ライフサイエンスコーパス: intruder

1 , regardless of the genetic identity of the 'intruder'.

2 reased anxiety by increasing approach to the intruder.

3 rger than both the assisted neighbor and the intruder.

4 e a tendency to express aggression toward an intruder.

5 rubber snake and in the presence of a human intruder.

6 n responding to a social stimulus, the human intruder.

7 ion than controls in the presence of a human intruder.

8 freezing behavior when confronted by a human intruder.

9 by altering brain activity in response to an intruder.

10 viors even when paired with a non-aggressive intruder.

11 and the total time spent attacking the male intruder.

12 er but more defensive aggression to a female intruder.

13 ve to protect her pups when challenged by an intruder.

14 tection against and response to any possible intruder.

15 e anxiety responses of a marmoset to a human intruder.

16 by bees to discriminate colony members from intruders.

17 mmunity by marking and eliminating microbial intruders.

18 n healthy and altered host cells and foreign intruders.

19 heir territories against conspecific calling intruders.

20 esidents selectively attacked T-treated male intruders.

21 ds its calling territory against conspecific intruders.

22 ng to fiercely protective aggression against intruders.

23 ostures and attacks on unfamiliar adult male intruders.

24 /sexual activity and involved in response to intruders.

25 aggressive response to both male and female intruders.

26 detecting, tracking and blocking malware and intruders.

27 ending their territories against conspecific intruders.

28 dentification of ACS respondents by external intruders.

29 of granular locomotion of arbitrarily shaped intruders.

30 uders faster and more frequently than female intruders.

31 mice and tested for aggression toward female intruders.

32 emistry to distinguish nestmates from colony intruders.

33 simulated conspecific versus heterospecific intruders.

34 alert other immune cell types to pathogenic intruders.

35 ulated as defense mechanisms against genomic intruders.

36 defeat and were paired with a non-aggressive intruder 24 h later as in experiment 1.

37 ritorial aggression when tested with a novel intruder 24 hours after an acute social defeat.

38 We trained CD-1 mice to self-administer intruders (9 d, 12 trials/d) and tested them for aggress

39 e a competitive advantage for residents over intruders across a wide range of relative group sizes, w

40 n inexperienced adult males, male and female intruders activated overlapping neuronal populations.

41 ogenic, dose-dependent response to the human intruder after 5HT(2A) pharmacological antagonism, while

42 e doubling of maternal attacks toward a male intruder after lesioning was also confirmed and was rela

43 either a sham or real 7-min test with a male intruder, after which their brains were examined for imm

44 prior to being tested with a non-aggressive intruder also displayed significantly less submissive be

45 as induced selectively in response to a male intruder and a similar trend was found in the LS.

46 often responded aggressively by chasing the intruder and broadcasting songs from outside the safety

47 for 24 h exhibited aggression towards a male intruder and had more Fos-immunoreactive (Fos-ir) cells

48 in more complex confined geometries, such as intruder and hopper geometries, even when the packing co

49 rtant role for the PMv in detecting the male intruder and how this nucleus modulates the network cont

50 dure as seen by decreased time exploring the intruder and in the three chamber sociability test by de

51 n tested for their aggressive response to an intruder and killed to examine AVT phenotype in the preo

52 tasks of monkey threat processing: the human intruder and object responsiveness tasks.

53 mportant for attacking in response to a male intruder and that the Avpr1b, likely through its role in

54 that the PMv signals the presence of a male intruder and transfers this information to the network o

55 gh personification, with the character of an intruder and unwanted companion responsible for their po

56 4 weeks is associated with aggression toward intruders and a down-regulation of brain allopregnanolon

57 s are crucial in the defense against foreign intruders and cancerous growths.

58 cells to survey, label and destroy microbial intruders and coordinate inflammation.

59 hibited improved defensive reactions against intruders and highly efficient pup retrieval performance

60 re addressing disproportionate fears of home intruders and increasing awareness of the risks associat

61 pair's own nest (personal information of an intruder) and/or on a neighbouring territory, to which t

62 ior experience with a female and identity of intruders) and the limbic activation in response to an i

63 a neutral arena with a small, nonaggressive intruder, and agonistic behavior was scored for 10 min.

64 d by the perception of sensory cues from the intruder, and here we have identified a site in the hypo

65 the average number of attacks against a male intruder, and the total time spent attacking the male in

66 (CCK4/5 and CCK8) from tissue homogenates in intruder animals 6 h after resident-intruder inter-male

67 Intruder animals that demonstrated submissive behavior (

68 ompared to non-submissive (i.e., "Friendly") intruder animals.

