absolute PD, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and coefficien

55 ty was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of

56 Bland-Altman analysis, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Spearman corre

57 Using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the scale was

58 erobserver variability of FCT measurement by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

59 ion (SW), coefficient of variation (CV), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

60 Reproducibility was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

61 t was assessed with kappa statistics and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

62 rver variability was analyzed by calculating intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

63 (1.96xSw), coefficient of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

64 experimental protocol was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

65 ty and repeatability were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

66 bility were assessed by Cronbach's alpha and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).

67 tal correlations; test-retest reliability by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); convergent val

68 t seizure onset was significantly heritable (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.17, p < 0.001) af

69 iety scores (P = .04), test-retest reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.57), specific to

70 ity of the modified Advocacy-Inquiry Scores (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.87) was excellent

71 al volumes were excellent (Pearson r = 0.97, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.93).

72 Interobserver reproducibility was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.94).

73 the "normalized" EZ reflectivity assessment (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.986, coefficient

74 Intermodal reliability was high (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.998, P < .01).

75 erior when assessed by flow reversal method (intraclass correlation coefficient =0.931; P<0.001) over

76 ed on the macula for capillary nonperfusion (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.825 for the 3

77 Smart sports bra was valid only during rest (Intraclass correlation Coefficient [ICC] = 0.79, mean ab

78 ication was higher for the reference cohort (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.94) than th

79 23.4, and 31.7 +/- 23.9 decibel-steradians (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.96).

80 ity coefficient and 3D FMBV reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]).

81 The concordance between methods was good (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.71), with ab

82 nd 2DTagg highly agreed with sonomicrometry (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.89 and ICC,

83 lted in a mean relative difference of 0.74% (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.996; 95%CI,

84 Correlation plots and intraclass correlation coefficient analysis confirmed bi

85 servers, and reproducibility was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman anal

86 nd intraobserver agreement was quantified by intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman anal

87 d by indirect calorimetry was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman anal

88 Interobserver comparison (intraclass correlation coefficient and Cohen kappa) was

89 The intraclass correlation coefficient and intergrader corre

90 racture resistance was assessed by using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the coefficient o

91 The intraclass correlation coefficient between point of care

92 culation analyzed accuracy of these methods; intraclass correlation coefficient examined reproducibil

93 The intraclass correlation coefficient for absolute agreemen

94 und for late enhancement (P < .001), and the intraclass correlation coefficient for ADCs was 0.788 (P

95 cian agreement of ICU benefit was poor (mean intraclass correlation coefficient for each vignette: 0.

96 In whole transplant biopsies, the mean intraclass correlation coefficient for glomerular counti

97 Mean intraclass correlation coefficient for MUNIX intra-rater

98 ion for internal consistency reliability and intraclass correlation coefficient for test-retest relia

99 The overall intraclass correlation coefficient for the HOME device w

100 Interreader agreement was excellent, with an intraclass correlation coefficient greater than 0.75 for

101 Additionally, all measures had an intraclass correlation coefficient higher than 0.99.

102 ements of horizontal and vertical deviation (intraclass correlation coefficient horizontal 0.83, 95%

103 volume, ranging from 79 mL to 487 mL with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.23 (interquartil

104 laboratory hemoglobin differences showed an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.47 within indivi

105 An intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.83 was reached b

106 ses corresponded in 87% of the cases with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.84 (95% confiden

107 ator, with excellent reproducibility with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.903 (95% CI, 0.8

108 2 graders showed excellent agreement with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.996 (95% CI, 0.9

109 ted ELISA resulting in excellent Pearson and intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.998 and 0.983, r

110 The intraclass correlation coefficient of 2TC V (T) values r

111 The intraclass correlation coefficient of all observations w

112 Intraclass correlation coefficient of full finger reperf

113 4D flow MRI measures was good to excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient range, 0.73-0.98), as

114 P < .001), and agreement was almost perfect (intraclass correlation coefficient range, 0.87-0.99).

115 The intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.96 to 0

116 Intraclass correlation coefficient suggested that 27% (9

117 in SNR in the remaining smokers improved the intraclass correlation coefficient to 0.82.

