ライフサイエンスコーパス: inulin clearance

1 arallel measurements of renal blood flow and inulin clearance.

2 al failure (ARF) according to the prevailing inulin clearance.

3 /min by creatinine clearance and single-dose inulin clearance.

4 lected 489 KTRs for whom GFR was measured by inulin clearance.

5 nd plasma clearance of iohexol compared with inulin clearance.

6 crolimus, the greatest effect being with JO (inulin clearance 15.1+/-3 vs. 6.0+/-1.1 ml/min in the no

7 Furthermore, acetazolamide treatment reduced inulin clearance and cortical expression of sodium/hydro

8 001, r = 0.79) correlated significantly with inulin clearance and indicated an increase in response t

9 ealthy subjects with para-aminohippurate and inulin clearances and their response to captopril.

10 unction, as assessed by serum creatinine and inulin clearance, and histologic score versus vehicle-tr

11 Inulin clearance (C(IN)) and urinary excretion of guanos

12 s induced in C57BL/6 mice, and SCr level and inulin clearance (Cin) were measured between 24 hr and 7

13 Inulin clearance, CsA blood level, and weekly blood pres

14 Mean inulin clearance decreased by 6.2 mL/min for patients re

15 ice measured using fluorescein isothiocynate inulin clearance demonstrated that GFR increased signifi

16 omethacin did not affect serum creatinine or inulin clearance, demonstrating that the normalization o

17 nd a rise in serum creatinine, but true GFR (inulin clearance) did not change.

18 glomerular filtration rate (measured by [14C]inulin clearance during continuous infusion from an i.p.

19 to assess correlation between CT methods and inulin clearance for estimation of GFR with least-square

20 filtration, as assessed by the rate of FITC-inulin clearance from the blood, which, in turn, was exp

21 tion was assessed by serum creatinine (Scr), inulin clearance (glomerular filtration rate; GFR), and

22 1) immunosuppression after OLT by performing inulin clearance (IC) as well as eGFR based on the Modif

23 At the dose used, VE reduced inulin clearance in D to control levels but failed to al

24 In WT mice, renal IR reduced (14)C-inulin clearance (index of GFR) and increased renal vasc

25 lpha) excretion, and the precipitous fall in inulin clearance induced by tacrolimus was completely pr

26 With the exception of inulin clearance, LA prevented or significantly attenuat

27 and young adults (1054 measurements), using inulin clearance (measured GFR [mGFR]) as the reference

28 At 52 weeks inulin clearance (muL/min/g) was 7.2+/-0.2 in sham, 5.0+

29 onal (serum creatinine, BUN and FITC-labeled inulin clearance) or histological protection against isc

30 The GFR was assessed by inulin clearance (P < 0.05).

31 semide excretion rates and GFR determined by inulin clearance rates were measured during each of thre

32 O and FO completely reversed the decrease in inulin clearance seen with tacrolimus, the greatest effe

33 ted tomographic (CT) images, with concurrent inulin clearance serving as the reference standard.

34 ssociated with diabetic nephropathy and used inulin clearance studies and albumin:creatinine measurem

35 y with determinations made by using standard inulin clearance techniques.

36 At 2 mo, inulin clearance, urinary albumin excretion, fractional

37 Inulin clearance was measured in nine pigs (18 kidneys)

38 Inulin clearance was performed in 202 consecutive patien

39 Whole kidney GFR (FITC-inulin clearance) was not different in UT-A1/3(-/-) mice

40 5, urinary prostaglandin (PG)F(2-alpha) and inulin clearances were measured.

41 e clearance) and glomerular filtration rate (inulin clearance) were measured during three fixed, esca

42 atlak method indicated poor correlation with inulin clearance, whereas GFR assessed with the modified

43 2(Akita) G2 and G3 progeny developed reduced inulin clearance with elevated blood urea nitrogen and p