69 However, if simulated intruders are less threatening, residents are more likel

70 media, forces on arbitrarily shaped granular intruders are observed to obey surprisingly simple, yet

71 ocial interaction with a smaller subordinate intruder as reinforcement for the development of conditi

72 Thus, antisense subjects clearly classify intruders as offensive, but fail to attack.

73 s from resident males following the resident-intruder assay.

74 duced the frequency of attacks in a resident-intruder assay.

75 we hypothesized that S. pneumoniae use owner-intruder asymmetries to settle contests, leading to the

76 Intruders behave and develop selfishly once they have in

77 Confronted with an aggressive intruder, behavioural and neural population responses re

78 ce showed reduced behavioral responses to an intruder behind a wire barrier.

79 xhibited more offensive aggression to a male intruder but more defensive aggression to a female intru

80 ions, neighbors may help residents fight off intruders, but only when the resident does not stand a r

81 their breeding territories from conspecific intruders by deploying defensive behavior in context-spe

82 ofessional phagocytic cells ingest microbial intruders by engulfing them into phagosomes, which subse

83 and the limbic activation in response to an intruder (by mapping regional staining for c-fos) in mal

84 irect cues of threats (including conspecific intruder calls and nest-predator calls) elicited higher

85 Some intruders can be dispatched by the humoral immune system

86 g invasion of biofilms by bacteriophages and intruder cells of different species.

87 s (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus) using the Intruder Challenge Test.

88 Our study suggests that asymmetric owner-intruder competitive strategies do not require complex c

89 Compared to dams without intruder, confrontation with intruder robustly activated

90 heightened aggressors (ANAs) during resident-intruder confrontations after self-administering 1.0 g/k

91 al interactions with either a female or male intruder decreased.

92 dependence of stresses in granular media on intruder depth, orientation, and movement direction and

93 Exposure to a male or female intruder did not increase Fos-ir staining in the MPO.

94 lactating females, with a marked shift from intruder-directed investigative behavior to very high le

95 sions prior to testing with a non-aggressive intruder displayed significantly more aggression than di

96 male residents defeated C57BL/6J (B6) female intruders during 5-minute encounters.

97 epolarization and spiking following resident-intruder encounters.

98 e, T-treated male, and estrogen-treated male intruders equally.

99 ntruder home-cage test as shown by increased intruder exploration.

100 In defeated intruders, extracellular dopamine levels in accumbens an

101 CD-1 aggressors attacked C57BL/6J male intruders faster and more frequently than female intrude

102 ough males often behave aggressively against intruders, female rodents usually express aggression onl

103 d then the females were replaced with a male intruder for 10 min.

104 lactating female mice were exposed to a male intruder for 20 min and those exhibiting maternal aggres

105 ups to scents, 'war cry' playbacks, and live intruders from a rival group.

106 een multiple members, including a high-speed intruder galaxy currently colliding into the intragroup

107 dentified by behavioral responses to a human intruder (HI) that are known to be sensitive to anxiolyt

108 uently approaching the potentially dangerous intruder, high rates of aggressive vocal threats, and mo

109 ial interaction tests: the resident-juvenile-intruder home-cage test and the three chamber sociabilit

110 social interaction in the resident-juvenile intruder home-cage test as shown by increased intruder e

111 he majority of monkeys (9/15), serving as an intruder in another social group affected cocaine self-a

112 ube (CNT), which also represents a potential intruder in the environment accompanying with the develo

113 dicate that RiTBi may be a relatively recent intruder in whiteflies given its low abundance in the fi

114 a security sensor which can detect and count intruders in a locality with decent precision and switch

115 ression toward both sexual partners and male intruders in a seminatural environment.

116 activity levels following exposure to naive intruders in their home cages.

117 moset displayed in the presence of the human intruder, increasing the likelihood of proactive mobbing

118 emales readily attacked unfamiliar B6 female intruders, inflicting >40 bites in a 5-minute encounter.

119 nates in intruder animals 6 h after resident-intruder inter-male aggression.

120 ity for several days after a single resident-intruder interaction.

121 essing IGC activity during repeated resident-intruder interactions abolishes the ramping aggression e

122 Resident-intruder interactions strongly activated granule cells i

123 reased excitability across repeated resident-intruder interactions, during which resident mice increa

124 expressing IGCs following male-male resident-intruder interactions.