118 n as the random effect in the model and used intraclass correlation coefficient to assess the proport

119 The intraclass correlation coefficient value showed excellen

120 < 0.001) were observed for all regions, and intraclass correlation coefficient values (test-retest c

121 The intraclass correlation coefficient was >0.90 for OCT-der

122 The intraclass correlation coefficient was >=0.90, indicatin

123 CI 68.9-100.0, p=0.0045), and the calculated intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.035.

124 The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.035.

125 photographs obtained at the same visit, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.946 (95% CI, 0.

126 The repeatability as measured by intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.977 for LPA and

127 Intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to acc

128 The intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to det

129 The intraclass correlation coefficient was greater than 0.8

130 Intraclass correlation coefficient was used to assess ag

131 The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to assess wi

132 Multilevel logistic models and intraclass correlation coefficient was used to evaluate

133 ive and absolute test-retest variability and intraclass correlation coefficient were evaluated for th

134 t test, correlation analyses, and intraclass correlation coefficient were used to explore

135 For within-weeks reproducibility, the intraclass correlation coefficient with PDFF was higher

136 Interobserver agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient) for ARI index was 0.

137 test-retest variability (represented by the intraclass correlation coefficient) of the regional SUV

138 In a multilevel model, 5.19% (intraclass correlation coefficient) of variation in 14-d

139 0 [95% confidence interval: 0.88, 1.00], and intraclass correlation coefficient, > 0.99, respectively

140 Descriptors with sufficient concordance (intraclass correlation coefficient, >0.8; kappa > 0.6) u

141 90, K(trans), and maximum slope enhancement (intraclass correlation coefficient, >0.9).

142 lower than that in the anesthetized animals (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.491-0.629) over th

143 0.02+/-0.03 J), mechanical potential energy (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.57; bias, -0.04+/-

144 plaque presence and from good to excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.69-0.99) for quant

145 es corresponded best with pathology volumes (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.72; P < .001).

146 Within-family correlation for QAT burden (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.73 in NF1-affected

147 -0.04+/-0.03 J), and ventricular efficiency (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.84; bias, 3.5+/-2.

148 the THV frame deformation (minimum-diameter intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.84; maximum-diamet

149 relation coefficient, 0.84; maximum-diameter intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.88; perimeter intr

150 iologists consistently preferred DLR images (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.89; 95% CI: 0.83,

151 traclass correlation coefficient, 0.91; area intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.91), more than mil

152 ass correlation coefficient, 0.88; perimeter intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.91; area intraclas

153 and adenosine-induced coronary flow reserve (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.922; P<0.001).

154 bility (coefficient of variation, 0.8%-5.2%; intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.93-0.98) in all pa

155 o-measured and model-calculated stroke work (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.93; bias, -0.02+/-

156 and 0.912, respectively) compared with TTE (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.940 and 0.871; res

157 igher with MR elastography than with biopsy (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.95 vs 0.89).

158 reement for LVMI and MWT was higher for MRI (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.951 and 0.912, res

159 reproducible from truncated 30-min datasets (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.96).

160 ed the most accurate K1 values (R(2) = 0.94; intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.96).

161 nonenhanced thick CT images were very good (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.963 and 0.899, res

162 oroidal segmentation software was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.97-0.99).

163 observer luminal measurements were reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.98; 95% confidence

164 very were well correlated with infused dose (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.98; P < .001).

165 relation coefficient (distance measurements: intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.979-

166 0.979-0.999; P < 0.001; number of ampullae: intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.988-

167 ed times wearing glasses in adults was high (intraclass correlation coefficient, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.999-

168 and Morisita's overlap index, as well as the intraclass correlation coefficient, and performed fold c

169 The coefficient of variation, intraclass correlation coefficient, and pooled standard

170 sulting in excellent Pearson correlation and intraclass correlation coefficient, both being 0.99 for

171 and reproducibility was determined by using intraclass correlation coefficient.

172 erreader agreement was assessed by using the intraclass correlation coefficient.

173 Agreement was quantified as the intraclass correlation coefficient.

174 and interobserver agreement was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient.

175 en attending radiologists was measured using intraclass correlation coefficient.

176 racteristics was analyzed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient.

177 ater reliability was assessed by calculating intraclass correlation coefficient.

178 , and reproducibility was evaluated by using intraclass correlation coefficient.

179 lity was assessed using the McNemar test and intraclass correlation coefficient.

180 among obese donors was attributed to center (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.232, P < 0.001).

181 c sonographers showed excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.93; 95% confidence

182 and excellent interobserver reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96,

183 Interreader agreement was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient: CSR chemical-shift r

184 pha=0.81 vs. 0.88); test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.66 vs. 0.61); conve

185 ra- and interobserver agreement according to intraclass correlation coefficients >0.90 for all parame

186 der reproducibility of CT was excellent (all intraclass correlation coefficients >= 0.95) without sig

187 Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altm

188 Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and mixed effe

189 The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) between the au

190 iation from a perfectly regular pattern) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to d

191 ferences with 95% confidence intervals (CI), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and Bland-Alt

192 Descriptive statistics, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and linear mi

193 Observer agreement was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).

194 and estimated interhospital variation using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).

195 Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland- Al

196 Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Alt

197 Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Alt

198 Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Alt

199 in tumor volume on IRV was studied by using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and linear mi

200 We used linear mixed models to calculate intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) as a measure

201 Evaluation of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between antib

202 DL algorithm performance was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between DL an

203 ETT-carina distances and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the radio

204 Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for total, co

205 We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of biomarkers

206 or maternal and child samples, we calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) to assess tri

207 Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculat

208 Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculat

209 Coefficients of variation and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculat

210 Associations with melanoma and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were evaluate

211 Two-way single-measure intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to

212 Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to

213 Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to

214 Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to

215 kappa Values, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and Bland-Al

216 Descriptive statistics, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and linear m

217 was assessed by using Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

218 Repeatability was measured with use of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

219 mparisons were made for each method by using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

220 ducibility between readers was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

221 ltman plots, repeatability coefficients, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

222 ween right and left eyes were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

223 Variability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

224 f kinetic perimetry (KP) were evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

225 nterobserver variability was tested by using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

226 high intrarater and inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.98 and 0.97, respe

227 imester phthalate metabolite concentrations (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.17-0.35).

228 son r = 0.819 and 0.831), and repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.947 and 0.942).

229 ng PCOS to assess reproducibility (kappa and intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs]).

230 Calculating intraclass correlation coefficients after controlling fo

231 Intraclass correlation coefficients and coefficients of

232 ission rates across diagnosis and calculated intraclass correlation coefficients and median odds rati

233 We estimated intraclass correlation coefficients and variance partiti

234 th their long-term averages and to calculate intraclass correlation coefficients for each parameter.

235 fect, absolute-agreement, single-measurement intraclass correlation coefficients for interobserver me

236 Estimates of intraclass correlation coefficients for MAGNIFI-CD, the

237 The interrater and intrarater intraclass correlation coefficients for scale were consi

238 Intraclass correlation coefficients for short-term varia

239 eement was high for all three measures, with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.91 with FLAIR,

240 0.984, 0.990, and 0.988, with intraobserver intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.989, 0.989, and

241 was observed at the neighborhood level, with intraclass correlation coefficients of 6% for telomere l

242 tial independent variables were items having intraclass correlation coefficients of at least 0.4 and

243 graders showed high agreement, with overall intraclass correlation coefficients of between 0.82 and

244 lated between separate imaging sessions with intraclass correlation coefficients of over 0.85 for all

245 Intraclass correlation coefficients of the automatic pip

246 Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.61 for

247 s from each patient were then compared using intraclass correlation coefficients to quantify the prec