125 ced DG granule cell activity during resident-intruder interactions.

126 dler crab can estimate how close a potential intruder is from its burrow entrance, even when the entr

127 thwart the attack/threat of male-conspecific/intruder is transiently expressed as she defends her pup

128 T-types exhibiting preferential responses to intruder males versus females but only rare examples of

129 on and increased licking and grooming toward intruder males.

130 e and fail to initiate aggressive attacks on intruder males.

131 text of plant-microbe interaction, where the intruder manipulates the extracellular matrix.

132 miliar or unfamiliar demonstrators attacking intruder mice.

133 ess using a modified version of the resident-intruder model for social stress (social defeat).

134 In the resident-intruder model of aggression, resident eNOS(-/-) males s

135 Rats were exposed to the resident-intruder model of social stress for 5 days.

136 marmoset monkeys were exposed to a resident-intruder model of stress.

137 sessions of social stress using the resident-intruder model or control manipulation.

138 ters were paired for 15-min using a resident-intruder model, and individuals were identified as winne

139 to repeated social stress using the resident-intruder model.

140 psychosocial stress was produced using a rat intruder model.

141 liferating cells in the dentate gyrus of the intruder monkeys was compared with that of unstressed co

142 After 1 hr in this condition, the intruder monkeys were injected with BrdU and perfused 2

143 very' period following an encounter with the intruder-more than an order of magnitude greater than th

144 l differences in aggression using a resident-intruder mouse model.

145 hat is typical of wild-type males towards an intruder mouse.

146 in nearby home ranges.(19) Finally, when an "intruder" mouse entered the environment during staged in

147 e, an FDA-approved sodium-potassium-chloride intruder (NKCC1) antagonist, on presynaptic and postsyna

148 antagonist of the sodium-potassium-chloride intruder, NKCC1) treatment increases postsynaptic inhibi

149 vel of inter-male aggression in the resident-intruder or dangler behavioral tests, NZB/B1NJ mice are

150 he trap-jaw mechanism to capture prey, eject intruders, or jump to safety.

151 develop a conditioned place aversion to the intruder-paired context.

152 lHb neuronal firing and promotes CPP to the intruder-paired context.

153 lHb neuronal firing and abolishes CPP to the intruder-paired context.

154 Animals underwent testing in the human intruder paradigm at ages 12 and 18 months, and a 3-step

155 xiety-related freezing behavior in the human intruder paradigm in hM4Di-expressing monkeys, while coo

156 immediate-early gene Arc after the resident-intruder paradigm increase their excitability for severa

157 for offensive aggression using the resident-intruder paradigm, and then examined for changes in GAD6

158 Following the resident-intruder paradigm, Arc-expressing IGCs in acute AOB slic

159 Further, in a resident-intruder paradigm, male Cplx1(-/-) mice failed to show t

160 ested for offensive aggression in a resident/intruder paradigm, resident hamsters treated with fluoxe

161 keys by 50% at 21 mg/kg (po) using the human intruder paradigm.

162 e behaviors by male mice during the resident intruder paradigm.

163 an ecologically-meaningful, stress-evoking, intruder paradigm.

164 both perspectives of mice within a resident-intruder paradigm.

165 ibution), population density, group size and intruder pressure (relative resource-holding potential).

166 le prey density, wolf population density and intruder pressure are not associated with territory size

167 behaviors as shown in the resident-juvenile intruder procedure as seen by decreased time exploring t

168 NR1 hypomorphic mice tested in the resident-intruder procedure displayed distinctly different behavi

169 tify aggression observed during the resident-intruder procedure.

170 t less, both spontaneously and in a resident/intruder provocation model.

171 The odor cues emanated by the intruder provoke aggressive behavior by robustly activat

172 rs display heightened aggression toward male intruders, purportedly to protect vulnerable young.

173 d binge-like access in episodically defeated intruder rats but suppressed cocaine intake by continuou

174 les were collected from previously-defeated 'intruder' rats in consecutive phases, while (1) in the h

175 The AMYGme was involved in processing intruder-related cues and/or in the regulation of aggres

176 or sexual experience but did not respond to intruder-related cues as measured by Fos-ir.

177 ctive (defensive) aggression in the resident intruder (RI) test and appetitive (rewarding) aggression

178 to dams without intruder, confrontation with intruder robustly activated PMv(CART)-neurons, augmented

179 Conversely, in males, intruder's presence activated lateral-PMv CART neurons,

180 ruder showed isolated cFos-cells in PMv, but intruder's presence triggered cFos-activation in differe

181 freezing in response to an unfamiliar human intruder's profile.