248 Test-retest intraclass correlation coefficients were >=0.90.

249 Intra- and interexamination intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.996-0.998 and

250 All intraclass correlation coefficients were at least 0.97.

251 Subsequently, intraclass correlation coefficients were determined betw

252 The intraclass correlation coefficients were excellent, from

253 Intraclass correlation coefficients were greater than 0.

254 MR imaging PDFF, intra- and interexamination intraclass correlation coefficients were greater than or

255 Intraclass correlation coefficients were greater than or

256 a coefficient and test-retest), reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients), sensitivity, and a

257 erobserver reproducibility of MRI were good (intraclass correlation coefficients, >0.99 and >0.99, re

258 ted highly with manually traced TKV and TLV (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.998 and 0.996, re

259 re assessed with linear regression analyses, intraclass correlation coefficients, and coefficients of

260 served values and temporal variability using intraclass correlation coefficients, and performed surro

261 etermined the distribution and dynamics (via intraclass correlation coefficients, ICCs) of the miRNA

262 trophysiologic evaluation were assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients, the Mann Whitney U

263 ed using repeatability coefficients (RC) and intraclass correlation coefficients.

264 Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients.

265 els, Akaike information criterion (AIC), and intraclass correlation coefficients.

266 Inter-rater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients.

267 percentage agreement, kappa statistics, and intraclass correlation coefficients.

268 s assessed by kappa coefficients (kappa) and intraclass correlation coefficients.

269 tions were quantified by using Pearson r and intraclass correlation coefficients.

270 rd deviations, repeatability limits (r), and intraclass correlation coefficients.

271 A high intraclass correlation for the VES (intraclass correlati

272 of probands compared with siblings, with an intraclass correlation of 0.40 (P = .07).

273 The intraclass correlation of each dimension was greater tha

274 ral stability of the rankings, we calculated intraclass correlation of the annual coverage values.

275 ed-model analysis to measure effect size and intraclass correlation to determine the influence of fam

276 kings exhibited high temporal stability with intraclass correlation values of 0.88 (95% confidence in

277 A high intraclass correlation for the VES (intraclass correlation VES: 0.923 vs. Vitiligo Area Scor

278 xcellent interrater reliability for the VES (intraclass correlation VES: 0.924 vs. Vitiligo Area Scor

279 The median (interquartile range) test-retest intraclass correlation was 0.69 (0.57-0.79) and 0.76 (0.

280 Intraclass correlation was used to compare diameters and

281 Intraclass correlation with histologic results was 0.57

282 efficient, Mann-Whitney U test, t tests, and intraclass correlation) were performed, where a P value

283 nd for all virtual catheter-derived metrics (intraclass correlation, 0.80 +/- 0.07; coefficient of va

284 SD-OCT measures had high intereye agreement (intraclass correlation, 0.83-0.93) and high intragrader

285 Excellent test-retest (intraclass correlation, 0.89-0.99 across studies and fol

286 eatable and reproducible for all parameters (intraclass correlation, 0.925 to 1.000).

287 ross studies and follow-up) and inter-rater (intraclass correlation, 0.97) reliability were found.

288 ctivity measures, Spearman rank correlation, intraclass correlation, and gray matter volumes.

289 Interstudy repeatability was assessed with intraclass correlation.

290 atine showed a modest degree of familiality (intraclass correlation=0.36).

291 Reliability was determined by intraclass-correlation coefficient, differences between

292 The intraclass correlations (ICC) of this technique compared

293 Intraclass correlations (ICCs) were used to test for inh

294 Test-retest reliability was confirmed with intraclass correlations above 0.6 after a three week int

295 ess agreement between measurement of acuity, intraclass correlations with 95% confidence intervals (C

296 Inter-rater agreement, measured using intraclass correlations, was 0.91 (SE = 0.09) across sta

297 and the interplay between new drug entry and intraclass drug prices.

298 and greater marketing associated with higher intraclass list prices.

299 Intraclass median SNV differences ranged from 23 to 245.

300 and the extent of interclass differences and intraclass variance was found to allow the identificatio