182 We asked human subjects to detect an intruder shape among six quadrilaterals.

183 The dams/males without intruder showed isolated cFos-cells in PMv, but intruder

184 Dams infused with 1,000 ng OTA attacked intruders significantly more often than buffer-infused d

185 male Long-Evans rats defeated in a resident-intruder social aggression paradigm, as indexed by eleva

186 Rats were exposed to repeated resident-intruder stress and coping strategy determined.

187 However, intruder stress increased p-Smad1 nuclear staining in th

188 ndisturbed or exposed to a 2-week regimen of intruder stress.

189 t became elevated in the cytoplasm following intruder stress.

190 en adult and adolescent rats during resident-intruder stress.

191 dism was achieved by thyroidectomy, and the 'intruder' stress was used as a model of chronic psychoso

192 ly, the varying responses of mockingbirds to intruders suggests behavioral flexibility and a keen awa

193 quickly recalibrated to different media and intruder surface types.

194 number of displacements in a 3-min resident-intruder test from 38 in control subjects to 0 in antise

195 ivity to 5HT(2A) antagonism during the human intruder test of anxiety.

196 stem nuclei, and when tested on the resident-intruder test they exhibited: 1) increased aggressive be

197 d plus maze tests), aggressiveness (resident-intruder test), and locomotor activity (horizontal and v

198 re presented with an uncertain threat (human intruder test).

199 avior using a primate test of anxiety (human intruder test).

200 of a singly housed mouse (i.e. the resident/intruder test).

201 In the human intruder test, increasing aHipp glutamate decreased anxi

202 components of Fos induction by the resident-intruder test, responses were compared for mice assessed

203 for offensive aggression using the resident/intruder test, sacrificed the following day, and, using

204 In the resident-pair intruder test, TP significantly increased aggression whe

205 sing an uncertain threat paradigm, the human intruder test, we cannulated 2 cohorts of marmosets (Cal

206 nd their wild type controls after a resident-intruder test.

207 mpared to wild-type controls in the resident-intruder test.

208 le mice and reduced freezing in the resident-intruder test.

209 Here, we used resident-intruder testing to determine whether endogenous opioids

210 y of this behavior is studied using resident-intruder testing.

211 ce tested in social interaction and resident-intruder tests (n = 8-14).

212 8 pigs were selected to perform two resident-intruder tests to assay aggressiveness.

213 gressiveness (tendency to attack in resident-intruder tests) and then experienced two dyadic contests

214 ere more likely to attack younger and weaker intruders than nonsubjugated controls.

215 xidation activity in the presence of O(2)-an intruder that normally incapacitates the sulfur- and ele

216 lso unknown, since no changes, except for an intruder that visited the south pole briefly, have occur

217 ression produced by lactating females toward intruders that plays an important role in protection of

218 In their encounters with foreign intruders, the cells of the insect innate immune system,

219 ivated to drive off potentially infanticidal intruders, the participation of others (e.g. juveniles,

220 g rats that is highly responsive to the male intruder--the ventral premammillary nucleus (PMv).

221 of the acute emotional response to the human intruder threat after 5HT(2A) antagonism.

222 hat sophisticated social parasites were nest intruders throughout, and probably before, the ascent of

223 the provocative stimulus or attempts by the intruder to 'cope' with the stimulus.

224 specific vulnerabilities that could allow an intruder to determine a particular individual's confiden

225 ed heterogeneously and can be used by active intruders to move effectively from a fluid through the l

226 Males/dams actively attacked the intruder; virgin-females did not.

227 bly easier when either the base shape or the intruder was a regular figure comprising right angles, p

228 Although the intruder was always defined by an identical amount of di

229 rapidly approach, engage, and challenge the intruder was derived from factor analysis of behavioral

230 The average time spent sniffing the intruder was indistinguishable between the 3-Br-7NI- and

231 trikingly, maternal aggression toward a male intruder was not different between control and preoptic

232 tricle 5 min before a smaller non-aggressive intruder was placed in the home cage of the experimental

233 male rodents are fiercely aggressive against intruders when they are rearing and protecting pups.

234 tating female rodents are aggressive against intruders when they are rearing and protecting pups.

235 hows dramatic activation when provoked by an intruder while silencing of these neurons suppressed mat

236 -based tests of anxiety: exposure to a human intruder with uncertain intent and unpredictable loud no